![]() |
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
Quote:
Prosecutors can't use prior convictions for the same type of conduct where you live? I'm a little overwhelmed by all the research you all are doing into this, and not going to dive into the weeds with you. I like the Patriots. But they've been caught cheating twice in recent years -- that's not a presumption, that's finding (so, really, my rhetorical question could well have been "Judges don't consider the conviction at sentencing where you live?" But that would have been opaque.) TM is very, very animated about this -- as he is (and many others are) about many things on this board, including seemingly all sports-related things (including sports he doesn't particularly like -- I miss the "I don't like soccer but let's debate the offsides rule" days, personally). Doesn't mean he's not actually right. |
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
Quote:
Do you believe they are equally possible? I'm honestly curious. I don't plan to read the entire whatshisname report, but I believe it reached the conclusion that the former is more likely than the latter, and I don't see a good reason to reject that conclusion. |
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
Quote:
|
Just Wondering
If I said that Belicheck, by cheating -- or, if you like, by getting to the very edge of the rules and maybe occasionally going past them, but only in an itty-bitty way -- and not really getting punished, had created an atmosphere where his players seem to think they can get away with murder, would that be in poor taste?
|
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
Quote:
And if you want to talk about sentencing/punishment, fine. But that was neither Ty's nor my point. |
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
Quote:
You also left out the part that says "...the reduction in pressure of the Patriots game balls cannot be explained completely by basic scientific principles..." And the part that says the difference in pressure drop for Patriots balls exceed the average pressure drop of the Colts balls by ~.5 to 1 psi, which the scientific experts deemed statistically significant. I won't even go into the list of factors their experts ruled out as a cause of the differences. Pesky facts getting in the way. TM |
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
Quote:
|
Re: Crimson and Clover
Quote:
|
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
Quote:
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...e-of-evidence/ Quote:
|
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
Quote:
But I don't understand why one can't discuss a rule that I don't understand. As far as I can tell, the only responses I got were of the "it prevents players from camping out on one end of the field," variety. When I asked why that's a concern since the other team could either take an advantage of one fewer player against them on defense or leave a player back to guard against cherry-picking, all I heard was silence. I've since researched it a bit and spoken to people who actually understand the game and apparently, the rule is supposed to protect the beauty of the perfectly-timed pass. Makes sense, I guess. I still think if you removed the rule, there would be more (or maybe different, to be fair) strategy. If it turned into one team dumping the ball into the other team's end--similar to hockey--that would ruin it. TM |
Top 20
Quote:
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=3326 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=3327 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=3328 http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=3329 TM |
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
Quote:
I didn't say we can't discuss that rule. I honestly enjoyed that discussion. But, I think I realized the true answer sometime after the discussion ended. The offsides rule does not apply on a corner kick. On a corner kick, the players all jam up in front of the goal, and everyone jumps around hoping to get a lucky tip into the goal. Sometimes you see beautiful scoring plays off a corner kick, but more often it's a lot of junky hits on the ball, and the goalie really can't do anything but try to punch the ball -- no playing angles, no coordinating the defense, nothing. Imagine every offensive play allowing for that -- players running just to get into the box, or hanging back on offense so that they can run back, and the offense reduced to "just kick the ball really hard towards to goal and hope someone manages to pop it in". I think you'd get a higher-scoring game, but one that was essentially a series of "corner" kicks -- with the corner being whatever midfield point where a player thought "I have enough teammates in the box to take a shot and hope for the best." You would lose all of the passing and technique that is designed to open up the defense (but that, I acknowledge, in the hands of some teams becomes boring as paste, e.g. Greece). |
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
Quote:
|
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
Quote:
If you want to think the whole thing turns on this article's findings and everything else amounts to a caaaarazy coincidence, then knock yourself out. TM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com