LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Waiting for Fitzgerald (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=704)

Tyrone Slothrop 09-26-2005 12:13 AM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Ty argued earlier against the idea that FDR misled the public about his intentions on getting the US involved in WWII.
No, I said I wanted more than a single sentence from a single speech that Penske found amidst the cartoons and photoshopped images on a website somewhere.

For a lawyer, you don't read too good.

Quote:

He also was skeptical about the fact the public buses where flooded during the Hurricane. Was he not questioning "common knowledge at these junctures"?
No, since there is a big difference between "common knowledge" and "images posted by Penske." As a relative newber, I suppose it's possible that you haven't noticed this yet.

Spanky 09-26-2005 12:24 AM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
What use is there in posting evidence if you are going to misread it in this fashion?

And I thought you might bother to read The Economist.
I read the article (or at least the portions cited in that ridiculous Blog article) and I did not misread it. But this is all so ridiculous. The Economist did not draw the conclusion that Bush doctored the numbers. They said there are facts that make it seem possible and there is reason to believe that is was in their interest to do so. But unlike you, they never implied that they had a smoking gun (conclusive evidence), so they did not make any conclusions.

Know one knows whether Bush intentionally inflated the numbers except for people in the Bush administration. And at this point no one seems to be talking. So we really don't know do we?

Of course you seem to think that it is a fact. Are you privy to inside sources at the White House that I am not aware of?

Hank Chinaski 09-26-2005 12:29 AM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop

No, since there is a big difference between "common knowledge" and "images posted by Penske." As a relative newber, I suppose it's possible that you haven't noticed this yet.
well I know a little something about photoshopping, and I know that people wouldn't think to make the image if there wasn't truth there.

See smoke? look for fire!

Spanky 09-26-2005 12:36 AM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
No, I said I wanted more than a single sentence from a single speech that Penske found amidst the cartoons and photoshopped images on a website somewhere.

For a lawyer, you don't read too good.
Why would we care what you want? To most everyone else this was common knowledge. It was like you were asking for a cite showing that Thomas Jefferson was the third president. Why would we find such a cite for you; something we all know to be obviously true?


Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
No, since there is a big difference between "common knowledge" and "images posted by Penske." As a relative newber, I suppose it's possible that you haven't noticed this yet.

You demand a cite to demonstrate to you something we already know, and yet, you seem to think that I should conlude that Bush intentionally overestimated the numbers, where all you have is conjecture and no direct evidence.

Any thing negative about Roosevelt, you need more than one cite (more than that speech as if that wasn't enough and even though everyone on the board is saying it is common knowledge) but you make a negative conclusion about Bush based purely on speculation.

Hank Chinaski 09-26-2005 11:49 AM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Why would we care what you want? To most everyone else this was common knowledge. It was like you were asking for a cite showing that Thomas Jefferson was the third president. Why would we find such a cite for you; something we all know to be obviously true?





You demand a cite to demonstrate to you something we already know, and yet, you seem to think that I should conlude that Bush intentionally overestimated the numbers, where all you have is conjecture and no direct evidence.

Any thing negative about Roosevelt, you need more than one cite (more than that speech as if that wasn't enough and even though everyone on the board is saying it is common knowledge) but you make a negative conclusion about Bush based purely on speculation.
2 as to everything, except I would change "a negative conclusion" to "biweekly warped insane charges."

Secret_Agent_Man 09-26-2005 12:07 PM

Just compensation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Are the rest of you just Dems because it is cool, but in reality are just greedy capitalists that don't care about people that are more unfortunate than you?
Said the real estate speculator. (I know, I know . . . you help people.)

Speaking of which, looking into some properties in New Orleans?

S_A_M

Penske_Account 09-26-2005 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
If I was poor I would take their money. Hell I would take their money now.

I think Kennedy really cares. He may be a pig, but he is a pig that does care about the less fortunate. Is there really any evidence to show he is corrupt. I don't think he has ever gained financially from his public service.

Am I wrong?
I am emailing Mary Jo Kopechne to get her thoughts. I will let you know what I find out.

SlaveNoMore 09-26-2005 12:12 PM

Just compensation
 
Quote:

Penske_Account
Nagin, Blanko and the NO city and State of LA governments would need 50 or 60 years to achieve the same result. Perhaps the government should turn the city over to Starwood.
Maybe we're giving Nagin a bum rap.

Of the purportedly hundreds and hundreds of dead bodies in the Superdome, the final actual total was SIX.

Yes, SIX.

Secret_Agent_Man 09-26-2005 12:12 PM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Why would we care what you want? To most everyone else this was common knowledge. It was like you were asking for a cite showing that Thomas Jefferson was the third president. Why would we find such a cite for you; something we all know to be obviously true?
Indeed, an excellent standard to facilitate discussion. If we all adopt it, the board will be the better for it.

For example, it is common knowledge, accepted by millions (perhaps even billions around the globe) that "Bush Lied and People Died."

Just accept it (and stop asking for proof) so that we can all move on.

S_A_M

Penske_Account 09-26-2005 12:15 PM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Why would we care what you want? To most everyone else this was common knowledge. It was like you were asking for a cite showing that Thomas Jefferson was the third president. Why would we find such a cite for you; something we all know to be obviously true?





You demand a cite to demonstrate to you something we already know, and yet, you seem to think that I should conlude that Bush intentionally overestimated the numbers, where all you have is conjecture and no direct evidence.

Any thing negative about Roosevelt, you need more than one cite (more than that speech as if that wasn't enough and even though everyone on the board is saying it is common knowledge) but you make a negative conclusion about Bush based purely on speculation.
2. The line in the speech I pulled was typical of Roosevelt's stump campaign rhetoric, all of which is part and parcel of a campaign that he ran that was based on not going to war in Europe. For that period this is as common knowledge as the fact that Hitler engaged in a campaign of genocide against the jews of Europe. Or, like the Palestinians, is Ty denying that historical fact too?????


As for the buses, the fact that Ty is still heding acceptance of them is beyond the pale.

Penske_Account 09-26-2005 12:17 PM

Just compensation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Maybe we're giving Nagin a bum rap.

Of the purportedly hundreds and hundreds of dead bodies in the Superdome, the final actual total was SIX.

Yes, SIX.
That's six more than died at the Starwood hotel chain's hotels.

Captain 09-26-2005 12:27 PM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Ty argued earlier against the idea that FDR misled the public about his intentions on getting the US involved in WWII. He also was skeptical about the fact the public buses where flooded during the Hurricane. Was he not questioning "common knowledge at these junctures"? Why should I have looked for cites to back this stuff up?

Why should I look up cites to demonstrate that the bond markets were disappointed in the 93 deficit reduction act? I am confident it happened. Why should I care if he believes it? If I spent my time finding cites to obvious facts that would negatively effect Tys twisted perception of reality it would be a 24/7 job.

The reason to look it up is because it is critical to your argument that the tax increases of 1993 were not necessary to balance the budget. That, in turn, is critical to your idea that the Democrats are intrinsically incapable of seeking to balance the budget (originally based on your incorrect statement that the Democrats had not voted a balanced budget in 50 years).

I assume you'd like to convince someone in that argument, perhaps me, for example. But, yes, if the only reason to look something up is to score points, and you don't want to convince anyone of your position, I do not believe those points will get you any frequent flyer miles and I'm sure there are better things to do with the time.

I did not see the discussion on FDR. Was it about the famous and oft-repeated line from him about "your boys will not die in any foreign wars"?

There has been a lot of work done on whether FDR had an actual change of heart or was purposely misleading in his campaign, and I think the consensus among historians is that he pushed the line early and kept to it, because it got big responses from the crowd, but that by the time of the election he had a pretty good idea war was unavoidable. Still, he may have believed it enough to wait for Pearl Harbor before getting in the war, even as England stood alone, and many think this delay was an enormous mistake that may have substantially prolonged the war.

Captain 09-26-2005 12:32 PM

What is all this stuff about buses? Just curious.

Secret_Agent_Man 09-26-2005 12:44 PM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
2. The line in the speech I pulled was typical of Roosevelt's stump campaign rhetoric, all of which is part and parcel of a campaign that he ran that was based on not going to war in Europe.
That is absolutely true -- and was essential to FDR's election in 1940, since much of America at that time was strongly isolationist.

But what was/is your point?

[See Penske, that's one of the problems with your prolix style and use of photshops and hyperbole and babyjesuschrist superstars -- sometimes you actually have a point, and it gets lost.]

S_A_M

P.S. Fortunately for the world -- the Japanese took care of that problem by attacking the U.S.

Bad_Rich_Chic 09-26-2005 12:46 PM

Just compensation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Cut that shit out right fucking now
Because I know where you live.
Your rhymes are for shit,
and your persuasion is poor:
You know where I live
But don't call anymore.

(Sniff.)

Still, since I got bored
And started this mess,
My verses may bug you,
But at least I post less.

Captain 09-26-2005 12:54 PM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
2. The line in the speech I pulled was typical of Roosevelt's stump campaign rhetoric, all of which is part and parcel of a campaign that he ran that was based on not going to war in Europe. For that period this is as common knowledge as the fact that Hitler engaged in a campaign of genocide against the jews of Europe. Or, like the Palestinians, is Ty denying that historical fact too?????

FDR made most of his statements about staying out of the war in the 1940 campaign, though by the time of the election peacetime conscription was already happening; the invasion of Poland happened in 1939, and the invasion of Belgium and France in Spring and Summer of 1940. At that point, everyone knew Hitler was a brutal meglamaniac and that he was anti-semitic (he had enacted race laws, for example), but there was no public knowledge of genocide.

The first State Department memoranda on the possibility of genocide come in 1942, and the first concentration camps were opened in 1943, but it's hard to say that there was common knowledge among the public until 1944.

futbol fan 09-26-2005 01:05 PM

Just compensation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic
Your rhymes are for shit,
and your persuasion is poor:
You know where I live
But don't call anymore.
I'm just afraid this may be how you actually talk now.

By the way, the weedlet and I were watching a bit of Charlotte's Web last night (I had to switch channels from Rome when she walked into the room) and I finally figured out who it is you've always reminded me of. The silky voice, the big vocabulary, the gams . . . salutations!

Oh yeah, forgot where I was: FDR should have driven the buses to Germany to stabilize the bond market or something.

Captain 09-26-2005 01:17 PM

Just compensation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic
Your rhymes are for shit,
and your persuasion is poor:
You know where I live
But don't call anymore.

(Sniff.)

Still, since I got bored
And started this mess,
My verses may bug you,
But at least I post less.
How about a nice ballad?

Hank Chinaski 09-26-2005 01:30 PM

Just compensation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
I'm just afraid this may be how you actually talk now.

By the way, the weedlet and I were watching a bit of Charlotte's Web last night (I had to switch channels from Rome when she walked into the room) and I finally figured out who it is you've always reminded me of. The silky voice, the big vocabulary, the gams . . . salutations!

Oh yeah, forgot where I was: FDR should have driven the buses to Germany to stabilize the bond market or something.
Say if you liked Scotish Breakfast tea, or English Breakfast tea better than Irish breakfast tea- would you still drink Irish breakfast tea for political reasons?

Does the IRA disarming change that at all?

Bad_Rich_Chic 09-26-2005 01:38 PM

Just compensation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Say if you liked Scotish Breakfast tea, or English Breakfast tea better than Irish breakfast tea- would you still drink Irish breakfast tea for political reasons?

Does the IRA disarming change that at all?
I know the answer -
Though tea is drunk lots
by the limeys and micks,
The best is the Scots!

English and Irish blend
Teas you can botch
Up with sugar or milk,
While a Scots blend is Scotch.

Hank Chinaski 09-26-2005 01:43 PM

Just compensation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic
I know the answer -
Though tea is drunk lots
by the limeys and micks,
The best is the Scots!

English and Irish blend
Teas you can botch
Up with sugar or milk,
While a Scots blend is Scotch.
Scotish is my favorite, but for some reason it's much rarer here than the other 2. Most companies sell Irish and English here, but only a few sell Scotish.

Do you have a link to the poem?

Bad_Rich_Chic 09-26-2005 01:50 PM

Just compensation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Scotish is my favorite, but for some reason it's much rarer here than the other 2. Most companies sell Irish and English here, but only a few sell Scotish.

Do you have a link to the poem?
I've no link to the poem,
So I can't help you dear,
But a link to your tea
I can offer you here.

futbol fan 09-26-2005 02:06 PM

Not a bullet, not an ounce.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Say if you liked Scotish Breakfast tea, or English Breakfast tea better than Irish breakfast tea- would you still drink Irish breakfast tea for political reasons?

Does the IRA disarming change that at all?
The Provos drink coffee. That was one of the most significant reasons behind the split in '69.

Secret_Agent_Man 09-26-2005 02:21 PM

Just compensation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic
I've no link to the poem,
So I can't help you dear,
But a link to your tea
I can offer you here.
I thought you had promised
That you would post less.
Your promise as good as
a Clinton's, I guess?

I confess I had penned
several more verses,
but omit them from here
to forestall your curses.

S_A_M

Hank Chinaski 09-26-2005 02:29 PM

Not a bullet, not an ounce.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
The Provos drink coffee. That was one of the most significant reasons behind the split in '69.
brc. would you post a poem to explain what this means?

Sidd Finch 09-26-2005 02:32 PM

Just compensation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
My faith in humanity is restored. There is no worse feeling than having liberals tell you that poor people need to suck it up.

I can identify one worse feeling: When you are conversing with someone who claims to be a die-hard anti-tax free market anti-government Republican, but who thinks we should spend a lot of public money to help poor people, and you say "fuck them, the market will provide," thinking that only an illiterate would miss the irony in that statement, and he misses it.


Quote:

Where are the defenders of the poor and dispossessed? Is Ty the only compassionate Dem on this board? Are the rest of you just Dems because it is cool, but in reality are just greedy capitalists that don't care about people that are more unfortunate than you?

See above. And try to think harder when you read.

Bad_Rich_Chic 09-26-2005 02:41 PM

Just compensation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
I thought you had promised
That you would post less.
Your promise as good as
a Clinton's, I guess?

I confess I had penned
several more verses,
but omit them from here
to forestall your curses.

S_A_M
I can post all I want,
So long as I rhyme.
The problem's that rhyming
Gets easier with time.

But Weedy's concern
Is one I share, too:
When I'm drafting contracts
Now verses sneak through.

The root cause is a fancy
My mind lately took:
To write nasty nursery
Rhymes for a book.

Old Father William,
with his very white head,
will be taking Viagra
to stand in his bed,

And you don't want to know
what Jack Sprat and his wife
are eating in my version -
No, not on your life.

Spanky 09-26-2005 02:46 PM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
That is absolutely true -- and was essential to FDR's election in 1940, since much of America at that time was strongly isolationist.

For days Ty refused to believe "that was absolutely true" and was demanding cites for days. Just like he demanded cites demonstrating that the buses were flooded. He lives in world where everything that reinforces his preconceived notions of the world do not need evidence, and anything that contradicts his preconceived notion of reality takes four primary sources and one has to be from a left wing loon.

Ty@50 09-26-2005 02:50 PM

I do apologize eventually
 
FWIW, once I join AA the archives here prove a big help for completing step 8.

Spanky 09-26-2005 02:50 PM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
Indeed, an excellent standard to facilitate discussion. If we all adopt it, the board will be the better for it.

For example, it is common knowledge, accepted by millions (perhaps even billions around the globe) that "Bush Lied and People Died."

Just accept it (and stop asking for proof) so that we can all move on.

S_A_M
Common knowlede.

1) Are you saying that FDR misleading the public about WWII is not common knowledge and needs cites?

2) Even Ty earlier agreed that Bush probably believed there where no WMDs when he released those statements. I believe lying requires Mens Rea. It is another allegation that we do not have proof of yet you want to accept as fact. Just like Bush intentionally mispredicted the budget numbers.

Again, in your world thing that back your preconceived notions of the world don't require evidence where things that do not require overwhelming evidence.

Spanky 09-26-2005 02:52 PM

Just compensation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
I can identify one worse feeling: When you are conversing with someone who claims to be a die-hard anti-tax free market anti-government Republican, but who thinks we should spend a lot of public money to help poor people, and you say "fuck them, the market will provide," thinking that only an illiterate would miss the irony in that statement, and he misses it.





See above. And try to think harder when you read.
I think my post preceded yours. At the time I posted it I believe Ty was the only one that challenged it. Didn't yours come later (or at least you posted it when I was working on my response).

ltl/fb 09-26-2005 02:53 PM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Again, in your world thing that back your preconceived notions of the world don't require evidence where things that do not require overwhelming evidence.
??? I think you have ben posting here too long, and/or reading posts by Hank and Penske too much. This is so incoherent.

Wait, maybe you just can't do long sentences -- if so, please go back to your normal style of short, declarative sentences only. If you could cut some of the repetitiveness, it'd be nice, but I would rather see repetitiveness than this bizarre incoherence.

Sidd Finch 09-26-2005 03:00 PM

Just compensation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
I think my post preceded yours. At the time I posted it I believe Ty was the only one that challenged it. Didn't yours come later (or at least you posted it when I was working on my response).

My "fuck em, the market will provide" post was at 4:48 pm on Friday. Your "don't you liberals care about poor people" post was at noon on Saturday.

And fuck you for making me go back to check all of this.

Shape Shifter 09-26-2005 03:00 PM

Just compensation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
My faith in humanity is restored. There is no worse feeling than having liberals tell you that poor people need to suck it up. Where are the defenders of the poor and dispossessed? Is Ty the only compassionate Dem on this board? Are the rest of you just Dems because it is cool, but in reality are just greedy capitalists that don't care about people that are more unfortunate than you?
The Katrina evacuees are in my back yard now. I have become a Conservative.

Hank Chinaski 09-26-2005 03:02 PM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
??? I think you have ben posting here too long, and/or reading posts by Hank and Penske too much. This is so incoherent.

Wait, maybe you just can't do long sentences -- if so, please go back to your normal style of short, declarative sentences only. If you could cut some of the repetitiveness, it'd be nice, but I would rather see repetitiveness than this bizarre incoherence.
If you are implying that spank has been influenced or has learned from Penske and me, then, ipsa facto, our posts must be coherent.

Shape Shifter 09-26-2005 03:04 PM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Why would we care what you want? To most everyone else this was common knowledge. It was like you were asking for a cite showing that Thomas Jefferson was the third president. Why would we find such a cite for you; something we all know to be obviously true?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/

ltl/fb 09-26-2005 03:05 PM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
If you are implying that spank has been influenced or has learned from Penske and me, then, ipsa facto, our posts must be coherent.
I think your ipso facto thingy works for "learned from" but one could be influenced even by The Sound and the Fury.

ltl/fb 09-26-2005 03:06 PM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/
Thanks! I don't know the presidents in order. The only one I could name by number is George Washington.

Secret_Agent_Man 09-26-2005 03:06 PM

Delay = RINO
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Common knowlede.

1) Are you saying that FDR misleading the public about WWII is not common knowledge and needs cites?

2) Even Ty earlier agreed that Bush probably believed there where no WMDs when he released those statements. I believe lying requires Mens Rea. It is another allegation that we do not have proof of yet you want to accept as fact. Just like Bush intentionally mispredicted the budget numbers.

Again, in your world thing that back your preconceived notions of the world don't require evidence where things that do not require overwhelming evidence.
On reading your post I
was rather distraught
that you speak of my world
of which you know naught.

You lump us together,
as if you had read
in my post words
never written or said.

You lack real humor,
have no sense of style,
from one post to the next
your words miss by a mile.

I fear that this discourse
may make me seem rude,
but your literal mind
makes you seem like a boob.

S_A_M :poke:

notcasesensitive 09-26-2005 03:09 PM

Just compensation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic
I can post all I want,
So long as I rhyme.
The problem's that rhyming
Gets easier with time.

But Weedy's concern
Is one I share, too:
When I'm drafting contracts
Now verses sneak through.

The root cause is a fancy
My mind lately took:
To write nasty nursery
Rhymes for a book.

Old Father William,
with his very white head,
will be taking Viagra
to stand in his bed,

And you don't want to know
what Jack Sprat and his wife
are eating in my version -
No, not on your life.
Rhyming can be quite fun
And BRC you have a sharp wit
But before this thread is done
I must point out that I invented it.

(well, Shifter's girfriend, Katy, had a part.)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com