![]() |
Oh boy.
Quote:
|
Oh boy.
Quote:
aV |
Oh boy.
Quote:
|
Stability in the MidEast
Quote:
You believe that Clinton should have done something more to attack al Qaeda, and that because he didn't 9/11 is his fault -- right? What do you think he should have done? Were any Republicans calling for him to do whatever that is? Did Bush propose that during the 2000 campaign? And if the threat was so clear and so obvious as you seem to think, why didn't Bush do anything about it during his first 8 months in office? I mean these as serious questions, though I doubt you'll give straight answers. |
Oh boy.
Quote:
Saudi Arabia has long been aware that if oil prices get too high, there will be more pressure for efficiency and alternatives that will be detrimental to oil prices in the future. Since Saudi is one of the few countries that is likely to continue pumping at current volumes for a long period of time, this is their particular concern, and so they have long worked to manipulate prices to find the right balance point. In other words, you already trust this process to politicians -- but to Saudi politicians, who are likely serving a different constituency with different concerns. I'll leave the comment about the entire community of non-oil financed climate scientists (what you call "the global warming crowd"). |
Oh boy.
Quote:
We should use nuclear, as well as developing other alternatives. But these are long-term proposals, as are things like fuel efficiency standards. Right now we are trying to fix the leaky roof while the raining, which leads to stupid and desperate proposals like the $100 check to everyone.... |
Oh boy.
Quote:
|
Oh boy.
Quote:
|
Oh boy.
Quote:
i blame fringe. |
Oh boy.
Quote:
what about human rights to clean air? |
Oh boy.
Quote:
Those are three different crowds. They each have some of the same people. But the fact that irrational people agree with rational people on some items does not make those items irrational. ETA: "kooing"? Is it your view that things are going just swimmingly, and that we don't need to be concerned with oil dependency or global warming or anything else? That we should just continue eliminating government interference in the energy markets* by, say, eliminating the CAFE standards instead of making them more rigorous? *I mean US government. The governments of Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc. will stay plenty involved, of course. |
Oh boy.
Quote:
B. You do realize that this was all tongue in cheek, right? I just figured that, if we're all dumb enough to take seriously politicians whose response to rising gasoline prices is "let's send them a $100 check", then this would also count as serious discourse. |
Oh boy.
Quote:
Seriously. |
Oh boy.
Quote:
I don't recall offhand if Marathon is now owned by Ashland or not, but if you're too lazy to google, I'm too lazy to argue. |
Oh boy.
Quote:
I don't think we're ever going to be able to comletely wean ourselves from hydrocarbons. But as the resource becomes more expensive (and more dangerous to obtain) we will see more applications of renewaable resource technology. And the majors will probably be at the forefront of bringing them to us. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:46 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com