LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Congratulations Slave and Catrin!!! (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=814)

bold_n_brazen 10-21-2008 10:31 PM

Re: Annoyances
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 368102)
we're doing a newlywed game and i need question help.

1- suggest questions.

2- help with this one:

Ladies, the last time your husband drove you two to whoppieland, would you say; he got on the expressway and sped too fast, got lost and wouldn't ask for directions or ?

I'm thinking "took the safe way home."

Whoppieland?

bold_n_brazen 10-21-2008 10:32 PM

Re: Annoyances
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen (Post 368106)
Whoppieland?

I've just been told this is next to Wallyworld.

ltl/fb 10-21-2008 10:34 PM

Re: Annoyances
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen (Post 368107)
I've just been told this is next to Wallyworld.

Willieworld?

Hank Chinaski 10-21-2008 11:39 PM

Re: Annoyances
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen (Post 368106)
Whoppieland?

if you do a Newlywed game, then you need to do it, with the whole 60s feel.

please don't fight the hypo, and help me develop the questions.

ltl/fb 10-21-2008 11:41 PM

Re: Annoyances
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 368110)
if you do a Newlywed game, then you need to do it, with the whole 60s feel.

please don't fight the hypo, and help me develop the questions.

Whoopieland. I think you were thinking floppy/woppy.

Maybe you can work in floppy? Your subconscious was going there . . .

Jack Manfred 10-22-2008 03:59 AM

Re: Annoyances
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by notcasesensitive (Post 368083)
From the sound of it, she isn't that into him (I have never told someone that I'd like to be single for a while unless I have written off any sort of serious connection). Adder, don't keep yourself up at night. You seem not to be a person who is capable of FWB. Cut the cord. If you want to, remind her of that period when she wanted to be single. Heck, if you are not a breaker-upper, just annoy her in the ways that you must have when she made the single comment and maybe she'll initiate the break-up again.

Or, alternate plan... suggest a threesome. After a couple of after-work drinks, tell her you've been thinking about spicing things up, and that a threesome might be fun.

It confirms that you think the relationship should remain casual. It could dampen any plans she had to discuss your kinda/sorta relationship at work because she might be embarassed to mention that fact (and if she does mention it and a different woman at the office pursues you down the road, well, that's just something else for the dossier, now isn't it?) Plus, she might go along with it. Or she might end everything right there, which might be merciful to you as you're agonizing over your situation while you have a woman in your bed.

I think George would agree that this is a good plan. Barney Stimson too. See them if you need the math done for you.

Jack Manfred 10-22-2008 04:05 AM

Re: Annoyances
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 368097)
I'd normally never say this, but in your situation, think with your dick.

You're lucky the search function here is disabled, Sebby.

And what constitutes "long foreplay"? Are we talking Hours? Minutes? Seconds?

robustpuppy 10-22-2008 09:42 AM

Re: Annoyances
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 368067)
Of course it will--the description has friend with benefits written all over it, with the added downside of its being a coworker. Adder needs to find himself a new love interest at least for the short term to extract himself from the situation.

I'd have given this a 10 if you had written "pull out" rather than extract. As it stands, you get a 9.0, with points for subtlety cancelled out by the fact that extract reminds me of many past dental traumas.

robustpuppy 10-22-2008 09:46 AM

Re: Annoyances
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield (Post 368092)
Do that thing that turns her off in bed. You know... talking.

Yours goes to 11.

Hank Chinaski 10-22-2008 09:49 AM

Re: Annoyances
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ltl/fb (Post 368111)
Whoopieland. I think you were thinking floppy/woppy.

Maybe you can work in floppy? Your subconscious was going there . . .

the two of you don't allot for regional dialects?

Diane_Keaton 10-22-2008 10:17 AM

Obama Busting Moves on Ellen
 
Clip here Cute and fun, but boy did they practice a restrained, presidential version of his dance moves. He's young, energetic and has much better moves than this. Would be fun if he busted them out at the election night party.

ThurgreedMarshall 10-22-2008 11:43 AM

Re: Annoyances
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 368073)
Thus far, I am trying the fizzle approach. Although as I may attempt to pursue something with someone else, it may have to become more affirmative just out of general decency to both.

I don't understand what the hell you're talking about. You said she wasn't that interested. You aren't that interested. Just tell her it's not going anywhere and you should just be friends. What's the big deal?

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 10-22-2008 11:48 AM

Re: Madness
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 368085)
so. They wouldn't have noticed early enough to make up 10 minutes. how many marathons all you guys with opinions have under your belts?

Why would there have to be such a large stagger? The group of elites should be small enough to start 30 seconds ahead of everyone else. Coltrane just said it is damn near impossible to run at the pace at which they run, so anyone who catches, keeps up and/or passes them from the second group should be respected.

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 10-22-2008 11:51 AM

Re: Annoyances
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 368093)
Underlying all of this, allegedly, is her difficultly getting over a serious relationship with her ex. The "needing to be single" thing was actually several months ago, and was followed by all of a few days of not seeing her before she reached out to me again. My main reaction to it was surprise that I wasn't really upset and it has been awhile since I initiated anything.

But you guys are probably right, and my anxiety is probably misplaced. I just worry that she is taking things more seriously when the conversation turns more emotional/intimate, but that is probably just because those topics make me uncomfortable in general so if I was her I wouldn't bring them up casually. That probably isn't true of her.

To some degree this is also driven by some interest in a friend who recently moved back into town. Oddly enough, she actually asked me why I never dated this friend (which is a long story of its own).

I have really only done FWB once in that past, which didn't end all that well after she started to take it more seriously, which probably colors my reactions here.

Let me ask you a question, since you think by staying with her, you are somehow preserving her feelings.

Do you want to be in a long-term relationship with this girl?

Because if you don't, you're just making things worse and will have to dump her silly ass at some point anyway. Do it now so you both can get on with your overly sensitive, mushy lives, separately.

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 10-22-2008 11:54 AM

Re: Annoyances
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen (Post 368107)
I've just been told this is next to Wallyworld.

So, it's closed too?

TM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com