LawTalkers
Page 44 of 334 « First 344243 44 45465494144 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Making a buck cleaning Lester's spittle trays on Sequels' 22-year old supermodel abs (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=680)

barely_legal 05-11-2005 06:10 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I would also like to know.
I don't remember exactly what the acronym stands for, but it's basically a sex partner who is sympathetic to your fetishes and willing to experiment with things they may not be totally comfortable with initially. For example, if you wanted to pee on me during sex, and I was like "ewwww, no way in hell you pervert" I would not be GGG. If I said "well, I'm not really into that, but maybe we can try it once and see how it goes" then I would be GGG.

ThurgreedMarshall 05-11-2005 06:12 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
True, but if she's really, really hot, you can't act shocked when you catch your friend out with her.
I sure as hell can.

TM

sebastian_dangerfield 05-11-2005 06:14 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I sure as hell can.

TM
It'd be dinner theatre quality.

sebastian_dangerfield 05-11-2005 06:16 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
This is how you knew the Commando Boy would be receptive to your hands in his pants on the first date?
No, she knew that because it was clear he was male.

Not Bob 05-11-2005 06:16 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by barely_legal
I don't remember exactly what the acronym stands for, but it's basically a sex partner who is sympathetic to your fetishes and willing to experiment with things they may not be totally comfortable with initially. For example, if you wanted to pee on me during sex, and I was like "ewwww, no way in hell you pervert" I would not be GGG. If I said "well, I'm not really into that, but maybe we can try it once and see how it goes" then I would be GGG.
I'm sure that I also speak for dtb and gwnc when I thank you (and GGG) for explaining the acronym and the concept.

Carry on.

robustpuppy 05-11-2005 06:17 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I guess my point is that he should be loyal to his friend, seeing as they are...well, friends.

Besides, as for the ex, if you really want my opinion, I think it's fucked up that she's fucking her ex-boyfriend's friend two weeks (or whatever) after they broke up. Seems like a shitty thing to do.

Friendships are more important than most relationships. I don't know how close the two friends were (getting drunk after a funeral seems to imply that they were pretty good friends), but if this girl was so hot and smart and incredible, there is a possibility that Guy A would want her back. Fucking her two weeks later without finding that out pretty much ends that possibility. Hell, I bet half of the people posting here on this one are full of shit -- trying to make everyone seem like they are above it all. Give me a break. Something like that would affect a friendship.

TM
I was assuming that the relationship was over. I didn't think of the real issue as loyalty or wanting the person back -- it's that perhaps the only thing worse than thinking about your ex fucking someone else is thinking about your ex telling her new boyfriend all about how badly you sucked. I also don't think that these people are fungible dating units and assume they really liked each other.

I don't imagine anybody here thinks it won't or "shouldn't" affect the friendship between the two guys. Nobody said Guy A should still be B's close friend afterward. I thought it was more about whether what Guy B had done was wrong or whether he deserved to be an outcast because of it.

ETA I think it was two months after the breakup, not two weeks.

ABBAKiss 05-11-2005 06:17 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
This is how you knew the Commando Boy would be receptive to your hands in his pants on the first date? And that he would be commando? Or did I get the timing wrong?

(Please PM me with my preferences. I don't want the whole board to know my weirdo fetishes.)
Timing was something like this (shortened version):

You're hot, let me buy you a drink, are you wearing a thong, no? nothing? commando Friday you say? holy shit that's hot, me?, see for yourself, <hand down pants>

This was all pre-first-date. First date we were supposed to go to dinner but he came in to pick me up and next think we knew we were fucking. Weird. He is perfect for me!

sebastian_dangerfield 05-11-2005 06:18 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
Don't fall for that. The results are disappointing.
Why are plaid pants Ok, but pink pants borderline "too much"?

Shape Shifter 05-11-2005 06:18 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I guess my point is that he should be loyal to his friend, seeing as they are...well, friends.

Besides, as for the ex, if you really want my opinion, I think it's fucked up that she's fucking her ex-boyfriend's friend two weeks (or whatever) after they broke up. Seems like a shitty thing to do.

Friendships are more important than most relationships. I don't know how close the two friends were (getting drunk after a funeral seems to imply that they were pretty good friends), but if this girl was so hot and smart and incredible, there is a possibility that Guy A would want her back. Fucking her two weeks later without finding that out pretty much ends that possibility. Hell, I bet half of the people posting here on this one are full of shit -- trying to make everyone seem like they are above it all. Give me a break. Something like that would affect a friendship.

TM
They went out for 2 years, which means their relationship was probably in a downward spiral for the last 21 months. Everyone could see that so they were emotionally prepared by the time it was made official. If Guy B was good enough friends to support Guy A after the funeral, he'd probably know where Guy A stood on the recycling issue. Guy A is just being immature and territorial.

Shape Shifter 05-11-2005 06:21 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Why are plaid pants Ok, but pink pants borderline "too much"?
Wear them and don't worry about it. I think they're just precious.

Flinty_McFlint 05-11-2005 06:21 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Shape Shifter
They went out for 2 years, which means their relationship was probably in a downward spiral for the last 21 months. Everyone could see that so they were emotionally prepared by the time it was made official. If Guy B was good enough friends to support Guy A after the funeral, he'd probably know where Guy A stood on the recycling issue. Guy A is just being immature and territorial.
Man it's good to hear you say that.

Shape Shifter 05-11-2005 06:28 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Flinty_McFlint
Man it's good to hear you say that.
No hard feelings. I hope you and slave are happy together.

futbol fan 05-11-2005 06:42 PM
Job, opening . . .
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Shape Shifter
No hard feelings. I hope you and slave are happy together.
You're fighting the hypothetical here. If RT's Guy A and Guy B got together everyone would have lived happily ever after in the all-naked pool.

ThurgreedMarshall 05-11-2005 06:54 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
I was assuming that the relationship was over. I didn't think of the real issue as loyalty or wanting the person back -- it's that perhaps the only thing worse than thinking about your ex fucking someone else is thinking about your ex telling her new boyfriend all about how badly you sucked. I also don't think that these people are fungible dating units and assume they really liked each other.
I think you're wrong. I don't think her talking to him has anything to do with it. As for the fungible dating units concept, again, there are far too many people out there to date. Is this person so special that you need to stomp on a friendship to be with her? Probably not. If she is, then recognize what you are doing and don't expect to be welcomed back into the party circuit your friend runs with open arms.

Asking out a friend's gf after two weeks or two months of them being broken up is fucked up and selfish. If she is that important and you are that into her, at the very least, you should have the balls to tell your friend that you want to date her. And that's without adding the horrible time Guy A was having that Guy B knew about when he was putting the moves on the girl. Jesus.

Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
I don't imagine anybody here thinks it won't or "shouldn't" affect the friendship between the two guys. Nobody said Guy A should still be B's close friend afterward. I thought it was more about whether what Guy B had done was wrong or whether he deserved to be an outcast because of it.
What is the distinction you're drawing? Guy A should get over it and invite Guy B to all of his parties and not worry about seeing his ex with his friend when he shows up? What exactly do you mean by "outcast?" Shit, it would be worse if Guy B broke up with the gf. Then you really wouldn't want him at your party because he'd probably have designs on whoever you and your friends are currently dating.

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 05-11-2005 06:55 PM
Job opening
 
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Why are plaid pants Ok, but pink pants borderline "too much"?
Borderline?

TM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:24 PM.
Page 44 of 334 « First 344243 44 45465494144 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com