LawTalkers - It's all about me

Originally posted by Gattigap
So, FBetties, there's a new show in Chi-Town:

Well, duh. Doubtful many guys would see this as material for a first date.

Young lesbians, OTOH, . . . . .

NoMoreSlave

08-18-2004 05:59 PM

So, I got this PM from Slave...

Quote:

Originally posted by NoMoreSlave
I hate to point out the obvious, but Shape Shifter is not an admin so he couldnt consider his behavior admin abuse. I do however think he considers your behaviour addmin abuse and that its a totality of the circumstance, not just your wounded pride busting out the rule book on his ass last night for mocking your prior deletion of his post. That prior deletion was the biggest offense as I am sure he will agree. Howeve,r there have been others. Last night's was mostly just an embarrassment for you. Howev,er your inability to admit you have done wrong ever and your lying about what you have done is where the abuse is. Its like, so George W Bush.

I give the admins until 5pm east coast time to decide what actions they are going to take to redress your many abuses.

Oh, and don't change the subject. It may have worked on bunny but it waint working on us. Thats just a weak ass tactic that makes you look even guiltier.

I meant five pm east coast time Friday.

Aloha Mr. Learned Hand

08-18-2004 05:59 PM

Coltrane's night job

Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
Well, duh. Doubtful many guys would see this as material for a first date.

Actually, in that neighborhood they might. NTTAWWT.

Gattigap

08-18-2004 06:00 PM

Coltrane's night job

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Young lesbians, OTOH, . . . . .

At best, I suspect they'd agree with the Sun-Times reviewer who described it as "surprisingly nonsexual comic burlesque." If they went at all.

Leagl?

ltl/fb

08-18-2004 06:02 PM

This just in.

Quote:

Originally posted by sunnybunny
I'd do the one on the right. The one on the left looks a little flabby.

The disgusting flab displayed by the one on the left is in the waist area, and the waist area of the one on the right is obscured by an arm. So she may be equally flabby.

Just don't want you to get all disappointed or anything.

Alex_de_Large

08-18-2004 06:10 PM

So, I got this PM from Slave...

Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Hey, AdL could use your help on the gadgets board. Please feel free to spend some time there.

Yeah, but only if he's gas-powered and 24" wide.

ltl/fb

08-18-2004 06:16 PM

So, I got this PM from Slave...

Quote:

Originally posted by Alex_de_Large
Yeah, but only if he's gas-powered and 24" wide.

He calls himself a "thread" but he's wider than 24". False advertising, if you ask me.

This really belongs on the other thread, but the smaller dryer I did the link to at Sears was electric. I didn't see any narrow ones that are gas.

ThurgreedMarshall

08-18-2004 06:16 PM

Official Warning

Quote:

Originally posted by NoMoreSlave
Thanks but we already have a Napoleon. My sources say tht you really only have the power to edit not the allmight delete function. THus, SS did not ask you bc you dont live high enough on the food chain. YOu are a fox to the hairless yet spineless lion that is the Slave. Yet we still do not have anyone admitting that they deleted the post. Is there something in the Lawtalkers rule book I can refer to on this matter?

Yez. Please check Article IX, Section 9.5(b)(i)(DD) Shut the Fuck Up.

And I believed the term "idiot" is already baked into that provision.

TM

SlaveNoMore

08-18-2004 06:18 PM

So, I got this PM from Slave...

Quote:

Shape Shifter
TOS violation my ass. As Ty pointed out, posts actually altered are tagged at the bottom of the post. Our posts were satire directed at you and are not "impersonations" of admins any more than my knock knock joke example. You didn't like being the target of the satire and lack the wit or inclination to stand up for yourself, so you found the closest TOS violation you could find and hid behind your admin shield. Then you try to shift the subject to user donations. Despicable.

1) Ty is factually incorrect on this point. Deleted content could appear exactly as you posted.

2) As you are clearly aware, both of your posts were nothing less than a deliberate attempt to further confuse the LT community as to the Lawtalkers deletion policy. Talk about despicable.

Tyrone Slothrop

08-18-2004 06:19 PM

Here's an article on the whole, brutal Washingtonienne saga, in detail that may violate the Geneva convention. Safe for work, but may make your head hurt.

NotFromHere

08-18-2004 06:19 PM

So, I got this PM from Slave...

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
He calls himself a "thread" but he's wider than 24". False advertising, if you ask me.

This really belongs on the other thread, but the smaller dryer I did the link to at Sears was electric. I didn't see any narrow ones that are gas.

I'm with Bilmore on this one. Gas dryers make me nervous. I don't think I'd want a flame next to my clothes and all that lint.

bold_n_brazen

08-18-2004 06:21 PM

beach volleyball sexploitation controversy

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop

A team of bikini-clad dancers from the Canary Islands is entertaining fans but offending some female beach volleyball players. Wearing bright orange outfits during the day and shiny silver ones at night, the sun- bronzed dancers race onto the sand between points and matches, gyrating to blaring techno-pop. At least one women's team isn't amused. "It's kind of disrespectful to the female players," said Australia's Nicole Sanderson. "I'm sure the male spectators love it, but I find it a little bit offensive." Kerri Pottharst, Sanderson's partner, said mixing in some male dancers would have made it OK. "Equality, equality!" she said. The fans, however, seem satisfied. Norman Brown brought his three sons to the Olympics from England. They came to the beach Tuesday after watching Britain play field hockey. When they spotted the dancers, they quickly grabbed four front-row seats. "We'll come again," Brown said as he videotaped them. Yvonne Anderson, of Edinburgh, Scotland, said the team adds to the beach-party atmosphere, but she also would have liked to see some male dancers. "It's all just a bit of fun," she said.

From the SF Chronicle

Very controversial. OTOH, if y'all would rather keep talking about the administration of the board, I could just take this sort of thing over to the PB.

Can you clarify for me, as I am too lazy to read the article? Is this team of bikini-clad dancers from the Canary Islands" also the beach volleyball team from the Canary Islands? Or just a rogue bunch of chicks dancing in bikinis?

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)

08-18-2004 06:23 PM

beach volleyball sexploitation controversy

Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
Or just a rogue bunch of chicks dancing in bikinis?

Rogue chicks (that is so hot).

Washington Post article, including brief interview with rogue chick

NoMoreSlave

08-18-2004 06:24 PM

Welcome Newest Member

Poker Prince. I cannot wait to see what you offer to the board. Don't forget to vote!

bilmore

08-18-2004 06:26 PM

So, I got this PM from Slave...

Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
I'm with Bilmore on this one. Gas dryers make me nervous. I don't think I'd want a flame next to my clothes and all that lint.

Huh?

All my dryers are gas.

I've never posted about dryers.

I'm so confused.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:37 PM.

Page 299 of 343

299

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page