LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   A frolic in Cambodia (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=634)

SlaveNoMore 10-29-2004 01:02 PM

The $150 million dollar question
 
Quote:

taxwonk
That someone would want to sleep with Demi Moore at all requires a fringey-esque suspension of disbelief.
I'm guessing your halloween costume this year is "Homosexual"?

Anne Elk 10-29-2004 01:05 PM

Poncho Confession
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Okay, so I was really behind you all during the Ponchos Suck discussion a few days ago, and I recall with horror (Horror!) the brown and white patterned poncho that my mom put me in as a kid (even worse, my sister had the same one, so we were matching goofballs), BUT I was shopping last night and I saw something I think qualifies as a poncho, but smaller - sort of a cross between a shrug and a poncho - in black cashmere, and I almost bought it.

So my questions are: will I incur the wrath of the FB if I buy this thing? Does the answer change at all if I spend a lot of time in a part of the country that is a little cool at night and warm during the day and the proposed Ponchoette (tm) would be a handy nighttime accessory? Am I just rationalizing here?

Talk me off the ledge or I'm going back to buy it this weekend.
In the yarn world they are called capelets. IMO they are more ridiculous than ponchos.

Anne
Who's sister has requested a hand knit poncho. In black. In stockingnette stitch. On small needles. Oh the horror!!!

lookingformarket 10-29-2004 01:08 PM

Psych warfare 101
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
You are way too bitter about this. I miss the old Thurgreed. (sniff)
The old Thurgreed who is not bitter and grouchy? You must be his twin, because I think he's been like this since he left the womb.

bold_n_brazen 10-29-2004 01:11 PM

Psych warfare 101
 
Quote:

Originally posted by lookingformarket
The old Thurgreed who is not bitter and grouchy? You must be his twin, because I think he's been like this since he left the womb.
Wow. The Thurgreed I know is always sunshine and light. He makes me think of furry little puppies, and darling tow-headed children squealing in deight at the sound of the ice-cream truck, and Santa Claus.

Shape Shifter 10-29-2004 01:15 PM

The $150 million dollar question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Right.

She's hideous. Wouldn't touch her.

TM
I'd at least use caution.

Moore, Demi. "Not very bright or talented." "Nicer than her reputation." Very nasty separation from Bruce Willis, although they may be back together. Never graduated from high school. Former high-priced Las Vegas callgirl. Achieved her breathy voice by permanently and deliberately damaging her vocal cords. Ego roughly the size of the Kingdome. Difficult to work with. Cheapskate. Former (and if reports are true current) drug user & abuser. More than one breast implant operation. $cientologist, but was forced to leave the cult by Willis when she tried to "convert" the kids. Bisexual, if not practising. Linked with Bill Clinton, Leonardo DiCaprio, Michael Douglas, Emilio Estevez, Colin Farrell, Anthony Kiedis, Ashton Kutcher (he's, what, a third her age? sheesh!), Rob Lowe, Tobey Maguire, Brad Pitt, Chris Rock, Ally Sheedy, and John Stamos.

http://www.geocities.com/mnussitch/gossip.html

Anne Elk 10-29-2004 01:16 PM

Psych warfare 101
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I see. Hank Aaron clearly deserved it. Ozzie Smith is arguable, but a Hall-of-Famer. Torre is a lock for the Hall, but they should have waited till after the 2000 Series to put him on the box. The Diamondbacks logo on the box is just stupid, as is having Ortiz on the box. So, to answer your question, in my opinion, the Diamondbacks and the Sox were thrown a bone.

There should be an extra large, special edition box with him in it.

TM
Are you bitter because both teams beat the Yankees? The idea of the logo on the box is stupid, but why should the Diamondbacks not be honored? Randy Johnson's ugly mug would have been more appropriate but probably would have scared the kids.

And why not Big Papi? He had a .304 BA, was third in doubles with 47, tied for second in HRs with 41, was second in RBIs with 139 and second in slugging percentage with .603. Add to that his heroic hits in the ALDS and ALCS and timely hits in the WS and some surprising defense. Why shouldn't he be on the Wheaties box?

ETA: Being on the Wheaties box is better than that "I'm going to Disney World!" schtick. Now that's a bone.

ThurgreedMarshall 10-29-2004 01:17 PM

Psych warfare 101
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
You are way too bitter about this. I miss the old Thurgreed. (sniff)
Ha! You don't even know who the old Thurgreed is anymore.

And I'm not bitter about it. I was actually trying to have an actual conversation about it. If I were a Boston fan, I wouldn't like it. If the Knicks won the Championship next year and they put any of our players on the Wheaties box, I would say the same thing. I take it you don't agree?

TM

bold_n_brazen 10-29-2004 01:26 PM

Psych warfare 101
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Ha! You don't even know who the old Thurgreed is anymore.

And I'm not bitter about it. I was actually trying to have an actual conversation about it. If I were a Boston fan, I wouldn't like it. If the Knicks won the Championship next year and they put any of our players on the Wheaties box, I would say the same thing. I take it you don't agree?

TM
Mostly, I don't care. I don't eat Wheaties anyway.

ThurgreedMarshall 10-29-2004 01:27 PM

Psych warfare 101
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Anne Elk
Are you bitter because both teams beat the Yankees? The idea of the logo on the box is stupid, but why should the Diamondbacks not be honored? Randy Johnson's ugly mug would have been more appropriate but probably would have scared the kids.

And why not Big Papi? He had a .304 BA, was third in doubles with 47, tied for second in HRs with 41, was second in RBIs with 139 and second in slugging percentage with .603. Add to that his heroic hits in the ALDS and ALCS and timely hits in the WS and some surprising defense. Why shouldn't he be on the Wheaties box?
I think you're missing the point. I thought the Wheaties box was reserved for the cream of the crop. A special honor for those who have achieved unbelievable athletic success. If they put Randy Johnson on, it would be to acknowledge not only his great post season performance that year, but his stellar career (and that is why I noted Torre's and Smith's Hall credentials). Ortiz has two and a half good seasons and one great post season and he gets put on the cover? I don't think that's it. If it were, the box would be just his and wouldn't honor the Sox as team.

They are honoring the Sox for overcoming decades of futility. That's fine, but it seems out of place with what they usually do. Maybe they changed their approach when they decided to put the Diamondbacks on (that still makes no sense to me). That's fine. But then if winning the championship was the accomplishment that gets you on, where is Anaheim's box cover?

Is it regional now or something?

And I love that if I say anything about Boston, I'm bitter. I can't put their accomplishment into perspective without being bitter? The comeback against the Yankees was amazing. But, Jesus. If they had won the Series in 1995 do you honestly think they'd get the cover of the Wheaties box this year?

TM

notcasesensitive 10-29-2004 01:28 PM

Psych warfare 101
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Ha! You don't even know who the old Thurgreed is anymore.

And I'm not bitter about it. I was actually trying to have an actual conversation about it. If I were a Boston fan, I wouldn't like it. If the Knicks won the Championship next year and they put any of our players on the Wheaties box, I would say the same thing. I take it you don't agree?

TM
The slogan for Wheaties is "The Breakfast of Champions" after all, and they are champions. I'm not sure I understand your criticism. Even if they don't do it every year, I'm not sure that matters. My guess is that they figured they'd sell a bunch of boxes of Wheaties (and, as a result, make bunches of cash) if they put a Red Sox player on the box. But maybe I lack the requisite deference to the inherent value of the space on the front of the Wheaties box.

(actually I think it is a little bit weird that they always put the Super Bowl champs on the box, but they don't automatically do so for other sports. or I would find it weird if I wasn't convinced that the NFL is the best professional sports league in the US.)

n(sad to see the reference to the "Giants 2001 Super Bowl Champions (phantom box)" on the list)cs

robustpuppy 10-29-2004 01:34 PM

The $150 million dollar question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I'd at least use caution.

Moore, Demi. "Not very bright or talented." "Nicer than her reputation." Very nasty separation from Bruce Willis, although they may be back together. Never graduated from high school. Former high-priced Las Vegas callgirl. Achieved her breathy voice by permanently and deliberately damaging her vocal cords. Ego roughly the size of the Kingdome. Difficult to work with. Cheapskate. Former (and if reports are true current) drug user & abuser. More than one breast implant operation. $cientologist, but was forced to leave the cult by Willis when she tried to "convert" the kids. Bisexual, if not practising. Linked with Bill Clinton, Leonardo DiCaprio, Michael Douglas, Emilio Estevez, Colin Farrell, Anthony Kiedis, Ashton Kutcher (he's, what, a third her age? sheesh!), Rob Lowe, Tobey Maguire, Brad Pitt, Chris Rock, Ally Sheedy, and John Stamos.

http://www.geocities.com/mnussitch/gossip.html
I don't know what's worse, that she's a cheapskate, or that she's linked with Ally Sheedy. Bleccccch.

spookyfish 10-29-2004 01:41 PM

Psych warfare 101
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Ha! You don't even know who the old Thurgreed is anymore.
it you don't agree?

TM
The old Thurgreed would have never typed Ha! in a post.

(I miss him. *sniff*)

Not Bob 10-29-2004 01:50 PM

Poncho Confession
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Okay, so I was really behind you all during the Ponchos Suck discussion a few days ago, and I recall with horror (Horror!) the brown and white patterned poncho that my mom put me in as a kid (even worse, my sister had the same one, so we were matching goofballs), BUT I was shopping last night and I saw something I think qualifies as a poncho, but smaller - sort of a cross between a shrug and a poncho - in black cashmere, and I almost bought it.

So my questions are: will I incur the wrath of the FB if I buy this thing? Does the answer change at all if I spend a lot of time in a part of the country that is a little cool at night and warm during the day and the proposed Ponchoette (tm) would be a handy nighttime accessory? Am I just rationalizing here?

Talk me off the ledge or I'm going back to buy it this weekend.
Mrs. Not Bob has one like that (except it isn't cashmere) -- she bought it several months ago when she was in TCOTU, and is quite happy to wear it.

Granted, we live in Podunkville, so YMM, as they say, V. For context, she dislikes Ugg boots, never wears hose with open-toed shoes, likes those ugly designer purses, and thinks that SJP looks cute in the Gap ads.

Flinty_McFlint 10-29-2004 01:52 PM

Psych warfare 101
 
Quote:

Originally posted by spookyfish
The old Thurgreed would have never typed Ha! in a post.

(I miss him. *sniff*)
Speaking of missing posters, where did str8 go? I miss hearing about who was dissing who at the Ivy, and the latest news from the Debbie Gibson fan club.

Memories, of the way we used to be.....

Shape Shifter 10-29-2004 01:54 PM

The $150 million dollar question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
I don't know what's worse, that she's a cheapskate, or that she's linked with Ally Sheedy. Bleccccch.
She was hot in St. Elmo's Fire.

http://www.geocities.com/stelmosfire...evinleslie.jpg

Anne Elk 10-29-2004 01:55 PM

Psych warfare 101
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I think you're missing the point. I thought the Wheaties box was reserved for the cream of the crop. A special honor for those who have achieved unbelievable athletic success. If they put Randy Johnson on, it would be to acknowledge not only his great post season performance that year, but his stellar career (and that is why I noted Torre's and Smith's Hall credentials). Ortiz has two and a half good seasons and one great post season and he gets put on the cover? I don't think that's it. If it were, the box would be just his and wouldn't honor the Sox as team.

They are honoring the Sox for overcoming decades of futility. That's fine, but it seems out of place with what they usually do. Maybe they changed their approach when they decided to put the Diamondbacks on (that still makes no sense to me). That's fine. But then if winning the championship was the accomplishment that gets you on, where is Anaheim's box cover?

Is it regional now or something?

And I love that if I say anything about Boston, I'm bitter. I can't put their accomplishment into perspective without being bitter? The comeback against the Yankees was amazing. But, Jesus. If they had won the Series in 1995 do you honestly think they'd get the cover of the Wheaties box this year?

TM
Since we only have brief internet conversations, I don't know if you are bitter or not. I only mentioned it because the two instances that you brought up as being 'bones' both involved teams that beat the Yankees. Granted, there aren't a lot of current baseball examples on the list.

It's all marketing. They are expecting 5 million people for the parade tomorrow (yes, clearly the members of Red Sox nation need a life). How many of those people will be buying the Wheaties box to display in their basement Rec Rooms along with the photographs that boston.com and the Boston Herald are hawking. It will give them something to look at until the inevitable DVD of the season comes out around Christmas.

Even if they had won the WS last year, any team that comes back from 3-0 against any other team deserves recognition. This year David Ortiz happened to be one of the faces associated with that event. Damon is just odd looking, nobody would know who Mark Bellhorn was and even up here we're sick of the Schilling bloody sock stuff.

Which reminds me of question I've had - does baseball have a higher percentage of born again Christians than other sports or is it just the Red Sox?

taxwonk 10-29-2004 01:55 PM

The $150 million dollar question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Right.

Demi Topless: http://www.cool-celebs.com/galleries/demi_moore2.jpg

http://www.countrymall.com/Celebrity...Moore%2001.jpg

http://go.sync.hu/images/hirekplussz...emi_moore_.jpg

She's hideous. Wouldn't touch her.

TM
I remember when she was doing promotion work for GI Jane, she went on Letterman and did a running front flip coming onto the set. Her tits did not move. That's right; her tits did not move.

A man could get hurt. That's all I'm saying.

ThurgreedMarshall 10-29-2004 02:00 PM

Psych warfare 101
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
The slogan for Wheaties is "The Breakfast of Champions" after all, and they are champions. I'm not sure I understand your criticism. Even if they don't do it every year, I'm not sure that matters. My guess is that they figured they'd sell a bunch of boxes of Wheaties (and, as a result, make bunches of cash) if they put a Red Sox player on the box. But maybe I lack the requisite deference to the inherent value of the space on the front of the Wheaties box.
Good point. Maybe I'm the only one who wonders why they don't do it every year. I don't really give a shit that Wheaties has some strange reasons behind their assignment of box covers -- hell, maybe it's all market-based. It just seems strange to me. And if I were a Boston fan, I wouldn't like it.

Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
(actually I think it is a little bit weird that they always put the Super Bowl champs on the box, but they don't automatically do so for other sports. or I would find it weird if I wasn't convinced that the NFL is the best professional sports league in the US.)
What's weird is that they seem to consistently do it for Super Bowl Champs but pick and choose for baseball. What makes one year's champs better than another?

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 10-29-2004 02:02 PM

Psych warfare 101
 
Quote:

Originally posted by spookyfish
The old Thurgreed would have never typed Ha! in a post.

(I miss him. *sniff*)
Good one! Lol.

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 10-29-2004 02:08 PM

Psych warfare 101
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Anne Elk
Since we only have brief internet conversations, I don't know if you are bitter or not. I only mentioned it because the two instances that you brought up as being 'bones' both involved teams that beat the Yankees. Granted, there aren't a lot of current baseball examples on the list.
I used the examples you gave me. But, who am I going to pick out of the recent years that you wouldn't think I was bitter about? Anaheim? Florida? They all beat us.

Quote:

Originally posted by Anne Elk
It's all marketing. They are expecting 5 million people for the parade tomorrow (yes, clearly the members of Red Sox nation need a life). How many of those people will be buying the Wheaties box to display in their basement Rec Rooms along with the photographs that boston.com and the Boston Herald are hawking. It will give them something to look at until the inevitable DVD of the season comes out around Christmas.
Instant collector's item. I agree. That answers why it was done. I just wondered if Boston fans felt the way I did about whether it should have been done, but you seem to have addressed that already and do so again in your next paragraph.

Quote:

Originally posted by Anne Elk
Even if they had won the WS last year, any team that comes back from 3-0 against any other team deserves recognition. This year David Ortiz happened to be one of the faces associated with that event. Damon is just odd looking, nobody would know who Mark Bellhorn was and even up here we're sick of the Schilling bloody sock stuff.
Okay. I see your point. I disagree, but that makes sense.

Quote:

Originally posted by Anne Elk
Which reminds me of question I've had - does baseball have a higher percentage of born again Christians than other sports or is it just the Red Sox?
I don't know about being born again. But sooo many players are deeply religious.

TM

robustpuppy 10-29-2004 02:17 PM

The $150 million dollar question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
She was hot in St. Elmo's Fire.

http://www.geocities.com/stelmosfire...evinleslie.jpg
Talk about suspension of disbelief.

NotFromHere 10-29-2004 02:29 PM

The $150 million dollar question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
I remember when she was doing promotion work for GI Jane, she went on Letterman and did a running front flip coming onto the set. Her tits did not move. That's right; her tits did not move.

A man could get hurt. That's all I'm saying.
Well since she's already had a couple of breast augmentations, maybe one more won't hurt.

LONDON - British biotechnology firm AorTech is moving towards clinical trials of what it says are “next generation” breast implants that are less prone to leaking and rupturing and feel more natural.

Elast-Eon implants could take 10 percent of the $600-million-a-year global market, Chief Executive Frank Maguire told Reuters on Friday following a meeting with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Breast implants have been around since the 1960s but have been dogged by controversy since the 1990s. Critics say silicones often leak from the gel-filled devices, causing cancer and neurological diseases.

As a result, some 90 percent of the U.S. market uses saline-filled implants. Scientists have been working on cross-linking the molecules in silicone-gel implants to prevent leaching, but their texture has become increasingly firm.

“Now they’re too firm,” said Maguire. “And saline implants are like bags of water.”

Trials of implants filled with peanut oil and soy-bean oil have come to nothing, he said.
“Elast-Eon is a very clean material that is free of the silicone oil that has been leaching out of gel-filled devices for the past 20 to 30 years,” said Maguire. “And we can move back into the softer range that more naturally simulates breast tissue.”

Tyrone Slothrop 10-29-2004 02:45 PM

Psych warfare 101
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
In my opinion, the Diamondbacks and the Sox were thrown a bone.
I guess there's something about their business model I don't understand -- I thought Wheaties was selling cereal. I saw that box and thought, "we are many, we are happy, and we eat breakfast!"

Tyrone Slothrop 10-29-2004 02:50 PM

Psych warfare 101
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
What's weird is that they seem to consistently do it for Super Bowl Champs but pick and choose for baseball. What makes one year's champs better than another?
At the risk of yet again failing to stp about BoSox-related stuff, in most of the country, I think people care more about football than baseball. More fans in most places, I think, would rather their team won the Super Bowl than the World Series. New England is an exception to this, though.

NotFromHere 10-29-2004 02:56 PM

Poncho Confession
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Okay, so I was really behind you all during the Ponchos Suck discussion a few days ago, and I recall with horror (Horror!) the brown and white patterned poncho that my mom put me in as a kid (even worse, my sister had the same one, so we were matching goofballs), BUT I was shopping last night and I saw something I think qualifies as a poncho, but smaller - sort of a cross between a shrug and a poncho - in black cashmere, and I almost bought it.

So my questions are: will I incur the wrath of the FB if I buy this thing?
Yes. Absolutely. Call it what you want, but a poncho is a poncho. Makes people wonder what you're covering up.

Matching goofballs. That's funny. My mom made matching outfits for us once - I hated it. What is it with moms and the matching outfits anyway?

notcasesensitive 10-29-2004 03:07 PM

Poncho Confession
 
Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
Yes. Absolutely. Call it what you want, but a poncho is a poncho. Makes people wonder what you're covering up.
actually, it might be a capelet.

Quote:

Matching goofballs. That's funny. My mom made matching outfits for us once - I hated it. What is it with moms and the matching outfits anyway?
my older sister liked having us match for some reason, even though she is 5 years older. we had swimsuits, coats, shirts, etc. that matched. in retrospect, not a good plan for her during her awkward adolescent years. the matching outfit photos have been kinder to me (most of them were taken during the always cute 3-5 yo range).

bilmore 10-29-2004 03:08 PM

Poncho Confession
 
Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
What is it with moms and the matching outfits anyway?
Tell me about it. It took years for me to get over the ridicule from fourth grade.

greatwhitenorthchick 10-29-2004 03:11 PM

Poncho Confession
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
actually, it might be a capelet.
I have never been too drawn to capelets (although I have been drawn to capes, especially Superman ones, which I frequently wear to the office), but it's hard to go wrong with anything cashmere. I just bought a hot pink cashmere hoodie because I really liked the way it felt on, even though it's like so Paris Hilton from two years ago. If you like it, get it.

NotFromHere 10-29-2004 03:14 PM

Poncho Confession
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
If you like it, get it.
But remember, we reserve the right to openly ridicule you. At all times.

Especially if the poncho/capelet is from the poncho department at Macy's.

notcasesensitive 10-29-2004 03:15 PM

Poncho Confession
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I have never been too drawn to capelets (although I have been drawn to capes, especially Superman ones, which I frequently wear to the office), but it's hard to go wrong with anything cashmere. I just bought a hot pink cashmere hoodie because I really liked the way it felt on, even though it's like so Paris Hilton from two years ago. If you like it, get it.
I am currently on a cashmere bender. not necessarily good on the checkbook. but it is making me happy.

notcasesensitive 10-29-2004 03:18 PM

Poncho Confession
 
Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
Especially if the poncho/capelet is from the poncho department at Macy's.
it is not. it was not hanging with other ponchos/capelets. it was in the cashmere sweater department (at Bloomingdales, if you must know). I think it will look fabulous over my go-out tops (many of which are sleeveless and therefore cold) this winter. with jeans or black pants and heels.

(yes, I'm gonna buy it.)

Ridicule away.

greatwhitenorthchick 10-29-2004 03:21 PM

Poncho Confession
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
it was not hanging with other ponchos/capelets.
I hope you realize that you are purchasing the Rudolf of the poncho/capelet species.

Replaced_Texan 10-29-2004 03:22 PM

Poncho Confession
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
I am currently on a cashmere bender. not necessarily good on the checkbook. but it is making me happy.
I probably purr when I have cashmere next to my skin. It's a good thing that I don't/can't go bra-less, because the feeling of cashmere on my bare breasts is amazingly erotic to me. I'd never be able to actually leave the house if I could wear it that way.

bold_n_brazen 10-29-2004 03:23 PM

Poncho Confession
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
it is not. it was not hanging with other ponchos/capelets. it was in the cashmere sweater department at Bloomingdales, if you must know). I think it will look fabulous over my go-out tops (many of which are sleeveless and therefore cold) this winter. with jeans or black pants and heels.

(yes, I'm gonna buy it.)

Ridicule away.

I am taking an online traffic school class at the moment. And I am quite sad that the only thing I have to distract me from it is this discussion of ponchos and capelets.

That said, I'm sure you'll look absolutely fetching in your capelet, ncs.

eta: thank you, rt. The image of cashmere against bare breasts will get me through for quite a while.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 10-29-2004 03:24 PM

The $150 million dollar question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Right.

Demi Topless: http://www.cool-celebs.com/galleries/demi_moore2.jpg

http://www.countrymall.com/Celebrity...Moore%2001.jpg

http://go.sync.hu/images/hirekplussz...emi_moore_.jpg

She's hideous. Wouldn't touch her.

TM
She's attractive, but for a movie star, she isn't and never has been that hot. Don't get me wrong, her body is phenomenal, but her face is well...leathery. There are women working at my office who are better looking than her.

Plus, she's an unbelievably bad actress. So bad it makes me angry. She single-handedly destroyed "A Few Good Men".

notcasesensitive 10-29-2004 03:26 PM

The $150 million dollar question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
She's attractive, but for a movie star, she isn't and never has been that hot. Don't get me wrong, her body is phenomenal, but her face is well...leathery. There are women working at my office who are better looking than her.

Plus, she's an unbelievably bad actress. So bad it makes me angry. She single-handedly destroyed "A Few Good Men".
I thought she was a pretty convincing coke-head in St. Elmo's Fire, but she probably spent years practicing up for that part.

notcasesensitive 10-29-2004 03:31 PM

Crap
 
My fucking SBC Yahoo homepage just spoiled last night's Apprentice for me by putting as the main news item on the page a picture of the loser, along with the headline "[Loser's] Fatal Mistake". Should I cancel my DSL service over this?

bold_n_brazen 10-29-2004 03:33 PM

Crap
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
My fucking SBC Yahoo homepage just spoiled last night's Apprentice for me by putting as the main news item on the page a picture of the loser, along with the headline "[Loser's] Fatal Mistake". Should I cancel my DSL service over this?
No. You should shit on someone's desk. Weren't you paying attention yesterday?

Did you just call me Coltrane? 10-29-2004 03:35 PM

The $150 million dollar question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
I thought she was a pretty convincing coke-head in St. Elmo's Fire, but she probably spent years practicing up for that part.
That's like me getting a gig where I have to play a convincing masturbator.

Fugee 10-29-2004 03:39 PM

Psych warfare 101
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Does Wheaties put the winner of the Series on the box every year? Because if it doesn't, it seems kind of sad to me. Like, "You guys finally won something so we'll throw you this little bone." I thought it was supposed to be difficult to get on the box.
TM
Depends on whether this is a national box or a regional box. I don't expect to see Red Sox World Series Wheaties boxes at my local grocery store as previous World Series champions have been regional according to this list.

The national ones may be limited but, judging from a Google search, they've even done regional ones for league champs. It's all about sales and I suspect there will be at least 10X as many BoSox Wheaties boxes stored in New England closets and basements as there are Twins 1987 and 1991 World Series boxes stored in Minnesota basements (the Fugee Mom has at least one of each).


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com