![]() |
Re: Naaaahhhh....
Quote:
|
Re: Madonna is 50. Five-oh.
Quote:
TM |
Re: Madonna is 50. Five-oh.
Quote:
You might not be able to buy Radiohead on iTunes, but you can certainly (legitimately) get Radiohead online. |
Re: Madonna is 50. Five-oh.
What is the problem with iTunes from the band's perspective? Do they not pay the bands enough? Do they ask for too much control?
FWIW, I downloaded SOC this morning based on the discussion here and would have gotten the new AC/DC album as well if it were on iTunes. But I doubt I will trek to wallieworld just for one album, so I'll likely rip a friends copy after they buy it. Why doesn't AC/DC want my money? |
Re: Madonna is 50. Five-oh.
Quote:
Looks like AC/DC feels the same way. ETA: Or read RT's post a couple pages up making the same point, but earlier. |
Re: Madonna is 50. Five-oh.
Quote:
|
Re: Madonna is 50. Five-oh.
Quote:
|
Re: Madonna is 50. Five-oh.
Quote:
|
Re: Madonna is 50. Five-oh.
So AC/DC says they want to sell albums, not singles. That seems easy and it makes little sense that iTunes would deny this sort of control to acts that can sell enough to make it worthwhile. Set a bar and grant the power to any who make it over that bar. If the market doesn't want to pay for whole albums then the band suffers too.
But, Kid Rock complains that the royalty is not high enough. He points out that iTunes doesn't have all of the promotional expenses that a normal label does, so the royalty should be more than the royalty from a CD sale. Also a valid point, but nobody else can get his music on my ipod as a impulse purchase. (To be clear, there is no way Kid Rock would ever make it on in any case, but without iTunes it is even more unpossible.) Both of these issues seem relatively minor. Is Apple really so stubborn that they can't get this sort of shit together? |
Re: Madonna is 50. Five-oh.
Quote:
|
Re: Madonna is 50. Five-oh.
Quote:
I think that was a fair paraphrase of his argument from the article you posted. |
Re: Madonna is 50. Five-oh.
Quote:
|
Ummm...
I've watched this clip many times and I just don't see how it's not the referee tackling the quarterback.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFhJGPf8j14 TM |
Re: Madonna is 50. Five-oh.
Quote:
New topic, of the worlds are colliding varietale. Scratch that, new querry of a sort. So a client sends me an email today.....let me clarify, in reality the client is a corporation, a quasi-fictional person at law, if you will, and those "persons" don't have opposable thumbs or other accentuating digits to allow them to hit the "send" button to dispurse the email. The source of the email was actually a flesh and blood human employee of the client aka corporate entity. Full disclosure: middle level employee to be exact, and I say this, because I know what you are thinking, that this person, employee, must be the CEO of the client aka corporate entity, given my corner office statii, but, in fairness, out of a sense of social justice and equity, which is what I am all about, on special occassions, for a premium billing rate adjustment, I deal with the hoi polloi ("proles" in Paigowworld, sniff), if you will. Anywhom, in short, as I digress, the email read: "Last nite, I dreamted that you shaved your head, and the look was off the hizzle. Everyone in the dream loved it." Two questions: A. Is this a come on? II. If so, does the implicit reference to others in the dream indicate group sex could be at hand (and foot, and other apendage)? Serious advice appreciated! |
Re: Madonna is 50. Five-oh.
Quote:
I think AC/DC is just stuck in the past, but they can get away with it because their fans are used to buying CDs. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com