LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Towards A Virtual Williamsburg! (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=868)

Hank Chinaski 11-06-2013 04:30 PM

Re: Interesting Article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy (Post 484157)
Back when I was at Biglaw and on the hiring committee, I used to pretty much advocate for every minority who had a chance, on the theory that they'd had to work twice as hard for many of their achievements.

maybe, but every so often you might hire a black attorney that spends all damn day surfing the internet looking for pictures of nearly naked woman, and until he finds 20 good ones.

ThurgreedMarshall 11-06-2013 05:04 PM

Top 20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 484164)
maybe, but every so often you might hire a black attorney that spends all damn day surfing the internet looking for pictures of nearly naked woman, and until he finds 20 good ones.

Hire that motherfucker yesterday.

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=2115

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=2116

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=2117

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=2118

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 11-06-2013 05:32 PM

Related?
 
Somehow I feel like this is tangentially related to our discussion of private schools the other day.

http://truthseekerdaily.com/2013/10/...-happens-next/

TM

dtb 11-06-2013 06:55 PM

Re: Interesting Article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 484093)
But an American with no racial baggage at all? That's a pretty rare person right there.

You said it, sister. (Uh... you know what I mean.) Actually, I would venture to say that there is no such person. And, loathe as I am to side with Mr. Cranky-Pants, he's absolutely got the facts on his side.

Furthermore, not only is it inaccurate to minimize the influence and effect of racism, it makes the problem more pernicious and intractable. It is far more productive to acknowledge one's own latent racism, even unintentional racism, than it is to proclaim it's not there. Only by noticing and acknowledging it can it be addressed. Sort of like "admitting you have a problem is the first step".

That is not to say that everyone is a rabid, ignorant racist like that football player (though I know such people exist, it's still jarring to hear that kind of ugliness; same thing with Kramer -- forget his real name now...). It's so important to acknowledge one's micro-aggressions or internal reactions to people different from one's self, especially black people (if they are different from one's self), because of the unfortunate place black people had in what is this country's most shameful institution. The end of legal slavery in this country didn't happen that long ago, and its deeply ingrained effects cannot be eradicated in a few generations. (I am ONE degree -- if I'm counting correctly -- from a man born into slavery; a law school professor of mine in his childhood knew a man who had been born into slavery. It wasn't that long ago.)

Anyway, it advances the ball to acknowledge that one is, e.g., nervous when encountering a group of urban yooots (ha) with their waistbands barely above their knees and crosses the street to avoid them. OK, that doesn't make you Kramer, but at least it heightens your awareness to your own reactions and forces you to think about what is making you nervous.

I do, however, take issue with one thing Mr. Cranky-Pants said. I'm not sure I would blame anyone who could move out of an area where there are daily shootings, drug violence, etc. who availed himself of that opportunity. That doesn't seem to me to be at all related to racism, but a matter of simple self-preservation. You don't need to be looking to get away from "those people" (Puerto Ricans, Domincans, Somalis, Muslims, whatever) to rationally decide that your family might be safer in a place that didn't experience daily gunplay in the building's courtyard. But maybe I misunderstood.

dtb 11-06-2013 07:06 PM

Re: Interesting Article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sidd Finch (Post 484113)
It's very interesting seeing that with kids. My experience is that kids notice skin color, not as "race" but as a feature, on a par with hair color.

But you will end up having to discuss it, and you should. You don't live in a bubble. Your kids will hear things -- they'll hear racist comments, they'll hear history, they'll hear the world around them -- and they should have a framework to understand it.

One of my proudest parenting moments was when I realized that one of my son's best friends at school is black. I wasn't proud because the kid was black, but because I didn't know he was until I saw him at a school function. My son would talk about him, and in response to questions I'd ask, like I do about all the kids he mentions (is he a boarder? where is he from? what classes do you share? does he play the same sports as you? etc., etc.), not once did my son mention that the kid is black.

That said, I don't know how much of that is parenting, and how much is the school environment, but it was eye-opening, and it felt like progress that the description of the friend's salient characteristics did not include "he's black".

Tyrone Slothrop 11-06-2013 07:09 PM

Re: Interesting Article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 484137)
I heard something similar once who said that, as someone born Catholic, I should do soul searching regarding the church's compliance in the Holocaust.

Relatedly, this is the best thing I've read in a while.

Tyrone Slothrop 11-06-2013 07:21 PM

Re: Interesting Article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 484148)
In many instances, people are not neglecting to work with minorities because they feel the minority person is inferior, or because they feel discomfort around them. They are not even focusing on the minorities. They are focusing, as people tend to, on those most like them, and choosing to work with those people, with whom they easily bond.

In other words, they're treating them differently because of the color of their skin. How is that not racism? I don't get it.

Tyrone Slothrop 11-06-2013 07:26 PM

Re: Interesting Article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 484150)
Apropos of nothing, Picabo Street no longer has the dumbest name in the sports. Hell, she no longer has the dumbest name of professional-skiers-cum-models.

Meet Sierra Quitiquit.

They both have some serious competition in the skier category.

Atticus Grinch 11-06-2013 08:16 PM

Re: Interesting Article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 484173)

Great. Now I want to go home and somehow punch the humanity out of myself.

Adder 11-06-2013 09:20 PM

Re: Interesting Article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 484176)
Great. Now I want to go home and somehow punch the humanity out of myself.

It's already gone. Already gone.

sebastian_dangerfield 11-07-2013 08:48 AM

Re: Interesting Article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 484173)

No hint of hyperbole, that is one of the most disturbing things I've read in a long time.

Plotzensee is an ugly, monstrous historical footnote. I've found myself reading articles about it in the past and almost always wishing afterward that I hadn't clicked the link.

ThurgreedMarshall 11-07-2013 09:00 AM

Re: Interesting Article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dtb (Post 484171)
Mr. Cranky-Pants

Um, that's psycho to you. You just made the list. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OnpkDWbeJs

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtb (Post 484171)
I do, however, take issue with one thing Mr. Cranky-Pants said. I'm not sure I would blame anyone who could move out of an area where there are daily shootings, drug violence, etc. who availed himself of that opportunity. That doesn't seem to me to be at all related to racism, but a matter of simple self-preservation. You don't need to be looking to get away from "those people" (Puerto Ricans, Domincans, Somalis, Muslims, whatever) to rationally decide that your family might be safer in a place that didn't experience daily gunplay in the building's courtyard. But maybe I misunderstood.

Even though you're pissed at me for being a dick (understandable), it's okay to address me directly. This level of passive aggression when we're not even in the same room seems silly.

I don't think I ever said people shouldn't move their families out of harm's way. But the options aren't just hard core ghetto and gated community. And I said that any one person's decision to remove their child from a crappy school is surely justified and difficult to criticize. But the collective result of those actions decimate schools and communities. And for me, if my child isn't in a school that is the top of the tops, I would rather expend the energy to supplement her education and/or strengthen the school then pull her out and place her with a bunch of other rich, privileged kids who are isolated, and as a result, don't really know what the real world looks like.

I think the wealthier we become the more isolated we try to be to protect our awesome stuff from all the awful people we just know want to take it. With that come the decisions to provide our children with the best. And we all believe "exclusivity" equates with "best." After all, if anyone can get in, how good could it be?

But, look. I'm a city boy. I think I would murder everyone around me if I lived in a rich suburb. I can't stand those people, I don't get why anyone with fewer than three children needs more than 2,000 square feet (which is a lot of fucking space), and it seems weird to me for kids to have to be driven miles in order to play with other kids (let alone other kids of different socioeconomic backgrounds).

TM

sebastian_dangerfield 11-07-2013 09:09 AM

Re: The Jews have all the money, and the whites have all the power.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Not Bob (Post 484161)
Sebby, you know I love you like that guy from undergrad who always picked up enough Slim Jims (and who remembered to grab Seagrams Golden Wine Coolers for the lay-dees) when he went on a beer run, but you are wrong in too many ways to count.

I don't doubt your personal views on this, but if you think that racism isn't the culprit for the exclusionary policies (like the example Hank just gave), you are willfully blind. If you really, upon actually thinking about it, feel that way, I'd suggest that you google the phrase "white privilege."

I know that I am, like the song says, a little bit (at least) racist. I don't like it, but it's there. (While I'm at it, you all should know that I'm also a bit sexist and have -isms as to certain religions and national origins. I'm less of a homophobe than I used to be, but still am squeamish, and I think that the Warren Commission was mostly right.) I can flat out tell you that every firm I've been with had an overwhelming number of partners young and old with explicit or thinly veiled race and gender biases.

Jesus Christ... I don't, and haven't, said racism is not a cause of exclusion. I have acknowledged it is (who couldn't?), but suggested that there are other causes as well, a big one being people's native inclination to herd with members of the "same tribe."

You've seen it. I know you have. It's the inside handshake thing. "Hey, you went to a school like me. Hey, you probably had to sit through church like me. Hey... We probably enjoy the same shit." It's lazy, superficial branding that unfortunately segregates a lot of people into factions.

But yes - there is racism also. People exclude people based on racism (I assume three admissions of this in one post are adequate to cause people to stop arguing past me). Oh, hell-- Here's a fourth:

I hereby acknowledge racism often plays a part in people being excluded in work and social situations, and that it remains a significant problem today.

Now, if one person acknowledge that the tribalism/laziness I note also plays a part, we'll have had an honest back and forth. But I very much doubt that will happen. The narrative shall be, "In all instances in which a minority is excluded, it is irrefutably racism." And we can never trifle with conventional wisdom, even only with an argument of degree. It is the only thing more infallible than the Pope.

sebastian_dangerfield 11-07-2013 09:14 AM

Re: Interesting Article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dtb (Post 484172)
One of my proudest parenting moments was when I realized that one of my son's best friends at school is black. I wasn't proud because the kid was black, but because I didn't know he was until I saw him at a school function. My son would talk about him, and in response to questions I'd ask, like I do about all the kids he mentions (is he a boarder? where is he from? what classes do you share? does he play the same sports as you? etc., etc.), not once did my son mention that the kid is black.

That said, I don't know how much of that is parenting, and how much is the school environment, but it was eye-opening, and it felt like progress that the description of the friend's salient characteristics did not include "he's black".

I'm not proud of my kid for the same behavior. I expect it. We don't describe people lazily by saying "He's the black guy," and unsurprisingly neither does our child.

dtb 11-07-2013 09:20 AM

Re: Interesting Article
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 484179)

Even though you're pissed at me for being a dick (understandable), it's okay to address me directly. This level of passivn when we're not even in the same room seems silly.
TM

I agree with you. I just happened to be responding to someone who wasn't you, so I referred to you then in the third person.

Do you think it is at all narrow minded to pre-judge people on the basis of their economic status?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com