![]() |
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
I'm nice, damnit. |
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
I be sure to leave the such things to old skoolers like Paigow (Paigow's old skool?). I understand my responsibilities as prince consort. I made my message confidential to Sidd. The fact that you and/or penske read it is a shocking (Shocking!) violation of the sanctity of the small italic type message. I feel like Phillip after the whole cell phone debacle. |
Islam. A religion for throwing the bomb or 3 yards and a cloud of dust?
Quote:
|
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
|
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
|
Islam. A religion for throwing the bomb or 3 yards and a cloud of dust?
Quote:
|
But She's Real Sorry About It.
Quote:
|
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
1. If it makes you happy to think that I dislike you and think you are a racist, like Democratic Party Leader Byrd, that's fine. I will stipulate to that for you. I don't think it is what I really believe but you and Sidd want it to be so so badly that it's easier to stipulate than engage in this stupidity. 2. Absolute. |
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
Are you aiming to be a minor league Atticus? |
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
|
Islam. A religion for throwing the bomb or 3 yards and a cloud of dust?
Quote:
|
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
|
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
Quote:
|
Islam. A religion for throwing the bomb or 3 yards and a cloud of dust?
Quote:
|
Islam. A religion for throwing the bomb or 3 yards and a cloud of dust?
Quote:
|
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
|
Islam. A religion for throwing the bomb or 3 yards and a cloud of dust?
Quote:
But just in case, I would think about getting circumcised if you aren't already. And knock it off with the matzo brei mishegas, already, ngu? |
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
|
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
|
Islam. A religion for throwing the bomb or 3 yards and a cloud of dust?
Quote:
|
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
Check. |
George Will on Miers
Quote:
I know well a lady about that age who is just retiring after a very successful career as a litigator (product defense, mostly). She rose to lead a Practice Group and sit on the Board and Management Committee of a large law firm (Amlaw 250) here on the East Coast. Her stories about some events while she was a summer associate in the early 1970s and a young litigator are just truly remarkable. (Not sexual assault -- just the way the firm and senior partners dealt with women.) Our local bank (top 30 city by population) would not allow my mother to open her own individual checking account in the mid -1960s. S_A_M |
From the DLC. I thought this was interesting......
=============================================
THE NEW DEM DISPATCH, October 05, 2005 Political commentary & analysis from the DLC ============================================= [http://www.DLC.org ] D.C.'s Charter Experiment: Mixed Grades, Great Promise The Katrina recovery effort has sparked yet another Kabuki-theater- type debate in Congress about conservative efforts to divert public money to subsidize private schools, as though that were the only available alternative to keeping public schools exactly the way they are. Ironically, in the same city, there is an enormous experiment underway to explore the potential of charter public schools -- schools that maintain the equal access and accountability for use of taxpayer dollars characteristic of traditional public schools, while appropriating much of the competitive quality and ability to innovate characteristic of the best private schools. About one-third of D.C. public school students now attend one of the city's 52 charter schools -- far more than the percentage in any of the 50 states. As an important new report from the Progressive Policy Institute explains, we are beginning to learn a lot about what to do and what not to do in making these and all other public schools successful. In Capital Campaign: Early Returns on D.C. Charter Schools, PPI fellow Sara Mead outlines the tangled history of the D.C. charter movement, but notes that Washington is exactly the kind of place where charter schools can perform a critical function: a city with a very troubled public school system, serving a heavily disadvantaged student population. Fortunately, charter schools in D.C. benefit from a strong legal authorization, a relatively level "playing ground," and intense interest from parents and students. As Mead notes, the District gives charters a strong foundation because it "provides for multiple authorizers; funds charter schools on an equitable basis with other public schools; gives charter schools significant operational and academic flexibility; and provides charter schools additional per- pupil facilities funding" -- all features often lacking in states with a weaker commitment to public school choice, and all features that have contributed to the remarkable growth of charter schools in Washington. In terms of initial performance in the decade since charter schools first appeared in D.C., Mead reports that they have in fact on average outperformed traditional public schools in all the standard measurements of student achievement. But the variations in charter school performance have been unusually wide, with a few "super- stars" such as Community Academy, the KIPP DC/KEY Academy, and SEED Public Charter School (the nation's only public boarding school); a variety of middle-of-the-pack performers; and nine schools that have closed down, eight of them because their charters were revoked. D.C.'s unusual dual-authorizer system has also produced variable results and important lessons, with one authorizer taking a hands- off position and the other perhaps engaging in too much micromanagement of schools. This illustrates the difficulty and the importance of striking the right balance in charter school oversight between the freedom to innovate and accountability for results. Mead makes a number of recommendations for improving charter schools in the District: * Providing more help to charter schools in obtaining suitable facilities, especially using excess space available in traditional public schools; * Closing more low-performance charter schools and providing a smooth transition and new opportunities for their students; * Focusing on raising the performance of "middle-of-the-pack" schools; * Clarifying the roles of charter school authorizers and more closely monitoring the quality of their decisions; * Improving data on charter school performance, and making it more broadly useful and accessible; * Integrating charter schools more systematically into overall public school strategies for reform and better performance. As Mead concludes: "The District of Columbia's charter school movement is strong, despite growing pains." If it continues to make strides in one of the toughest educational environments in the country -- an environment that reflects America's most important educational challenges -- then this little-known experiment in the shadow of the Capitol can and should move into the front-lines of national debate on how to build world-class schools. |
George Will on Miers
Quote:
|
George Will on Miers
Quote:
|
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
So in other words you want to motivate me to impose a prior restraint on my political speech because you don't like it? Interesting that this is what I see from the left generally a lot. I talk with people irl about politics with some frequency. People who make moveon.org members look rightwing. I would never say to them, I know you are going to criticise Bush and I know its going to be visceral emotional observations and vitriolic and I don't want to hear it because it makes me feel like you are saying those things about me. I listen to what they say. I may say, that's sort of fucked up, but I don't say don't say it. Why do you want to supress speech? Quote:
|
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
I speculate that Penske just has it in for Balt because Balt suggested that Penske's: (a) vocal celebration of the deaths of left wingers and certain foreign people of color, and (b) hyperbolic condemnation of certain broad groups of people (by politics, ethnicity and/or religion) might be honest expressions of his opinions and reflect motives that are less than pure. I've actually enjoyed much of Penske's posting since he has stopped socking and become more coherent -- but the key is not to take a single word he says seriously if his post includes sentences with more than one adjective in a row. S_A_M [et change "three" to "one".] |
George Will on Miers
Quote:
S_A_M |
George Will on Miers
Quote:
|
DING!
Quote:
While you're at it, you should drop the grand ol' part as well, because those are the roots, not the babyjesusloving southerners. |
Islam. A religion for throwing the bomb or 3 yards and a cloud of dust?
Quote:
|
DING!
Quote:
I wonder if the porch party is still on. |
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
|
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
|
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
eta: giving, not taking, nttawwt. |
DING!
Quote:
|
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
|
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
Quote:
2. When the wishes of a young child and a parent don't coincide, whose wishes must be honored? Check. |
DING!
Quote:
It's easy to figure out. When Lott says: I don't just automatically salute or take a deep bow anytime a nominee is sent up," he said. "I have to find out who these people are, and right now, I'm not satisfied with what I know. I'm not comfortable with the nomination, so we'll just have to work through the process in due time." Lott said while Miers may be qualified, she is "clearly" not the most qualified person for the job. Essentially that means, I am as smart or smarter than this lady and a Supreme Court nominee should impress me, big tyme, with their intellect. More than one commentator and Senator noted that Roberts' intellect obviously outclassed most, if not all, of the Senate. Jones, Luttig, McConnel, Alita, JRB etal, all possess that ability. Certainly on jurisprudence, no matter how much their staff is feeding them, those judges run circles around the likes of boneheads like Kennedy and Biden (and Lott too). Even though I am back in the fold (hi Spanky!) this is an fawful nomination and I hope and pray to the babyjesuschristsuperstar that the Lott's and Brownback's of the world have the intestinal fortitude to deep six it. for history's sake. |
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
Are you actually now saying that Bush is a murderer as well, because he has commanded the killing of thousands of Afghans and Iraqis? And what of your claimed love for the Second Amendment? If you are truly a devoted disciple of God and Jesus, then how can you express a wilingness to kill? Is it because all of this is relative? Checkmate? |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:41 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com