LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Language (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Curiosities in the public record (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=111)

tmdiva 04-09-2003 03:21 AM

I am the most timmy
 
Or at least I'm having serial annoyances.

In a forwarded e-mail message today: "froth" when he meant "fraught."

tm

pretermitted_child 04-10-2003 02:15 AM

U.S. to host oppoition meeting in Iraq

cnn.com's headline ticker (at 10:06pm PST on April 9, 2003).

robustpuppy 04-10-2003 04:11 PM

I am the most timmy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by tmdiva
Or at least I'm having serial annoyances.

In a forwarded e-mail message today: "froth" when he meant "fraught."

tm
Does the sender pronounce height as "heighth," too?

Atticus Grinch 04-11-2003 02:39 PM

Inure
 
Thanks to Dictionary.com's Word of the Day, I'm starting to wonder whether I and every lawyer I've ever met have been using "inure" incorrectly. Of course, it never gets used except in the phrase "inures to the detriment of the plaintiff," in which phrase it's pretty meaningless anyway. When you file a complaint, the average reader will safely assume that you're complaining that something or someone is giving you some cause to complain.

[Edit: typo]

AngryMulletMan 04-11-2003 03:04 PM

Inure
 
In transactional practice, a thing inures to a person when it benefits that person or or that person fixes his interest in it.

What I am wondering is why "X inures to the benefit of Y" is the drafting standard. It seems redundant.

Any Edwin Newman types out there?

AngryMulletMan 04-11-2003 03:06 PM

Or or
 
Flame away!

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 04-11-2003 03:20 PM

Inure
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Thanks to Dictionary.com's Word of the Day, I'm starting to wonder whether I and every lawyer I've ever met have been using "inure" incorrectly. Of course, it never gets used except in the phrase "inures to the detriment of the plaintiff," in which phrase it's pretty meaningless anyway. When you file a complaint, the average reader will safely assume that you're complaining that something or someone is giving you some cause to complain.

[Edit: typo]
They must be repeating themselves:

Dec. 20, 1999, WOTD

It does seem incorrectly used. In an "obviates the need for" kind of way.

pretermitted_child 04-13-2003 02:23 AM

cnn.com does it again
 
CNN's Brent Sadler: Tikrit quite, looks like ghost town

location: http://www.cnn.com, first bullet point under very big "Tikrit Abandoned" headline (at 22:21 PST on April 13, 2003)

NOTE: The mistake was corrected within three minutes of my post.

coup_d'skek 04-13-2003 08:36 PM

Inure
 
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Quote:

Thanks to Dictionary.com's Word of the Day, I'm starting to wonder whether I and every lawyer I've ever met have been using "inure" incorrectly. Of course, it never gets used except in the phrase "inures to the detriment of the plaintiff," in which phrase it's pretty meaningless anyway.
You haven't seen a lawyer use the word "inure" in the transitive sense? One would've thought you moved in better circles.

In any event, Dictionary.com's definition of "inure"'s intrasitive sense is incomplete. It's used in two ways: (i) come into effect, take or have effect, be applied &c , or (ii) to serve to the use or benefit of (e.g., the donation inured to the benefit of the charity).

Other dictionaries, perhaps even yours, include a broader definition of the intransitive sense.

Atticus Grinch 04-15-2003 03:43 PM

Inure
 
Quote:

Originally posted by coup_d'skek
In any event, Dictionary.com's definition of "inure"'s intrasitive sense is incomplete. It's used in two ways: (i) come into effect, take or have effect, be applied &c , or (ii) to serve to the use or benefit of (e.g., the donation inured to the benefit of the charity).
What a relief! My cheap-ass firm doesn't have one of those better dictionaries upon which you rely. Is your firm accepting resumes? Because I really hope we can be cubicle-mates and share a copy of the OED and perhaps much more.

SlaveNoMore 04-15-2003 03:55 PM

A roomful of wannabe Safires
 
My god, who started this room?

My god, no wonder I hated law school so much.


not7yS(hoot me)

pretermitted_child 04-15-2003 06:21 PM

A roomful of wannabe Safires
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
My god, who started this room?
Mistress Eaze so graciously
conjured this room with alacrity
upon a silly request from me
so the FB remains timmy-free


pretermitted(with a flourish, em doffs em's feathered cap and bows deeply)child

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 04-15-2003 08:54 PM

Inure
 
Quote:

Originally posted by coup_d'skek
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch


You haven't seen a lawyer use the word "inure" in the transitive sense? One would've thought you moved in better circles.

In any event, Dictionary.com's definition of "inure"'s intrasitive sense is incomplete. It's used in two ways: (i) come into effect, take or have effect, be applied &c , or (ii) to serve to the use or benefit of (e.g., the donation inured to the benefit of the charity).

Other dictionaries, perhaps even yours, include a broader definition of the intransitive sense.
All these lawyers and no one has noted that inure is a term of art, set out in section 501(c)(3) of the tax code (no part of the net earnings of a charity may inure to a private individual) and defined in the regulations as well as various rulings and cases?!?!!

Class, please, remember that dictionaries constitute neither statutes nor caselaw, and thus have no precedential value unless cited by said statutes or caselaw. The legal term of art is not subject to amendment by the rabble, even when the rabble have JDs.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 04-15-2003 08:57 PM

A roomful of wannabe Safires
 
Quote:

Originally posted by pretermitted_child
Mistress Eaze so graciously
conjured this room with alacrity
upon a silly request from me
so the FB remains timmy-free


pretermitted(with a flourish, em doffs em's feathered cap and bows deeply)child

HERE HERE!!

Good Post, but must the FB be truly timmifry?

pretermitted_child 04-15-2003 11:13 PM

and this is the Delicious Dish on National Public Radio . . .
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
HERE HERE!!

Good Post, but must the FB be truly timmifry?
timmifry? Is this some new dish?

pretermitted(I can't cook)child


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com