LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Keeping it civil instead of returning to our dark ways (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=633)

Shape Shifter 10-28-2004 01:30 PM

the missing explosives
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
This is beginning to feel like talking to Sebby.
No, I've just been listening to our wise leader.

THE PRESIDENT: And a political candidate who jumps to conclusions without knowing the facts is not the person you want as the Commander-in-Chief.

bilmore 10-28-2004 01:44 PM

the missing explosives
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
No, I've just been listening to our wise leader.

THE PRESIDENT: And a political candidate who jumps to conclusions without knowing the facts is not the person you want as the Commander-in-Chief.
Nor is a poster who forgets the words in the SOTU speech one with whom you want to be discussing the SOTU speech.

Tyrone Slothrop 10-28-2004 02:00 PM

the missing explosives
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
They said (I don't have the exact quote) that this happened while Bush was in charge of the area. First, they had no proof of that. Second, the info coming out would seem to strongly imply, at least, that this was incorrect. Is it my burden to prove them wrong? Shouldn't they have some burden to be able to prove what they print, six days before the election?
I'll believe that you have found the NYT saying something inaccurate when you quote it.

Quote:

Why is it that the stories that you deem helpful become "the larger story", and mine are "smaller"? Mine are central to the work of the Democrats and the liberal media to portray Bush as a liar, as a basic theme in the fight to elect a Democrat. (And, my gawd, Bush's National Guard service is a "larger story"? That's lame, Ty.)
You don't have to be a Dem or a GOPster to see that the question of whether Iraq had WMD was bigger than the question of whether Joe Wilson is a liar, or that the question of whether Bush was blowing off his National Guard service and getting preferential treatment in the process was bigger than the question of whether Dan Rather's reporting on that story relied in part on a couple of bogus documents. As a question of chronology and scope, it's really pretty clear. I understand that you and your ideological cohorts would rather change the subject to talk about the bias of the liberal media, etc. That was the point we were making.

Quote:

No, you've posted to blogs that tell us why Wilson's lies mean so little in the face of Bush's horrid National Guard service.
I believe the post that you are thinking of is this one, but -- characteristically -- you've got it wrong.

Quote:

I'm glad you added "to my recollection." It keeps you honest.
I'm sure we're both being honest.

Shape Shifter 10-28-2004 02:08 PM

the missing explosives
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Nor is a poster who forgets the words in the SOTU speech one with whom you want to be discussing the SOTU speech.
The White House subsequently disavowed (and none too willingly) claims made in the State of the Union address. Were they lying then, too? It's hard to keep track.

Shape Shifter 10-28-2004 02:16 PM

Al Qaqaa Photo (not a caption contest)
 
The "large overview" pic is pretty cool.

http://www.digitalglobe.com/sample_imagery.shtml

SlaveNoMore 10-28-2004 02:19 PM

WTF?
 
Quote:

Bad_Rich_Chic
So, I'm minding my own insomniac business this morning, channel surfing until I find an old horror flick (The Beast Must Die, with Peter Cushing, '74), and this campaign ad comes on. Now, I'm in NYC and I have to admit I'm not sure why anyone bothers to run campaign ads here at all, but nevermind.
They are for the NJ market [i.e., the state with no channels of its own, other than UPN 9].

Hank Chinaski 10-28-2004 02:28 PM

I told you so
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
They should have used something else.

http://thm-a.search.vip.re2.yahoo.com/image/172181606
SS, you may be right. A single truck might have been able to move it all BECAUSE THERE WAS ONLY 3 TONS. HOW THE FUCK CAN ANYONE BELIEVE THE NYT?

http://www.abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=204304&page=1

Bad_Rich_Chic 10-28-2004 02:28 PM

WTF?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
They are for the NJ market [i.e., the state with no channels of its own, other than UPN 9].
Ah, that would explain it.

Not necessarily the jeezis-ey overtones, though.

Shape Shifter 10-28-2004 02:32 PM

I told you so
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
SS, you may be right. A single truck might have been able to move it all BECAUSE THERE WAS ONLY 3 TONS. HOW THE FUCK CAN ANYONE BELIEVE THE NYT?

http://www.abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=204304&page=1
Did you read what you linked? 3 tons of RDX. There was still plenty of the other stuff.

Another Concern


The IAEA documents from January 2003 found no discrepancy in the amount of the more dangerous HMX explosives thought to be stored at Al-Qaqaa, but they do raise another disturbing possibility.


The documents show IAEA inspectors looked at nine bunkers containing more than 194 tons of HMX at the facility. Although these bunkers were still under IAEA seal, the inspectors said the seals may be potentially ineffective because they had ventilation slats on the sides. These slats could be easily removed to remove the materials inside the bunkers without breaking the seals, the inspectors noted.

eta: what does this do to the story about the Russians?

bilmore 10-28-2004 02:33 PM

Frustration is . . . .
 
Living in the Land of Wellstone.

See map.

http://vodkapundit.com/archives/Oct27TradeSports.jpg

Tyrone Slothrop 10-28-2004 02:33 PM

the missing explosives
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
Because the story du jour which broke this flap was Dan Rather reporting that CBS News had obtained documents which show "XYZ bad things about President Bush's NG service."

Therefore, proving that the documents were probably forgeries is _not_ changing the subject -- it is refuting the Rather story. So, it is not a credible response to say: "the forgery doesn't matter because the substance is consistent with other information." Even Rather gave up on that one.

When you make that argument you're trying way too hard, making it seem that your world-view is somewhat slanted.

The story of what Bush did and did not do in the NG (which you're telling) has been the same for several years, although many more details and corroboration are now known. Bush's campaign worked very hard to hide/suppress and minimize that issue, and have been largely successful. So be it.

The point of the Rather story was "we have these _documents_ that confirm". They didn't.
The story was that Bush blew off his NG service and got preferential treatment in so doing. Rather reported on one part of this, and -- as I recall -- his reporting was based on things other than the forged documents. The crux of the disagreement between us seems to be this last point, and I certainly may be wrong.

You're right that Bush's campaign worked hard to suppress the story. It appears that part of these efforts were aimed at changing the focus from Bush to Rather.

Replaced_Texan 10-28-2004 02:40 PM

I told you so
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Did you read what you linked? 3 tons of RDX. There was still plenty of the other stuff.

Another Concern


The IAEA documents from January 2003 found no discrepancy in the amount of the more dangerous HMX explosives thought to be stored at Al-Qaqaa, but they do raise another disturbing possibility.


The documents show IAEA inspectors looked at nine bunkers containing more than 194 tons of HMX at the facility. Although these bunkers were still under IAEA seal, the inspectors said the seals may be potentially ineffective because they had ventilation slats on the sides. These slats could be easily removed to remove the materials inside the bunkers without breaking the seals, the inspectors noted.

eta: what does this do to the story about the Russians?
That gels with an embedded reporter's account on how easy it was to get into those bunkers:

Quote:

During that trip, members of the 101st Airborne Division showed the 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS crew bunker after bunker of material labelled explosives. Usually it took just the snap of a bolt cutter to get in and see the material identified by the 101st as detonation cords.
via Atrios

Hank Chinaski 10-28-2004 02:49 PM

I told you so
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Did you read what you linked? 3 tons of RDX.
I read 377 tons

The information on which the Iraqi Science Ministry based an Oct. 10 memo in which it reported that 377 tons of RDX explosives were missing — presumably stolen due to a lack of security — was based on....

No wait, I read 141 tons

"declaration" from July 15, 2002. At that time, the Iraqis said there were 141 tons of RDX explosives at the facility.

I'm sorry, you're right 3 tons


But the confidential IAEA documents obtained by ABC News show that on Jan. 14, 2003, the agency's inspectors recorded that just over three tons of RDX were stored at the facility — a considerable discrepancy from what the Iraqis reported.

Ty might be bothered that an Iraqui agency is this shoddy and maybe untruthful. He was just mentioning his high esteem and trust for officials of the former Iraqui governemnt.

Replaced_Texan 10-28-2004 03:01 PM

Side note
 
I hope to whatever diety is out there that this election is over and done with by this time next week. When the the Onion published this piece back in July, it hit a little too close to home. Now, it's getting to be political overload. I look forward to the day when I get only one or two pieces of political spam instead of the 20 or so I'm getting now. I think they're timing it hourly.

I think we should all head to a day spa and/or a bar next week to detox.


bilmore 10-28-2004 03:11 PM

Side note
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I think we should all head to a day spa and/or a bar next week to detox.
I'm seriously considering an absentee ballot, and a scuba trip starting tomorrow.

Bad_Rich_Chic 10-28-2004 03:18 PM

Side note
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I hope to whatever diety is out there that this election is over and done with by this time next week. When the the Onion published this piece back in July, it hit a little too close to home. Now, it's getting to be political overload. I look forward to the day when I get only one or two pieces of political spam instead of the 20 or so I'm getting now. I think they're timing it hourly.

I think we should all head to a day spa and/or a bar next week to detox.
2.

I'm starting early, actually - I've quit wasting time by trolling the internet for news and have been eBaying instead.

Say_hello_for_me 10-28-2004 03:18 PM

Side note
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
I'm seriously considering an absentee ballot, and a scuba trip starting tomorrow.
I'm buying an Ipod for myself* tonight or tomorrow, and learning how to use it over the weekend. That, plus "The Wire" on Sunday night, and maybe a movie or Grand Theft Auto - San Andreas on Monday/Tuesday (plus work of course), and I'm hoping I can come into work on Wednesday and honestly say "maybe three will be the charm for Tareeeeeeza".

Of course, if Arafat dies, I'm definitely going out to celebrate with a beer.

SlaveNoMore 10-28-2004 03:20 PM

Maybe the exposure isn't all that bad...
 
Boston pitcher Curt Schilling, interviewed on ABC's "Good Morning America" this morning:

Quote:

"Tell everybody to vote. And vote Bush next week."

andViolins 10-28-2004 03:25 PM

Side note
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
I'm buying an Ipod for myself* tonight or tomorrow, and learning how to use it over the weekend.

Of course, if Arafat dies, I'm definitely going out to celebrate with a beer.
1. iPods are incrediby easy to use. You will be using it within minutes after opening the box.

2. If the terrorist kicks, I'll buy the first round.

aV

Tyrone Slothrop 10-28-2004 03:27 PM

the missing explosives
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Um, one, you should read the SOTU speech, maybe, and two, you should read the posts prior to this.
SS, bilmore's trying to say that although Bush was trying to scare people with stories about Hussein's nukes, and although we know now that there were no nukes, and that Hussein wasn't trying to buy uranium from Niger, and although our own people said the relevant words shouldn't in the SOTU because we disagreed with the British, and although we didn't know exactly what the Brits were basing their view on because they wouldn't tell us, and although it now has become fairly apparent that the British were relying on variants of the same forgeries that everyone else had -- despite all these thing, Bush has been vindicated because his speech referred to what British intelligence said, and British intelligence said those things. More importantly, of course, Joe Wilson is a smearing liar.

sebastian_dangerfield 10-28-2004 03:28 PM

the missing explosives
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Honest? You, Ty, ss and maybe some others went off the deep end on the "we let insurgants steal 380 tons of explosives under our noses" act all day yesterday. When I pointed out that it would have required an army of trucks a very long time to take all that, and the country is under constant surveillance, SS had the honesty to agree the story could not possibly be true.

You and the herd? well lets just say, when we see you using the word "honest" going forward, we at best can think you are your own lexiographer.
I said nothing about the 380,000 lbs of explosives. I couldn't care less about that issue. You're confusing me with someone else.

Tyrone Slothrop 10-28-2004 03:29 PM

the missing explosives
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
To be a lie, you had to have known that the statement was false and have intent to deceive.
Or have been reckless.

Bad_Rich_Chic 10-28-2004 03:30 PM

Maybe the exposure isn't all that bad...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Boston pitcher Curt Schilling, interviewed on ABC's "Good Morning America" this morning:
I'm friggin' sick of people telling me (i) to vote and (ii) how to vote. I'm sick of athletes & Nascar drivers telling me to vote Bush, sick of my neighbors telling me to vote Kerry, sick of random marines in bars telling me to vote Bush, sick of movie stars telling me to vote Kerry, sick of Puff Daddy telling me to vote or die. I vote that they all go stick it. The last South Park had it exactly right.

BR(I love the expression on everyone's face when I say "I'm voting Badnarik.")C

Tyrone Slothrop 10-28-2004 03:33 PM

Maybe the exposure isn't all that bad...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic
I'm friggin' sick of people telling me (i) to vote and (ii) how to vote. I'm sick of athletes & Nascar drivers telling me to vote Bush, sick of my neighbors telling me to vote Kerry, sick of random marines in bars telling me to vote Bush, sick of movie stars telling me to vote Kerry, sick of Puff Daddy telling me to vote or die. I vote that they all go stick it. The last South Park had it exactly right.

BR(I love the expression on everyone's face when I say "I'm voting Badnarik.")C
I love Curt Schilling as much as the next guy, but I'm tired of athletes who thank God (as Schilling has several times in the last several days) for their successes. It just makes me bitter that God gave Curt a magic arm while I have to work under flourescent lighting for a living.

Say_hello_for_me 10-28-2004 03:34 PM

Quick note on morality, God, judgement, abortion
 
Don't know why this came to me today, but I figured someone might find this interesting if they've never seen it before.

http://www.juntosociety.com/inaugural/lincoln2nd.html
(Spree: Lincoln's 2nd Inaugural)

Particularly:

Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether."

No reason to comment more on it, I suppose.

Hello

Say_hello_for_me 10-28-2004 03:36 PM

the missing explosives
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I said nothing about the 380,000 lbs of explosives. I couldn't care less about that issue. You're confusing me with someone else.
Quick note. There are 2000 lbs in a ton Sebby.

NotFromHere 10-28-2004 03:56 PM

Please vote
 
Arafat may have blood cancer, is heading to Paris for care.
Arafat’s red blood cell count at around noon was 35,000. A normal red blood count is 50,000 and at death the count is 10,000.


Isn't blood cancer like leukemia? Lymphoma?
So if he needs a bone marrow transplant, what are the odds he will get a donor? Aren't stem cells supposed to help? Can you see the possibilities?

bilmore 10-28-2004 04:06 PM

Please vote
 
Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
Aren't stem cells supposed to help? Can you see the possibilities?
Bush has declared a federal funding ban for curing Arafat.

ThurgreedMarshall 10-28-2004 04:54 PM

uh...
 
http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2004/WORLD/me...afat.oct28.jpg

Someone needs to tell Arafat to stop getting his fashion tips from JLo.

He looks kind of like a garden gnome.

TM

Replaced_Texan 10-28-2004 05:09 PM

Health Advisory for Ty
 
http://www.americandigest.org/mt-archives/002499.php

Quote:

Doctors are blaming a rare electrical imbalance in the brain for the bizarre death of a blogger whose head literally exploded in the final week of the election! No one else was hurt in the fatal explosion but a small room at the blogger's residence was sprayed with blood and brain matter when Gerard Van der Leun's head suddenly blew apart. Experts say he suffered from a condition called Hyper-Cerebral Blogosis or HCB .

"He was deep in concentration with his eyes focused on the screen and his fingers frozen over the keyboard," said Laguna Beach early responder, Miguel Wilsonista. "He seems to have hit 'Post' for what had to be the 3,456,856th item of inept political photoshopping this year when the blast occurred.

"His browser history documents that he went from Drudge to Real Clear Politics to Talking Points Memo to Instapundit to Fox News to the New York Times to MSNBC to Kos to Roger Simon to Little Green Footballs to The Corner to Atrios to Google News to Allah to Belmont Club to Wonkette and finally, and probably fatally, to Andrew Sullivan. All of a sudden his hands flew to his temples and he screamed in pain. Seals and surfers far below on Main Beach in Laguna looked up from the water startled by the shrieks of agony cascading down from Arch Beach Heights. Then, as if someone had put a bomb in his cranium, Van der Leun's head popped like a firecracker."
I suspect there will be several more cases of this over the weekend.

Not Me 10-28-2004 06:15 PM

Health Advisory for Ty
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
http://www.americandigest.org/mt-archives/002499.php



I suspect there will be several more cases of this over the weekend.
This happened to one of the drummers of Spinal Tap.

Not Me 10-28-2004 06:17 PM

Maybe the exposure isn't all that bad...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic

"I'm voting Badnarik."
2.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 10-28-2004 06:21 PM

Maybe the exposure isn't all that bad...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
2.
It's interesting that when Badnarik is thrown into polls he is running at least even with Little Ralphie; I think he may get a surprisingly strong vote.

So what message will the Rs take from this? The message Ds take from Ralph (that he's a shit and a half-baked lefty loon) or the message Ralph and Badnarik want to send (e.g., your candidates are ignoring our constitency)?

Not Me 10-28-2004 06:22 PM

Quick note on morality, God, judgement, abortion
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether."

Take it to the Bible board.

Not Me 10-28-2004 06:24 PM

Maybe the exposure isn't all that bad...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
It's interesting that when Badnarik is thrown into polls he is running at least even with Little Ralphie; I think he may get a surprisingly strong vote.

So what message will the Rs take from this? The message Ds take from Ralph (that he's a shit and a half-baked lefty loon) or the message Ralph and Badnarik want to send (e.g., your candidates are ignoring our constitency)?
BRC and I live in solidly Blue states. If I lived in a swing state, I wouldn't be voting for Badnarik.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 10-28-2004 06:26 PM

Maybe the exposure isn't all that bad...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
BRC and I live in solidly Blue states. If I lived in a swing state, I wouldn't be voting for Badnarik.
But what message are you trying to send by voting for Badnarik, and will the Rs receive that message?

ThurgreedMarshall 10-28-2004 06:31 PM

Damn
 
http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/...l/28kerry2.jpg

Supposedly 80,000 showed up in Wisconsin to see Kerry and Springstein. That's a lot of pppledge pppins.

TM

Say_hello_for_me 10-28-2004 06:34 PM

Quick note on morality, God, judgement, abortion
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
Take it to the Bible board.
You want me to avoid a quote from Abraham Lincoln? Sista, you might want to use that quote someday, particularly the "until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword" thing.

Hello

Not Me 10-28-2004 06:35 PM

Maybe the exposure isn't all that bad...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
But what message are you trying to send by voting for Badnarik, and will the Rs receive that message?
I am trying to show support for third party candidates. I think we need more of them. I was going to vote for Nader, although I admit I don't even know if he is on my state's ballot. I signed a petition to get him on. I'll find out on Tuesday if it worked.

If it sends a message to the R's of any type, I hope it is to legalize drugs.

Tyrone Slothrop 10-28-2004 06:40 PM

According to a study conducted by researchers at John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and published online by The Lancet, the war in Iraq has likely caused 100,000 "excess deaths" of civilians--or more.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com