![]() |
Now What
Actually, after the way the bush administration handled the runup to Iraq and has botched the occupation, it's not surprise the rest of the world (other than the UK) has no stomach for military action. This nonsense about "let the sanctions work first" or "let diplomacy work first" may be really just utter bullshit - but it's the only bullshit left.*
|
Now What
Quote:
|
Now What
when you say
Quote:
Quote:
|
Now What
Quote:
I have my doubts -- didn't Iran learn a lesson from Israel's bombing of an Iraqi reactor many years ago, and spread its research efforts around? |
Now What
Quote:
|
Now What
Quote:
Iran will eventually turn into a modernized govt. The trick we're trying to work here is to allow it to do so while also preventing it from getting nukes. Cheney's "threats" are bluffs, and I'm not sure their good ones. The rest of the world is smartly assuring Iran that it need not worry about the crap Dick is saying to avoid Dick's statement providing a rallying cry for support for the religious leaders. We're not going to kill a revolution over there. Why do you think we've stopped Israel from bombing Iran for the past two years? You think the Israelis don't already know eactly where each piece of Iran's nuke program is located? They could blow Iran's nuke program back to 1970, but we won't let them. Are the US and Britain playing good cop, bad cop her? I don't know. |
Duke
Quote:
Or they've fucked the case up and won't be able to get a prosecution and are desperately trying to put Humpty Dumpty back togeher again... My guess would be the former, but we are talking state officials here... |
Now What
Quote:
|
Remember the Biolabs?
Well, we know by now that they weren't really WMD in Iraq. Today, WaPo tells us that the Administration knew they weren't, even then:
Frustrated? Well, some are. I laughed at Kevin Drum's response: "Is this ever going to end? How many more deliberate fabrications would we learn about if we could just turn the White House upside down and shake it?" But I think the Drums of the world need to get a little perspective here. We are learning about confidentiality these days, people, and this DOD report was secret. Sure, it was distributed several days before Bush declared WMD victory, but how do we know that Bush had declassified the report so that he could read it and learn this little detail? Huh? That's right. So remember, people. Perspective. Gattigap |
Now What
Quote:
|
Duke
Quote:
That said, closing the case and closing the investigtion of the lacrosse players could be separate. If she was in fact raped (my understanding is that there was evidence of a rape), then someone must have done it. And you at least have to investigate that. |
Remember the Biolabs?
Quote:
It's a pity, really. The Trailers of Mass Destruction was one of my favorite myths of the war. How many Rs on this board cited the TMD as justifying the war? |
Remember the Biolabs?
Quote:
Okay- but they did exist- they weren't imaginary. Our intelligence on their function was wrong. As to bush mentioning them as proof 2 days after some report was written let me ask you, have you ever worked in government? do you have any idea was filing a report means in governement. what is the lag time between such a report and it being reviewed and funneled to the President? When an associate does a memo for you, do you always review it that very day? |
Remember the Biolabs?
Quote:
|
Remember the Biolabs?
Quote:
And hopefully the next 9/11 intell is sent immediately, but a report on what the trailers were actually doing is routine isn't it? This original post made the point "Bush lied again!" Prove it. And another thing- we thought they were for WMDs- once we had them we see they weren't. Sadaam bluffed the world that he had WMDs- maybe the function of the trailers was to appear as what we thought they were. Has there ever been any other function given? |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:05 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com