LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Technology (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=48)
-   -   Cars and Other Driving Machines (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24)

Atticus Grinch 03-28-2008 01:47 AM

Yay!!!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
http://www.2guysreview.com/images/BMW-135i.jpg
In the famous words of Adolf Hitler, "I've taken shits better looking than a Chris Bangle chassis."

John Phoenix 03-28-2008 09:42 AM

Yay!!!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
In the famous words of Adolf Hitler, "I've taken shits better looking than a Chris Bangle chassis."
I like the look of the front end of the 1 series; it's as if it was the next step after the e46. But I hate the back end of it. They should have used the back end of the e92.

Icky Thump 03-29-2008 11:37 PM

Yay!!!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by John Phoenix
I like the look of the front end of the 1 series; it's as if it was the next step after the e46. But I hate the back end of it. They should have used the back end of the e92.
Anything beats the back of the E90 though.

John Phoenix 03-30-2008 04:58 PM

Yay!!!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Icky Thump
Anything beats the back of the E90 though.
Yeah, I'm not crazy about it either, but would take it over the 1 series back end.

BTW, I saw the CS Concept in person at the NY Auto Show. Pictures don't do it justice. That's a hot looking car.

Icky Thump 03-31-2008 07:59 AM

Yay!!!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by John Phoenix
Yeah, I'm not crazy about it either, but would take it over the 1 series back end.

BTW, I saw the CS Concept in person at the NY Auto Show. Pictures don't do it justice. That's a hot looking car.
Beg to differ.


Hmm, maybe I should have got myself one of these instead?


http://d.yimg.com/eur.yimg.com/xp/ca...e-revealed.jpg

NotFromHere 03-31-2008 12:48 PM

Yay!!!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by John Phoenix
Was I really, based on what the article said?



I also went to BMW's website, to get the listed specs on both the 135i and 335i. Here's how they compare:

Unladen - Automatic Transmission:
135i: 3384 lbs
335i: 3582 lbs

Acceleration 0-60 mph – Automatic transmission:
135i: 5.2 sec
335i: 5.5 sec

Was I really that far off in saying:
Yes. From the quote you quoted...
Quote:

The 1-series is compact, endlessly involving, and absurdly fast. It is everything that the 3-series was before that car grew up. It is also more fun than a caffeinated circus monkey.
In a straight line that's almost half a second. That's lot, and in the twisties, way way better.

taxwonk 03-31-2008 12:59 PM

Yay!!!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
Yes. From the quote you quoted...
In a straight line that's almost half a second. That's lot, and in the twisties, way way better.
See, this is why I'm not a car freak. For me, about the only way a half-second is going to make a bit of difference is if a whole lot of money in my pocket rests on it.

Replaced_Texan 04-07-2008 04:17 PM

Truck question
 
If any of ya'll were looking for a pickup, would your first inclination be Chevy or Ford?

taxwonk 04-07-2008 04:50 PM

Truck question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
If any of ya'll were looking for a pickup, would your first inclination be Chevy or Ford?
GMC. They're Chevys, but they hold their resale value better.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 04-07-2008 04:58 PM

Truck question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
GMC. They're Chevys, but they hold their resale value better.
http://montysbluff.com/CALCHVY.jpg

John Phoenix 04-07-2008 06:09 PM

Truck question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
If any of ya'll were looking for a pickup, would your first inclination be Chevy or Ford?
Ford. But what sort of stuff are you going to doing with the truck? Pulling trailers? Home Depot runs?

Replaced_Texan 04-07-2008 06:13 PM

Truck question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by John Phoenix
Ford. But what sort of stuff are you going to doing with the truck? Pulling trailers? Home Depot runs?
Hauling equipment is the main purpose. I don't see a trailer being involved all that much, but it could be necessary from time to time.

Atticus Grinch 04-07-2008 08:32 PM

Truck question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
If any of ya'll were looking for a pickup, would your first inclination be Chevy or Ford?
Top Gear and 5,000 Somali warlords can't all be wrong. Toyota Hilux/Tacoma.

Hank Chinaski 04-07-2008 08:38 PM

Truck question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Top Gear and 5,000 Somali warlords can't all be wrong. Toyota Hilux/Tacoma.
why do you hate America so?

John Phoenix 04-07-2008 08:47 PM

Truck question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Hauling equipment is the main purpose. I don't see a trailer being involved all that much, but it could be necessary from time to time.
If it's not heavy duty equipment, you might expand your horizons beyond just Chevy and Ford (and Dodge, of course). Both of those certainly are good starts, but consider whether they are offering trucks that are more heavy duty than what you'll need at the top end of your duties. If so, consider more than just the domestics to include other options, like Toyota, Honda, and Nissan. The Ridgeline is a good option, from what I've read and heard, if you don't need a heavy duty hauler.

Icky Thump 04-07-2008 09:16 PM

Truck question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
If any of ya'll were looking for a pickup, would your first inclination be Chevy or Ford?
6 Cyl Toyota

taxwonk 04-07-2008 10:51 PM

Truck question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by John Phoenix
If it's not heavy duty equipment, you might expand your horizons beyond just Chevy and Ford (and Dodge, of course). Both of those certainly are good starts, but consider whether they are offering trucks that are more heavy duty than what you'll need at the top end of your duties. If so, consider more than just the domestics to include other options, like Toyota, Honda, and Nissan. The Ridgeline is a good option, from what I've read and heard, if you don't need a heavy duty hauler.
The Ridgeline isn't good for hauling. It has a "trunk" built in to the
truckbed. The floor won't hold up as well as other trucks. They're more for the suburban cowboy.

On the other hand, the Toyota Titan is a great truck, built in Texas, with the most powerful engine available in anything other than the GMC Denali. Of course, fully-loaded, it will run you about $30,000.

Get a Sierra SLE with the basic 350 short-block and it'll run for about 500,000 miles.

Atticus Grinch 04-08-2008 12:00 PM

Truck question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
On the other hand, the Toyota Titan is a great truck, built in Texas, with the most powerful engine available in anything other than the GMC Denali. Of course, fully-loaded, it will run you about $30,000.
The Titan is a Nissan, no? NTTAWWT.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 04-14-2008 02:48 PM

Acura RDX
 
I ended up going with the RDX, which is pretty sweet. I got a helluva deal, and it's much (MUCH) easier getting things in and out of the trunk.

http://www.sibergaleri.com/images/ga..._acura_rdx.jpg

taxwonk 04-14-2008 03:27 PM

Acura RDX
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
I ended up going with the RDX, which is pretty sweet. I got a helluva deal, and it's much (MUCH) easier getting things in and out of the trunk.

http://www.sibergaleri.com/images/ga..._acura_rdx.jpg
I hear they're pretty nice. I don't know that they're worth the spread over a Honda CRX, which is virtually the same vehicle, but then, I also don't know what kind of deal you got.

taxwonk 04-14-2008 03:34 PM

Truck question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
The Titan is a Nissan, no? NTTAWWT.
You're right. It is a NIssan.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 04-14-2008 03:34 PM

Acura RDX
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
I hear they're pretty nice. I don't know that they're worth the spread over a Honda CRX, which is virtually the same vehicle, but then, I also don't know what kind of deal you got.
I only paid about $3k more (a friend knows the owner of the dealership) than I would have paid for the CRV. The RDX has a significantly nicer interior. Plus, it has a turbo engine and has similar 0-60 results as the TL. The CRV drove like a lawnmower.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 04-14-2008 03:54 PM

Smart4-2
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
lawnmower.
Any recs on these? (Seriously). Gas, electric start, mulching, motor drive.

Brands? What to look for?

Did you just call me Coltrane? 04-14-2008 05:16 PM

Smart4-2
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Any recs on these? (Seriously). Gas, electric start, mulching, motor drive.

Brands? What to look for?
Sorry. I don't have a lawn.

bold_n_brazen 04-14-2008 05:18 PM

Smart4-2
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Any recs on these? (Seriously). Gas, electric start, mulching, motor drive.

Brands? What to look for?
I have about a dozen guys from Haiti. They do a nice job.

taxwonk 04-14-2008 05:20 PM

Acura RDX
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
I only paid about $3k more (a friend knows the owner of the dealership) than I would have paid for the CRV. The RDX has a significantly nicer interior. Plus, it has a turbo engine and has similar 0-60 results as the TL. The CRV drove like a lawnmower.
Sounds like it was worth the small premium. Sweet.

Replaced_Texan 04-14-2008 05:51 PM

Smart4-2
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Any recs on these? (Seriously). Gas, electric start, mulching, motor drive.

Brands? What to look for?
Note: 5000 sq ft property, house takes up maybe a third, landscaping and driveway takes another third.

Reel push mower. Purchased at Home Depot c. 2002 when I bought the house, about $100 total purchase price.

Upside: Felt much better about my carbon footprint. Didn't have to pull any cords to start motor or pouring and/or mixing gasoline/oil. Noise was minimal.

Downside: Pain in the fucking ass if I didn't cut the lawn every week, because the grass would get too high, and I'd have to push pretty damned hard. Also, I wasn't exactly the most even lawn cutter in the world, and it was pretty noticable.

The Black and Decker 18" electric mower (it was a good $50 cheaper at the time) replaced the reel push mower. Purchased via Amazon.com on July 24, 2004 (Amazon has a nifty "you bought this product" feature if you hit a page you've already done business on) when the push mower handle broke from me pushing too hard.

Upside: Didn't have to pull any cords to start motor or pouring and/or mixing gasoline/oil. Noise was more than push mower, but not that bad. Much quicker process.

Down side: I had to replace the power cord once when I accidently ran over it with the mower. Pain in the ass if I didn't cut the lawn every three weeks in the summer, because the grass would get too high, and it'd accumulate under the lawnmower.

Alfredo Jaimes (and co) replaced the electric mower c. June 2007. $25/every two weeks in the summer, about once a month in the winter.

Upside: Didn't have to pull any cords to start motor or pouring and/or mixing gasoline/oil. Yard is professionally mowed, edged, and raked. Leaf blowers are used on sidewalk, porch and driveway. Same guys do next door yard and about 10 other yards on the street, so they all look good at the same time. Yard looks awesome most of the year.

Down side: A little noisier when they're there. They once forgot to secure the back gate, and my mom's dog got out of the yard.

All in all, I tend to be someone that hates to outsource something that I'm perfectly capable of doing myself, but I happily pay Alfredo (who told me he's voting Obama when he saw the signs in my yard, so I guess I'm not actively thwarting immigration laws as much as I thought I was) $25 if it means I don't have to mow the grass. Gives me time to do the yard work that I actually like instead. And the grass looks a hell of a lot better if someone other than me cuts it.

John Phoenix 04-14-2008 05:52 PM

Smart4-2
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Any recs on these? (Seriously). Gas, electric start, mulching, motor drive.

Brands? What to look for?
I have a very small yard, so I got something similar to this model - mine's just a few years older.

It's a push mower (not self propelled), gas powered, rear bag. Rear bagging is nice, because the side bag gets in the way. It has a Briggs & Stratton engine, which has been fine. A friend of mine thinks that Honda engines are nice in mowers, but my yard is too small and I was too cheap to step up for that. I usually use it with the bag off and the mulch trap shut.

It's got a pull start. Pull starts have gotten easier than they were when we were kids.

Years ago, my dad got us a self-propelled machine after we had a Toro that lasted over 20 years. I don't remember the brand of the newer one, just that it was orange. Anyway, the self-propelled part was ok, certainly made it easier if you have long rows to mow, but it's much heavier to turn and to lift up.

If you find that you have to walk away from the mower every so often, think about a blade brake/clutch, which allows you to leave the engine running but stops the blade from spinning, so you don't have to restart it every time that you let go of the handle and safety bar.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 04-14-2008 06:02 PM

Smart4-2
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan

Reel push mower.

Black and Decker 18" electric mower

Alfredo Jaimes (and co)
I've used a reel mower. It would be fine, but the lawn is getting bigger with a move. And one needs a nice, flat lawn for them to work well. They also don't lift and cut, just cut, so the grass tends to be much less even unless one cuts it like a putting green.

Had an electric as a kid. The happiest day was when my parents finally stepped up to a gas mower. No more adjusting the cord to get around trees and to move over a row. If they didn't have trees everywhere, electric would have been fine, but I spent more time cord moving that mowing.

Alfredo doesn't work in my community. Although perhaps someone else with similar competency does.

The blade brake is definitely the way to go. Fortunately my parents knew to get one of those when they moved to gas.

I think the engines are all four stroke now, so the pollution is greatly reduced from the older two-stroke versions.

NotFromHere 04-14-2008 06:16 PM

Smart4-2
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
I've used a reel mower. It would be fine, but the lawn is getting bigger with a move. And one needs a nice, flat lawn for them to work well. They also don't lift and cut, just cut, so the grass tends to be much less even unless one cuts it like a putting green.

Had an electric as a kid. The happiest day was when my parents finally stepped up to a gas mower. No more adjusting the cord to get around trees and to move over a row. If they didn't have trees everywhere, electric would have been fine, but I spent more time cord moving that mowing.

Alfredo doesn't work in my community. Although perhaps someone else with similar competency does.

The blade brake is definitely the way to go. Fortunately my parents knew to get one of those when they moved to gas.

I think the engines are all four stroke now, so the pollution is greatly reduced from the older two-stroke versions.
If it has a Briggs and Stratton engine, don't touch it with a 10 ft pole. Back in the day, when there was 1/4 ac. front and 1/4 ac. backyard, the Honda was a godsend. Self propelled. Now that there's 15' of backyard and 15' of front, the Honda just does a nice job, cuts evenly and starts every time. Minimal maintenance.
Yes, it runs on gas, but we aren't going to trade it in for a push mower at this time.

ltl/fb 04-14-2008 06:20 PM

Smart4-2
 
Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
If it has a Briggs and Stratton engine, don't touch it with a 10 ft pole. Back in the day, when there was 1/4 ac. front and 1/4 ac. backyard, the Honda was a godsend. Self propelled. Now that there's 15' of backyard and 15' of front, the Honda just does a nice job, cuts evenly and starts every time. Minimal maintenance.
Yes, it runs on gas, but we aren't going to trade it in for a push mower at this time.
It seems like, given the forum, only riding mowers should be under discussion.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 04-14-2008 06:24 PM

Smart4-2
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
It seems like, given the forum, only riding mowers should be under discussion.
Self-propelled qualifies. You can appeal to the board mod if you want.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 04-14-2008 06:24 PM

Smart4-2
 
Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere

Yes, it runs on gas,
What do the electrics run on? Nuclear? Coal?

Maybe in Wash. you could claim that since it's hydro, it's environmentally sensitive. But the salmon would beg to differ.

ltl/fb 04-14-2008 06:32 PM

Smart4-2
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
What do the electrics run on? Nuclear? Coal?

Maybe in Wash. you could claim that since it's hydro, it's environmentally sensitive. But the salmon would beg to differ.
Wind!

I totally agree with you re: hydroelectric power not being all that enviromentally sensitive.

What are your feelings on the legal underpinnings of zoning for lot size/multi-family housing?

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 04-14-2008 06:33 PM

Smart4-2
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Wind!

The birds and Ted Kennedy would disagree with you about that.

ltl/fb 04-14-2008 06:35 PM

Smart4-2
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
The birds and Ted Kennedy would disagree with you about that.
Fuck the birds.

Uh, I mean, I think that anything is going to change stuff, so all we can do is figure out the method with the least impact.

Hydro doesn't just impact salmon, it changes the entire whatever-ology (hydrology/biology/etymology/physiognomy) of the rivers on which there are dams. I think the dams are not only for power, though -- also used to let big-ass ships go way far inland.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 04-14-2008 06:49 PM

Smart4-2
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I think the dams are not only for power, though -- also used to let big-ass ships go way far inland.
That's more the south. The McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System to be specific.

ltl/fb 04-14-2008 06:53 PM

Smart4-2
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
That's more the south. The McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System to be specific.
I thought they went to Idaho, more or less? I wrote a big-ass paper on the various non-symmetrically overlapping federal and state agencies that have varying types of authority over water use in the Pac-NW, but even so, I may be misremembering.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 04-14-2008 07:04 PM

Smart4-2
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I thought they went to Idaho, more or less? .
Well, both Lewiston, Idaho, and Tulsa Oklahoma, purport to be seaports.

ltl/fb 04-14-2008 07:10 PM

Smart4-2
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Well, both Lewiston, Idaho, and Tulsa Oklahoma, purport to be seaports.
Crazy.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:02 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com