Re: It was the wrong thread
 

I don't normally respond to the same post twice, but in this case I will make an exception...

I have a layover, npi, at the DET airport tomorrow...53 mins....ask her if she wants to meet me for 25 go rounds and a drink....;):o:)

Re: It was the wrong thread
 

You're bringing 24 other fast shooters?

Re: It was the wrong thread
 

Putting aside whether the bare allegation of infidelity is libelous, implying someone might be down, npi, for a 25 guy gangbang is cerrtainly a bit further along the scale, unless we are talking about a porn star.......:o

Re: It was the wrong thread
 

2. we're getting close to I need a paycheck for that.

Re: It was the wrong thread
 

2. You're welcome in advance :D

Re: It was the wrong thread
 

Shame on you.

Re: It was the wrong thread
 

I have no idea whether Mrs. Hank would be up for that. But it'd be the only way you could offer her that many go rounds -- unless "go rounds" is code for something that doesn't involve any kind of performance on your part. ;)

Re: It was the wrong thread
 

I see sarcasm is lost within 24 hours or so.

Re: It was the wrong thread
 

Perhaps he just don't like your joke.....:(

Don't Let Your Clients E-Mail You
 

Seriously. It may not be privileged if they use their work computer - http://calapp.blogspot.com/2011/01/h...nt-co-cal.html

ETA: The more I think about this, this more wrong it seems. That said, I think diligent representation of my clients now requires me to demand all e-mails between the other side and their counsel, along with the office policy on the use of the computers on which those e-mails were sent or received.

Re: Don't Let Your Clients E-Mail You
 

Going back to when I became partner, I blocked off about 5 hours one day a week to get on to the server and read employees' emails. Not so much to be able to assert that we followed the policy in the handbook, but more from a prurient interest standpoint, but hopefully my practice establishes a foundation for any undercutment of the interpretation at your link.

ERISA Question?
 

Person is working for a company A. Has group disability policy.

Person files claim for disability.

Claim is denied.

Person appeals.

Disability causes person to be unable to continue working.

While appeal is pending, person leaves job. Employer then stops paying for disability policy.

Does the person have an obligation to keep paying under the policy? (Don't even know how that'd be done.) Convert to independent policy? Would non-payment while a claim or appeal is pending be considered a lapse?

a need to vent
 

Celebrity patients are a nightmare for the privacy officer.

Re: a need to vent
 

oh! Who's at your hospital? You can say! I won't tell! Just between us.

Re: a need to vent
 

Thankfully, it's not my hospital. But I have a colleague that's hating life right now.