LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=877)

Hank Chinaski 10-02-2016 07:50 PM

Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
 
In retrospect, and considering how dead this board is, perhaps it was a mistake to have ran off Ppnyc? Who knows how many fun adventures she has had these past years. I blame Thurgreed.

Icky Thump 10-02-2016 07:54 PM

Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 502851)
In retrospect, and considering how dead this board, perhaps it was a mistake to have ran off Ppnyc? Who knows how many fun adventures she has had these past years. I blame Thurgreed.

Im here now

http://forums.compuserve.com/discuss...s?redirCnt=1&=

All the rage.

ThurgreedMarshall 10-03-2016 03:57 PM

Top 20
 
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4358

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4359

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4360

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4361

TM

sebastian_dangerfield 10-05-2016 01:33 PM

Re: an actual fashion post
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Not Bob (Post 502770)
After reading this:

I'd have to respectfully disagree.

Underwear only enables one to get lazy with self-control. We of the commando persuasion keep the sphincters taut.

Re boxers specifically, though I used to wear them about the house casually at times, with clothes, they're basically shorts for wearing pants (or other shorts). You're already wearing shorts or pants, the function of which is to cover up in a socially acceptable, perhaps even stylish, manner. You don't need shorts for wearing pants, or shorts, any more than you need contacts for wearing glasses.

Hank Chinaski 10-05-2016 03:13 PM

Re: an actual fashion post
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 502869)
Underwear only enables one to get lazy with self-control. We of the commando persuasion keep the sphincters taut.

Re boxers specifically, though I used to wear them about the house casually at times, with clothes, they're basically shorts for wearing pants (or other shorts). You're already wearing shorts or pants, the function of which is to cover up in a socially acceptable, perhaps even stylish, manner. You don't need shorts for wearing pants, or shorts, any more than you need contacts for wearing glasses.

I'm always jel of men whose mommy taught them to wipe completely:(:mad:

LessinSF 10-05-2016 09:53 PM

Em Lives
 
16 years later, campuses are following our lead. http://college.usatoday.com/2016/10/...igan-pronouns/

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 10-06-2016 10:31 AM

Re: Em Lives
 
eh

Icky Thump 10-09-2016 07:44 AM

Re: Okinawa Bleg
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LessinSF (Post 502834)
Anyone been to Okinawa? If so, thoughts and suggestions are invited. I will be there for about a week over Thanksgiving. And, yes, I have seen the Bourdain episode. Thanks,

Board is dead but this is close enough

http://en.rocketnews24.com/2015/04/0...ouse-in-osaka/

Hank Chinaski 10-09-2016 02:51 PM

Re: Okinawa Bleg
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Icky Thump (Post 502885)
Board is dead but this is close enough

http://en.rocketnews24.com/2015/04/0...ouse-in-osaka/

Saw a JetBlue ad on the #2 Train- "most legroom in coach!" What the fuck you always bitchin for?

ThurgreedMarshall 10-11-2016 04:41 PM

Top 20
 
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4362

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4363

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4364

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4365

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 10-12-2016 04:47 PM

Top 20
 
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4366

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4367

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4368

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4369

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 10-14-2016 11:29 AM

Yesterday's Top 20
 
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4370

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4371

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4372

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4373

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 10-14-2016 11:40 AM

Top 20 (All gifs edition)
 
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4374

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4375

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4376

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4377

TM

Icky Thump 10-15-2016 05:40 PM

Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
 
So Jackie Fox and Anabella Sciorrs showed up in FB as friends of friends.

Hank Chinaski 10-15-2016 11:17 PM

Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Icky Thump (Post 502999)
So Jackie Fox and Anabella Sciorrs showed up in FB as friends of friends.

The bass player from some dumb 80s band is my friend on FB.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com