![]() |
More on that "Contained" Dictator
Quote:
|
More on that "Contained" Dictator
Quote:
TPM (links omitted). But Hank says it's all OK because everyone does it. |
More on that "Contained" Dictator
Quote:
S_A_M P.S. Plus, the flyer makes the author look like an idiot -- not Bush -- and are hardly likely to sway even a single undecided voter. The public humiliation and firing to come wil be more than enough "justice." |
More on that "Contained" Dictator
Quote:
Quote:
|
More on that "Contained" Dictator
Quote:
Some of us may have been confused earlier. |
More on that "Contained" Dictator
Quote:
It's all garbage. Fairly equal garbage. |
Alas, poor RSN
Kerry's given up on Manny Ortez, Eddie Yost, and the rest of you:
Quote:
|
Suddenly all you neoconservatives are claiming that the atrocities of Hussein are the reason we went to war in Iraq. Just to clarify, which of the following are you saying:
(a) We knew about the atrocities, and it was part of the reason for going to war in Iraq, but we would still have gone to war anyway because of WMD; (b) We knew about the atrocities, and it was part of the reason for going to war in Iraq, but we would still have gone to war anyway because of the relationship with AQ; (c) The atrocities in Iraq were the worst in the world, and it makes sense to go to preemptive war with the state committing the worst atrocities; (d) The atrocities in Iraq weren't the worst or among the worst, but we were going to war there anyway, so it's good that we can take care of these atrocities; and/or (e) Whatever else you can say to clarify your position... |
More on that "Contained" Dictator
Quote:
Though, I'm guessing that unlike the "take your bibles" pitch, this isn't a DNC-backed creation. Like their counterparts across the street, the DNC is sophisticated enough to know that smears only work in color, not in this amateurish, grainy black-and-white shit. |
More on that "Contained" Dictator
Quote:
|
More Republicans courageously thwarting vote fraud.
No one who's been watching this race thinks turn-out might be, say, higher than recent elections, eh?
link |
Quote:
|
While we're at it, how should we determine which preemptive wars to enter into? Which of the following conditions are sufficient? Which are nececssary for one reasoning for preemptive war, but not sufficient for that reasoning?
(a) State A will probably attack us, and has the WMD to do it. (b) State A would attack us if it had the WMD, but it doesn't have the WMD, but we think they do. (c) State A attacked us, and State B was friends with them, so we attack State B. (d) State A commits atrocities. (d) State A commits more atrocities than anyone. (e) State A commits religious atrocities. (f) Our President's father kind of went to war with State A to protect our ally. Also please comment on how resources weigh in. Should we get into WWIII with 12 countries because of all the atrocity in the world? What about if we have oil interests there? |
The two (d)s are to sex it up a little bit.
|
More on that "Contained" Dictator
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:08 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com