LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Offering constructive criticism to the social cripples in our midst since early 2005. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=681)

Tyrone Slothrop 07-25-2005 03:40 PM

FactCheck.org
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
To show bipartianianship, would Ty or Sebby please respond to this post and show how much sophistry old Ironhead just emitted?
Spanky seems to think the UN is a good idea. I'm with him.

sebastian_dangerfield 07-25-2005 03:42 PM

We're not talking about it . . . well, I mean, unless we want to talk about it.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Q Yes, Scott, can you assure us that Andrew Card did not speak to either -- or did not tell the President or Karl Rove or Scooter Libby or anybody else about the Justice Department investigation?

MR. McCLELLAN: Yes, again, those questions came up back in October of 2003 and I addressed them at the time.

Q May I ask one follow-up?

MR. McCLELLAN: You may. Go ahead.

Q I know that none of you are speaking about this because it's an ongoing investigation. Can you explain why Alberto Gonzales would go on TV yesterday and do that, and talk about it?

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, what he said was already said from this podium back in October of 2003, and I don't think he got into commenting in any substantive way on the discussion. But the President has said that we will be glad to talk about this once the investigation has come to a conclusion, but not until then. And there have certainly been preferences expressed to the White House that we not get into discussing it while it is ongoing.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0050725-5.html
I used to think these guys were cagey and operated on the same page. There appears to be a lot more confusion in this Admin than I thought. Clearly, the marching order memos aren't getting around. Or maybe they're smart enough to realize no one gives a damn what that fat twit says at press briefings?

The Bush Administration, confounding us for five years with the never ending curiosity.... "Lucky idiots or brilliant devious bastards?"

I think both. Perhaps they are divinely guided. If they are, lovely. God loves a scheming inmbecile. Maybe I will get to heaven after all...

ltl/fb 07-25-2005 03:47 PM

We're not talking about it . . . well, I mean, unless we want to talk about it.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I used to think these guys were cagey and operated on the same page. There appears to be a lot more confusion in this Admin than I thought. Clearly, the marching order memos aren't getting around. Or maybe they're smart enough to realize no one gives a damn what that fat twit says at press briefings?

The Bush Administration, confounding us for five years with the never ending curiosity.... "Lucky idiots or brilliant devious bastards?"

I think both. Perhaps they are divinely guided. If they are, lovely. God loves a scheming inmbecile. Maybe I will get to heaven after all...
You don't think that one of them going off and yapping was part of the plan? A sign that really they only aren't talking about it when talking about it would involve saying they were wrong, but are talking about it when it suits them?

I guess I am cynicaler than you are.

Hank Chinaski 07-25-2005 03:49 PM

FactCheck.org
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Spanky seems to think the UN is a good idea. I'm with him.
Communism is a good idea, but I'm not ready to suggest we sign on.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 07-25-2005 03:51 PM

FactCheck.org
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Communism is a good idea, but I'm not ready to suggest we sign on.
In theory communism works.

ETA: K, as in Das Kapital.

paigowprincess 07-25-2005 03:52 PM

FactCheck.org
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Communism is a good idea, but I'm not ready to suggest we sign on.
K?

Gattigap 07-25-2005 03:52 PM

FactCheck.org
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Communism is a good idea, but I'm not ready to suggest we sign on.
That thunderclap you just heard was the snap of Penske and his socks abandoning you at the speed of argyle.

paigowprincess 07-25-2005 03:53 PM

FactCheck.org
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
I theory communism works.

ETA: K, as in Das Kapital.
GODDAMIT. WHy didnt someone (hi penske!!!) tell me the K was on. I just missed this. The insurgency coul dhave had both boards.

futbol fan 07-25-2005 04:12 PM

FactCheck.org
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
Your point?
I was under the impression you were taking the position that the Admin never said the WMD threat was "imminent." My bad. No one could be stupid enough to say GWB and Co. never argued that there was an imminent threat, right?

futbol fan 07-25-2005 04:14 PM

FactCheck.org
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
To show bipartianianship, would Ty or Sebby please respond to this post and show how much sophistry old Ironhead just emitted?
Ain't nobody talkin to you, biotech.

sebastian_dangerfield 07-25-2005 04:16 PM

We're not talking about it . . . well, I mean, unless we want to talk about it.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
You don't think that one of them going off and yapping was part of the plan? A sign that really they only aren't talking about it when talking about it would involve saying they were wrong, but are talking about it when it suits them?

I guess I am cynicaler than you are.
I don't think its ever in their plan to look as stupid as McClellan's been looking.

That said, I do lean a bit toward them being more devious than disorganized. I think they know their true believers will never turn on them, facts be damned.

I'm not sure these guys even give a shit about the future of their party.

Penske_Account 07-25-2005 04:16 PM

FactCheck.org
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
That thunderclap you just heard was the snap of Penske and his socks abandoning you at the speed of argyle.
Actually I agree with him. A.good.idea. I have had lots of ideas that seemed good at the time, in the idea stage. "In practice" is a-hole-nother matter.

Remember patentparalegal?

Penske_Account 07-25-2005 04:19 PM

FactCheck.org
 
Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
GODDAMIT. WHy didnt someone (hi penske!!!) tell me the K was on. I just missed this. The insurgency coul dhave had both boards.
Eyez on the pryze, Paigs, eyez on the pryze.

Hank Chinaski 07-25-2005 04:20 PM

FactCheck.org
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Actually I agree with him. A.good.idea. I have had lots of ideas that seemed good at the time, in the idea stage. "In practice" is a-hole-nother matter.

Remember patentparalegal?
Stealing blue_Triangle was a great idea, but then leagl said it made it was precedant to make it okay for someone to steal my Juan sock


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com