| Spanky |
02-02-2007 03:50 PM |
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I haven't quoted the NYT op ed page. That was Sebby, too. But thanks for playing.
|
No but you dismissed anything put out by the WSJ Op ed page or the CATO intitue and defended the NYT, to back up your argument. In my opinion, you have those assumptions backward, and therefore discredited your argument when you made those claims.
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Which Sebby? The one with the Reynolds article from the WSJ, or the one with all of the other people who say that inequality is increasing? My and President Bush are with the second Sebby.
You mean your ipso facto isn't worth much? OK.
|
Sebby said that this issue is being way oversimplified by most people. The terms are vague and therefore the statistics can be manipulated to support any vague assertion. Until you specifically define what you mean by income inequality, and what strata of society you are identifying, your statements are meaningless. Terms like rich, working class, the poor are all way to vague to have any meaning. Same goes for terms like "disproportionate rises in income, income gap, rise in income inequality etc.
In order to have a real discussion, you need to talk about quintiles of the entire population and how much their income is actually rising or falling. And then look at the hard numbers.
His point was proven by all the articles he posted and you posted.
Any article that doesn’t specifically describe how its numbers were reached, how they define a strata of society, how they are defining change (or widening gap) and display the actual numbers they were looking at, is about as useful as brass knuckles in a gun fight.
|