![]() |
Job opening
Quote:
He had had a nice, good, idle time all the while--plenty of company--and the fence had three coats of whitewash on it! If he hadn't run out of whitewash he would have bankrupted every boy in the village. Tom said to himself that it was not such a hollow world, after all. He had discovered a great law of human action, without knowing it--namely, that in order to make a man or a boy covet a thing, it is only necessary to make the thing difficult to attain. If he had been a great and wise philosopher, like the writer of this book, he would now have comprehended that Work consists of whatever a body is OBLIGED to do, and that Play consists of whatever a body is not obliged to do. And this would help him to understand why constructing artificial flowers or performing on a tread-mill is work, while rolling ten-pins or climbing Mont Blanc is only amusement. There are wealthy gentlemen in England who drive four-horse passenger-coaches twenty or thirty miles on a daily line, in the summer, because the privilege costs them considerable money; but if they were offered wages for the service, that would turn it into work and then they would resign. ETA: Law review works under a similar principle. |
Job opening
Quote:
|
Job opening
Quote:
|
Job opening
Quote:
|
Job opening
Quote:
|
Runaway Bride
Quote:
|
Chicago
Quote:
|
Job opening
Quote:
In an effort to make up for it, a scenario: Couple in social group breaks up in mid-March. He (Guy A) is one of the primary centers of the group (has the big parties, knows everyone, organizes events). She's a pretty amazing woman. Gorgeous, smart, has a pretty successful business. Due to overlapping friends, major efforts have been made to keep hostilities to a minimum. He encourages everyone to stay friends with her and vice versa. I love them independently of each other and think it was probably a good idea for them to break up given their personality quirks (i.e. he flirts with everything that walks, and she has inexplicable insecurities). Two weeks ago a guy (Guy B) in the group asks her out. She says yes and they've been dating since then. I saw them together at a party on Friday, though I thought they were there as friends, because frankly, I think he's way out of her league. Saturday, Guy B tells Guy A that he's dating ex. Doesn't exactly go over well. Guy B was brought into the group by the Guy A. Invited to a lot of parties, introduced to a lot of people, etc. Guy A has gone through a lot of shit in the last six months, including the death of a parent, another close family death, and breakup of longstanding relationship. Guy B knew all about this, and in fact got drunk with Guy A the night of a particularly painful funeral. The rumor mills have been flying, and Guy B has declined a lot of lot of party invitations in the last two days (including my birthday party). Questions: 1.) Should Guy B have made a move on Guy A's ex? Should he have waited longer? 2.) Should Guy B have told Guy A about the move on his ex earlier? (Note: Guy A was in Mexico the first week that they were dating.) 3.) Should Guy B expect to be cut out of Guy A's life (and possibly social circle) because of moving in on Guy A's ex? 4.) Should Guy B have apologized to Guy A about his actions? |
Job opening
Quote:
|
Job opening
Quote:
2.) Earlier? Sheesh! It's been two weeks. It's not like she's pregnant already. 3.) Maybe he should expect it, but it wouldn't be right. 4.) What's to apologize for? See 1. This is not to say he shouldn't be sensitive to Guy A's troubles. The timing is unfortunate, but nobody's obligated to honor some emotional moratorium. |
Job opening
Quote:
Guy A should drink and forget. Women B and C in Group should comfort Guy A to help him forget. Of course, if Guy A didn't put down his paintbrush, none of this would have ever happened. |
Job opening
Quote:
2.) If they've only been dating 2 weeks, I'm not clear how much earlier B could have told A. This seems to me like a non-issue. 3.) Of course there is always a risk of that if dating from the same pool. One would think that friends would not be judgmental enough to kick B to the curb, but can't blame A for cutting him out if it really bothers A that much. Shouldn't expect invites to A's parties. 4.) Sure. Or at least apologized for A's hurt feelings. Seems to me that the main problem is lack of time for break-up wounds to mend. Asking permission to date might be nice, but if you're going to do it anyway, regardless of permission or not, is just a formality, right? Shouldn't be sprung on A by showing up at an event together though. Either the woman or B should have given A a heads up. I bet it all blows over, but B has to be prepared for worst case scenerio just in case. |
Job opening
Quote:
I am curious about Guy B, though. He has "declined a lot of lot of party invitations in the last two days"? What the fuck? I have received absolutely zero party invitations in the last two days. What's up with this dude? Does he have really good blow or something? I'll be logging in under the FBA in a bit to wish you a happy birthday, you certain special somebody! |
The sad decline
A signpost in the inevitable decline of any major personality includes the tell-all publications from those close to the fading star. Usually, these "tell-alls" tell us little of substance, and are reviewed, if at all, for their amusing minutae.
So it is with PLF. Today's "Sleeping with the President" has been reduced to a mere blog entry, but such are the sad times we live in. At least the language is colorful. PLF, we shall miss you. (Yes, I know it doesn't mention PLF by name, but bitch, please. Whose razor do you think it is?) |
Everything is relative
Anytime you feel sad about PLF's so-called decline, just go to the most stupid blog ever , and I promise, you will feel better.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:42 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com