LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Waiting for Fitzgerald (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=704)

Spanky 10-05-2005 04:36 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
over the objections of ... the insurance industry,
Why would the insurance industry be against this? They supported the 55 speed limit, seat bealt laws, helmut laws etc.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 10-05-2005 04:39 PM

Your forgetting the benefit of putting cops out of work
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
They're still cheaper than humans. And they never stop at donut shops.
Presumptive guilt is cheaper than trials, too.

Gattigap 10-05-2005 04:39 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
helmut laws
Hunh. Houston is even more cosmopolitan than I thought.

ltl/fb 10-05-2005 04:41 PM

Go Arnold Go......
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
The Governor’s reform agenda includes:

Proposition 74 which will require new teachers to work successfully for several years before they get tenure and a virtual job for life.
Proposition 75 which will give workers like police officers, firefighters and teachers the ability to choose whether or not money from their paychecks should be used for political purposes.
Proposition 76 which will control spending to end state deficits and balance the budget without raising taxes. At the same time, it will stabilize education funding to make sure our public schools are getting the money they need.
Proposition 77 which will allow independent judges to draw election districts instead of the politicians. It then allows voters to approve or reject those districts. It is about giving more power to the people and making politicians more accountable.
Can you cut and paste descriptions from a source that doesn't like them, so that we can get a more comprehensive idea of what they involve? Gracias.

Spanky 10-05-2005 04:41 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
Hunh. Houston is even more cosmopolitan than I thought.
That would be on of those German Helmets with the little pointy cross on the top that bikers often wear.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 10-05-2005 04:42 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
As someone who went to law school mainly to deal with all my traffic citations, I am way to close to this one to give a measured, thoughtful and unemotional analysis. However, I did hear that if you get one of these in the mail and just ignore it then nothing will happen. The reason I heard was because you have never been served properly. This is why cops force you to sign a ticket when they give it to you. They can't do that when it just comes in the mail. However, this does not seem necessary for parking citations, so who knows.
Not true. At least in DC (and I think this is the case in surrounding jurisdictions), the fine is against the car owner and the car. The ticket is sent to the owner. The owner can sign an affidavit that someone else was driving, or pay the fine. Not paying means the fine shows up next time you try to register. There are no consequences for the ticket other than the fine, however (like a parking ticket), which may save the gov't. That said, if your argument works, what are you going to do about it when they don't let you reregister your car? Claim "sufficiency of service"?

Spanky 10-05-2005 04:42 PM

Go Arnold Go......
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Can you cut and paste descriptions from a source that doesn't like them, so that we can get a more comprehensive idea of what they involve? Gracias.
Now you are sounding like Ty. Do your own research.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 10-05-2005 04:43 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Why would the insurance industry be against this? They supported the 55 speed limit, seat bealt laws, helmut laws etc.
2. Anything that allows them to rat out bad drivers is a good idea to them. Although maybe if the cameras meant less actual police enforcement, with a charge against the driver, they were concerned that it would diminish info about bad driving.

Sidd Finch 10-05-2005 04:43 PM

George Will on Miers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
I have to disagree with Will on the fact that you can't assume she has been a victim of discrimination. If she is 61, she had to overcome serious obstacles to get where she is today. Especially in Texas where the old boys network is a strong as ever. I believe those obstacles have been seriously diminshed but there were rock solid when she began her legal career.
Absolutely. She, like O'Connor, was at the top of her law school class but couldn't find a job when she graduated.

Replaced_Texan 10-05-2005 04:45 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Why would the insurance industry be against this? They supported the 55 speed limit, seat bealt laws, helmut laws etc.
I think it had to do with the fact that the insurance companies aren't getting the data, since the fines are civil, not criminal, (Texas ACLU blogger, Grits for Breakfast, has some analysis on contesting the tickets on that basis (if you follow his links, you'll see a lot more discussion on the cameras)), so it does them no good in analyzing who might be a dangerous driver.

ETA: Here's the link with the explanation of the insurance industry's objection: http://www.offthekuff.com/mt/archives/004610.html

Spanky 10-05-2005 04:45 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Not true. At least in DC (and I think this is the case in surrounding jurisdictions), the fine is against the car owner and the car. The ticket is sent to the owner. The owner can sign an affidavit that someone else was driving, or pay the fine. Not paying means the fine shows up next time you try to register. There are no consequences for the ticket other than the fine, however (like a parking ticket), which may save the gov't. That said, if your argument works, what are you going to do about it when they don't let you reregister your car? Claim "sufficiency of service"?
Just something I heard. Of course when I got mine I paid it. The cameras were amazing. Picture of me in the car from a few angles, close up of the license, close up of my face, etc.

Sidd Finch 10-05-2005 04:46 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
Okay. Here's a chance to clarify. This post is a response to Shifter. In what way is Chavez "his boy?"

Funny, I don't think he responded to this one. Of course, sometimes it takes Penske a few hours to respond to posts.

robustpuppy 10-05-2005 04:46 PM

George Will on Miers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Absolutely. She, like O'Connor, was at the top of her law school class but couldn't find a job when she graduated.
Maybe it was because she wore too much makeup to her interviews.

(I kid. I probably would have left that part out, too.)

Spanky 10-05-2005 04:50 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I think it had to do with the fact that the insurance companies aren't getting the data, since the fines are civil, not criminal, (Texas ACLU blogger, Grits for Breakfast, has some analysis on contesting the tickets on that basis (if you follow his links, you'll see a lot more discussion on the cameras)), so it does them no good in analyzing who might be a dangerous driver.
In CA such tickets put points on your driving record which the insurance companys have access to. If the insurance companys did not have access to these records I would never go to traffic school.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 10-05-2005 04:51 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I think it had to do with the fact that the insurance companies aren't getting the data, since the fines are civil, not criminal, (Texas ACLU blogger, Grits for Breakfast, has some analysis on contesting the tickets on that basis (if you follow his links, you'll see a lot more discussion on the cameras)), so it does them no good in analyzing who might be a dangerous driver.
That's a pretty sorry equal protection argument. There are plenty of things we have both criminal and civil penalties for. Also, the "safer to run it in the conditions" argument is pretty weak, given that means the speed was unsafe.

That said, it raises a very fair point that it eliminates any discretion and contextual assessment. I have related elsewhere (under a sock) my story about speeding cameras in DC. Suffice to say the protest mechanism does not take into account circumstances that would ordinarily call for a police escort rather than a speeding ticket. (Nor, I'm told does it ever take into account any excuses--it's a rubber-stamp rejection of your appeal. But that's the due process issue, not the ticket in the first place).

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 10-05-2005 04:52 PM

George Will on Miers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Maybe it was because she wore too much makeup to her interviews.

(I kid. I probably would have left that part out, too.)
More likely the hair than the makeup.

http://www.politics1.com/pix1/cab-miers.jpg

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 04:55 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
Okay. Here's a chance to clarify. This post is a response to Shifter. In what way is Chavez "his boy?"
By association ala 2 degrees of separation. I believe it is SS (unless it was Hank) has previously voiced support of Elian's freedom robbing kidnapping at the hands of the Red conspirators, Shake n Bake Reno, Clinton and their comrade in arms, Fidel. Chavez and Fidel are bossom buddies. Ergo, it follows SS is part of their little cabal, or at least a riff raffian co-conspirator.

baltassoc 10-05-2005 04:55 PM

George Will on Miers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
More likely the hair than the makeup.

http://www.politics1.com/pix1/cab-miers.jpg
Back in the day, though, she had a certain je ne sais quoi.

http://underneaththeirrobes.blogs.co...et_miers_2.jpg

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 10-05-2005 04:57 PM

George Will on Miers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by baltassoc
Back in the day, though, she had a certain je ne sais quoi.

http://underneaththeirrobes.blogs.co...et_miers_2.jpg
quoi?

My google-fu is a bit off. That's the pic I wanted (or at least the era). Too bad it doesn't show the shoulder pads and big collar.

ltl/fb 10-05-2005 04:57 PM

George Will on Miers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
More likely the hair than the makeup.

http://www.politics1.com/pix1/cab-miers.jpg
In TX, that hair is high enough to be A-OK. Probably she should have told her hairdresser to give her some fluff over her rather extensive forehead, but all in all, that is not bad hair. Is that from the 80s?

I was perusing the website of her church (now former church -- the pastor who was recently replaced at that church and several other people, including Ms. Miers, have split off and are meeting/worshipping at a hotel). God really wants to forgive me. I wish that they stuff they had up had an "updated" date so that I could tell what went up before the schism and what is post-schism. Valley View Christian Church in Dallas.

dtb 10-05-2005 04:58 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Why would the insurance industry be against this? They supported the 55 speed limit, seat bealt laws, helmut laws etc.
Why does the insurance industry endorse special laws for Austrians?

ltl/fb 10-05-2005 04:58 PM

George Will on Miers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
quoi?

My google-fu is a bit off. That's the pic I wanted (or at least the era). Too bad it doesn't show the shoulder pads and big collar.
What is wrong with the hair in the pic balt posted? It's even less offensive than in the pic you posted.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 05:00 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by baltassoc
Confidential to Sidd: While Penske is a mod, I understand that if you ask nicely, RT will put him on ignore for you, even for people who aren't sleeping with her. You may find this lowers your level of stress while reading the board. YMMV.

Congrats on this Balt. Way to be classily mature and not-petty. Although in fairness, I guess you have a right to be embittered and cranky and its easy to project than deal with those feelings by looking at their real causes. Yes, my posts are stress inducing to you. Thank god and the babyjesi that you have such a stress free life and nothing else to worry about that an internet chatboard could cause you stress. But now its gone. Super.

And hey, if those bitter feelings come up again and I'm not a handy strawman you should ask your shrink if he could prescribe something for those feelings or if you'd like I know some people in your neck of the nape, I can get you a referral to a good psyche outpatient program. Let me know. Because. I. Care.

baltassoc 10-05-2005 05:00 PM

George Will on Miers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
quoi?

My google-fu is a bit off. That's the pic I wanted (or at least the era). Too bad it doesn't show the shoulder pads and big collar.
Same picture, different crop:

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/...rs_583_290.jpg

Maybe Meirs' best hair day ever.

cheeky monkey 10-05-2005 05:02 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Congrats on this Balt. Way to be classily mature and not-petty. Although in fairness, I guess you have a right to be embittered and cranky and its easy to project than deal with those feelings by looking at their real causes. Yes, my posts are stress inducing to you. Thank god and the babyjesi that you have such a stress free life and nothing else to worry about that an internet chatboard could cause you stress. But now its gone. Super.

And hey, if those bitter feelings come up again and I'm not a handy strawman you should ask your shrink if he could prescribe something for those feelings or if you'd like I know some people in your neck of the nape, I can get you a referral to a good psyche outpatient program. Let me know. Because. I. Care.
That's cold dude. Chill out.

Hank Chinaski 10-05-2005 05:02 PM

George Will on Miers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
In TX, that hair is high enough to be A-OK. Probably she should have told her hairdresser to give her some fluff over her rather extensive forehead, but all in all, that is not bad hair. Is that from the 80s?

I was perusing the website of her church (now former church -- the pastor who was recently replaced at that church and several other people, including Ms. Miers, have split off and are meeting/worshipping at a hotel). God really wants to forgive me. I wish that they stuff they had up had an "updated" date so that I could tell what went up before the schism and what is post-schism. Valley View Christian Church in Dallas.
I hate to be the messanger, but it seems to me like she ain't got much to work with. Look at this

http://www.whitehouse.gov/ask/images...t-margaret.jpg

you'd think we could find someone with a law degree and something more than an A-cup.

Hank Chinaski 10-05-2005 05:03 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
By association ala 2 degrees of separation. I believe it is SS (unless it was Hank) has previously voiced support of Elian's freedom robbing kidnapping at the hands of the Red conspirators, Shake n Bake Reno, Clinton and their comrade in arms, Fidel. Chavez and Fidel are bossom buddies. Ergo, it follows SS is part of their little cabal, or at least a riff raffian co-conspirator.
plus he might know the guy who blew up at an Oklahoma football game.

ltl/fb 10-05-2005 05:04 PM

George Will on Miers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I hate to be the messanger, but it seems to me like she ain't got much to work with. Look at this

http://www.whitehouse.gov/ask/images...t-margaret.jpg

you'd think we could someone with a law degree and something more than an A-cup.
??? You are not wise in the ways of hairstyling, TX style. With enough spray and a few curling irons of different sizes, that hair could get pretty high. The higher the hair, the closer to God.

Replaced_Texan 10-05-2005 05:04 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
In CA such tickets put points on your driving record which the insurance companys have access to. If the insurance companys did not have access to these records I would never go to traffic school.
Well, the difference is that the state legislature tried very hard to prevent the whole thing from happening, so it's entirely a city ordinance, which is why it's a civil fine instead of a criminal one. The ticket that the cop gave me in April for running that red light would have shown up on my insurance (had it not been dismissed on Friday for unknown reasons; I was guilty as hell). The ticket that a hypothetical camera will give me next month will be a civil fine by the city of Houston that cannot be reported to the insurance industry.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 05:04 PM

Islam. A religion for throwing the bomb or 3 yards and a cloud of dust?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
You are aware that the God of Islam is the same God as the God of the Bible, aren't you?
Yes, but the god of islam's son wasn't a drunk pedophile. nttawwt.

Replaced_Texan 10-05-2005 05:07 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by cheeky monkey
That's cold dude. Chill out.
Hmm. I guess SS's request was fulfilled.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 05:07 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
It's only divinity because you choose to believe it. In this little game of metaphysical chess, I believe that would constitute a check. But let's not get sidetracked here.

You said:



That statement doesn't answer the question of whether or not there are absolute rights and absolute wrongs. It only defines what belief set you choose to point to. If God, as you call him, establishes what is right and what is wrong, then are you suggesting that everything God declares to be wrong is absolutely wrong?
Yes.

baltassoc 10-05-2005 05:08 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by cheeky monkey
That's cold dude. Chill out.
Wow. That was cold. I had no idea my approval (or lack thereof) meant so much to the racist bastard. (Had you not quoted him, I'd likely still not know.)

[Penske]'s but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury
Signifying nothing.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 05:12 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Don't forget that Tom McClintock ran against Arnold (it was an open election - no primaries - everyone on the same ticket) and Arnold still won by a landslide even with McClintock getting fifteen percent of the vote. So even if the archconservatives sit it out we can still win.

A moderate Republican can win in New York (Giuliani) California, Mass (current governor), Ohio, Penn (Spector), New Jersey (Whitman) Michigan and Illinois. They would have a strong shot in Florida and Texas (depending on how many conservatives bail). I think that is a majority of the electoral college right there.
spank, I love ya, and I know you know far more political strategy than I, but come on. Arnold is not representative of a "normal" candidate of any stripe.


As for some of the others, Spector is not a moderate. Whitman is okay but she is probably the left side of moderate, notwithstanding her book, Giuliani is somewhat of a special case, but I don't think he could beat hitlery in NY. Sadly.

Hank Chinaski 10-05-2005 05:14 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by baltassoc
Wow. That was cold. I had no idea my approval (or lack thereof) meant so much to the racist bastard. (Had you not quoted him, I'd likely still not know.)

[Penske]'s but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury
Signifying nothing.
1 the "you're on ignore" act is best done by old schooler's like Paigow or Thurgreed. You run the risk of someone thanking you for ignoring them, or asking who you are, etc.

2 As RT's consort you have to think how hurtful the things you say are. Let RT make the criticisms. You should stick to non-controversial issues- Did you ever hear Laura Bush attack anyone personally?

Gattigap 10-05-2005 05:14 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
By association ala 2 degrees of separation. I believe it is SS (unless it was Hank) has previously voiced support of Elian's freedom robbing kidnapping at the hands of the Red conspirators, Shake n Bake Reno, Clinton and their comrade in arms, Fidel. Chavez and Fidel are bossom buddies. Ergo, it follows SS is part of their little cabal, or at least a riff raffian co-conspirator.
Let's save this one for the archives, kids.

Next time anyone calls Penske out for calling us, individually, baby killers, racists, or some such other shit, he'll attack us for poor reading skills. But when he gets tagged with a pure-ty fuckup in this regard, he freaks and goes all Kevin Bacon.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 05:15 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Reagan had to do it because Nixon had fucked up.

You'll see how it goes in Mass. with Romney. I doubt the support that elected him governor will be there in the primaries (if he gets that far) now that he's born again.

And how do you explain ME, NH, and RI, all of which have R senators, but voted for Kerry. There's R support there, but not religious right.
Got it. And Reagan went right because of Nixon. His prior couple of decades of history of writing and talking about issues that resonated with the right must have been a set up for that moment. Amazing he could forsee the need.

The people in ME NH and RI was RiNOs of the worst order. I could call myself a democrat, it doesn't make your in tune with the national party., even excepting the fringes.

taxwonk 10-05-2005 05:17 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
By association ala 2 degrees of separation. I believe it is SS (unless it was Hank) has previously voiced support of Elian's freedom robbing kidnapping at the hands of the Red conspirators, Shake n Bake Reno, Clinton and their comrade in arms, Fidel. Chavez and Fidel are bossom buddies. Ergo, it follows SS is part of their little cabal, or at least a riff raffian co-conspirator.
So, again, you are resorting to guilt by association. The two degrees of separation argument is exactly what you have been doing to me, but with respect to Robert Byrd, notwithstanding that I have never once said anything that could be favorably disposed toward Byrd.

Now, let's examine your substantive point here. You are asserting that it was wrong of the US to return Elian to Cuba. Is that an absolute wrong or a relative wrong?

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 05:18 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Not true. At least in DC (and I think this is the case in surrounding jurisdictions), the fine is against the car owner and the car. The ticket is sent to the owner. The owner can sign an affidavit that someone else was driving, or pay the fine. Not paying means the fine shows up next time you try to register. There are no consequences for the ticket other than the fine, however (like a parking ticket), which may save the gov't. That said, if your argument works, what are you going to do about it when they don't let you reregister your car? Claim "sufficiency of service"?
Don't pay and move to a different jurisdiction.

taxwonk 10-05-2005 05:18 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by dtb
Why does the insurance industry endorse special laws for Austrians?
Have you ever seen his work for Vogue? He was an absolute genius.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com