![]() |
Victimhood (Prius Rant)
Quote:
The SUV is no worse for the environment or our geopolitical interests than a load of other vehicles no one complains about (diesels, motor homes, 18 wheelers, gas guzzling sports cars, boats, etc...). It's a strawman for people of a certain political bent to to take potshots at sector of society espousing values and a lifestyle they don't like. The environmentalist movement has a lot of good people in it, but until it gets rid of the large percentage of its rank and file who view it as a fundamentalist crusade, its going to remain a laughinstock, with minimal political influence. |
Victimhood (Prius Rant)
Quote:
And, btw, they are worse for the environment because they use much more gas. My point was not that they don't use more gas. They do. My point was that few people use so much gas that it matters. Even a travelling salesman who logs 40k miles/year isn't spending but a couple thousand extra with gas prices where they are. (and your facts are wrong about diesel--or at least will be soon. There are a lot of new environmental regs that will make diesels a lot cleaner). |
Victimhood (Prius Rant)
Quote:
|
Victimhood (Prius Rant)
Quote:
|
Victimhood (Prius Rant)
Quote:
I drive my SUV slow and safely, because anyone who drives one for more than 30 seconds, realizes you can't wind it out like a fucking sports car.* I drive my wife's car, OTOH, like a bat out of hell, because its fun. I get to speed around the way I can't in a SUV. That mass argument is BS. Got any stats on how many people walked away from accidents because they had the added mass of an SUV? I know a dude who swears he'd be dead if the 18 wheelerhad hit him in anything other than his Tahoe. Any death caused by increased mass is easily outweighed by lives saved by it. *With exceptions, where I can get away with doing otherwise. |
Victimhood (Prius Rant)
Quote:
First--you have to compare the number who walked away with the number who died in rollovers that wouldn't have occured in a car. Second--my point was that the SUV owners are creating less safe roads for others, not for themselves. But it's self-defeating. If SUVs are in fact safer, then everyone will eventually get them. And instead of having 3000lb cars hitting eachother, we'll have 5000lb SUVs hitting each other. Which is more likely to cause fatalities. Prisoners dilemma, etc. While the individual owner may be better off, society is worse off . BTW--who likes minivans? But, yes, they have some of the same problems. But they're not as wide, and usually not as high. I don't like driving behind trucks either. But SUVs, unlike trucks, are not everyhwere. |
Victimhood (Prius Rant)
Quote:
|
Victimhood (Prius Rant)
Quote:
|
Victimhood (Prius Rant)
Quote:
|
Victimhood (Prius Rant)
Quote:
|
Victimhood (Prius Rant)
Quote:
Are you suggesting the lives saved as a result of people being in SUVs aren't a valid offset against those you claim are taken by SUVs? That's an interesting methodology. I'd like you to do my taxes. It also assumes, quite arrogantly, that SUVs cannot benefit people more than the shrill anti-SUVers claim they damage them. You don't know and can't prove that SUVs cause more deaths than they prevent. That position, which you cite as though it were fact, is a popular belief touted by anti-SUV people, whose supporting information (if any) most assuredly does not offset the deaths caused by the deaths prevented. You're offering a piece of politically correct rhetoric as fact. Show me a study confirming deaths caused outweigh deaths prevented. I see no prisoner's dilemna except the one a certain group of people want to find. |
Slow PB day
Quote:
|
Victimhood (Prius Rant)
Quote:
I'm not anti-SUV, but there are tons and tons of studies that show the same thing: SUVs increase danger to their occupants and the occupants of other vehicles. |
Victimhood (Prius Rant)
Quote:
First, because of the increased riskof rollover, SUV drivers are, on balance, no safer than if they were in a car. link here Second, because of their increased mass, SUVs in two-car crashes cause more harm to the other car. The increase in harm to the other car is not fully offset by a decrease in harm (that is, risk of injury or death) to the SUV driver. While the SUV is better off, the overall benefit to society is negative. This is not a suprise because you have more mass of car, with people no more capable of resisting injuries from metal hitting them. ETA link for second proposition 4.3 times the number of deaths as a result, is her estimate. |
Victimhood (Prius Rant)
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:37 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com