LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Waiting for Fitzgerald (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=704)

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 02:30 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
No, it obviously does not.

Stop and think whether the fact that Wonk and I agree on this -- one of whom you know personally, the other of whom you know a fair amount about -- indicates that, even if you mean to limit your comments in the manner you suggest, you are failing to do that.

In other words - when (what you claim is) your message doesn't get through to the audience, it may not be the audience's fault.
Which part of the obvious disclaimers don't you understand? IRL, when someone makes a disparaging remark about republicans, like back in November when you overheard someone say something to the effect of "only an idiot would vote for bush" and if you didn't hear, PM Thurgreed and he will assert it for you, did you correct them. "Now that's not fair, there are lots of plainly intelligent people who voted for Bush"? I doubt it.

Further evidence that you are not someone I am directing the criticism at is, no offence, you don't have skin thick enough to be in political leadership if you take this stuff this personally.

Sidd Finch 10-05-2005 02:31 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Cite please? I am a spiritual zionist in my soul and my posts indicate as much. FWIW, I have frequently considered conversion, but some of the holiday cuisine is a little off putting. No offence.
I was giving an example of the type of comment you would make, in response to what Wonk said. NOt suggesting that the comment would be about Zionists in particular.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 02:32 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
It's your hysterical ranting. I'd just like to separate the political penske from the personal penske. It doesn't bother me when your socks froth at the mouth and spout irresponsible lunacy, but it does sort of bother me when it's your primary. Maybe we need an intervention to make you start socking again? I think you need the outlet.
the babyjesuschristsuperstar was a misunderstood and denounced rebel too. Like your boy Chavez.

Sidd Finch 10-05-2005 02:37 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Which part of the obvious disclaimers don't you understand?
Once again, consider the possibility that if multiple people who you know not to be pussies are finding your message to be other than what (you claim to) intend, that the fault is in what you say, not in how they/we take it.

Perhaps you are failing to make disclaimers, or the level of vitriol you spout overwhelms any cursory disclaimers you might make.

Or, perhaps, you really do believe that Democrats are stupid, and not worthy of having an intellectual discussion with because, after all, well, Byrd. (Similar to Ann Coulter's view -- why talk to a liberal, unless you really have to?) I haven't met you in person, but frmo your comments here, I think this paragraph more accurately reflects what you really feel, and I regard your claims that "it's only about the party leadership" to be utter bullshit.


Quote:

Further evidence that you are not someone I am directing the criticism at is, no offence, you don't have skin thick enough to be in political leadership if you take this stuff this personally.
If I were thin-skinned, I would have the same feelings about the comments by Slave, Club, etc. Yet I don't. I can have rational discussions with them. I can have vitriolic discussions with them. Yet I've never come to the conclusion that either of them actually holds all Democrats in disgust and disdain. That is exactly the conclusion that I've reached about you.

But I'm sure it's just my fault. And Wonk's. And SS's. Right?

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 02:38 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
I was giving an example of the type of comment you would make, in response to what Wonk said. NOt suggesting that the comment would be about Zionists in particular.
And who or what group would it be about? Murders? Evaders of responsibility to society? Rapists? Perjurers? Other high criminals and Felons? Racists? Terrorists? Communists? radical socialists? Oppressors of Freedom? People who drive 55 in the passing lane?

If so, you are correct, those are all objectively bad and absolutely morally empty and evil people and I decry them and their anti-social satanic ways.

People with honest philosophies, ideas, beliefs and PoVs of any stripe, except the above, are fine. It's a marketplace of ideas. I respect that.

Shape Shifter 10-05-2005 02:40 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
the babyjesuschristsuperstar was a misunderstood and denounced rebel too. Like your boy Chavez.
You know, you won't be able to post nearly as much after you're nailed to a fucking cross. The voice recognition software is still so sketchy.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 02:44 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Once again, consider the possibility that if multiple people who you know not to be pussies are finding your message to be other than what (you claim to) intend, that the fault is in what you say, not in how they/we take it.

Perhaps you are failing to make disclaimers, or the level of vitriol you spout overwhelms any cursory disclaimers you might make.

Or, perhaps, you really do believe that Democrats are stupid, and not worthy of having an intellectual discussion with because, after all, well, Byrd. (Similar to Ann Coulter's view -- why talk to a liberal, unless you really have to?) I haven't met you in person, but frmo your comments here, I think this paragraph more accurately reflects what you really feel, and I regard your claims that "it's only about the party leadership" to be utter bullshit.




If I were thin-skinned, I would have the same feelings about the comments by Slave, Club, etc. Yet I don't. I can have rational discussions with them. I can have vitriolic discussions with them. Yet I've never come to the conclusion that either of them actually holds all Democrats in disgust and disdain. That is exactly the conclusion that I've reached about you.

But I'm sure it's just my fault. And Wonk's. And SS's. Right?
Apparently yes.

While, I do think the DNC and its political philoshopy is empty, anachronistic and detrimental to the country, but that doesn't mean that I think that they should be denied their first amendment rights or otherwise outlawed. And some of my best friends are dimwit......democrats. Obviously, or not, if you want to be intentionally dense, if I had such a visceral hatred of people who are registered democrats or socialists or greens etc. then I wouldn't live in a place where they outnumber me 6 to 1. I would move to Utah or someone in the south or Texas, no offence. to commune with my kind. I do have a visceral dislike of some of the parties leaders. I did recently bid on an auctioned lunch with Communist congressman Baghdad Jim McDermott, in order, if I had won, to air my grievances with his traitorous ways, yet otoh, I have friends who know him, love him, can't live without him and I respect and discourse with them, in spite of their misguided ways. What is so hard for you to understand about this?

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 02:48 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
You know, you won't be able to post nearly as much after you're nailed to a fucking cross. The voice recognition software is still so sketchy.
I realise that Shifter, but its enough to know that my sacrifice may be such to wash you clean of your sins. As it is I am already out $248.38 to PETA and that has not done the trick, but if a couple of nails through my apendages can save you, I am there for you.

The insurgency is Never Alone.

Not Bob 10-05-2005 02:55 PM

Close the pod bay doors, HAL.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I would offer my Notbob sock for sale, but that's the only way I can get any Convo from the jeune filles, s'il vous plea.
Wow. Now I know how Sean Young felt in "Blade Runner."

Sidd Finch 10-05-2005 02:58 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
And who or what group would it be about? Murders? Evaders of responsibility to society? Rapists? Perjurers? Other high criminals and Felons? Racists? Terrorists? Communists? radical socialists? Oppressors of Freedom? People who drive 55 in the passing lane?
Democrats. (or "Dims", as you call us)

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 02:58 PM

Decker supported the 2nd Amendment.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Bob
Wow. Now I know how Sean Young felt in "Blade Runner."
But then I'd rather be a killer than a victim.

Sidd Finch 10-05-2005 03:03 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Apparently yes.

While, I do think the DNC and its political philoshopy is empty, anachronistic and detrimental to the country, but that doesn't mean that I think that they should be denied their first amendment rights or otherwise outlawed. And some of my best friends are dimwit......democrats. Obviously, or not, if you want to be intentionally dense, if I had such a visceral hatred of people who are registered democrats or socialists or greens etc. then I wouldn't live in a place where they outnumber me 6 to 1. I would move to Utah or someone in the south or Texas, no offence. to commune with my kind. I do have a visceral dislike of some of the parties leaders. I did recently bid on an auctioned lunch with Communist congressman Baghdad Jim McDermott, in order, if I had won, to air my grievances with his traitorous ways, yet otoh, I have friends who know him, love him, can't live without him and I respect and discourse with them, in spite of their misguided ways. What is so hard for you to understand about this?

If the tone and content of your posts were remotely consistent with the tone and content of this post, then I would have no problem understanding the message you (claim to) espouse. But this post has less than 1% of the vitriol that you normally spout, and is not directed at "dims" in general, and is not the penske-stock "I don't want to have a discussion with a 'dim', so I will post a picture of Byrd and tell the 'dim' that this is his moral conscience."

Ads for why you live in Seattle, I neither know nor care. You wouldn't be the first person who for reasons of job, weather, family, or sheer enjoyment of martyrdom chose to surround himself with people he hold in disdain and disgust. Which, again, is what your posts -- your normal posts, not the ones you write when you are called on your shit and have to clean it up -- suggest to me is your real world view.


Okay, I can probably assume you don't live in Seattle for the weather. Or the tittie-bars.

Secret_Agent_Man 10-05-2005 03:04 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Debating supremacy of competing Gods is like debating whether Spiderman would kick Batman's ass. That a large swath of this or any other country still engages in such debate disproves Evolution pretty soundly. No ape is that dumb.
Batman would kick his ass. Too much technology.

Hell, the Dark Knight defeated Superman when it came down to it -- though he had the help of the Green Arrow.

S_A_M

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 03:05 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Democrats. (or "Dims", as you call us)
No, its not an absolute equation. Some are more guilty than others and some are kool-aided, and I absolve them and seek to offer love and guidance to help them empower themselve to the journey to the other side of righteousness. the babyjesi hates the sin but loves the sinners. Unless they are too far gone.

Take my hand Sidd, I'm here for you.

http://www.ourtown50.com/bush.kick.butt.gif

Gattigap 10-05-2005 03:05 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I would move to Utah or someone in the south or Texas, no offence. to commune with my kind.
Or Alabama.

The Sirens are calling, Penske. It's time for your to commune and bring your babyjesus home.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 03:11 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
If the tone and content of your posts were remotely consistent with the tone and content of this post, then I would have no problem understanding the message you (claim to) espouse. But this post has less than 1% of the vitriol that you normally spout, and is not directed at "dims" in general, and is not the penske-stock "I don't want to have a discussion with a 'dim', so I will post a picture of Byrd and tell the 'dim' that this is his moral conscience."

Ads for why you live in Seattle, I neither know nor care. You wouldn't be the first person who for reasons of job, weather, family, or sheer enjoyment of martyrdom chose to surround himself with people he hold in disdain and disgust. Which, again, is what your posts -- your normal posts, not the ones you write when you are called on your shit and have to clean it up -- suggest to me is your real world view.


Okay, I can probably assume you don't live in Seattle for the weather. Or the tittie-bars.
1. Please find a post where I said I don't talk to people who are registered democrats? I don't believe I have ever said or posted I wouldn't talk to Kennedy or Byrd (although I have posted that two minutes in Hillary's presence would be two minutes too long).

2. The party leadership calls Byrd its conscience. You appear to be more vested in some sort of relationship with that party that you take far more personally than I take mine with the Republicans, to the extent that I have any relationship with the Republican party, why don't you take it up with them? My point, all along is, how can these people, these leaders, this DNC, have any moral authority on any issue from a leadership standpoint, when they a Klansman as their conscience.

3. The idea that I surround myself with people I loathe and disgust me is assinine and you know it.

4. The rain in Seattle is overrated.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 03:12 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
Or Alabama.

The Sirens are calling, Penske. It's time for your to commune and bring your babyjesus home.

As soon as you move to Paris , FR or Gaza, I'm there. sweet home alabama, indeed.

Sidd Finch 10-05-2005 03:19 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
3. The idea that I surround myself with people I loathe and disgust me is assinine and you know it.
Oh, please. I'm sure you can find enough kindred souls, people who similarly despise Dems, even in Seattle. (After all -- they sell Ann Coulter's books there, don't they?)

You seem to think that I am not actually serious about this, but I am. What you post conveys a very different message that what you claim to intend.

You can consider that, or tell me I'm an idiot for failing to understand your meaning. I don't really care, and don't have any further interest in this discussion.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 03:30 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Oh, please. I'm sure you can find enough kindred souls, people who similarly despise Dems, even in Seattle. (After all -- they sell Ann Coulter's books there, don't they?)

Not since Slave left. I am not sure, I have never seen one of her books in person, although I understand that the bookstores tend to give her books less advantageous display than those of someone like Franken. But that's a market decision that would make sense here.

Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch

You seem to think that I am not actually serious about this, but I am. What you post conveys a very different message that what you claim to intend.
I am not sure if you are serious or not, but I stand by the assertion that when taken as a whole, unless you are being wilfully dense or difficult, the intent of the message of my posts has been made clear. If you want to go back and cite the posts where I said I never talk to people who are registered democrats etc. I will be happy to reassess, otherwise the comments and context they are placed in should be clear. Certainly clearer than all the "Anyone who votes for bush is a fucking idiot" I have heard from non-party leader liberals over the last 5 years. Unless they meant and there is that level of bigotry, ignorance and prejudice in a large swath of the left wing. I tend to think not and apply a larger context to those statements.

Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch

You can consider that, or tell me I'm an idiot for failing to understand your meaning. I don't really care, and don't have any further interest in this discussion.
I don't think you are an idiot, either intentuionally dense or difficult, or is that the same thing?

Hank Chinaski 10-05-2005 03:32 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
1. Please find a post where I said I don't talk to people who are registered democrats? I don't believe I have ever said or posted I wouldn't talk to Kennedy or Byrd (although I have posted that two minutes in Hillary's presence would be two minutes too long).

2. The party leadership calls Byrd its conscience. You appear to be more vested in some sort of relationship with that party that you take far more personally than I take mine with the Republicans, to the extent that I have any relationship with the Republican party, why don't you take it up with them? My point, all along is, how can these people, these leaders, this DNC, have any moral authority on any issue from a leadership standpoint, when they a Klansman as their conscience.

3. The idea that I surround myself with people I loathe and disgust me is assinine and you know it.

4. The rain in Seattle is overrated.
you miss the point. Go back and reread the eggshell plaintiff case from torts. if you assult, you take the risk that you've assulted someone unexpectedly fragile. I'm with Sidd on this one.

taxwonk 10-05-2005 03:33 PM

It has a fishy smell
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I will take issue with your lox. You've screwed up that franchise royally. The Scottish cured stuff is kicking your ass. For shame... you sat on your laurels and look what happened.
What do you know from lox, Goyishekop? The best smoked salmon these days is coming out of Norway

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 03:36 PM

Dear Spanky
 
I am ready to come home. The dims tent is too small, parochial and inhospitable for me.

I apologise for leaving the reservation, sts. No more crazy Cantwell talk.

I trust Bush did us right with Miers.

Please take me back.

Yours in Free-market loving Patriotic fiscal conversatism,

Penske

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 03:38 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
you miss the point. Go back and reread the eggshell plaintiff case from torts. if you assult, you take the risk that you've assulted someone unexpectedly fragile. I'm with Sidd on this one.
Thanks for getting my back. Just wait, they will be calling you out next.......



http://static.flickr.com/2/3781660_9bcca3fa11.jpg

Hank Chinaski 10-05-2005 03:39 PM

It has a fishy smell
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
What do you know from lox, Goyishekop? The best smoked salmon these days is coming out of Norway
Why do you people act like fried matzoh is good? my FIL is like, "every year I can't wait for Passover for the fried Matzoh." And I'm like, do you look forward to prostrate exams?

And if you really like them (either of them) why only do them annually? there is no religous reason not to indulge more frequently is there?

Spanky 10-05-2005 03:40 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I don't get this, you think that there are 4M republicans living in NYC but not voting? Or voting D? I am unconvinced, but perhaps some day I will be proven wrong. I still don't see the last time moderates won an election. Maybe Carter, but that's factoring the Watergate backlash. Clinton didn't win because of moderates, he won because of a third party candidate. He didn't get a majority of the vote, either time, not really even close (as say Bush was in 2000). If he relied on moderates, that shows moderates can't carry the day.
Here in California we ran a pro-life conservative against Davis. He lost. We then ran a pro-choice Republican against him and he won by a massive land slide. I believe the difference was over 3 million votes. And it was not all that high of a turnout.

So there is 3 million of your voters right there.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 03:41 PM

It has a fishy smell
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Why do you people act like fried.......... prostrate exams?

?

What do you mean by "you people"?

robustpuppy 10-05-2005 03:42 PM

George Will on Miers
 
Has anyone seen this? Apologies if it's been discussed already, I don't have time to ketchup on the PB.

I don't read Will's column very often, but when I do, I never find myself wishing I had written it myself (although I would have left out the peevish mention of the McCain-Feingold bill).

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...100400954.html

Quote:

It is not important that she be confirmed because there is no evidence that she is among the leading lights of American jurisprudence, or that she possesses talents commensurate with the Supreme Court's tasks. The president's "argument" for her amounts to: Trust me. There is no reason to, for several reasons.

He has neither the inclination nor the ability to make sophisticated judgments about competing approaches to construing the Constitution. Few presidents acquire such abilities in the course of their pre-presidential careers, and this president particularly is not disposed to such reflections.

Furthermore, there is no reason to believe that Miers's nomination resulted from the president's careful consultation with people capable of such judgments. If 100 such people had been asked to list 100 individuals who have given evidence of the reflectiveness and excellence requisite in a justice, Miers's name probably would not have appeared in any of the 10,000 places on those lists.

Sidd Finch 10-05-2005 03:43 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
you miss the point. Go back and reread the eggshell plaintiff case from torts. if you assult, you take the risk that you've assulted someone unexpectedly fragile. I'm with Sidd on this one.
If I'm exceptionally fragile, Hank, why do I think that you are just a run-of-the-mill dick, and not someone who hold Dems in disgust?

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 03:43 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Here in California we ran a pro-life conservative against Davis. He lost. We then ran a pro-choice Republican against him and he won by a massive land slide. I believe the difference was over 3 million votes. And it was not all that high of a turnout.

So there is 3 million of your voters right there.
I am okay with that. I think California is probably an anamoly. I am not sure there are 4-5M others around the country, just waiting for the religious right to leave. If there had been, Reagan wouldn't have needed to cozy up to Falwell.

Spanky 10-05-2005 03:46 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
People who drive 55 in the passing lane?
There should be an exception to the cruel and unusual limitation for these people.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 03:47 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
If I'm exceptionally fragile, Hank, why do I think that you are just a run-of-the-mill dick, and not someone who hold Dems in disgust?
It's sad that you have to resort to the politics of personal destruction against me, in order to attempt to discredit my criticism of empty and immoral leadership of the demo party. You intentionally twist my words, despite my clearly asserted rebuttal of such falsehoods.

And ftr, I would rather be a big-dick, than a run of the mill dick. Hank's wife is more accommodating to the former.

Replaced_Texan 10-05-2005 03:49 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
There should be an exception to the cruel and unusual limitation for these people.
2. They should be shot on site, and if they survive, they should have their licenses revoked.

Spanky 10-05-2005 03:50 PM

Dear Spanky
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I am ready to come home. The dims tent is too small, parochial and inhospitable for me.

I apologise for leaving the reservation, sts. No more crazy Cantwell talk.

I trust Bush did us right with Miers.

Please take me back.

Yours in Free-market loving Patriotic fiscal conversatism,

Penske
OK. However, I think we must acknowledge that the DLC is a group that we can work with and respect. The DLC supported CAFTA even with huge pressure from their own party. They sacrificed political gain for the good of the country. We need to separate the reasonable Dems from the unreasonable dems.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 03:52 PM

Dear Spanky
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
OK. . We need to separate the reasonable Dems from the unreasonable dems.
Exactly, that's what I have been trying to do all along. I am glad someone gets the message.

taxwonk 10-05-2005 03:52 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Dissent. Its divinity.
It's only divinity because you choose to believe it. In this little game of metaphysical chess, I believe that would constitute a check. But let's not get sidetracked here.

You said:

Quote:

The babyjesus or his dad, as applicable, guides the universal moral compass.
That statement doesn't answer the question of whether or not there are absolute rights and absolute wrongs. It only defines what belief set you choose to point to. If God, as you call him, establishes what is right and what is wrong, then are you suggesting that everything God declares to be wrong is absolutely wrong?

Sidd Finch 10-05-2005 03:52 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
It's sad that you have to resort to the politics of personal destruction against me, in order to attempt to discredit my criticism of empty and immoral leadership of the demo party. You intentionally twist my words, despite my clearly asserted rebuttal of such falsehoods.

And ftr, I would rather be a big-dick, than a run of the mill dick. Hank's wife is more accommodating to the former.

Yes, Penske. My view of what you believe is because I embrace the politics of personal destruction, and not because of what ou say. I manage to drop that political bent when I talk to or deal with innumerable other repubs and conservatives -- or, I do attack them personally, but somehow I manage to recognize that they, unlike you, do not despise all democrats.

Obviously, it's my lack of reading comprehension that is at fault here. And since no other person has expressed this view of you for at least 10 minutes, clearly it must be just me.

Enough of this -- I was attempting to do you the service of pointing out that the message you send is not the message you (claim that you) want to send. You may consider the favor withdrawn, and I will consider that I was wrong -- the message you send is exactly the message that you want to send. No need for the parenthetical in that last sentence.

Bad_Rich_Chic 10-05-2005 03:55 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
Batman would kick his ass. Too much technology.

Hell, the Dark Knight defeated Superman when it came down to it -- though he had the help of the Green Arrow.

S_A_M
It's an unfair match, but Batman
Would tear Spidey assunder;
But, I must note, Spidey could take
The pansy-assed Boy Wonder.

Spanky 10-05-2005 03:56 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I am okay with that. I think California is probably an anamoly. I am not sure there are 4-5M others around the country, just waiting for the religious right to leave. If there had been, Reagan wouldn't have needed to cozy up to Falwell.
Don't forget that Tom McClintock ran against Arnold (it was an open election - no primaries - everyone on the same ticket) and Arnold still won by a landslide even with McClintock getting fifteen percent of the vote. So even if the archconservatives sit it out we can still win.

A moderate Republican can win in New York (Giuliani) California, Mass (current governor), Ohio, Penn (Spector), New Jersey (Whitman) Michigan and Illinois. They would have a strong shot in Florida and Texas (depending on how many conservatives bail). I think that is a majority of the electoral college right there.

Sidd Finch 10-05-2005 03:56 PM

George Will on Miers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Has anyone seen this? Apologies if it's been discussed already, I don't have time to ketchup on the PB.

I don't read Will's column very often, but when I do, I never find myself wishing I had written it myself (although I would have left out the peevish mention of the McCain-Feingold bill).

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...100400954.html

How sad. And yet, I suspect the right wing's fears are overstated.

I have no doubt that Miers is a right-wing Christ-o-crat, and that this -- combined with the lack of public record -- is why Bush picked her as First Among the Toadies.

Once on the bench, perhaps her lack of experience will result in her deferring to others, or seeking popularity by following O'Connor's evolution.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 10-05-2005 03:57 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I am okay with that. I think California is probably an anamoly. I am not sure there are 4-5M others around the country, just waiting for the religious right to leave. If there had been, Reagan wouldn't have needed to cozy up to Falwell.
Reagan had to do it because Nixon had fucked up.

You'll see how it goes in Mass. with Romney. I doubt the support that elected him governor will be there in the primaries (if he gets that far) now that he's born again.

And how do you explain ME, NH, and RI, all of which have R senators, but voted for Kerry. There's R support there, but not religious right.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:32 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com