bin Laden
 

See, and you claim that i misconstrued your attack as ad hominem. I wonder why. Go back to my original post. Other than calling Goss crazy, I speculated as to motivations, and suggested they were lacking. Of course, I offered up the possiblity I was missing something. Oddly, penske, but not you, responded substantively to that inquiry, to which I responded.

Maybe I'm right; maybe I'm wrong, but why are you riding my jock as opposed to saying "it's all a plan; don't question the plan, because it's a good plan"?

Frankly, the way this admin. has conducted foreign policy (putting aside that the CIA seems to be conducting it, if the reasons Goss offers are to be believed), is particularly worthy of inquiry, regardless of how minimal the explanations they give are.

bin Laden
 

We have a foreign policy?

bin Laden
 

Until we can follow Brazil's example and ease our dependence of foreign oil, yeah. Then we can build the wall around ourselves and throw away the key.

Democrats lose California wins
 

I was under the impression that it was a national release. No?

Democrats lose California wins
 

Well, now at least you know someone has read it.

bin Laden
 

Actually on my first post about this I quoted you because you were making sense when you said "or are we not getting told everything?". It was your second post when you misquoted me that I attacked you. Anyway, you will be given no quarter today because on Saturday night at a poker game I got gang raped by a bunch of the posters to this board. Although you and the Sgt. Club were not there I am pretty sure you both were part of the conspiracy. Therefore, I am going to assume, that any comments made by members of the conspiracy are in furtherance of said conspiracy, and therefore, are intrinsically flawed.

Democrats lose California wins
 

"I was under the impression that it was a national release. No?"


See above post

bin Laden
 

Its the new paradigm. I invented the GreedyPolitics board on Infirm, which begat this Board, and yet I have never posted substantively (although I suppose Not Me attained an aura of faux substantiveness).

Seemed overdue.

bin Laden
 

None of my socks were there, because I retired from socking, but if you want to send me your ante to the pots that I would have won had I been there I will text message my paypal account.

And we are off.....
 

Hillary has been a woman of the ultra-Left ever since she entered Wellesley College 40 years ago this year. She’s been consistently anti-military (despite her recent votes), pro-nationalized health care, and pro-abortion without parental consent.

This is going to get good. I may buy this book, even though as a rule I don't read anything but client documents, this board, the WSJ and the Sunday NYTimes (go figure).

If she can survive the relentless assault over the next 3.5 years, I daresay she might deserve the office (short of achieving it by voter fraud like JFK), although my prediction is no way she can live down her true self.

The only thing I don't like is why does he politicize lesbianism!?!? is nothing sacred?!!?:

"Hillary’s politics were shaped by the culture of radical feminism and lesbianism at Wellesley College in the 1960s."

bin Laden
 

Bitch please. Club and I weren't in, so it's all those purported doves. They'd rather rape and pillage in the bay area than in Iraq, where it's deserved.

bin Laden
 

Dove? F you.

bin Laden
 

Speaking of which, McCain was on the Today Show this morning and it was noted that we (the US) are now Vietnam's biggest trading partner. Anyone think it's possible to trade him back there?

Democrats lose California wins
 

Agree with everything you said -- except criticizing the Dems for not eliminating the Reagan/Bush deficit within the first year in office -- before they had even passed a budget -- is a little..... much.

bin Laden
 

What's so scary, new-sock, is that I know you aren't joking.