![]() |
Re: Those evil-natured robots, they're programmed to destroy us.
Quote:
|
Re: Those evil-natured robots, they're programmed to destroy us.
Quote:
|
Re: Those evil-natured robots, they're programmed to destroy us.
Quote:
|
Re: Those evil-natured robots, they're programmed to destroy us.
Quote:
|
Re: Those evil-natured robots, they're programmed to destroy us.
Quote:
|
Re: Those evil-natured robots, they're programmed to destroy us.
Quote:
|
Re: Mother, mother, mother - there's too many of you crying.
|
Re: Mother, mother, mother - there's too many of you crying.
Quote:
|
Re: Mother, mother, mother - there's too many of you crying.
Quote:
|
Re: Mother, mother, mother - there's too many of you crying.
Quote:
Hillary won the black vote overwhelmingly. She garnered almost 90%. Trump got fucking crushed and it would have been worse if Republicans didn't suppress the black vote in all sorts of ways. If you're going to compare her performance to Obama's numbers, you're a fool. She outperformed Bill Clinton in his reelection bid. She matched Kerry. Gore did a little better. It's a similar story with Hispanics. She got 65% of the Hispanic vote. Gore got 62%. Bill got 73%. In '08, Obama got 67% and against Romney he got 73%. Trump did worse among minorities than anyone other than fucking Dole. Relatively speaking,* minorities aren't to blame for this fucking debacle. https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/poll...-groups-voted/ TM *And I say this because our country is filled with apathetic assholes who can't be bothered to keep assholes from destroying the country. |
Re: Mother, mother, mother - there's too many of you crying.
Quote:
So of course he's going to blame it on the blacks. |
Re: Mother, mother, mother - there's too many of you crying.
Quote:
And even on a percentage basis, Trump bizarrely did better than expected among minorities. http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/09/politi...-white-voters/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/omriben.../#586d415064e4 http://www.phillytrib.com/news/black...d7639dc97.html And contrary to GGG's silly post, of course I'm not blaming any one group. As your quote from my earlier post acknowledges, I cited lower minority voter turnout as one of many factors. And I'm also not discounting voter suppression. Why there was lower minority voter turnout is a different discussion. I also don't think you can call someone a fool for comparing her to Obama in 2012. |
The New Class War
Long, but worth it: https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2...new-class-war/
|
Re: Mother, mother, mother - there's too many of you crying.
Quote:
This is getting tiresome, but I could only have voted against her if I had an obligation to vote for her. From where does this obligation stem? From you, or Hank? Are you suggesting I, or anyone else for that matter, has an obligation to vote for someone? Are you really saying I had a duty to cast my vote for Hillary and I shirked it? That's some pretty crazy ass moral pedestal assumption you've engaged in there, old boy. And I've not deflected, once. Deflection's for those seeking to offload responsibility. I own the fact that I did not vote for HRC. I'm not hiding from it. Nor am I hiding from the fact that if more people who voted as I did voted for her, she could have won. These are objective realities. It is also an objective reality, to people who read English as at least a third language, that I did not vote against her. I took nothing away from her which she otherwise had. Vis a vis HRC, I am a neutral actor. ...And you a man looking to gin up guilt in very much the wrong place. |
Re: Mother, mother, mother - there's too many of you crying.
Quote:
Quote:
The first: "Some 88% of African-American voters supported Clinton, versus 8% for Donald Trump, as of very early Wednesday morning. While that's a large margin, it's not as big as Obama's victory over Mitt Romney in 2012. Obama locked up 93% of the black vote to Romney's 7%. Some 12% of the electorate was African-American this year, compared to 13% four years ago." Uh...shocking? The second: Actually, I'm not sure why you posted a link to the second at all. Is it because of this?: "It is of course true that in some areas, like Pennsylvania, Trump’s gains over Romney were more impressive than Clinton’s loss of Obama voters." Can't be. The third: "The number of Black ballots counted nationally significantly decreased by more than 11 percent when compared to Black voter performance in the previous 2012 presidential election cycle, numbers show." Again, see below when it comes to comparing Hillary's numbers with black voters to Obama's. Also, from the article: "However, many critics, particularly in the Black political community and on social media, have vigorously pushed back against the notion that Black voters are to blame for huge Republican gains this election cycle, instead pointing to a massive wave of white voters — especially in Rust Belt and Southern states — that overwhelmingly broke for Republican nominee Donald Trump in a contentious and racially charged political campaign." In fact, the whole article seems to just compare black voting numbers in 2016 against 2012. Quote:
Quote:
TM *And if you mention Carson or Keyes or anyone in a primary decades ago, go ahead and draft up my completely predictable response yourself. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:58 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com