LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Fashion Board 12-09-03 through 1-08-04 (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=511)

Not Bob 12-12-2003 01:10 PM

"Denial" is apparently the name of a building on the Upper East Side.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Good article on the Yankees upgrading their pitching staff.
TM
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Start by getting rid of a young left hander for an old left hander with a history of injuries.* Makes sense to me. Heck, so long as he goes to a National League team, who cares about losing the guy who has been the big-game pitcher for the Yanks over the last several years?

Here's a realistic article about the Pettite thing. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/12/sp...l?pagewanted=1

*Yes, Kevin Brown is a great pitcher. When he's healthy.

Shape Shifter 12-12-2003 01:14 PM

Not Bob, NFH, ncs
 
The Not Family has increased considerably lately. Please consider Not Fucking, or at least Not Reproducing further. I consider myself to be Not Notophobic. But there are so many of you now that it is Not Funny.

taxwonk 12-12-2003 01:17 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Is this irony? A watch - a clock you hang on your wrist - for "under $500" is a "fantastic value"?
A watch, a piece of kinetic art that has more or less utility, depending upon the aesthetic of the wearer. One can be a bargain at $500 or an outrageous expense at $69.99. I'd imagine you'd be utterly baffled by my Patek Philippe.

But then, I can't begin to understand why you'd pay money for a two-wheeled death machine that leaves your hair and skin feeling gritty and bugs in your teeth. And just out of curiosity, how much do you suppose you've sunk into a bunch of stuff that you use to remove yourself from any place that has toilets and kitchens?

Not Me 12-12-2003 01:19 PM

Not Bob, NFH, ncs
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
The Not Family has increased considerably lately. Please consider Not Fucking, or at least Not Reproducing further. I consider myself to be Not Notophobic. But there are so many of you now that it is Not Funny.
Ditto on the Star Trek characters, 'kay? Between you and Seven of Nine, I think we are set.

bold_n_brazen 12-12-2003 01:21 PM

Not Bob, NFH, ncs
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
The Not Family has increased considerably lately. Please consider Not Fucking, or at least Not Reproducing further. I consider myself to be Not Notophobic. But there are so many of you now that it is Not Funny.
There are also too many of you who simply are NotFunny.

Mister_Ruysbroeck 12-12-2003 01:28 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Is this irony? A watch - a clock you hang on your wrist - for "under $500" is a "fantastic value"?
There is some disconnect in your mind that won't allow you to connect the words "watch," "value," and "under $500" (which is quite a broad range), but I assure you irony is not to blame.

Anyway, what's wrong with spending a little on a nice watch? It's not like you're plopping down $15,000 on a gawdy jewel-speckled Rolex. It's a couple hundred bucks on an understated, stylish watch that will last till the day you die and then some. How is that a bad thing?

notcasesensitive 12-12-2003 01:32 PM

Not Bob, NFH, ncs
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
The Not Family has increased considerably lately. Please consider Not Fucking, or at least Not Reproducing further. I consider myself to be Not Notophobic. But there are so many of you now that it is Not Funny.
It is all Not My Fault and Not Amusing To Me, I assure you.

I will Not Stop Fucking. But I will agree to Not Discontinue My Birth Control either. G'day.

bilmore 12-12-2003 01:36 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
I'd imagine you'd be utterly baffled by my Patek Philippe.
Probably. I just can't DO those Roman numeral thingies.

Quote:

But then, I can't begin to understand why you'd pay money for a two-wheeled death machine that leaves your hair and skin feeling gritty and bugs in your teeth. And just out of curiosity, how much do you suppose you've sunk into a bunch of stuff that you use to remove yourself from any place that has toilets and kitchens?
The difference, I think, is that I don't buy the mink potscrubber or the jewel-encrusted tent peg. A good tent peg is almost a zenlike thing, but adding rubies around the top and then speaking of value seems . . . well . . . different.

bilmore 12-12-2003 01:39 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mister_Ruysbroeck
There is some disconnect in your mind that won't allow you to connect the words "watch," "value," and "under $500" (which is quite a broad range), but I assure you irony is not to blame.
You're probably right. "Value" has, in my warped and dim mind, a different meaning than the one you are likely applying here.

SlaveNoMore 12-12-2003 01:45 PM

"Denial" is apparently the name of a building on the Upper East Side.
 
Quote:

Not Bob
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Start by getting rid of a young left hander for an old left hander with a history of injuries.* Makes sense to me. Heck, so long as he goes to a National League team, who cares about losing the guy who has been the big-game pitcher for the Yanks over the last several years?

Here's a realistic article about the Pettite thing. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/12/sp...l?pagewanted=1

*Yes, Kevin Brown is a great pitcher. When he's healthy.
One more time (and I'm happy ESPN said it AFTER I already said it yesterday).

Vasquez is the Pettite replacement. And several years younger.

Brown is the Roger replacement. And several years younger.

I think our staff potentially got better - that being said, I'm all about loyalty to local sports heroes and would liked to have kept Andy around another 5 years - and have "46" join future Retirees "2", "22", and "42" on the Left field wall.

edited to add:
And actually, "EL Duque" was our big game pitcher - after Jimmy Key was our big game pitcher. Stop revising history.

Shape Shifter 12-12-2003 01:50 PM

Not Bob, NFH, ncs
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
Ditto on the Star Trek characters, 'kay? Between you and Seven of Nine, I think we are set.
Assclench, please. My avatar was not chosen out of my affinity for Star Trek in general or one wholly unbelievable episode in particular (let's face it, Kirk got lucky, and not for the first time). I chose my avatar simply as a way of relating a concept to feeble mammal minds that otherwise may have difficulty grasping the idea of shifting shapes. And, if I may say so, my breasticle day picture was hot.

Well fed on a proper diet of human blood, prefereably that of blonde-haired blue-eyed children, I can choose to appear fully human and operate freely in society. '96 was an excellent year for children, particularly in Oregon's Willamette Valley.

But this is distracting us from more important issues. What's the deal with white guys who date asian chicks exclusively?

NotFromHere 12-12-2003 01:53 PM

Not Bob, NFH, ncs
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
It is all Not My Fault and Not Amusing To Me, I assure you.

I will Not Stop Fucking. But I will agree to Not Discontinue My Birth Control either. G'day.
I have absolutely nothing to do with the recent increase in the family.

NotBob, what do you have to say for yourself?

Sidd Finch 12-12-2003 01:56 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mister_Ruysbroeck
Anyway, what's wrong with spending a little on a nice watch? It's not like you're plopping down $15,000 on a gawdy jewel-speckled Rolex. It's a couple hundred bucks on an understated, stylish watch that will last till the day you die and then some. How is that a bad thing?
Depends what you have to do to make it last past your death.

Think "Pulp Fiction."

Oliver_Wendell_Ramone 12-12-2003 01:58 PM

Not Bob, NFH, ncs
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Well fed on a proper diet of human blood, prefereably that of blonde-haired blue-eyed children, I can choose to appear fully human and operate freely in society. '96 was an excellent year for children, particularly in Oregon's Willamette Valley.
The 2000 vintage blonde-haired blue-eyed children are not aging nearly so well. No reason for you to visit the Willamette Valley again. Nope, nothing to see here. Move along, lizard.

Ollie (think I can get a 3-year-old to wear a wig and brown contact lenses?) Ramone

ThurgreedMarshall 12-12-2003 01:58 PM

george/cashman/pettitte
 
I no longer place all the blame on Cashman and Steinbrenner for losing Pettitte. It looks to me like his mind was made up long ago (as NotBob seemed to have known).

Here is a breakdown of the negotiations:

October 25: "At the conclusion of the World Series, I told Andy we'd be in touch with him soon."

Early November: "Prior to Andy electing to go free agent, I made a get-us-started offer to Randy, of $10 (million) for three (years). His response was, he would take it to Andy. He also said Andy wanted to test the market, see his market-value, and asked if we would give him patience.
"This was new to him, and something he had earned. We had to respect that. Free agency means free choice."

Late November: "We wanted to get something done before Thanksgiving. I presented a series of concept offers ... $11 (million) for three (years), will that work? ... $17 over three, plus some deferred ... a $12 for three idea was thrown back.
"We exchanged concepts back and forth."

December 10, 7 p.m.: "Last night I got their first official counter-offer, $52 for four [years] 'to get his attention.' There was no guarantee that he would take it."

December 10, 10:30 p.m.: "We responded, $13 for three, with the third-year guaranteed on some concepts, which I'd rather not get into."

December 11, 10:30 a.m.: "They informed us they made the decision to go to Houston."

http://newyork.yankees.mlb.com/NASAp...=.jsp&c_id=nya
_________

TM

Shape Shifter 12-12-2003 02:00 PM

Not Bob, NFH, ncs
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
There are also too many of you who simply are NotFunny.
Just keep manufacturing children, sweetheart.

Sidd Finch 12-12-2003 02:00 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
The difference, I think, is that I don't buy the mink potscrubber or the jewel-encrusted tent peg. A good tent peg is almost a zenlike thing, but adding rubies around the top and then speaking of value seems . . . well . . . different.

Uh-huh. And your motorcycle was the cheapest scooter on the lot? Or does spending a few grand to go faster, look cooler, and rev louder equate to "value" in your mind, while spending a few hundred bucks to have something you wear everyday look good and function perfectly equates to "waste of money"?

And is your kayak one of those red plastic ones that we had in summer camp?

The difference is that you and wonk are different people making different choices about how to spend your hard-earned money. Until you spend most of your feeding the poor, stop pontificating about why your choices are morally superior to anyone else's.

Not Me 12-12-2003 02:02 PM

Not Bob, NFH, ncs
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
But this is distracting us from more important issues. What's the deal with white guys who date asian chicks exclusively?
That'a an easy one. They are into submissive chicks. It's not due to inner turmoil. It is more of a fetish.

purse junkie 12-12-2003 02:07 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Uh-huh. And your motorcycle was the cheapest scooter on the lot? Or does spending a few grand to go faster, look cooler, and rev louder equate to "value" in your mind, while spending a few hundred bucks to have something you wear everyday look good and function perfectly equates to "waste of money"?

And is your kayak one of those red plastic ones that we had in summer camp?

The difference is that you and wonk are different people making different choices about how to spend your hard-earned money. Until you spend most of your feeding the poor, stop pontificating about why your choices are morally superior to anyone else's.
Right. The main thing wrong with spending $15k on a watch is that most of us can't.

Oh perfect little Gucci bag...no vapid society skeletor would ever love you so much as I....

Sidd Finch 12-12-2003 02:14 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by purse junkie
Right. The main thing wrong with spending $15k on a watch is that most of us can't.
They weren't talking about $15k watches, they were talking about watches "under $500." Which is a good bit more than I've ever spent on a watch, but less than what I'll spend on a really nice dinner for two.

purse junkie 12-12-2003 02:22 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
They weren't talking about $15k watches, they were talking about watches "under $500." Which is a good bit more than I've ever spent on a watch, but less than what I'll spend on a really nice dinner for two.
Either way. The money's still better invested in the handbag. Plus dinner.

bilmore 12-12-2003 02:26 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Uh-huh. And your motorcycle was the cheapest scooter on the lot? Or does spending a few grand to go faster, look cooler, and rev louder equate to "value" in your mind, while spending a few hundred bucks to have something you wear everyday look good and function perfectly equates to "waste of money"?

And is your kayak one of those red plastic ones that we had in summer camp?

The difference is that you and wonk are different people making different choices about how to spend your hard-earned money. Until you spend most of your feeding the poor, stop pontificating about why your choices are morally superior to anyone else's.
Yesterday, the music poll (I think it was) left me thinking you were a lot younger than I had thought before.

Now, I think you're a lot older, and have lost your sense of humor, and can't quite get your grasp around giving someone a hard time, for fun, for calling a $500 watch a "good value".

(And, when the day comes when I try to justify my bike as a "good value", well, roll me over and call me Sidd.)

;)

bilmore 12-12-2003 02:28 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
. . .but less than what I'll spend on a really nice dinner for two.
My god. Are you serious? I don't think you could do that here if you tried.

(Well, maybe with a $350 bottle of wine.)

Hank Chinaski 12-12-2003 02:30 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
giving someone a hard time, for fun, for calling a $500 watch a "good value".
my watch, i think around $400, a Hamilton ventura was extravagent for me for watches. I lose them so I don't spend typically. It was a good purchase, I'm happy I got it, But agree I'm not sure it is a good value.

bilmore 12-12-2003 02:32 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
my watch, i think around $400, a Hamilton ventura was extravagent for me for watches. I lose them so I don't spend typically. It was a good purchase, I'm happy I got it, But agree I'm not sure it is a good value.
It all goes to MR's point that my disconnect is not with the idea of buying fun toys, but with calling a fur sink a "good value".

barely_legal 12-12-2003 02:34 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Uh-huh. And your motorcycle was the cheapest scooter on the lot? Or does spending a few grand to go faster, look cooler, and rev louder equate to "value" in your mind, while spending a few hundred bucks to have something you wear everyday look good and function perfectly equates to "waste of money"?

And is your kayak one of those red plastic ones that we had in summer camp?

The difference is that you and wonk are different people making different choices about how to spend your hard-earned money. Until you spend most of your feeding the poor, stop pontificating about why your choices are morally superior to anyone else's.
Why do I love you so much lately?

Sidd Finch 12-12-2003 02:36 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
My god. Are you serious? I don't think you could do that here if you tried.
Good lord. Why would I travel to West of Butt-fuck to have that special, once-or-twice-a-year dinner? I'm really no fan of woodchuck pate.

Bad_Rich_Chic 12-12-2003 02:37 PM

Random article
 
http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2003/...rms/index.html

[drunkenness gene found in worms: "He and the other scientists dosed hundreds of thousands of worms with enough alcohol that they would be too drunk to drive legally."]

The image of a blotto worm behind the wheel just tickled me.

Sidd Finch 12-12-2003 02:37 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by barely_legal
Why do I love you so much lately?
Was it the way I brought you to screaming multiple orgasms the other night?

(that was you, wasn't it?)

bilmore 12-12-2003 02:38 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by barely_legal
Why do I love you so much lately?
Because you love vapid, overblown, moralistic speeches that miss the point entirely, too?

Oliver_Wendell_Ramone 12-12-2003 02:38 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
My god. Are you serious? I don't think you could do that here if you tried.

(Well, maybe with a $350 bottle of wine.)
I was thinking the same thing. I've eaten in Sidd's neighborhood quite a bit, and I think it would even be tough there (absent a really expensive wine or one hell of a tip). Around these parts, it would take a) more food than I'd ever really want (i.e., 2 appetizers, 2 salads, 2 soups, 2 entrees, 2 deserts) and a lot of high-end booze (cocktails, a couple of really good wines, cognac).

Maybe Sidd was talking about dinner with the stripper. With tipping, that could easily top $500.

Not Me 12-12-2003 02:41 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Uh-huh. And your motorcycle was the cheapest scooter on the lot? Or does spending a few grand to go faster, look cooler, and rev louder equate to "value" in your mind, while spending a few hundred bucks to have something you wear everyday look good and function perfectly equates to "waste of money"?

And is your kayak one of those red plastic ones that we had in summer camp?

The difference is that you and wonk are different people making different choices about how to spend your hard-earned money. Until you spend most of your feeding the poor, stop pontificating about why your choices are morally superior to anyone else's.
Where the hell's your sense of humor?

Geez, people cannot even make a joke around here without the cranky pants types going on the attack.

Not Me 12-12-2003 02:42 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone
Maybe Sidd was talking about dinner with the stripper. With tipping, that could easily top $500.
Wouldn't surprise me if Sidd had to pay for it.

Sidd Finch 12-12-2003 02:43 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone
I was thinking the same thing. I've eaten in Sidd's neighborhood quite a bit, and I think it would even be tough there (absent a really expensive wine or one hell of a tip). Around these parts, it would take a) more food than I'd ever really want (i.e., 2 appetizers, 2 salads, 2 soups, 2 entrees, 2 deserts) and a lot of high-end booze (cocktails, a couple of really good wines, cognac).

Try Gary Danko sometime. Well worth it (I know, Bilmore -- how could a $500 dinner be well worth it, if that's not something that you would spend your money on?).

I can recommend a good splurge restaurant in Paris, too. Plan to spend at least three hours eating a multicourse meal



Quote:

Maybe Sidd was talking about dinner with the stripper. With tipping, that could easily top $500.

5th Amendment.

NotFromHere 12-12-2003 02:44 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by barely_legal
Why do I love you so much lately?
Because it's bonus season?

spookyfish 12-12-2003 02:46 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
I'm really no fan of woodchuck pate.
Did someone say woodchuck pate?

http://www.unclejedcountry.com/images/jed.jpg

Weeel doggies, that's good eatin!!!

Sidd Finch 12-12-2003 02:47 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
Wouldn't surprise me if Sidd had to pay for it.
My god, you're right -- I should be taking sense-of-humor lessons from you.

When I can pluck the pebble from the folds of Bilmore's wattle, I will be ready to leave here.....

bilmore 12-12-2003 02:48 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Well worth it (I know, Bilmore -- how could a $500 dinner be well worth it, if that's not something that you would spend your money on?).
You know, assjack, you've already (I suspect) realized that you missed the point of my post entirely and are just keeping up this pretense of what you wish I had said so you don't have to admit that you gave your standard "don't tread on me" speech one more time unnecessarily, so why put in the effort any more?

(Must be Friday.)

barely_legal 12-12-2003 02:48 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Was it the way I brought you to screaming multiple orgasms the other night?

(that was you, wasn't it?)
Yeah, I forgot to thank you for those drinks, didn't I? thanks.


p.s. you spelled "two" wrong

Atticus Grinch 12-12-2003 02:48 PM

Speaking of Watches...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
I can recommend a good splurge restaurant in Paris, too. Plan to spend at least three hours eating a multicourse meal
Confidential to Bilmore: Definitely order "la pātisserie a formé comme un singe." Take my word for it. Just watching a French waiter fall into a millstream from laughing is a good value at 13 Euros.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com