Secret_Agent_Man |
03-17-2005 04:52 PM |
This Should be Fun
Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
He did not like it, because women in the jail unit at night get challenged much more frequently than men.
|
And that is the issue -- "challenged more frequently" -- due to perceptions of vulnerability not necessarily connected to actual ability to take care of oneself. Still, that is a legitimate concern for employers who desire/need mainly to keep the peace and avoid trouble.
For example, I once saw an advertisement in the newspaper some years back (mid-1990s) in which a large, well-known, rowdy area "gentlemen's club" was seeking bouncers. The job advertisement not only specified gender, but minimum height and weight requirements.
I am a man who is well above the national average in size -- perhaps even larger than Sidd or Hank. Still, I barely cleared those minimums. It has been explained to me that, for such jobs, they want people so large and scary looking that even drunk and horny young guys will not _think_ to start trouble. A smaller man (or any woman), even one with two or three black belts who could kick ass, would not be suitable for the job because the drunk would think: "Yeah, I could take him" and give it a try. The goal is to minimize fights, not just to win them.
I can see the same argument applying to certain law enforcement jobs -- but the problem is that this camel's nose opens the door to a return to non-essential height/weight/strength requirements that caused all male police and fire depatrtments for decades.
S_A_M
|