| Secret_Agent_Man |
12-04-2003 03:32 PM |
Why is this a Story?
Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
Agreed, but why is it fair for you to mock the national guard?
|
It isn't fair, but that's not really what I'm doing.
Remember also that the role of the NG in the 1960's - 1980s wasn't like the role of the NG now in Iraq. The post-Cold War restructuring of our military has greatly increased the role/active service/pressure on the Reserve and the NG.
The focus of my opprobrium is not the Guard itself, but those individuals who, when faced with the risk of being called to serve our nation in war (a) jump into Guard units that are nearly 100% certain not to deploy into harm's way (e.g., Quayle and Bush), and (b) then come out the other side as conservative uber-patriots and all-around tough guys (e.g. the same). I find folks like Cheney -- who didn't even go into the Guard, but ended up in the same role afterwards -- somewhat worse.
To complete the list -- Bush's apparent failure as a young man to complete his NG obligation kicks him a few notches down that pole in my view, and Clinton's machinations in that regard were simply embarassing. Note that, in my view, military service is not required -- but standing up and being counted honestly in a critical time should be required. I have much more respect for those who demonstrated in the streets on the other side and/or took conscientious objector status than I do for the so-called "chickenhawks".
P.S. Part of it may also be the residuum of the unkind (and often unfair) attitude that active duty soldiers traditionally take towards the competence, toughness, etc. of the national Guardsmen (the old joke is that NG stands for "No Good").
S_A_M
|