LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Waiting for Fitzgerald (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=704)

Spanky 10-05-2005 01:15 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
I think there are probably 4M in CA alone.
2.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 01:15 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
In 1984, Reagan won every state except Minnesota. I don't think babyjesus carried Massachusetts for him. So what you're saying is that Bush I and Reagan both won elections without having to pander to baby jesus. And Bush II won one election by doing so.

We'd have president Gore now if one didn't pander to the right. But if one took a different strategy fro the outset, I assess differently where you'd end up. Yes, you'd lose some votes. But right now the assessment apparently is that you'd lose less votes that way than by continuing to pander.
I love him, but Reagan pandered to the religious right. If you think not, you are either too young to remember or weren't watching closely enough. I cede that in 84 there was less of a need for pandering and in selective states pandering wasn't necessary, but it doesn't change how he got to 84. And the Religious right has more sway now than it did in Reagan's day, thanks in part to Bush and Rove. If the party wants to remake itself and shoot for the WH in 2020, jettisoning the religious right makes sense, but if they want to contest in this decade again, they gotta dance with she who brung em.

taxwonk 10-05-2005 01:16 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I disagree with that. Not everything has to be an abolsute, but I also disagree with the liberals guiding principle that there are no absolutes.
I don't recall ever saying that there are no absolutes. However, in deciding whether or not something is absolute, you are forced to look at everything relatively. The only other alternative is to admit you are drawing lines arbitrarily, which is the height of relativism. Or are you suggesting that you alone have some sort of divine insight, such that your judgment and yours alone is the only one that matters?

Sidd Finch 10-05-2005 01:17 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I don't accuse you of those things and have the appropriate love and respect for you, unless you are secretly a bagman for the Daleys, then all bets are off.
Some day, perhaps you will realize that "I didn't mean you" is really not much of an apology.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 01:18 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
I think the calculus will change, because if Bush needs to nominate a hard right-winger, instead of just the usual toady, his enslavement to the bible-thumpers will be complete, and apparent.

Please, let it be so.
Amen. PTL.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 01:21 PM

A Sign?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Understatement of the year:

“It will make the clubs less fun.”
I doubt I will go either way, but I don't know. Then again, I would sooner sink the cashish into hookers and booze in a nice hotel room than a lapdance (mainly because my one experience proved that my addictive personality is incapable of one, or twenty...or thirty...)

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 01:23 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
2.
Assuming that is true, and I am a little skeptical, where are the 4M hiding, NYC?

baltassoc 10-05-2005 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
That can't be right, can it? Pregnancy other than by intercourse? What are they going to do - inspect all the turkey basters? That makes no sense? And if they do determine you've done the turkey baster, is it a fine?
Interesting to think that the babyjesuschristsuperstar (or I guess, technically, theblessedvirginmarysuperstar) would be totally screwed under this law - his unmarried mother conceived him without intercourse.

(I wish I could take credit for this insight, but I picked it up elsewhere).

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 01:24 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
I don't recall ever saying that there are no absolutes. However, in deciding whether or not something is absolute, you are forced to look at everything relatively. The only other alternative is to admit you are drawing lines arbitrarily, which is the height of relativism. Or are you suggesting that you alone have some sort of divine insight, such that your judgment and yours alone is the only one that matters?
The babyjesus or his dad, as applicable, guides the universal moral compass.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 01:30 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Some day, perhaps you will realize that "I didn't mean you" is really not much of an apology.
If you are going to internalise criticism of philosophy or Party Platforms or governance in a political discussion then there is no way to avoid being offended. It's an immature outlook, imnsho. You aren't a party leader and unless I am missing something the heirarchy of the DNC couldn't give a rat's arse as to what you or Wonk think. So what grandiose delusion makes you think that when I criticise them it somehow includes you? Schizophrenics internalise comments directed at others in this way. Perhaps you guys need meds. Maybe fringey can share?

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 10-05-2005 01:30 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
If the party wants to remake itself and shoot for the WH in 2020, jettisoning the religious right makes sense, but if they want to contest in this decade again, they gotta dance with she who brung em.
Apparently Rove disagrees. There's one more presidential election this decade--as of now, the far right is a liability, because it's spending like a drunken sailor while pushing a conservative agenda that has brought strong reaction. The Schiavo matter clearly didn't poll well, outside of a few churches in the south. And now Rs are embarassing eachother by declining to give back bridges to nowhere for which the money could be spent helping the poor in Louisiana. Besides, do you really think that the right will pull the lever for Hillary out of spite in 2008?

taxwonk 10-05-2005 01:31 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
The babyjesus or his dad, as applicable, guides the universal moral compass.
That involves a choice. It requires you to view the Judeo-Christian God as relatively superior to other Gods.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 10-05-2005 01:33 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Assuming that is true, and I am a little skeptical, where are the 4M hiding, NYC?
I would think you would be frightened to realize that Hilary has already figured out that, yes, 4M are hiding in NYC, and a bunch elsewhere as well.

The R's have been lucky that the D's candidates since 2000 have been so utterly unconvincing that they, like Bill Clinton, "get it" and that the moderates matter and will be better served by D's than R's.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 01:36 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Apparently Rove disagrees. There's one more presidential election this decade--as of now, the far right is a liability, because it's spending like a drunken sailor while pushing a conservative agenda that has brought strong reaction. The Schiavo matter clearly didn't poll well, outside of a few churches in the south. And now Rs are embarassing eachother by declining to give back bridges to nowhere for which the money could be spent helping the poor in Louisiana. Besides, do you really think that the right will pull the lever for Hillary out of spite in 2008?

No, I think that they will sit out like they did with her husband. Or vote for some third party candidate if one emerges, like Bauer or Keyes. I am confused as to how the far right/religious right is on a spending spree. I don't think that issue plays with them like the social issues do.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 01:37 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
That involves a choice. It requires you to view the Judeo-Christian God as relatively superior to other Gods.
Exactly.

sebastian_dangerfield 10-05-2005 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I thought A Handmaid's Tale was supposed to be fiction.

ETA: summary of objectional parts of the law if you don't want to wade through the bill
These "bills" are the Right setting up liberals and moderates. They hope to pass this and then cry when a Court chucks it as unconstitutional following a challenge from some Democratic group. This kind of cheap nonsense will be ending very shortly, as the nation's tolerance for the Right is getting awfully short. Bush is sinking like a stone, and the Right is equated with him. As he goes, they go.

Cheney talked about "death throes of an insurgency in Iraq." He was looking in the wrong direction. I'd say the Religious Right's high water mark has passed. In the coming decades, people disgusted with the nonsense they've seen perpetrated by the few who sseek to rule everyone under their idiot religious rules are going tio start whacking the right with their votes rather than court challenges to absurd bills.

I wonder what the Right will do then? Shit, I know what it will do - it will petition the Courts, and scream about how it needs an activist judiciary to save the nation from moral relativists working at the legislative level. It'll just be a shifting of instrumentality - the Rights using the Courts, the Left/Middle using the legislature. What a comic dance of idiots. Intelligent design? Yeh...

taxwonk 10-05-2005 01:38 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
If you are going to internalise criticism of philosophy or Party Platforms or governance in a political discussion then there is no way to avoid being offended. It's an immature outlook, imnsho. You aren't a party leader and unless I am missing something the heirarchy of the DNC couldn't give a rat's arse as to what you or Wonk think. So what grandiose delusion makes you think that when I criticise them it somehow includes you? Schizophrenics internalise comments directed at others in this way. Perhaps you guys need meds. Maybe fringey can share?
Perhaps we personalize it because you make the comments to us. You were responding to my post when you characterized "us Demos" as being blah, blah, blah. When you make a comment including me in a group, then you disparage that group, it doesn't really mean much when you then say that you weren't talking about us.

How is what you do qualitatively different that making a disparaging remark about Jews, but then saying, "Not you, Wonk, you're one of the good ones?"

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 01:40 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
I would think you would be frightened to realize that Hilary has already figured out that, yes, 4M are hiding in NYC, and a bunch elsewhere as well.

The R's have been lucky that the D's candidates since 2000 have been so utterly unconvincing that they, like Bill Clinton, "get it" and that the moderates matter and will be better served by D's than R's.
I don't get this, you think that there are 4M republicans living in NYC but not voting? Or voting D? I am unconvinced, but perhaps some day I will be proven wrong. I still don't see the last time moderates won an election. Maybe Carter, but that's factoring the Watergate backlash. Clinton didn't win because of moderates, he won because of a third party candidate. He didn't get a majority of the vote, either time, not really even close (as say Bush was in 2000). If he relied on moderates, that shows moderates can't carry the day.

taxwonk 10-05-2005 01:40 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Exactly.
That's moral relativism at the highest level. Which kind of makes your argument full of shit.

sebastian_dangerfield 10-05-2005 01:43 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
That involves a choice. It requires you to view the Judeo-Christian God as relatively superior to other Gods.
Debating supremacy of competing Gods is like debating whether Spiderman would kick Batman's ass. That a large swath of this or any other country still engages in such debate disproves Evolution pretty soundly. No ape is that dumb.

sebastian_dangerfield 10-05-2005 01:45 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
Perhaps we personalize it because you make the comments to us. You were responding to my post when you characterized "us Demos" as being blah, blah, blah. When you make a comment including me in a group, then you disparage that group, it doesn't really mean much when you then say that you weren't talking about us.

How is what you do qualitatively different that making a disparaging remark about Jews, but then saying, "Not you, Wonk, you're one of the good ones?"
I will take issue with your lox. You've screwed up that franchise royally. The Scottish cured stuff is kicking your ass. For shame... you sat on your laurels and look what happened.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 01:47 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
Perhaps we personalize it because you make the comments to us. You were responding to my post when you characterized "us Demos" as being blah, blah, blah. When you make a comment including me in a group, then you disparage that group, it doesn't really mean much when you then say that you weren't talking about us.

How is what you do qualitatively different that making a disparaging remark about Jews, but then saying, "Not you, Wonk, you're one of the good ones?"
I made the comment about the demo party or dems in general, but it obviously, in context, goes to the leadership or philosophical leaders of the group. You are a member a neither, to the best of my knowledge. When you get into the DNC party leadership then you can take the criticism personally because it may then be directed at you. For now, its directed at the party leaders, the PAC groups that front them and the outward unofficial spokespeople that consult with them, eg Michael Moore. I don't understand how people can defend some of the egregious abuses of these people or vote them and I think its a sad abdication of the power of your vote, but it doesn't make you a murderer or rapist, and I still fail to see, other than via grandiose delusion, how you internalise such comments.

I don't disparage Jews.

Hank Chinaski 10-05-2005 01:48 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
If you are going to internalise criticism of philosophy or Party Platforms or governance in a political discussion then there is no way to avoid being offended. It's an immature outlook, imnsho. You aren't a party leader and unless I am missing something the heirarchy of the DNC couldn't give a rat's arse as to what you or Wonk think. So what grandiose delusion makes you think that when I criticise them it somehow includes you? Schizophrenics internalise comments directed at others in this way. Perhaps you guys need meds. Maybe fringey can share?
you forgot to say "no offense."

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 01:49 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
That's moral relativism at the highest level. Which kind of makes your argument full of shit.
Dissent. Its divinity.

Shape Shifter 10-05-2005 01:50 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I made the comment about the demo party or dems in general, but it obviously, in context, goes to the leadership or philosophical leaders of the group. You are a member a neither, to the best of my knowledge. When you get into the DNC party leadership then you can take the criticism personally because it may then be directed at you. For now, its directed at the party leaders, the PAC groups that front them and the outward unofficial spokespeople that consult with them, eg Michael Moore. I don't understand how people can defend some of the egregious abuses of these people or vote them and I think its a sad abdication of the power of your vote, but it doesn't make you a murderer or rapist, and I still fail to see, other than via grandiose delusion, how you internalise such comments.

I don't disparage Jews.
I think lawtalkers needs to revisit the issue of your socking. For some reason, you are much less offensive when you post this sort of thing using a sock. Is Juan the Marine still available?

sgtclub 10-05-2005 01:57 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Assuming that is true, and I am a little skeptical, where are the 4M hiding, NYC?
They didn't hide when Arnold ran.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 02:00 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
you forgot to say "no offense."

Their tender souls will take offence no matter Hank. The demo party leadership has softened their rank and file lemmings up to the point of hyper-sensitivity. If I internalised criticism of BUsh like this, I would have to kill myself in despondency. "Oh I must be stupid, I'm a dummy, I'm a racist, I'm a facist, I'm a liar, I'm a killer, my syntax is garbled, I'm an imperialist, I'm arrogant, I choke on pretzels, I'm a crazy christian, oh woe is me, I'm wounded!!!"

sebastian_dangerfield 10-05-2005 02:05 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
If the party wants to remake itself and shoot for the WH in 2020, jettisoning the religious right makes sense, but if they want to contest in this decade again, they gotta dance with she who brung em.
Ah, but dancing, even with your sister, is forbidden by the Southern Baptist Convention.

Don't despair - you can still rape her, beat her and keep her trapped in a loveless marriage. Shit, you can even force her to risk her health with countless pregnancies. Thats a good way to get rid of her if you don't want her around any more or she gets uppity. And if she calls you on having a small cock, or makes fun of your impotence, you can slap her silly. She won't say shit - your pastor won't hear any woman sassing back her man - the bible forbids it.

I've really denigrated Jesus by calling these people Jesus Freaks. These sanctimonious, insecure, scared gutless abusive fucks don't deserve to prance around under that name.

Hank Chinaski 10-05-2005 02:06 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I think lawtalkers needs to revisit the issue of your socking. For some reason, you are much less offensive when you post this sort of thing using a sock. Is Juan the Marine still available?
The real juan or the sock? the real juan who met with Mr. Thottam in his pre-convict days is probably occupied being an imperialist occupier, no? Juan the Marine the sock was recently re-discovered as an Infirm login and would be available for sale on Infirm. I fear the geographic limitation against it being used here might limit its sale value:(

I can offer Ty@50 for sale on both boards. I would offer my Notbob sock for sale, but that's the only way I can get any Convo from the jeune filles, s'il vous plea.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 02:08 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I think lawtalkers needs to revisit the issue of your socking. For some reason, you are much less offensive when you post this sort of thing using a sock. Is Juan the Marine still available?
What part do you take offence at? The shot at Michael Moore, the implicit shots at Admiral Sean Pean and the Hollyweirdos, the Moveon.org crowd, the Cindy Sheehan crowd? Does it bother you that I don't disparage Jews? Perhaps when I have the cultural and historical maturity of my amis in France and Germany, I will to be anti-semitic, for now I am immature and naive in my outlook, as my Euro pals have told me.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 02:10 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Ah, but dancing, even with your sister, is forbidden by the Southern Baptist Convention.

Don't despair - you can still rape her, beat her and keep her trapped in a loveless marriage. Shit, you can even force her to risk her health with countless pregnancies. Thats a good way to get rid of her if you don't want her around any more or she gets uppity. And if she calls you on having a small cock, or makes fun of your impotence, you can slap her silly. She won't say shit - your pastor won't hear any woman sassing back her man - the bible forbids it.

I've really denigrated Jesus by calling these people Jesus Freaks. These sanctimonious, insecure, scared gutless abusive fucks don't deserve to prance around under that name.

Why so much blind hate Sebby? You are better than this. The babyjesi love you, despite your sinful ways.

juan, usmc 10-05-2005 02:13 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
The real juan or the sock? the real juan who met with Mr. Thottam in his pre-convict days is probably occupied being an imperialist occupier, no? Juan the Marine the sock was recently re-discovered as an Infirm login and would be available for sale on Infirm. I fear the geographic limitation against it being used here might limit its sale value:(

I can offer Ty@50 for sale on both boards. I would offer my Notbob sock for sale, but that's the only way I can get any Convo from the jeune filles, s'il vous plea.
Callete! Yo vivo! Tu eres el mas stupido! Lo-berry dicheme.

Sidd Finch 10-05-2005 02:14 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
If you are going to internalise criticism of philosophy or Party Platforms or governance in a political discussion then there is no way to avoid being offended. It's an immature outlook, imnsho. You aren't a party leader and unless I am missing something the heirarchy of the DNC couldn't give a rat's arse as to what you or Wonk think. So what grandiose delusion makes you think that when I criticise them it somehow includes you? Schizophrenics internalise comments directed at others in this way. Perhaps you guys need meds. Maybe fringey can share?
If your comments and diatribe were limited to the above, then your post would be justified. But your comments and diatribe are not. You essentially refuse to discuss anything with anyone who is not a right-wing R on an intellectual level, and instead respond with Byrd this, Kennedy that, these are the people you follow crap.

Sidd Finch 10-05-2005 02:16 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
Perhaps we personalize it because you make the comments to us. You were responding to my post when you characterized "us Demos" as being blah, blah, blah. When you make a comment including me in a group, then you disparage that group, it doesn't really mean much when you then say that you weren't talking about us.

How is what you do qualitatively different that making a disparaging remark about Jews, but then saying, "Not you, Wonk, you're one of the good ones?"

"I was only talking about Zioinist leaders when I responded to your statement by saying "well, your religion is filled with murdering bigots."

Hank Chinaski 10-05-2005 02:16 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by juan, usmc
Callete! Yo vivo! Tu eres el mas stupido! Lo-berry dicheme.
You need to let people know which translator page they should use.

Sidd Finch 10-05-2005 02:18 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I made the comment about the demo party or dems in general, but it obviously, in context, goes to the leadership or philosophical leaders of the group.
No, it obviously does not.

Stop and think whether the fact that Wonk and I agree on this -- one of whom you know personally, the other of whom you know a fair amount about -- indicates that, even if you mean to limit your comments in the manner you suggest, you are failing to do that.

In other words - when (what you claim is) your message doesn't get through to the audience, it may not be the audience's fault.

Shape Shifter 10-05-2005 02:19 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
What part do you take offence at? The shot at Michael Moore, the implicit shots at Admiral Sean Pean and the Hollyweirdos, the Moveon.org crowd, the Cindy Sheehan crowd? Does it bother you that I don't disparage Jews? Perhaps when I have the cultural and historical maturity of my amis in France and Germany, I will to be anti-semitic, for now I am immature and naive in my outlook, as my Euro pals have told me.
It's your hysterical ranting. I'd just like to separate the political penske from the personal penske. It doesn't bother me when your socks froth at the mouth and spout irresponsible lunacy, but it does sort of bother me when it's your primary. Maybe we need an intervention to make you start socking again? I think you need the outlet.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 02:20 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
If your comments and diatribe were limited to the above, then your post would be justified. But your comments and diatribe are not. You essentially refuse to discuss anything with anyone who is not a right-wing R on an intellectual level, and instead respond with Byrd this, Kennedy that, these are the people you follow crap.

Dissent. I am trying to inspire you to a place where you realise that it is okay to empower yourself to lead your ideological soulmates to a higher plain and not follow these gods and sinful charlatans who have abused you with their kool aid and plantation style politics. Rise up Sidd, I know you are better than those who betray your trust and your vote. [cyber cuddle] Because. I. care. [/cyber cuddle]

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 02:23 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
"I was only talking about Zioinist leaders when I responded to your statement by saying "well, your religion is filled with murdering bigots."
Cite please? I am a spiritual zionist in my soul and my posts indicate as much. FWIW, I have frequently considered conversion, but some of the holiday cuisine is a little off putting. No offence.

baltassoc 10-05-2005 02:28 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
In other words - when (what you claim is) your message doesn't get through to the audience, it may not be the audience's fault.
You democrats. Always with the politics of personal destruction. Nice.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:43 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com