![]() |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
I don't consider myself Republican, but I am still watching to see if the party is truly dead, or if a spectacular loss will flush this out. I fear that the damage of Trump's rhetoric is permanent, but I am watching what is being planned in the shadows. This Politico story explains it pretty well. I am definitely banking on a Trump loss. http://www.politico.com/magazine/sto...d-trump-214065 |
Re: And...
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEtXT9w9AYU |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
Seems like establishment Republicans are waiting for Trump to lose so that they can try to reassert control, but I think it's that simple. |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
The Rs "losing black votes" is not a thing. Woman sure, but maybe they didn't count on that? |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
|
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
Hillary will be lucky to win as high a percentage of Black votes as Obama, and lucky to get as high a turnout as he did. But Trump is making that more likely. And Georgia and North Carolina could easily swing to the Dems based on black turnout. However, Hillary may beat Obama among Hispanics on both percentage of vote and turnout. But Hispanics have very low rates of voting. She needs marked improvement in both vote and turnout, and then Arizona and Texas come within reach. If the republicans improved their position among hispanics, it would be a big problem for the Dems in several states, but that is unlikely to occur. For Trump's core, the uneducated white voters, he needs to get to something like a 50% spoint spread in that demographic alone to flip enough states to win, assuming all others stay at 2012 levels. Even something like a 40% spread only flips Ohio and Iowa without movement elsewhere. My takeaway is that the race is going to be fought out among every demographic. The one thing this isn't useful for is testing the gender gap. Hopefully that will be included in version 2. |
Amazing
The implosion of the Republican Party has been more fun to watch than I thought it would be.
http://www.slate.com/content/dam/sla...ediumlarge.jpg I love that Cruz almost got his ass kicked for not endorsing Trump. 'The convention floor briefly devolved into chaos following his remarks. Cruz's wife, Heidi, was escorted off the floor as hecklers shouted "Goldman Sachs!" -- a reminder of where she works. Minutes later, a delegate had to be restrained from physically attacking Cruz.' http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/21/politi...ree-takeaways/ TM |
Re: Amazing
http://www.slate.com/content/dam/sla...ediumlarge.jpg
Someone is going to have to explain that salute to me. Can't be on purpose, can it? But how do you do that by accident? |
Re: Amazing
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJWygHbLIJc TM |
Re: I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.
Quote:
And the under the radar bigoted vote. "I've nothing against immigration, but let's face it - they muck up the neighborhood, and this Muslim thing in Europe's a shit show. I don't want that here." I hear sentiments like that all the time among poor to quite affluent voters of all races. It's unwise to think those doing well, who tend to be better educated, will lockstep behind Hillary. The argument I hear over and over goes like this: "You can't vote for him! It'll fuck up the market!" "Perhaps. But only for so long. And we need to shake shit up. And she'll tax the fuck out of us... Obama would have, but he couldn't because of the 2008 mess. She can and will." The "let's try something - anything - new" and "fuck all the incumbents" sentiments are also strong, and run across almost all demographics. ETA: But you'll never see any accurate data on how much these views permeate the numerous demographics because none of the people saying this shit will say it out loud except for the dumb foot soldiers you see at Trump rallies. Quote:
ETA: I don't see Trump winning, but I also don't see Nate Silver being very accurate this year. There's a potentially 'yuge, eye-opening and ugly surprise lurking beyond the data collection nets. That's what's keeping this otherwise depressing race interesting. |
Re: Amazing
Quote:
|
Re: Amazing
Quote:
I thought she was a natural. |
Re: And...
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V68umXWWJAM |
Re: Amazing
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com