|  | 
| 
 Re: Interesting Article Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Top 20 Quote: 
 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=2115 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=2116 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=2117 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=2118 TM | 
| 
 Related? Somehow I feel like this is tangentially related to our discussion of private schools the other day. http://truthseekerdaily.com/2013/10/...-happens-next/ TM | 
| 
 Re: Interesting Article Quote: 
 Furthermore, not only is it inaccurate to minimize the influence and effect of racism, it makes the problem more pernicious and intractable. It is far more productive to acknowledge one's own latent racism, even unintentional racism, than it is to proclaim it's not there. Only by noticing and acknowledging it can it be addressed. Sort of like "admitting you have a problem is the first step". That is not to say that everyone is a rabid, ignorant racist like that football player (though I know such people exist, it's still jarring to hear that kind of ugliness; same thing with Kramer -- forget his real name now...). It's so important to acknowledge one's micro-aggressions or internal reactions to people different from one's self, especially black people (if they are different from one's self), because of the unfortunate place black people had in what is this country's most shameful institution. The end of legal slavery in this country didn't happen that long ago, and its deeply ingrained effects cannot be eradicated in a few generations. (I am ONE degree -- if I'm counting correctly -- from a man born into slavery; a law school professor of mine in his childhood knew a man who had been born into slavery. It wasn't that long ago.) Anyway, it advances the ball to acknowledge that one is, e.g., nervous when encountering a group of urban yooots (ha) with their waistbands barely above their knees and crosses the street to avoid them. OK, that doesn't make you Kramer, but at least it heightens your awareness to your own reactions and forces you to think about what is making you nervous. I do, however, take issue with one thing Mr. Cranky-Pants said. I'm not sure I would blame anyone who could move out of an area where there are daily shootings, drug violence, etc. who availed himself of that opportunity. That doesn't seem to me to be at all related to racism, but a matter of simple self-preservation. You don't need to be looking to get away from "those people" (Puerto Ricans, Domincans, Somalis, Muslims, whatever) to rationally decide that your family might be safer in a place that didn't experience daily gunplay in the building's courtyard. But maybe I misunderstood. | 
| 
 Re: Interesting Article Quote: 
 That said, I don't know how much of that is parenting, and how much is the school environment, but it was eye-opening, and it felt like progress that the description of the friend's salient characteristics did not include "he's black". | 
| 
 Re: Interesting Article Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Re: Interesting Article Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Re: Interesting Article Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Re: Interesting Article Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Re: Interesting Article Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Re: Interesting Article Quote: 
 Plotzensee is an ugly, monstrous historical footnote. I've found myself reading articles about it in the past and almost always wishing afterward that I hadn't clicked the link. | 
| 
 Re: Interesting Article Quote: 
 Quote: 
 I don't think I ever said people shouldn't move their families out of harm's way. But the options aren't just hard core ghetto and gated community. And I said that any one person's decision to remove their child from a crappy school is surely justified and difficult to criticize. But the collective result of those actions decimate schools and communities. And for me, if my child isn't in a school that is the top of the tops, I would rather expend the energy to supplement her education and/or strengthen the school then pull her out and place her with a bunch of other rich, privileged kids who are isolated, and as a result, don't really know what the real world looks like. I think the wealthier we become the more isolated we try to be to protect our awesome stuff from all the awful people we just know want to take it. With that come the decisions to provide our children with the best. And we all believe "exclusivity" equates with "best." After all, if anyone can get in, how good could it be? But, look. I'm a city boy. I think I would murder everyone around me if I lived in a rich suburb. I can't stand those people, I don't get why anyone with fewer than three children needs more than 2,000 square feet (which is a lot of fucking space), and it seems weird to me for kids to have to be driven miles in order to play with other kids (let alone other kids of different socioeconomic backgrounds). TM | 
| 
 Re: The Jews have all the money, and the whites have all the power. Quote: 
 You've seen it. I know you have. It's the inside handshake thing. "Hey, you went to a school like me. Hey, you probably had to sit through church like me. Hey... We probably enjoy the same shit." It's lazy, superficial branding that unfortunately segregates a lot of people into factions. But yes - there is racism also. People exclude people based on racism (I assume three admissions of this in one post are adequate to cause people to stop arguing past me). Oh, hell-- Here's a fourth: I hereby acknowledge racism often plays a part in people being excluded in work and social situations, and that it remains a significant problem today. Now, if one person acknowledge that the tribalism/laziness I note also plays a part, we'll have had an honest back and forth. But I very much doubt that will happen. The narrative shall be, "In all instances in which a minority is excluded, it is irrefutably racism." And we can never trifle with conventional wisdom, even only with an argument of degree. It is the only thing more infallible than the Pope. | 
| 
 Re: Interesting Article Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Re: Interesting Article Quote: 
 Do you think it is at all narrow minded to pre-judge people on the basis of their economic status? | 
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 PM. | 
	Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com