Hank Chinaski |
04-08-2005 08:39 PM |
opportunity costs
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Don't be such a moron. Have you been under a rock? Everyone now understands they were for conventional rockets.
- The Intelligence Community’s analysis of the high-strength aluminum tubes offers an illustration of these problems. Most agencies in the Intelligence Community assessed—incorrectly—that these were intended for use in a uranium enrichment program. The reasoning that supported this position was, first, that the tubes could be used in centrifuges and, second, that Iraq was good at hiding its nuclear program.
By focusing on whether the tubes could be used for centrifuges, analysts effectively set aside evidence that the tubes were better suited for use in rockets, such as the fact that the tubes had precisely the same dimensions and were made of the same material as tubes used in the conventional rockets that Iraq had
declared to international inspectors in 1996. And Iraq’s denial and deception capabilities allowed analysts to find support for their view even from information that seemed to contradict it. Thus, Iraqi claims that the tubes were for rockets were described as an Iraqi “cover story” designed to conceal the nuclear end-use for the tubes. In short, analysts erected a theory that almost could not be disproved—both confirming and contradictory facts were construed as support for the theory that the tubes were destined for use in centrifuges.
last week's WMD report, chapter 1, pages 49-50
|
Dick-head
The helium ballon reference was to the vans. And if you find out your son's ZZs are for wrapping candy- congrats- answer is you still have to call bullshit on him for having them.
"I think the establishment of a democracy in Iraq, and the break down of the other totalitarian regimes, and the creation of a becon of hope to combat the lure of jihad is good- but it doesn't justify what we went and did. After all, a crime happened here on 9/11 but the 18 guilty parties all paid with their lives."
|