|  | 
| 
 Top 40 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4990 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4991 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4992 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4993 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4994 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4995 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4996 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4997 TM | 
| 
 Top 40 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4998 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4999 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5000 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5001 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5002 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5003 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5004 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5005 TM | 
| 
 Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group Quote: 
 next question: the NY Philharmonic does a few movie scores each fall. They screen a film in the hall, stripped of score, and the orchestra plays. Pretty special. I have seen 2001 and Manhattan the last few years. This year they are doing Star Wars 1 and 4-6. I won't be there when 4 is on, and of course have no desire to see 1. Soooo between Empire and Jedi, which has the best soundtrack? | 
| 
 Top 40 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5006 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5007 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5008 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5009 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5010 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5011 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5012 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5013 TM | 
| 
 NotBob NotBob, I wish you were on Facebook so I could hear what you have to say about Niskanen's hit on Crosby. | 
| 
 Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group I need to dress for a steampunk-themed party. I have nothing at all in my closet that smacks of steampunk. How do I do this quickly and cheaply? | 
| 
 Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group Quote: 
 And we're not really trying. White or tan or forest green button down shirt, brown pants, suspenders. Boots. Goggles. Felt brown/tan hat if you got one. A store in the small town where our ranch is realized that the nicer cowboy crap they were selling could also be marketed to the steampunk set. | 
| 
 Oh, Canada Girls.* Quote: 
 I've watched and rewatched it a million times, and I'm still not sure whether or not it was intentional. I'm leaning towards intentional - perhaps because of clips I've seen on Twitter (for some reason, I started following the exec producer of a Pittsburgh sports radio show), and almost certainly because of my strong dislike for the Capitals. That said, some respected and neutral hockey dude said the other day that Niskanen's hands were too close together on his stick for it to have been an intentional cross-check. Who knows. I'm sure I'd have a strong position if I liked either of the teams. Apropos of hockey, I am of course pulling for the Rangers, but I have to admit that I have a soft spot for Guy Boucher (you probably do, too, but for different reasons), and am happy that he got the Sens to where they are now. If they do move into the next round, they will become this year's Not Bob Official Playoff Team. Carry on. *Where is the re line from, Not Bob? (spree for Flower: the bonus track to an album from a mainstay of my "Acoustic Estrogen" playlist) | 
| 
 Re: Oh, Canada Girls.* Quote: 
 You are the voice of reason on the hit -- I think it was intentional, but I'm biased. Nodding in agreement with Don Cherry, and I hate when that happens. I said I would root for the Rangers but I can't bring myself to do it against the Sens. | 
| 
 Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group Quote: 
 . . . . (Do you?) TM | 
| 
 Yesterday's Top 40 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5014 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5015 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5016 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5017 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5018 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5019 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5020 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5021 TM | 
| 
 Today's Top 40 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5022 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5023 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5024 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5025 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5026 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5027 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5028 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5029 TM | 
| 
 Tomorrow's Top 40 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5030 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5031 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5032 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5033 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5034 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5035 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5036 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=5037 TM | 
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:22 PM. | 
	Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com