LawTalkers
Page 14 of 126 « First 41213 14 15162464114 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Making a buck cleaning Lester's spittle trays on Sequels' 22-year old supermodel abs (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=680)

futbol fan 05-11-2005 11:45 AM
Runaway Bride of Frankenberry
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
But which one causes your wife to become distracted and stop listening to you when you have Fox Sports World on in the background . . .
Mourinho doesn't distract the wife - she had him sussed from day one. If I had a son, though, I certainly wouldn't be taking him anywhere near Stamford Bridge.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...inhoTongue.jpg

Replaced_Texan 05-11-2005 11:50 AM
Job opening
 
It appears that a family on the Eastern Seaboard could use someone's help. My guess is that the contracting part of the job will involve making offers that cannot be refused.

(Spree: Attorney listing at careerbuilder.com)

Shape Shifter 05-11-2005 11:55 AM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
It appears that a family on the Eastern Seaboard could use someone's help. My guess is that the contracting part of the job will involve making offers that cannot be refused.

(Spree: Attorney listing at careerbuilder.com)
Damn. I'm out.

"If you cannot remember six family member names and four company directors after the third time you hear them then this will not work for you."

Hank Chinaski 05-11-2005 12:08 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan My guess is that the contracting part of the job will involve making offers that cannot be refused.

(Spree: Attorney listing at careerbuilder.com)
No. Per PACER the Corleones don't show up as Plaintiff in any RICO cases.

sebastian_dangerfield 05-11-2005 12:09 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
It appears that a family on the Eastern Seaboard could use someone's help. My guess is that the contracting part of the job will involve making offers that cannot be refused.

(Spree: Attorney listing at careerbuilder.com)
This ad is a joke (or pathetic). But it does raise a pet peeve I have. Ever sit in an interview and have some dickhead tell you he needs you to do "Far more than an associate at your level would be expected to do"? I've always wanted to snap back "Then why don't you hire a more experienced associate? If you were selling cars and I came in and said 'I want a shiny new Benz at a used Volvo price,' you'd think I was a fool, right? So why make the equivalent pitch here?"

These same twits are the ones who come into your office a month into the job and tell you some story about how "there are no free lunches..."

The only good thing about knowing these people is watching their personal lives explode every few years and realizing they'll probably die alone. Its like an epic about the operation of karma in modern professional life.

Replaced_Texan 05-11-2005 12:19 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
This ad is a joke (or pathetic). But it does raise a pet peeve I have. Ever sit in an interview and have some dickhead tell you he needs you to do "Far more than an associate at your level would be expected to do"? I've always wanted to snap back "Then why don't you hire a more experienced associate? If you were selling cars and I came in and said 'I want a shiny new Benz at a used Volvo price,' you'd think I was a fool, right? So why make the equivalent pitch here?"
Tom gave up the brush with reluctance in his face, but alacrity in his heart. And while the late steamer Big Missouri worked and sweated in the sun, the retired artist sat on a barrel in the shade close by, dangled his legs, munched his apple, and planned the slaughter of more innocents. There was no lack of material; boys happened along every little while; they came to jeer, but remained to whitewash. By the time Ben was fagged out, Tom had traded the next chance to Billy Fisher for a kite, in good repair; and when he played out, Johnny Miller bought in for a dead rat and a string to swing it with--and so on, and so on, hour after hour. And when the middle of the afternoon came, from being a poor poverty-stricken boy in the morning, Tom was literally rolling in wealth. He had besides the things before mentioned, twelve marbles, part of a jews-harp, a piece of blue bottle-glass to look through, a spool cannon, a key that wouldn't unlock anything, a fragment of chalk, a glass stopper of a decanter, a tin soldier, a couple of tadpoles, six fire-crackers, a kitten with only one eye, a brass doorknob, a dog-collar--but no dog--the handle of a knife, four pieces of orange-peel, and a dilapidated old window sash.

He had had a nice, good, idle time all the while--plenty of company--and the fence had three coats of whitewash on it! If he hadn't run out of whitewash he would have bankrupted every boy in the village.

Tom said to himself that it was not such a hollow world, after all. He had discovered a great law of human action, without knowing it--namely, that in order to make a man or a boy covet a thing, it is only necessary to make the thing difficult to attain. If he had been a great and wise philosopher, like the writer of this book, he would now have comprehended that Work consists of whatever a body is OBLIGED to do, and that Play consists of whatever a body is not obliged to do. And this would help him to understand why constructing artificial flowers or performing on a tread-mill is work, while rolling ten-pins or climbing Mont Blanc is only amusement. There are wealthy gentlemen in England who drive four-horse passenger-coaches twenty or thirty miles on a daily line, in the summer, because the privilege costs them considerable money; but if they were offered wages for the service, that would turn it into work and then they would resign.


ETA: Law review works under a similar principle.

Gattigap 05-11-2005 12:22 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Nicely played, though it is a bit jarring to read it on the same page with a title describing spittle trays.

Replaced_Texan 05-11-2005 12:23 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Gattigap
Nicely played, though it is a bit jarring to read it on the same page with a title describing spittle trays.
Parlance of another time.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 05-11-2005 12:33 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Tom gave up the brush with reluctance in his face, but alacrity in his heart. And while the late steamer Big Missouri worked and sweated in the sun, the retired artist sat on a barrel in the shade close by, dangled his legs, munched his apple, and planned the slaughter of more innocents. There was no lack of material; boys happened along every little while; they came to jeer, but remained to whitewash. By the time Ben was fagged out, Tom had traded the next chance to Billy Fisher for a kite, in good repair; and when he played out, Johnny Miller bought in for a dead rat and a string to swing it with--and so on, and so on, hour after hour. And when the middle of the afternoon came, from being a poor poverty-stricken boy in the morning, Tom was literally rolling in wealth. He had besides the things before mentioned, twelve marbles, part of a jews-harp, a piece of blue bottle-glass to look through, a spool cannon, a key that wouldn't unlock anything, a fragment of chalk, a glass stopper of a decanter, a tin soldier, a couple of tadpoles, six fire-crackers, a kitten with only one eye, a brass doorknob, a dog-collar--but no dog--the handle of a knife, four pieces of orange-peel, and a dilapidated old window sash.

He had had a nice, good, idle time all the while--plenty of company--and the fence had three coats of whitewash on it! If he hadn't run out of whitewash he would have bankrupted every boy in the village.

Tom said to himself that it was not such a hollow world, after all. He had discovered a great law of human action, without knowing it--namely, that in order to make a man or a boy covet a thing, it is only necessary to make the thing difficult to attain. If he had been a great and wise philosopher, like the writer of this book, he would now have comprehended that Work consists of whatever a body is OBLIGED to do, and that Play consists of whatever a body is not obliged to do. And this would help him to understand why constructing artificial flowers or performing on a tread-mill is work, while rolling ten-pins or climbing Mont Blanc is only amusement. There are wealthy gentlemen in England who drive four-horse passenger-coaches twenty or thirty miles on a daily line, in the summer, because the privilege costs them considerable money; but if they were offered wages for the service, that would turn it into work and then they would resign.


ETA: Law review works under a similar principle.
I finally get Geddy Lee out of my head, and somehow, someway, he finds his way back in...

sebastian_dangerfield 05-11-2005 12:36 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Parlance of another time.
I've often thought there was more behind the frequent historical pushes to ban his books from school libraries than his mere use of a racial slur. Does nothing for the "treadmill" to consider the truth raised in those three paragraphs.

taxwonk 05-11-2005 01:48 PM
Runaway Bride
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr. Man
Just because it is tuned down 3 steps in drop D and played with PRS singlecut through an Uberschall with a 4x12 vintage cab doesn't mean it's not a love song.
That is so hot.

taxwonk 05-11-2005 01:51 PM
Chicago
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ABBAKiss
Who will be in Chicago this weekend?
I will.

Replaced_Texan 05-11-2005 01:56 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I've often thought there was more behind the frequent historical pushes to ban his books from school libraries than his mere use of a racial slur. Does nothing for the "treadmill" to consider the truth raised in those three paragraphs.
It makes me sad that Mark Twain killed the board.

In an effort to make up for it, a scenario:

Couple in social group breaks up in mid-March. He (Guy A) is one of the primary centers of the group (has the big parties, knows everyone, organizes events). She's a pretty amazing woman. Gorgeous, smart, has a pretty successful business. Due to overlapping friends, major efforts have been made to keep hostilities to a minimum. He encourages everyone to stay friends with her and vice versa. I love them independently of each other and think it was probably a good idea for them to break up given their personality quirks (i.e. he flirts with everything that walks, and she has inexplicable insecurities).

Two weeks ago a guy (Guy B) in the group asks her out. She says yes and they've been dating since then. I saw them together at a party on Friday, though I thought they were there as friends, because frankly, I think he's way out of her league. Saturday, Guy B tells Guy A that he's dating ex. Doesn't exactly go over well.

Guy B was brought into the group by the Guy A. Invited to a lot of parties, introduced to a lot of people, etc. Guy A has gone through a lot of shit in the last six months, including the death of a parent, another close family death, and breakup of longstanding relationship. Guy B knew all about this, and in fact got drunk with Guy A the night of a particularly painful funeral.

The rumor mills have been flying, and Guy B has declined a lot of lot of party invitations in the last two days (including my birthday party).

Questions:

1.) Should Guy B have made a move on Guy A's ex? Should he have waited longer?

2.) Should Guy B have told Guy A about the move on his ex earlier? (Note: Guy A was in Mexico the first week that they were dating.)

3.) Should Guy B expect to be cut out of Guy A's life (and possibly social circle) because of moving in on Guy A's ex?

4.) Should Guy B have apologized to Guy A about his actions?

Shape Shifter 05-11-2005 02:02 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Questions:

1.) Should Guy B have made a move on Guy A's ex? Should he have waited longer?

2.) Should Guy B have told Guy A about the move on his ex earlier? (Note: Guy A was in Mexico the first week that they were dating.)

3.) Should Guy B expect to be cut out of Guy A's life (and possibly social circle) because of moving in on Guy A's ex?

4.) Should Guy B have apologized to Guy A about his actions?
Guy A needs to get over it. If he didn't want other people to date her, he shouldn't have broken up. Guy B has nothing to apologize for. The same rules apply as for discarded property.

robustpuppy 05-11-2005 02:05 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Questions:

1.) Should Guy B have made a move on Guy A's ex? Should he have waited longer?

2.) Should Guy B have told Guy A about the move on his ex earlier? (Note: Guy A was in Mexico the first week that they were dating.)

3.) Should Guy B expect to be cut out of Guy A's life (and possibly social circle) because of moving in on Guy A's ex?

4.) Should Guy B have apologized to Guy A about his actions?
1.) Yes. No. This answer assumes the moves were made and welcomed because of genuine attraction and not any desire to get back at Guy A in some way. People don't own their exes after a breakup and neither ex should be restricted as to whom they can date, with an exception for anyone in the ex's immediate family.

2.) Earlier? Sheesh! It's been two weeks. It's not like she's pregnant already.

3.) Maybe he should expect it, but it wouldn't be right.

4.) What's to apologize for? See 1. This is not to say he shouldn't be sensitive to Guy A's troubles. The timing is unfortunate, but nobody's obligated to honor some emotional moratorium.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 05-11-2005 02:07 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
It makes me sad that Mark Twain killed the board.

In an effort to make up for it, a scenario:

Couple in social group breaks up in mid-March. He (Guy A) is one of the primary centers of the group (has the big parties, knows everyone, organizes events). She's a pretty amazing woman. Gorgeous, smart, has a pretty successful business. Due to overlapping friends, major efforts have been made to keep hostilities to a minimum. He encourages everyone to stay friends with her and vice versa. I love them independently of each other and think it was probably a good idea for them to break up given their personality quirks (i.e. he flirts with everything that walks, and she has inexplicable insecurities).

Two weeks ago a guy (Guy B) in the group asks her out. She says yes and they've been dating since then. I saw them together at a party on Friday, though I thought they were there as friends, because frankly, I think he's way out of her league. Saturday, Guy B tells Guy A that he's dating ex. Doesn't exactly go over well.

Guy B was brought into the group by the Guy A. Invited to a lot of parties, introduced to a lot of people, etc. Guy A has gone through a lot of shit in the last six months, including the death of a parent, another close family death, and breakup of longstanding relationship. Guy B knew all about this, and in fact got drunk with Guy A the night of a particularly painful funeral.

The rumor mills have been flying, and Guy B has declined a lot of lot of party invitations in the last two days (including my birthday party).

Questions:

1.) Should Guy B have made a move on Guy A's ex? Should he have waited longer?

2.) Should Guy B have told Guy A about the move on his ex earlier? (Note: Guy A was in Mexico the first week that they were dating.)

3.) Should Guy B expect to be cut out of Guy A's life (and possibly social circle) because of moving in on Guy A's ex?

4.) Should Guy B have apologized to Guy A about his actions?
Guy B should send Guy A a fifth of his favorite booze and a note saying: "I know you're in pain but you're also an idiot. May you drink and forget."

Guy A should drink and forget. Women B and C in Group should comfort Guy A to help him forget.

Of course, if Guy A didn't put down his paintbrush, none of this would have ever happened.

notcasesensitive 05-11-2005 02:10 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Questions:

1.) Should Guy B have made a move on Guy A's ex? Should he have waited longer?

2.) Should Guy B have told Guy A about the move on his ex earlier? (Note: Guy A was in Mexico the first week that they were dating.)

3.) Should Guy B expect to be cut out of Guy A's life (and possibly social circle) because of moving in on Guy A's ex?

4.) Should Guy B have apologized to Guy A about his actions?
1.) How long were they dating? Probably should have waited more than 2 months to date publicly.

2.) If they've only been dating 2 weeks, I'm not clear how much earlier B could have told A. This seems to me like a non-issue.

3.) Of course there is always a risk of that if dating from the same pool. One would think that friends would not be judgmental enough to kick B to the curb, but can't blame A for cutting him out if it really bothers A that much. Shouldn't expect invites to A's parties.

4.) Sure. Or at least apologized for A's hurt feelings.

Seems to me that the main problem is lack of time for break-up wounds to mend. Asking permission to date might be nice, but if you're going to do it anyway, regardless of permission or not, is just a formality, right? Shouldn't be sprung on A by showing up at an event together though. Either the woman or B should have given A a heads up.

I bet it all blows over, but B has to be prepared for worst case scenerio just in case.

Pretty Little Flower 05-11-2005 02:11 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
It makes me sad that Mark Twain killed the board.

In an effort to make up for it, a scenario:

Couple in social group breaks up in mid-March. He (Guy A) is one of the primary centers of the group (has the big parties, knows everyone, organizes events). She's a pretty amazing woman. Gorgeous, smart, has a pretty successful business. Due to overlapping friends, major efforts have been made to keep hostilities to a minimum. He encourages everyone to stay friends with her and vice versa. I love them independently of each other and think it was probably a good idea for them to break up given their personality quirks (i.e. he flirts with everything that walks, and she has inexplicable insecurities).

Two weeks ago a guy (Guy B) in the group asks her out. She says yes and they've been dating since then. I saw them together at a party on Friday, though I thought they were there as friends, because frankly, I think he's way out of her league. Saturday, Guy B tells Guy A that he's dating ex. Doesn't exactly go over well.

Guy B was brought into the group by the Guy A. Invited to a lot of parties, introduced to a lot of people, etc. Guy A has gone through a lot of shit in the last six months, including the death of a parent, another close family death, and breakup of longstanding relationship. Guy B knew all about this, and in fact got drunk with Guy A the night of a particularly painful funeral.

The rumor mills have been flying, and Guy B has declined a lot of lot of party invitations in the last two days (including my birthday party).

Questions:

1.) Should Guy B have made a move on Guy A's ex? Should he have waited longer?

2.) Should Guy B have told Guy A about the move on his ex earlier? (Note: Guy A was in Mexico the first week that they were dating.)

3.) Should Guy B expect to be cut out of Guy A's life (and possibly social circle) because of moving in on Guy A's ex?

4.) Should Guy B have apologized to Guy A about his actions?
I don't have answers to your questions, because I don't care. Maybe if you had called them by their names, or made up names for them, I would have gotten more engaged. But all this Guy A, Guy B stuff makes them seem almost like stick figures to me. Who cares if or whom they fuck?

I am curious about Guy B, though. He has "declined a lot of lot of party invitations in the last two days"? What the fuck? I have received absolutely zero party invitations in the last two days. What's up with this dude? Does he have really good blow or something?

I'll be logging in under the FBA in a bit to wish you a happy birthday, you certain special somebody!

Gattigap 05-11-2005 02:14 PM
The sad decline
 
A signpost in the inevitable decline of any major personality includes the tell-all publications from those close to the fading star. Usually, these "tell-alls" tell us little of substance, and are reviewed, if at all, for their amusing minutae.

So it is with PLF. Today's "Sleeping with the President" has been reduced to a mere blog entry, but such are the sad times we live in. At least the language is colorful. PLF, we shall miss you.

(Yes, I know it doesn't mention PLF by name, but bitch, please. Whose razor do you think it is?)

robustpuppy 05-11-2005 02:16 PM
Everything is relative
 
Anytime you feel sad about PLF's so-called decline, just go to the most stupid blog ever , and I promise, you will feel better.

Sparklehorse 05-11-2005 02:19 PM
If Dan Savage says it, it must be true
 
It's official -- oral sex is part of the vanilla repertoire. NotBob, please update your records accordingly.

Link

Quote:
I'm a 24-year-old male and I lost my virginity to my girlfriend last year. She is three years younger than I am, but I am the 10th man that she has fucked. This is not a problem with me, as I am not a jealous guy. What bothers me is that she is unwilling to perform oral sex on me. I enjoy giving oral to her. I am really in love with her and could see myself marrying her, but I need to be assured that I will get a blowjob at some point in my life. She says she doesn't like the taste of semen, which makes me just the slightest bit jealous, because that means she has done this for other men but won't do it for me, a man whom she is ostensibly considering marrying.
Been Lost Oral Woman

Dump her, BLOW. Sucking cock can no longer be regarded as some sort of above-and-beyond-the-call indulgence. Blowjobs are standard. Any make or model that doesn't come with blowjobs should be immediately returned to the showroom.

I am a GGG girlfriend, and I'm up for pretty much anything my boyfriend wants to do. I also love giving head, and he loves receiving it. But he will not reciprocate. We talked about it, and he said he just doesn't eat pussy. This really bothers me, but should I just deal with it if I like him, or is it a dump-worthy problem?
Wanting More

Dump him, WM. Eating pussy can no longer be regarded as some sort of above-and-beyond-the-call indulgence. Cunnilingus is standard. Any make or model that doesn't come with cunnilingus should be immediately returned to the showroom.

bold_n_brazen 05-11-2005 02:21 PM
If Dan Savage says it, it must be true
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Sparklehorse
It's official -- oral sex is part of the vanilla repertoire. NotBob, please update your records accordingly.

Link
Would it be bad form to quote Dan Savage in my Petition for Dissolution of Marriage?

Pretty Little Flower 05-11-2005 02:22 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Guy A needs to get over it. If he didn't want other people to date her, he shouldn't have broken up. Guy B has nothing to apologize for. The same rules apply as for discarded property.
O.K., the more I think about it, the more I kind of like Guy A and Guy B and feel for their situation. So here is the polite thing to do so they can all move on. Guy B should wait for a social situation where most of the social group, including Guy A but exluding the chick, is gathered. Then, Guy B should wait a bit and, if things seem a bit awkward, he should pat Guy A on the shoulder and loudly announce, "Listen, I know it is a bit weird with me dating [the chick] and everything, but I could not help it. She is one horned up wildcat in bed, if you know what I mean, and I know you do. But, I have to say that she is so damn loose down there she is almost flapping. You must be hung like [some animal that has a massive cock]. Good work, my friend." That way, there is a public acknowledgement of the succesor-in-interest dating situation, but it is done in a way that Guy A gets to keep his ego intact and save face with the social group.

robustpuppy 05-11-2005 02:23 PM
If Dan Savage says it, it must be true
 
Quote:
Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
Would it be bad form to quote Dan Savage in my Petition for Dissolution of Marriage?
Good GOD woman, you must be a saint to have put up with that for as long as you did.

bold_n_brazen 05-11-2005 02:26 PM
If Dan Savage says it, it must be true
 
Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
Good GOD woman, you must be a saint to have put up with that for as long as you did.
It's funny how much you don't realise you miss something until it's gone.

Actually, now that I think about it, it's not funny at all.

Hank Chinaski 05-11-2005 02:29 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
O.K., the more I think about it, the more I kind of like Guy A and Guy B and feel for their situation. So here is the polite thing to do so they can all move on. Guy B should wait for a social situation where most of the social group, including Guy A but exluding the chick, is gathered. Then, Guy B should wait a bit and, if things seem a bit awkward, he should pat Guy A on the shoulder and loudly announce, "Listen, I know it is a bit weird with me dating [the chick] and everything, but I could not help it. She is one horned up wildcat in bed, if you know what I mean, and I know you do. But, I have to say that she is so damn loose down there she is almost flapping. You must be hung like [some animal that has a massive cock]. Good work, my friend." That way, there is a public acknowledgement of the succesor-in-interest dating situation, but it is done in a way that Guy A gets to keep his ego intact and save face with the social group.
I was going to suggest having guy B say publically that he can't believe [chick] doesn't give head, because its just standard now, and its no wonder that guy A dumped her. Same reasons as you give, but I was taught it is impolite to speak of a ladie's private parts in public.

Hank Chinaski 05-11-2005 02:34 PM
If Dan Savage says it, it must be true
 
Quote:
Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
It's funny how much you don't realise you miss something until it's gone.

Actually, now that I think about it, it's not funny at all.
Wait, this is from the start, or just evolved (or devolved)--- he never would?

Shape Shifter 05-11-2005 02:34 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
O.K., the more I think about it, the more I kind of like Guy A and Guy B and feel for their situation. So here is the polite thing to do so they can all move on. Guy B should wait for a social situation where most of the social group, including Guy A but exluding the chick, is gathered. Then, Guy B should wait a bit and, if things seem a bit awkward, he should pat Guy A on the shoulder and loudly announce, "Listen, I know it is a bit weird with me dating [the chick] and everything, but I could not help it. She is one horned up wildcat in bed, if you know what I mean, and I know you do. But, I have to say that she is so damn loose down there she is almost flapping. You must be hung like [some animal that has a massive cock]. Good work, my friend." That way, there is a public acknowledgement of the succesor-in-interest dating situation, but it is done in a way that Guy A gets to keep his ego intact and save face with the social group.
This is not very helpful.

Flinty_McFlint 05-11-2005 02:34 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
"If it feels good...do it!"
- unknown

Communal living situations fostered short-lived relationships, and much sexual experimentation. Groups like the Sexual Freedom League popped up, advertising their ongoing orgiastic events. Even the taboo against sex in public was forgotten. In parks, at festivals, in fact almost any hippie gathering was often the occasion for newly formed "couples" to get it on, often in public view. "Free love" meant you could love anyone, anywhere, anytime, without guilt.

But the biggest single event to liberate women from their designated roles as housewife and mother, was the contraceptive pill. This along with the popularization of other forms of birth control, like the IUD and spermicidal creams, allowed women to have sex, without concern about unintended consquences.

Around 1965, fashion went crazy, with a slew of new styles that emphasized women's sexuality. The mini-skirt took the world by storm, revealing leg, thigh and sometimes more. Plunging necklines, see-thru tops and the rejection of the bra, gave men much more to drool over. Women at last had the power to manifest their latent femininity and sexuality.

Twiggy, set the fashion world on its head by making an icon out of a thin, boyish stick of a girl. Her sexual ambiguity and slim figure revolutionized the way women are portrayed in the media, and they way they look at themselves, and is still an essential part of the fashion scene today.
In 1972 a crack commando unit was sent to prison by a military court for a crime they didn't commit. These men promptly escaped from a maximum security stockade to the Los Angeles underground. Today, still wanted by the government, they survive as soldiers of fortune. If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the A-Team.

Pretty Little Flower 05-11-2005 02:38 PM
If Dan Savage says it, it must be true
 
Quote:
Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
It's funny how much you don't realise you miss something until it's gone.

Actually, now that I think about it, it's not funny at all.
I'll be here for you when you the time is right.

Pretty Little Flower 05-11-2005 02:45 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I was going to suggest having guy B say publically that he can't believe [chick] doesn't give head, because its just standard now, and its no wonder that guy A dumped her. Same reasons as you give, but I was taught it is impolite to speak of a ladie's private parts in public.
That is why I included the part about the chick not being present. I am not a Neanderthal. I know which fork to use.

Well, alright, I don't know which fork to use. I did not even know there were multiple forks to choose among. But I am pretty certain I am at least as well-bred as Sebastian.

Flinty_McFlint 05-11-2005 02:50 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Questions:

1.) Should Guy B have made a move on Guy A's ex? Should he have waited longer?

2.) Should Guy B have told Guy A about the move on his ex earlier? (Note: Guy A was in Mexico the first week that they were dating.)

3.) Should Guy B expect to be cut out of Guy A's life (and possibly social circle) because of moving in on Guy A's ex?

4.) Should Guy B have apologized to Guy A about his actions?
Guy A should find Guy B's mother, sister, ex-girlfriends, pets, and sleep with all of them. Then he should tell both Guy B and old girlfriend, and give rankings, with ex-girlfriend coming in no higher than 4th.

Hank Chinaski 05-11-2005 02:50 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
But I am pretty certain I am at least as well-bred as Sebastian.
I once thought I was too, but I've learned I'm not. I've learned my mom, who is married, has had repeated degrading sex with at least 6 guys who post here. One is a negro. And that's just from who posts here, I have no idea what else she may have done. Anyway, having been raised by someone like that, I'm sure there's lots I have wrong with me.:(

futbol fan 05-11-2005 02:50 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Flinty_McFlint
Guy A should find Guy B's mother, sister, ex-girlfriends, pets, and sleep with all of them. Then he should tell both Guy B and old girlfriend, and give rankings, with ex-girlfriend coming in no higher than 4th.
What, no muffin basket?

Flinty_McFlint 05-11-2005 02:55 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ironweed
What, no muffin basket?
My type lives by a code you know, and he broke it. No baked goods for him. Plus, he already has the ex-girlfriend.

futbol fan 05-11-2005 02:55 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I once thought I was too, but I've learned I'm not. I've learned my mom, who is married, has had repeated degrading sex with at least 6 guys who post here. One is a negro. And that's just from who posts here, I have no idea what else she may have done. Anyway, having been raised by someone like that, I'm sure there's lots I have wrong with me.:(
I have heard from reliable sources that SS is actually part Cherokee.

Hank Chinaski 05-11-2005 03:00 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ironweed
I have heard from reliable sources that SS is actually part Cherokee.
No. That rumor just comes up because on his first date with slave he kept asking "HOW"

notcasesensitive 05-11-2005 03:01 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I once thought I was too, but I've learned I'm not. I've learned my mom, who is married, has had repeated degrading sex with at least 6 guys who post here. One is a negro. And that's just from who posts here, I have no idea what else she may have done. Anyway, having been raised by someone like that, I'm sure there's lots I have wrong with me.:(
Would it make you feel better to know that the 6 guys posting here are all Penske socks?

greatwhitenorthchick 05-11-2005 03:01 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Flinty_McFlint
In 1972 a crack commando unit was sent to prison by a military court for a crime they didn't commit. These men promptly escaped from a maximum security stockade to the Los Angeles underground. Today, still wanted by the government, they survive as soldiers of fortune. If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the A-Team.
The problem with getting a lot of good sex is that all of a sudden the weirdest things seem really hot.

bold_n_brazen 05-11-2005 03:03 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
The problem with getting a lot of good sex is that all of a sudden the weirdest things seem really hot.
Oh, quit your whining.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 PM.
Page 14 of 126 « First 41213 14 15162464114 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com