LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Big Board (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   It was the wrong thread (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=573)

Hank Chinaski 01-07-2011 08:03 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LessinSF (Post 442969)
Wrong. You are governed by the MI rules of professional conduct.

I thought u meant court rules. I was grandfathered out of the ethics rules.

addendumb:

in patents the D will often waive the ACP and hand over opinions as part of its defense, so it isn't such a weird thing to see stuff you might not have expected to see.

the one time I saw something I "knew" I shouldn't I sent an email to OC and he told me it was something they had sent my client as part of a settlement attempt.

more egg on my face than anytime since that Tuesday night I convinced Atticus's sister it was okay for us to date during her period.

LessinSF 01-08-2011 03:01 AM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 442972)
I thought u meant court rules. I was grandfathered out of the ethics rules.

addendumb:

in patents the D will often waive the ACP and hand over opinions as part of its defense, so it isn't such a weird thing to see stuff you might not have expected to see.

the one time I saw something I "knew" I shouldn't I sent an email to OC and he told me it was something they had sent my client as part of a settlement attempt.

more egg on my face than anytime since that Tuesday night I convinced Atticus's sister it was okay for us to date during her period.

And the wait for whether MI has addressed this issue continues.

Hank Chinaski 01-08-2011 04:07 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LessinSF (Post 442988)
And the wait for whether MI has addressed this issue continues.

questioning someone's legal ethics is libel per se IIRC.

Penske 2.0 01-08-2011 05:29 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 442997)
questioning someone's legal ethics is libel per se IIRC.

I skipped ethics in LS and just went with the answer that made the least sense to me on the multi-state ; so I'm not sure if that is true, but, if it is, some h8ers here may want to go back and edit some posts....:(:(

Hank Chinaski 01-08-2011 06:15 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Penske 2.0 (Post 443000)
I skipped ethics in LS and just went with the answer that made the least sense to me on the multi-state ; so I'm not sure if that is true, but, if it is, some h8ers here may want to go back and edit some posts....:(:(

Some of them show behavior that is unethical per se (eg deleting political commentary) and truth is a defense so I'm comfortable with my actions- I sleep soundly thank you very much.

Hank Chinaski 01-08-2011 07:37 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Penske 2.0 (Post 443000)
I skipped ethics in LS and just went with the answer that made the least sense to me on the multi-state ; so I'm not sure if that is true, but, if it is, some h8ers here may want to go back and edit some posts....:(:(

i don't normally respond to the same post twice- but you might be interested to know, as a historical fact- probably a bit out of date- but saying a married lady has sex outside of marriage was once libel per se too, again maybe not true anymore, probably not an issue anymore,

Atticus Grinch 01-08-2011 08:48 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 443002)
i don't normally respond to the same post twice- but you might be interested to know, as a historical fact- probably a bit out of date- but saying a married lady has sex outside of marriage was once libel per se too, again maybe not true anymore, probably not an issue anymore,

AON, I'll consider it a milestone when a state appellate court overturns a defamation verdict on the ground that alleging that someone is gay is simply not defamatory because it does not tend to harm the reputation of the plaintiff.

Fugee 01-08-2011 08:48 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 443002)
you might be interested to know, as a historical fact- probably a bit out of date- but saying a married lady has sex outside of marriage was once libel per se too, again maybe not true anymore, probably not an issue anymore,

It's especially not an issue if truth is a defense. :eek:

Adder 01-08-2011 09:05 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 443004)
AON, I'll consider it a milestone when a state appellate court overturns a defamation verdict on the ground that alleging that someone is gay is simply not defamatory because it does not tend to harm the reputation of the plaintiff.

You mean 'cause yer gay?

Atticus Grinch 01-09-2011 02:51 AM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 443006)
You mean 'cause yer gay?

Oooh, burn.

Penske 2.0 01-09-2011 03:01 AM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fugee (Post 443005)
It's especially not an issue if truth is a defense. :eek:

Thanks. :):):D

Hank Chinaski 01-09-2011 11:46 AM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fugee (Post 443005)
It's especially not an issue if truth is a defense. :eek:

Q: how many Penske's does it take to have sex with a married lady?
A: no one knows. so far no identified penske has been willing to fulfill the condition precedent of telling his doctor he need a Viagra Rx:(:(

Penske 2.0 01-09-2011 01:50 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 443013)
Q: how many Penske's does it take to have sex with a married lady?
A: no one knows. so far no identified penske has been willing to fulfill the condition precedent of telling his doctor he need a Viagra Rx:(:(

When I could regularly knock off sub-5 miles I had no need for performance enhancing drugs, same assessment with Viagra. As much as I enjoy excess, there probably can be too much of a good thing. :D

Hank Chinaski 01-09-2011 04:19 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Penske 2.0 (Post 443022)
When I could regularly knock off sub-5 miles I had no need for performance enhancing drugs, same assessment with Viagra. As much as I enjoy excess, there probably can be too much of a good thing. :D

my wife said to tell you she thinks you're sub 2 minutes:confused::confused:

can someone decode this?

Penske 2.0 01-09-2011 05:42 PM

Re: It was the wrong thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 443026)
my wife said to tell you she thinks you're sub 2 minutes:confused::confused:

?

A gentleman doesn't kiss and tell; however, at least your last post clears up the spurious libel issue. Thanks.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com