LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Waiting for Fitzgerald (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=704)

Replaced_Texan 10-05-2005 05:21 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski

2 As RT's consort you have to think how hurtful the things you say are. Let RT make the criticisms. You should stick to non-controversial issues- Did you ever hear Laura Bush attack anyone personally?
Did you ever hear of RT doing same? (aside from asshole drivers and motherfucking jackass tom delay)

I'm nice, damnit.

baltassoc 10-05-2005 05:21 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
1 the "you're on ignore" act is best done by old schooler's like Paigow or Thurgreed. You run the risk of someone thanking you for ignoring them, or asking who you are, etc.

2 As RT's consort you have to think how hurtful the things you say are. Let RT make the criticisms. You should stick to non-controversial issues- Did you ever hear Laura Bush attack anyone personally?
Wow, thanks for the great advice, Hank!

I be sure to leave the such things to old skoolers like Paigow (Paigow's old skool?).

I understand my responsibilities as prince consort. I made my message confidential to Sidd. The fact that you and/or penske read it is a shocking (Shocking!) violation of the sanctity of the small italic type message. I feel like Phillip after the whole cell phone debacle.

taxwonk 10-05-2005 05:23 PM

Islam. A religion for throwing the bomb or 3 yards and a cloud of dust?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Yes, but the god of islam's son wasn't a drunk pedophile. nttawwt.
I'm sorry. I don't understand what you are saying here. The God Islam is the God of Abraham. The Muslims, like the Jews, don't believe God had a son.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 05:23 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Funny, I don't think he responded to this one. Of course, sometimes it takes Penske a few hours to respond to posts.
I was at lunch. Interesting that you were done with the conversation, yet you still feel the compulsion to post about me. Why the campaign of slander? Of hate? Its as if you are employing the tactics of hatred of Byrd or Carville. Why?

taxwonk 10-05-2005 05:24 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Yes.
Okay, so you believe that what God declares to be wrong is an absolute wrong. Can I then assume you are opposed to the war in Iraq?

Replaced_Texan 10-05-2005 05:25 PM

Islam. A religion for throwing the bomb or 3 yards and a cloud of dust?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
I'm sorry. I don't understand what you are saying here. The God Islam is the God of Abraham. The Muslims, like the Jews, don't believe God had a son.
Seems to me, given how much his teachings are disregarded, some Christians don't either.

taxwonk 10-05-2005 05:27 PM

But She's Real Sorry About It.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Did you ever hear Laura Bush attack anyone personally?
Actually, I believe she killed someone in a car. Which is an attack, isn't it?

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 05:28 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
So, again, you are resorting to guilt by association. The two degrees of separation argument is exactly what you have been doing to me, but with respect to Robert Byrd, notwithstanding that I have never once said anything that could be favorably disposed toward Byrd.

Now, let's examine your substantive point here. You are asserting that it was wrong of the US to return Elian to Cuba. Is that an absolute wrong or a relative wrong?

1. If it makes you happy to think that I dislike you and think you are a racist, like Democratic Party Leader Byrd, that's fine. I will stipulate to that for you. I don't think it is what I really believe but you and Sidd want it to be so so badly that it's easier to stipulate than engage in this stupidity.

2. Absolute.

Hank Chinaski 10-05-2005 05:28 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by baltassoc
Wow, thanks for the great advice, Hank!

I be sure to leave the such things to old skoolers like Paigow (Paigow's old skool?).

I understand my responsibilities as prince consort. I made my message confidential to Sidd. The fact that you and/or penske read it is a shocking (Shocking!) violation of the sanctity of the small italic type message. I feel like Phillip after the whole cell phone debacle.
The whole "confidential" post style is tired- and doubly so the "why did you read what I posted confidentially?"

Are you aiming to be a minor league Atticus?

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 05:29 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
Let's save this one for the archives, kids.

Next time anyone calls Penske out for calling us, individually, baby killers, racists, or some such other shit, he'll attack us for poor reading skills. But when he gets tagged with a pure-ty fuckup in this regard, he freaks and goes all Kevin Bacon.
Isn't Bacon a democrat? You should be happy I am giving him tacit props.

Hank Chinaski 10-05-2005 05:31 PM

Islam. A religion for throwing the bomb or 3 yards and a cloud of dust?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
I'm sorry. I don't understand what you are saying here. The God Islam is the God of Abraham. The Muslims, like the Jews, don't believe God had a son.
Some of my in-laws don't like that I'm not a Jew. When they come near me, so I worry they might blow us both up?

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 05:33 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by baltassoc
Wow. That was cold. I had no idea my approval (or lack thereof) meant so much to the racist bastard. (Had you not quoted him, I'd likely still not know.)

[Penske]'s but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury
Signifying nothing.
You are a jack arse. Read your post and honestly assess the maturity level of the person who wrote. I give you the benefit of doubt of assuming you are bitter and you're projecting. If not, you have the maturity level of 8 year old. And to say reading the posts on an internet chatboard can give you stress is indicative of other psychoses I don't feel the need to dwell on. If you're serious, get help.

taxwonk 10-05-2005 05:34 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
1. If it makes you happy to think that I dislike you and think you are a racist, like Democratic Party Leader Byrd, that's fine. I will stipulate to that for you. I don't think it is what I really believe but you and Sidd want it to be so so badly that it's easier to stipulate than engage in this stupidity.
Actually, we don't want you to stipulate to it. We want you to stop it.

Quote:

2. Absolute.
Okay, if it was an absolute wrong for the US to return Elian to Cuba, then parents must not have any right to raise their children as they see fit?

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 05:36 PM

Islam. A religion for throwing the bomb or 3 yards and a cloud of dust?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
I'm sorry. I don't understand what you are saying here. The God Islam is the God of Abraham. The Muslims, like the Jews, don't believe God had a son.
I thought we were all god's children, no? Why exclude Mohammed? Unless he was SAtan's spawn, yes?

baltassoc 10-05-2005 05:36 PM

Islam. A religion for throwing the bomb or 3 yards and a cloud of dust?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Some of my in-laws don't like that I'm not a Jew. When they come near me, so I worry they might blow us both up?
Are they from Oklahoma? Because that's where all the terrorists seem to come from.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 05:36 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
Okay, so you believe that what God declares to be wrong is an absolute wrong. Can I then assume you are opposed to the war in Iraq?
No.

taxwonk 10-05-2005 05:41 PM

Islam. A religion for throwing the bomb or 3 yards and a cloud of dust?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Some of my in-laws don't like that I'm not a Jew. When they come near me, so I worry they might blow us both up?
I don't tend to believe that someone's religion has anything to do with whether or not they are prone to throw bombs. It's the sort of activity that people of all faiths take part in.

But just in case, I would think about getting circumcised if you aren't already. And knock it off with the matzo brei mishegas, already, ngu?

blueballs 10-05-2005 05:41 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
You are a jack arse. Read your post and honestly assess the maturity level of the person who wrote. I give you the benefit of doubt of assuming you are bitter and you're projecting. If not, you have the maturity level of 8 year old. And to say reading the posts on an internet chatboard can give you stress is indicative of other psychoses I don't feel the need to dwell on. If you're serious, get help.
Can't we all just get along?

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 05:43 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
The whole "confidential" post style is tired- and doubly so the "why did you read what I posted confidentially?"

Are you aiming to be a minor league Atticus?
2. The confidential post thing was why justice.com invented email for GA posters back in 2001. How lame to be living 4 years behind the curve.

taxwonk 10-05-2005 05:47 PM

Islam. A religion for throwing the bomb or 3 yards and a cloud of dust?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I thought we were all god's children, no? Why exclude Mohammed? Unless he was SAtan's spawn, yes?
I believe that the statement that we are all God's children is a metaphor. But if you aren't taking it as a meatphor, then I would have to reply that God has chosen many imperfect prophets. Augustine... Moses... Perhaps he's just more forgiving than some of us here on Earth?

taxwonk 10-05-2005 05:48 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
No.
But the very first of God's Commandments is Thou Shalt Not Kill. Therefore, wouldn't all killing, even in war, be an absolute wrong?

Check.

Secret_Agent_Man 10-05-2005 05:54 PM

George Will on Miers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
I have to disagree with Will on the fact that you can't assume she has been a victim of discrimination. If she is 61, she had to overcome serious obstacles to get where she is today. Especially in Texas where the old boys network is a strong as ever. I believe those obstacles have been seriously diminshed but there were rock solid when she began her legal career.
Word.

I know well a lady about that age who is just retiring after a very successful career as a litigator (product defense, mostly). She rose to lead a Practice Group and sit on the Board and Management Committee of a large law firm (Amlaw 250) here on the East Coast.

Her stories about some events while she was a summer associate in the early 1970s and a young litigator are just truly remarkable. (Not sexual assault -- just the way the firm and senior partners dealt with women.)

Our local bank (top 30 city by population) would not allow my mother to open her own individual checking account in the mid -1960s.

S_A_M

Spanky 10-05-2005 05:59 PM

From the DLC. I thought this was interesting......
 
=============================================
THE NEW DEM DISPATCH, October 05, 2005
Political commentary & analysis from the DLC =============================================
[http://www.DLC.org ]

D.C.'s Charter Experiment: Mixed Grades, Great Promise


The Katrina recovery effort has sparked yet another Kabuki-theater- type debate in Congress about conservative efforts to divert public
money to subsidize private schools, as though that were the only
available alternative to keeping public schools exactly the way they
are.

Ironically, in the same city, there is an enormous experiment
underway to explore the potential of charter public schools --
schools that maintain the equal access and accountability for use of
taxpayer dollars characteristic of traditional public schools, while
appropriating much of the competitive quality and ability to
innovate characteristic of the best private schools.

About one-third of D.C. public school students now attend one of the
city's 52 charter schools -- far more than the percentage in any of
the 50 states. As an important new report from the Progressive
Policy Institute explains, we are beginning to learn a lot about
what to do and what not to do in making these and all other public
schools successful.

In Capital Campaign: Early Returns on D.C. Charter Schools, PPI
fellow Sara Mead outlines the tangled history of the D.C. charter
movement, but notes that Washington is exactly the kind of place
where charter schools can perform a critical function: a city with a
very troubled public school system, serving a heavily disadvantaged
student population.

Fortunately, charter schools in D.C. benefit from a strong legal
authorization, a relatively level "playing ground," and intense
interest from parents and students. As Mead notes, the District
gives charters a strong foundation because it "provides for multiple
authorizers; funds charter schools on an equitable basis with other
public schools; gives charter schools significant operational and
academic flexibility; and provides charter schools additional per- pupil facilities funding" -- all features often lacking in states
with a weaker commitment to public school choice, and all features
that have contributed to the remarkable growth of charter schools in
Washington.

In terms of initial performance in the decade since charter schools
first appeared in D.C., Mead reports that they have in fact on
average outperformed traditional public schools in all the standard
measurements of student achievement. But the variations in charter
school performance have been unusually wide, with a few "super- stars" such as Community Academy, the KIPP DC/KEY Academy, and SEED
Public Charter School (the nation's only public boarding school); a
variety of middle-of-the-pack performers; and nine schools that have
closed down, eight of them because their charters were revoked.

D.C.'s unusual dual-authorizer system has also produced variable
results and important lessons, with one authorizer taking a hands- off position and the other perhaps engaging in too much
micromanagement of schools. This illustrates the difficulty and the
importance of striking the right balance in charter school oversight
between the freedom to innovate and accountability for results.

Mead makes a number of recommendations for improving charter schools
in the District:

* Providing more help to charter schools in obtaining suitable
facilities, especially using excess space available in
traditional public schools;

* Closing more low-performance charter schools and providing a
smooth transition and new opportunities for their students;

* Focusing on raising the performance of "middle-of-the-pack"
schools;

* Clarifying the roles of charter school authorizers and more
closely monitoring the quality of their decisions;

* Improving data on charter school performance, and making it
more broadly useful and accessible;

* Integrating charter schools more systematically into overall
public school strategies for reform and better performance.

As Mead concludes: "The District of Columbia's charter school
movement is strong, despite growing pains." If it continues to make
strides in one of the toughest educational environments in the
country -- an environment that reflects America's most important
educational challenges -- then this little-known experiment in the
shadow of the Capitol can and should move into the front-lines of
national debate on how to build world-class schools.

robustpuppy 10-05-2005 06:07 PM

George Will on Miers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
Word.

I know well a lady about that age who is just retiring after a very successful career as a litigator (product defense, mostly). She rose to lead a Practice Group and sit on the Board and Management Committee of a large law firm (Amlaw 250) here on the East Coast.

Her stories about some events while she was a summer associate in the early 1970s and a young litigator are just truly remarkable. (Not sexual assault -- just the way the firm and senior partners dealt with women.)

Our local bank (top 30 city by population) would not allow my mother to open her own individual checking account in the mid -1960s.

S_A_M
I have heard, in addition to such stories about firms, stories about abominable treatment of women in law school in the early 70s, e.g., being required to stand up and state their LSAT scores as justification (or lack thereof) for their being present at the school; only being called on or permitted to ask questions in class on particular days, and the like.

Spanky 10-05-2005 06:08 PM

George Will on Miers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man


Our local bank (top 30 city by population) would not allow my mother to open her own individual checking account in the mid -1960s.

S_A_M
For the love of God. What state do you live in?

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 06:10 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
Actually, we don't want you to stipulate to it. We want you to stop it.


So in other words you want to motivate me to impose a prior restraint on my political speech because you don't like it? Interesting that this is what I see from the left generally a lot. I talk with people irl about politics with some frequency. People who make moveon.org members look rightwing. I would never say to them, I know you are going to criticise Bush and I know its going to be visceral emotional observations and vitriolic and I don't want to hear it because it makes me feel like you are saying those things about me. I listen to what they say. I may say, that's sort of fucked up, but I don't say don't say it. Why do you want to supress speech?

Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk


Okay, if it was an absolute wrong for the US to return Elian to Cuba, then parents must not have any right to raise their children as they see fit?
His natural rights trumped.

Secret_Agent_Man 10-05-2005 06:12 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
2 As RT's consort you have to think how hurtful the things you say are. Let RT make the criticisms. You should stick to non-controversial issues- Did you ever hear Laura Bush attack anyone personally?
Oh my. But why was his joke hurtful? Should not have been, even under the eggshell theory.

I speculate that Penske just has it in for Balt because Balt suggested that Penske's:

(a) vocal celebration of the deaths of left wingers and certain foreign people of color, and

(b) hyperbolic condemnation of certain broad groups of people (by politics, ethnicity and/or religion) might be honest expressions of his opinions and reflect motives that are less than pure.

I've actually enjoyed much of Penske's posting since he has stopped socking and become more coherent -- but the key is not to take a single word he says seriously if his post includes sentences with more than one adjective in a row.

S_A_M
[et change "three" to "one".]

Secret_Agent_Man 10-05-2005 06:19 PM

George Will on Miers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
For the love of God. What state do you live in?
It was in the State of Ohio.

S_A_M

ltl/fb 10-05-2005 06:22 PM

George Will on Miers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
It was in the State of Ohio.

S_A_M
Edit -- nevermind, I looked it up.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 10-05-2005 06:24 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
The people in ME NH and RI was RiNOs of the worst order. I could call myself a democrat, it doesn't make your in tune with the national party., even excepting the fringes.
So you're saying the republicans are a majority party in name only? Because drop those RiNO Senators and even the nuclear option is unavailable.

While you're at it, you should drop the grand ol' part as well, because those are the roots, not the babyjesusloving southerners.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 06:25 PM

Islam. A religion for throwing the bomb or 3 yards and a cloud of dust?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
I believe that the statement that we are all God's children is a metaphor. But if you aren't taking it as a meatphor, then I would have to reply that God has chosen many imperfect prophets. Augustine... Moses... Perhaps he's just more forgiving than some of us here on Earth?
Perhaps, which is why I try to be a beacon of understanding and foregiveness, following the ways of the babyjesi. Hating solely the sin and not the sinner.

Replaced_Texan 10-05-2005 06:28 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
So you're saying the republicans are a majority party in name only? Because drop those RiNO Senators and even the nuclear option is unavailable.

While you're at it, you should drop the grand ol' part as well, because those are the roots, not the babyjesusloving southerners.
Hmm... Lott is breaking ranks.

I wonder if the porch party is still on.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 06:42 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
But the very first of God's Commandments is Thou Shalt Not Kill. Therefore, wouldn't all killing, even in war, be an absolute wrong?

Check.
So what if it is. Then God will be their judge. I am not saying we can't engage in absolute wrong, I am just saying call it what it is.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 10-05-2005 06:44 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
So what if it is. Then God will be their judge. I am not saying we can't engage in absolute wrong, I am just saying call it what it is.
But if they just want to engage in some good ol' fashion buttfucking, then letting God be their judge doesn't get the job done?

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 06:47 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
But if they just want to engage in some good ol' fashion buttfucking, then letting God be their judge doesn't get the job done?
When did I say that? I am pro-anal (hi uknowwho!).


eta: giving, not taking, nttawwt.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 10-05-2005 06:48 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Hmm... Lott is breaking ranks.

I wonder if the porch party is still on.
Sandy's going to be there a while.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 10-05-2005 06:48 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
When did I say that? I am pro-anal (hi uknowwho!).


eta: giving, not taking, nttawwt.
RiNO either way.

taxwonk 10-05-2005 06:51 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
So in other words you want to motivate me to impose a prior restraint on my political speech because you don't like it? Interesting that this is what I see from the left generally a lot. I talk with people irl about politics with some frequency. People who make moveon.org members look rightwing. I would never say to them, I know you are going to criticise Bush and I know its going to be visceral emotional observations and vitriolic and I don't want to hear it because it makes me feel like you are saying those things about me. I listen to what they say. I may say, that's sort of fucked up, but I don't say don't say it. Why do you want to supress speech?
What I want is for you to stop saying that anybody who disagrees with you is just as bad as a rapist and a murderer and a bigot. I want you to stop responding to everything by posting pictures of Byrd in a klan hood. I want you to discuss things like a grownup.


Quote:

His natural rights trumped.
1. God say that Thou Shalt Honor thy Mother and Thy Father. Since Elian's mother was dead, it was absolutely Right that the wishes of Elian's father be honored.

2. When the wishes of a young child and a parent don't coincide, whose wishes must be honored?

Check.

Penske_Account 10-05-2005 06:55 PM

DING!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Hmm... Lott is breaking ranks.

I wonder if the porch party is still on.

It's easy to figure out. When Lott says:

I don't just automatically salute or take a deep bow anytime a nominee is sent up," he said. "I have to find out who these people are, and right now, I'm not satisfied with what I know. I'm not comfortable with the nomination, so we'll just have to work through the process in due time."

Lott said while Miers may be qualified, she is "clearly" not the most qualified person for the job.


Essentially that means, I am as smart or smarter than this lady and a Supreme Court nominee should impress me, big tyme, with their intellect. More than one commentator and Senator noted that Roberts' intellect obviously outclassed most, if not all, of the Senate. Jones, Luttig, McConnel, Alita, JRB etal, all possess that ability. Certainly on jurisprudence, no matter how much their staff is feeding them, those judges run circles around the likes of boneheads like Kennedy and Biden (and Lott too).

Even though I am back in the fold (hi Spanky!) this is an fawful nomination and I hope and pray to the babyjesuschristsuperstar that the Lott's and Brownback's of the world have the intestinal fortitude to deep six it. for history's sake.

taxwonk 10-05-2005 07:05 PM

Calling Penske Out
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
So what if it is. Then God will be their judge. I am not saying we can't engage in absolute wrong, I am just saying call it what it is.
Ah, but Penske, that is exactly what you are saying. You say it all the time. You hate the Clintons because they have done wrong. You hate Ted Kennedy because he has done wrong. Same for Byrd and Michael Moore.

Are you actually now saying that Bush is a murderer as well, because he has commanded the killing of thousands of Afghans and Iraqis?

And what of your claimed love for the Second Amendment? If you are truly a devoted disciple of God and Jesus, then how can you express a wilingness to kill?

Is it because all of this is relative?

Checkmate?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:02 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com