![]() |
Re: A or B
Quote:
|
Re: Team Eradication 1, Team Herd Immunity Nil
Quote:
|
Re: A or B
Quote:
Don’t know if that still holds true. |
Re: Team Eradication 1, Team Herd Immunity Nil
Quote:
|
Re: Team Eradication 1, Team Herd Immunity Nil
Quote:
1. You get it and don’t die; 2. You get it again and your immune system’s T cells mount a response from memory, or they don’t, in which case you are given a therapy, numerous of which are working, and will only improve (as dropping death rates partially indicate); 3. Repeat #2 Or, 1. You get it and die (unlikely) Eventually, humans will adapt and we’ll acquire defenses and/or the virus will develop weaknesses or mutate simply to survive (can’t live if you keep killing the host). A number of us will die, but statistically, judged against the 7 billion of us, it won’t be anywhere near huge. I suspect the angst of today would have existed in 1918 had we had social media and 24/7 news then as well. Life’s terminal, as Warren Zevon sang. Do your best to put off the result as long as possible. Covid’s just one more thing with which we mortals will dance. Selah. And blame ain’t gonna change that. |
Re: Team Eradication 1, Team Herd Immunity Nil
Quote:
|
Re: Team Eradication 1, Team Herd Immunity Nil
Quote:
|
Re: Team Eradication 1, Team Herd Immunity Nil
Quote:
|
Re: Team Eradication 1, Team Herd Immunity Nil
Quote:
|
Re: Team Eradication 1, Team Herd Immunity Nil
Quote:
|
Re: Team Eradication 1, Team Herd Immunity Nil
Quote:
|
Re: Team Eradication 1, Team Herd Immunity Nil
Quote:
|
Re: Team Eradication 1, Team Herd Immunity Nil
Quote:
But even at a loss of two million lives, statistically, it's not enormous: .00608273 (2mil/328.2mil) Then you have to factor in how many of those deaths were among the significantly aged, to assess life years lost. Increasingly, you get a picture, particularly in Sweden, of a disease that has hunted the old and co-morbidity-riddled most perniciously. Is that acceptable here (as it is among policy makers in Sweden)? Most would say if it were preventable, no. If this was not preventable save pre-emptive actions that had to have been taken long ago and could not be taken fast enough when we were caught flat footed, you'd have to list those deaths as largely unpreventable. They'd be sad consequences of policy inaction. But netted against them must be the offset for life years lost, and when you consider this disease thankfully does not end many young lives or healthy lives with many future life years to look forward to, you see a reason to make the argument, "This is not good, and not acceptable, but it's also not an apocalypse, and people should be a bit less alarmist and more circumspect in their thinking about the situation." "But we must do all at any cost to save lives!" is a comment I hear a lot. It's a great emotive response to someone asserting that we need a balanced approach that takes the economy and the value of preserving some normalcy into account. I'd say wearing masks and observing social distancing while the scientists develop more therapies and hopefully a vaccine seems a reasonable way to approach life right now. I have no patience for anyone who refuses to wear a mask. It's ludicrous. But I also have no patience for anyone who asserts that this was entirely preventable or that we should engage in national or even regional lockdowns bacause "lives!!!" This is bad. But as grandmother (mine lived thru the 1918 flu) would have said, "stiff upper lip." It doesn't take much to be careful. Do so. |
Re: Team Eradication 1, Team Herd Immunity Nil
Quote:
Upwards of 70% of the Covid19 death toll in Sweden has been people in elderly care services (as of mid-May 2020). We summarize the Covid19 tragedy in elderly care in Sweden, particularly in the City of Stockholm. We explain the institutional structure of elderly care administration and service provision. Those who died of Covid19 in Stockholm’s nursing homes had a life-remaining median somewhere in the range of 5 to 9 months. Having contextualized the Covid19 problem in City of Stockholm, we present an interview of Barbro Karlsson, who works at the administrative heart of the Stockholm elderly care system. Her institutional knowledge and sentiment offer great insight into the concrete problems and challenges. There are really two sides to the elderly care Covid19 challenge: The vulnerability and frailty of those in nursing homes and the problem of nosocomial infection—that is, infection caused by contact with others involved in the elderly care experience. The problem calls for targeted solutions by those close to the vulnerable individuals.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369443/ |
Re: Team Eradication 1, Team Herd Immunity Nil
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com