LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=877)

LessinSF 10-26-2016 10:40 PM

Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
 
All that cunninglingus that our generation and younger are performing is not all good - http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/T...d-10306813.php

Hank Chinaski 10-27-2016 12:48 AM

Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LessinSF (Post 503149)
All that cunninglingus that our generation and younger are performing is not all good - http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/T...d-10306813.php

Michael Douglas actually broke this story. We have choices to make.

ThurgreedMarshall 10-27-2016 03:06 PM

Top 20
 
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4410

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4411

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4412

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4413

TM

taxwonk 10-27-2016 05:27 PM

Re: for the litigators
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 503134)
Conf to NB: Raising the issue is a nasty thing cuz it means the law firm screwed up in how it handled evidence. I know you recognize that, but I didn't want to point to Wonk to you for further advice, because, frankly, it would be notnice for you to educate wonk on how to potentially ruin another person's career! Namaste!

This is the State of Illinois's in-house counsel, and Wonk intends to have his little girl taken care of if it means costing this asshole his license.

Not Bob 10-27-2016 07:12 PM

Promise me son, not to do the things I've done.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 503134)
Conf to NB: Raising the issue is a nasty thing cuz it means the law firm screwed up in how it handled evidence. I know you recognize that, but I didn't want to point to Wonk to you for further advice, because, frankly, it would be notnice for you to educate wonk on how to potentially ruin another person's career! Namaste!

Your concern is appreciated. On those distasteful occasions* when I've had to be Not Nice by raising instances of opposing counsel's shenanigans to the judge, it's been more in sorrow than in anger.

Namaste!

*Two of my former firms actually had strict policies prohibiting the filing of motions for sanctions (even discovery) or under Rule 11 without prior permission of the firm's GC/loss management counsel. If I recall, that sort of firm policy was pushed as a "best practice" recommended by ALAS or some other big legal malpractice carrier.

ThurgreedMarshall 10-31-2016 04:21 PM

Top 20 (All gifs edition)
 
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4414

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4415

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4416

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4417

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 11-01-2016 05:38 PM

Top 20
 
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4418

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4419

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4420

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4421

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 11-02-2016 04:58 PM

Top 20
 
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4422

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4423

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4424

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4425

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 11-03-2016 12:22 PM

Top 20
 
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4426

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4427

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4428

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4429

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 11-08-2016 02:00 PM

Top 20
 
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4430

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4431

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4432

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4433

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 11-09-2016 02:41 PM

Top 20
 
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4434

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4435

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4436

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4437

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 11-10-2016 03:52 PM

Top 20
 
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4438

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4439

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4440

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4441

TM

Replaced_Texan 11-10-2016 05:25 PM

Re: Top 20
 
Due to work and general lack of interest, I don't generally view these pages, but it has been brought to my attention that our future first lady has a ton of photos that probably are appropriate. There's a girl-on-girl pic with on my facebook feed right now.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 11-14-2016 09:04 AM

Re: Top 20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan (Post 503732)
Due to work and general lack of interest, I don't generally view these pages, but it has been brought to my attention that our future first lady has a ton of photos that probably are appropriate. There's a girl-on-girl pic with on my facebook feed right now.

Ted Cruz?

ThurgreedMarshall 11-14-2016 05:20 PM

Top 20
 
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4442

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4443

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4444

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4445

TM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:14 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com