LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Politics As Usual (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=580)

bilmore 05-19-2004 05:53 PM

Intelligenter than you!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Shit, we cityfolk should up and leave anti-Atlas Shrugged-style and let you boonies roll around in your own shit!
It's heartening to see that, aside from our differences, we do share common goals.

Not Me 05-19-2004 05:54 PM

a new thread!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I agree. I recommend that the slur be shortened to "Slamis" to sound more slurlike. It's also easier to spell than "camel schtuppers."
POTD

Did you just call me Coltrane? 05-19-2004 05:57 PM

Intelligenter than you!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I live in the second wealthiest county in the country, and one of the best educated. It went for Bush pretty strong. my town was 70% for Gore though.
But your arrogence is typical, and one of the reasons why your party is doomed. Save your campaign buttons; they'll be worth lquite a bit in 20 years. "Daddy what's a Democrat?"
Christ. It wasn't a real rant. I was expecting a mirror image comeback on democrats. Sheesh. You just took the fun out of it.

Hank Chinaski 05-19-2004 05:58 PM

Intelligenter than you!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Christ. It wasn't a real rant. I was expecting a mirror image comeback on democrats. Sheesh. You just took the fun out of it.
I have children. Protecting this country from your likes isn't always fun. It is however, something I owe my kids.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 05-19-2004 05:59 PM

Intelligenter than you!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I have children. Protecting this country from your likes isn't always fun. It is however, something I owe my kids.
True. I could kick your kids' asses.

All over Gross Pointe (oops couldn't be based on your stats).

Or Birmingham.


ltl/fb 05-19-2004 06:03 PM

Intelligenter than you!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I live in the second wealthiest county in the country, and one of the best educated. It went for Bush pretty strong. my town was 70% for Gore though.
But your arrogence is typical, and one of the reasons why your party is doomed. Save your campaign buttons; they'll be worth lquite a bit in 20 years. "Daddy what's a Democrat?"
Maybe your town skews the overall education level of the county upwards. Or do you live in the town that houses the servants of the rest of the people in your county?

Not Me 05-19-2004 06:07 PM

Intelligenter than you!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Exactly. Most of what gore won was the inner cities, where IQ is on average low, either because of cultural bias in the test, or because you guys have fucked up on social policy. the blue/red imbalance is bad at a state level- look at it on county level and you'll see just how isolated you really are.
Or because IQ tests aren't a good measure of intelligence. Or because, well, because there are racial disparities in intelligence levels.

Intelligence is something that is profoundly affected by prenatal/perinatal and early childhood conditions, as well as nutrional status in the early years of life. Babies born to mothers who don't get good prenatal care on average score lower on IQ tests. I doubt this is a cultural bias, but rather a very real organic phenomena - these people's brains aren't as good as they could have been if their mother had gotten better prenatal care. I think it is fair to say that blacks don't get the same quality and quantity of prenatal care as whites on average in this society.

Same is true of the perinatal/infancy period, in particular, if the baby is breast fed. Fewer blacks breast feed than whites.

Same is true of the nutritional status in the early years of life. On average, malnutrition in the US is more prevalent in black children than in white children in the US.

So there are legitimate medical explanations for why it could be that it isn't cultural bias that causes the racial disparity in IQ test scores. It could be that on average, blacks aren't as intelligent as whites in the US because of environmental factors that affect their developing brains in utero and early in life. But no one is allowed to discuss that without being called a racist in this society.

The head start programs and other interventions can only help a person reach their biologically determined maximum intelligence. If their brain developed under sub-optimal environmental conditions in utero or throughout the early years of life, their maximum achievable intelligence will be reduced from what it would have been had their environmental conditions been optimal. Once that occurs, it cannot be fixed by education or otherwise.

Hank Chinaski 05-19-2004 06:07 PM

Intelligenter than you!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
True. I could kick your kids' asses.

All over Gross Pointe (oops couldn't be based on your stats).

Or Birmingham.
Sorry. birmingham went for bush (I think). Grosse Pointe is Wayne County.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 05-19-2004 06:09 PM

Intelligenter than you!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Sorry. birmingham went for bush (I think). Grosse Pointe is Wayne County.
No Michigan counties are in the Top 10:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...-wyoming_x.htm

Tyrone Slothrop 05-19-2004 06:11 PM

Intelligenter than you!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
Or because IQ tests aren't a good measure of intelligence. Or because, well, because there are racial disparities in intelligence levels.

Intelligence is something that is profoundly affected by prenatal and perinatal conditions, as well as nutrional status in the early years of life. Babies born to mothers who don't get good prenatal care on average score lower on IQ tests. I doubt this is a cultural bias, but rather a very real organic phenomena - these people's brains aren't as good as they could have been if their mother had gotten better prenatal care. I think it is fair to say that blacks don't get the same quality and quantity of prenatal care as whites on average in this society.

Same is true of the perinatal/infancy period, in particular, if the baby is breast fed. Fewer blacks breast feed than whites.

Same is true of the nutritional status in the early years of life. On average, malnutrition in the US is more prevalent in black children than in white children in the US.

So there are legitimate medical explanations for why it could be that it isn't cultural bias that causes the racial disparity in IQ test scores. It could be that on average, blacks aren't as intelligent as whites because of environmental factors that affect their developing brains in utero and early in life. But no one is allowed to discuss that without being called a racist in this society.
The idea that there is something called intelligence that can be measured in this way is a fallacy of reification.

Tyrone Slothrop 05-19-2004 06:12 PM

Andrew Sullivan, about to jump ship
 
  • The Republican party is now committed to chronic fiscal irresponsibility, the micro-managing of people's private lives, the subjugation of political to religious discourse, and the politicization of the Constitution. In so many ways, it is an insult to the word "conservative."

cite

Did you just call me Coltrane? 05-19-2004 06:13 PM

Intelligenter than you!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Sorry. birmingham went for bush (I think). Grosse Pointe is Wayne County.
I give up. My final answer is:

Chocolate babies?

sgtclub 05-19-2004 06:20 PM

Andrew Sullivan, about to jump ship
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
  • The Republican party is now committed to chronic fiscal irresponsibility, the micro-managing of people's private lives, the subjugation of political to religious discourse, and the politicization of the Constitution. In so many ways, it is an insult to the word "conservative."

cite
Agreed, and I still won't vote Democratic. What does that say . . .

Tyrone Slothrop 05-19-2004 06:21 PM

Andrew Sullivan, about to jump ship
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
Agreed, and I still won't vote Democratic. What does that say . . .
I think we already covered the IQ subject for the day.

Not Me 05-19-2004 06:22 PM

Intelligenter than you!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
The idea that there is something called intelligence that can be measured in this way is a fallacy of reification.
I agree with you if what you are saying is that IQ tests aren't a great way to measure the full spectrum of human intelligence. They don't measure creative intelligence at all, which IMO is the highest form of intelligence.

But the tests do measure some forms of intelligence and there are racial disparaties in the test scores. I doubt that culture bias can account for all of the disparities. There is plenty of reasearch to back up the claim that environmental conditions in utero and early in life when a person's brain is developing have a profound effect on the person's ability to think. And there is plenty of epidemological and social research to back up the claim that on average, blacks in the US are subject to less optimal conditions during the years when their brains are developing. Everything from nutritional status of their mothers during pregnancy to prenatal care to breast feeding to malnutrition in early childhood to delivering the proper stimuli to an infant to help their brain to develop can affect the person's maximum achievable intelligence level. On average, in the US, the conditions udner which black children develop are less optimal than the conditions under which white children develop.

This is not a function of race, but rather a function of economics. Regardless, the result is a very real effect on the brain that reduces the maximum achievable intelligence.

sgtclub 05-19-2004 06:22 PM

No Release of Oil Reserves
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Not really. I can't believe that releasing oil would have any effect on prices, and he would simply be attacked on some other equally silly ground. But I did get a chuckle out of your attempt to paint Bush's leadership on this issue as a profile in courage.
Clinton opened the reserves in 2000 and it had a short term effect of lower prices from $37 to $31 or so per, so it's likely to have a similar effect in 2004.

sgtclub 05-19-2004 06:24 PM

Andrew Sullivan, about to jump ship
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I think we already covered the IQ subject for the day.
good one

baltassoc 05-19-2004 06:26 PM

No Release of Oil Reserves
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
I agree with it. The purpose of the reserve is not to artifically lower oil prices.
...
It is admirable of Bush to be constrained on this. He could help himself in the election if he released them.
Some things are more important than an election to a boy from West Texas.

It's also not a forgone conclusion that it would be to his advantage. The release of reserves would at provide partial but not complete relief, and it is almost universally true that no matter what people pay for gas, they think it is too much.

On the other hand, by keeping crude prices up, more dollars are going directly into hands that are much more likely to donate to Bush than Kerry, from oil executives to roughnecks.

Not Me 05-19-2004 06:31 PM

Andrew Sullivan, about to jump ship
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I think we already covered the IQ subject for the day.
Yes, we did. The Reps have higher IQs on average than the Dems. This is a function of economics, but still, a truth.

On another topic, membership in organized religion is negatively correlated with IQ, too. The higher your IQ, the less likely you are to identify yourself as belonging to a religion.

Not Me 05-19-2004 06:35 PM

No Release of Oil Reserves
 
Quote:

Originally posted by baltassoc
It's also not a forgone conclusion that it would be to his advantage. The release of reserves would at provide partial but not complete relief, and it is almost universally true that no matter what people pay for gas, they think it is too much.
I am happy the prices are high. We need to discourage people from using so much gasoline in this country.

Tyrone Slothrop 05-19-2004 06:35 PM

No Release of Oil Reserves
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
Clinton opened the reserves in 2000 and it had a short term effect of lower prices from $37 to $31 or so per, so it's likely to have a similar effect in 2004.
Given the volume of oil in the world market and the volume in the strategic reserve, I find those numbers utterly implausible. Which is to say, cite please.

Tyrone Slothrop 05-19-2004 06:36 PM

Andrew Sullivan, about to jump ship
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
Yes, we did. The Reps have higher IQs on average than the Dems. This is a function of economics, but still, a truth.

On another topic, membership in organized religion is negatively correlated with IQ, too. The higher your IQ, the less likely you are to identify yourself as belonging to a religion.
Since we're making up IQ facts, let me point out that literal people have notoriously low IQs.

Not Me 05-19-2004 06:37 PM

Hunts vs. Heinz
 
So ever since JFK became the Dem nominee, I have stopped buying Heinz products. I now buy Hunt's ketchup, but I find that I don't like it as much as the Heinz. Hunt's tastes sweeter to me and Heinz has more of an acidic bite to it.

If anyone knows of a non-Heinz ketchup that is not as sweet as Hunt's please post the info.

TIA!!

Not Me 05-19-2004 06:39 PM

No Release of Oil Reserves
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Given the volume of oil in the world market and the volume in the strategic reserve, I find those numbers utterly implausible. Which is to say, cite please.
IF you watched Fox news, you wouldn't need him to provide you with a cite.

baltassoc 05-19-2004 06:41 PM

Andrew Sullivan, about to jump ship
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
Yes, we did. The Reps have higher IQs on average than the Dems. This is a function of economics, but still, a truth.

On another topic, membership in organized religion is negatively correlated with IQ, too. The higher your IQ, the less likely you are to identify yourself as belonging to a religion.
I get the economic correlation, and could see that maybe among those people who are drawn to one party or another, Republicans might do better on the IQ thing.

But doesn't your second statement, with which I completely agree and which I suspect is well documented, contradict your first? I mean, not everybody is a Republican because they are rich. Some are just wingnuts.

Not Me 05-19-2004 06:43 PM

Andrew Sullivan, about to jump ship
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Since we're making up IQ facts, let me point out that literal people have notoriously low IQs.
What about literal socks?

Not Me 05-19-2004 06:49 PM

Andrew Sullivan, about to jump ship
 
Quote:

Originally posted by baltassoc
I get the economic correlation, and could see that maybe among those people who are drawn to one party or another, Republicans might do better on the IQ thing.

But doesn't your second statement, with which I completely agree and which I suspect is well documented, contradict your first? I mean, not everybody is a Republican because they are rich. Some are just wingnuts.
It really is just a matter of an average. Truth be told, a more useful number to look at is the median, not the average. The standard deviation would of course be important, too.

The mode would be useful to look at, too.

Atticus Grinch 05-19-2004 06:50 PM

Intelligenter than you!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
I give up. My final answer is:

Chocolate babies?
"I can't believe I paid $20 for this piece of meat."

"Chateaubriand?"

sgtclub 05-19-2004 06:54 PM

No Release of Oil Reserves
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Given the volume of oil in the world market and the volume in the strategic reserve, I find those numbers utterly implausible. Which is to say, cite please.
Quote:

TAYLOR: It's only been used a couple of times, most recently in 2000 by President Clinton. He allowed companies to borrow oil from the reserve with promised to pay that oil back, either in kind or in price somewhere down the road to alleviate the price spike that we saw in 2000.

That reduced price nearly overnight, from about $37 a barrel down to about $31 a barrel. So it had a very quick impact, but then prices started creeping back up again in short order. And so there's some debate about how much that relief did for the world market.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120376,00.html

SlaveNoMore 05-19-2004 06:54 PM

Andrew Sullivan, about to jump ship
 
Quote:

Tyrone Slothrop
  • The Republican party is now committed to chronic fiscal irresponsibility, the micro-managing of people's private lives, the subjugation of political to religious discourse, and the politicization of the Constitution.

cite
Let's see. Across the bench we have:

Higher Taxes
Affirmative Action
Overly-Broad construction of the First Amendment
Overly-restrictive reading of the Second Amendment.

Which party was he talking about again?

Tyrone Slothrop 05-19-2004 06:59 PM

No Release of Oil Reserves
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120376,00.html
Taylor is unspecific about timing, so it's a little hard to tell how long that $31 price held. This suggests to me that this government action only works if it's unanticipated by the market, because there is some short term inelasticity of supply, but that this effect doesn't last very long at all. Which is to say it really wouldn't do much good, as Taylor seems to acknowledge.

Not Me 05-19-2004 07:00 PM

Welcome to the Big Tent
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
  • The Republican party is now committed to chronic fiscal irresponsibility, the micro-managing of people's private lives, the subjugation of political to religious discourse, and the politicization of the Constitution. In so many ways, it is an insult to the word "conservative."

cite
The Rep party is not conservative in the Barry Goldwater sense of the word anymore. The Rep party on whole is right of center but not right wing.

There are right wing elements within the party, but it is a diverse party with a common goal - less taxation.

It is a big tent, you know.

Shape Shifter 05-19-2004 07:01 PM

No Release of Oil Reserves
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120376,00.html
Your sources suck.

Atticus Grinch 05-19-2004 07:03 PM

Andrew Sullivan, about to jump ship
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Overly-Broad construction of the First Amendment
So which one are you against, speech or religion? On second thought, nevermind.

I'll note the Dems are the party of peyote sacraments and medical marijuana, which should help single-issue voters on bedshitting to decide.

Tyrone Slothrop 05-19-2004 07:05 PM

Andrew Sullivan, about to jump ship
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Higher Taxes
I understand this contradicts your dogma (or is that your culture?), but someone is going to have to pay for the money Bush is spending. If not now, later with interest. He's for taxing our kids.

Quote:

Affirmative Action
Bzzzt. Non-responsive. Besides, didn't Bush try to finesse the UM case in the Supreme Court?

Quote:

Overly-Broad construction of the First Amendment
Yeah, whatever. If you think the wingnuts should be teaching creation science in the public schools, you should move to the boondocks for the quality of education you'll find there.

Quote:

Overly-restrictive reading of the Second Amendment.
Sullivan was talking about all the attempts to amend the Constitution. You see, Bush wants to enshrine discrimination against Sullivan and other gays in the Constitution. I know you personally don't like this, so I can understand why you would change the subject.

And sooner or later we'll have the Second Amendment debate on this board and I'll kick your ass. I like guns as much as the next guy, but you guys just try to ignore the "well-regulated militia" part.

Tyrone Slothrop 05-19-2004 07:06 PM

Welcome to the Big Tent
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
There are right wing elements within the party, but it is a diverse party with a common goal - less taxation.
The one thing that unites Republicans is the thought that we can spend money today and have our kids pay for it tomorrow. Sooner or later, the grownups will put a halt to these sorts of tax cuts without concomitant cuts in spending, and then the party will be over.

Not Me 05-19-2004 07:08 PM

No Release of Oil Reserves
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Your sources suck.
http://www.freep.com/news/politics/gas19_20040519.htm
  • The reserve was most recently tapped in 2000, when the Clinton administration put 30 million barrels of oil onto the market. Oil prices dropped to $30 a barrel, down from $37 a barrel, but rebounded within days to $36 per barrel.

Not Me 05-19-2004 07:12 PM

Welcome to the Big Tent
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
The one thing that unites Republicans is the thought that we can spend money today and have our kids pay for it tomorrow. Sooner or later, the grownups will put a halt to these sorts of tax cuts without concomitant cuts in spending, and then the party will be over.
Cutting taxes improves the economy which leads to a larger tax base which leads to higher revenues.

For the record, though, I don't have kids and never will. In fact, I hate kids and laugh at the idea that your kids will be paying for my benefits. Muaahahahaha!

Tyrone Slothrop 05-19-2004 07:13 PM

No Release of Oil Reserves
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
http://www.freep.com/news/politics/gas19_20040519.htm
  • The reserve was most recently tapped in 2000, when the Clinton administration put 30 million barrels of oil onto the market. Oil prices dropped to $30 a barrel, down from $37 a barrel, but rebounded within days to $36 per barrel.

Do you guys think prices at the pump would fall in this situation? Did it happen in 2000? If not, consumers aren't seeing any benefit, and middlemen are enriched. Retail gas prices are slow to drop.

Not Me 05-19-2004 07:13 PM

Bravo Loyal Subjects!!!!
 
I would like to commend those who participated in the discussion on the PB today. Job well done.

That is all. You are dismissed.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com