LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Politics As Usual (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=580)

Say_hello_for_me 06-11-2004 01:54 PM

Bush: We tortured people, OK?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Since it turns out that menacing the Abu Ghraib prisoners with unmuzzled dogs was expressly authorized by military intelligence, according to the dog handlers, I'm afraid the "abuse was policy, not frolic" story has more legs than you're willing to admit.
Oh, so those must be the drug-sniffing dogs being misused? Lord knows you don't want the bite-em-in-the-ass-when-they-run-from-you dogs anywhere near our military. Sounds like the misuse might be cruelty to animals too. Better call PETA.

Hank Chinaski 06-11-2004 01:59 PM

Bush: We tortured people, OK?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Since it turns out that menacing the Abu Ghraib prisoners with unmuzzled dogs was expressly authorized by military intelligence, according to the dog handlers, I'm afraid the "abuse was policy, not frolic" story has more legs than you're willing to admit.
nnnnhhh, sorry no. This was for interrogation. You have to distinguish being vicious for no reason to innocents from interrogating people who know shit. I know you have a problem with interrogation, but believe me this story only has legs because of the cruel for no reason angle.

Gattigap 06-11-2004 02:04 PM

Bush: We tortured people, OK?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
nnnnhhh, sorry no. This was for interrogation. You have to distinguish being vicious for no reason to innocents from interrogating people who know shit. I know you have a problem with interrogation, but believe me this story only has legs because of the cruel for no reason angle.
As I recall, some of the photos captured the "before" and "after" of a detainee being bitten in the leg by one of these dogs, so your choice of body part in characterizing the story is apt, no?

Atticus Grinch 06-11-2004 02:09 PM

Bush: We tortured people, OK?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
Oh, so those must be the drug-sniffing dogs being misused? Lord knows you don't want the bite-em-in-the-ass-when-they-run-from-you dogs anywhere near our military. Sounds like the misuse might be cruelty to animals too. Better call PETA.
I didn't say it was misuse, I said it was authorized. But this seems like a lot of work to train a dog to bark at the end of a leash at a naked man. Hank gets that basically for free. Then again, we spent $189,000 on Lynndie Englund so she could get gang-boffed on a concrete floor.

The Larry Davis Experience 06-11-2004 02:09 PM

The U.N. is a religion of peace!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
What's wit you Californians anyway? Last year I raised my voice at Atty G for misquoting me. My quote from the second post where I raised screening was "the U.N. is incompetent for not screening the recipients of their aid to determine the individual's justifiable and compensatable need for relief". I understand that "justifiable" might be a bit vague, but it certainly narrows the meaning of "screening" to something that would seem to exclude those with AKs and M16s who barge in and threaten you.
I didn't quote you, so I'm not sure where I misquoted you. On top of that I think you see screening as much more of a science than I do. Screening could easily be "Omar's house was knocked down, but we know Omar used to hang out with that kid who blew himself up at the security checkpoint, so that means Omar is a terrorist, so he gets no relief." That to me is an exercise of discretion, even more so than "you are a childless couple, so you get a 600 sq ft apartment, not a house" is. I think that criticizing the UN for doing one and not doing the other is contradictory.
Quote:

Whoa, assumes facts not in evidence. Like that we are rebuilding inhabited homes. I, personally, am against and hope that we are not. Charity begins at home.
You're right. I have no idea what we're doing in terms of destroyed homes. That was just as an example.

To dodge your policy viewpoint on repairing homes, if I used repairing sewer systems for Fallujah as a hypo, would that be aid and comfort to those who hung the bodies from the bridge, fought our troops, and as yet have not been brought to justice?

I just don't think the US is doing any screening even though there are areas in Iraq which are quite infested with our "enemies". That's why I asked you for a cite.

Hank Chinaski 06-11-2004 02:18 PM

Bush: We tortured people, OK?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
I didn't say it was misuse, I said it was authorized. But this seems like a lot of work to train a dog to bark at the end of a leash at a naked man. Hank gets that basically for free.
But I see your point. I'd sure feel funny if there were girls around too.

Sidd Finch 06-11-2004 02:26 PM

Bush: We tortured people, OK?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Make a prediction about this yourself, assclam. What do you make of Bush's answers? He doesn't usually sound like he's been prepped by a lawyer.

The fact that Bush gives lawerly responses to questions about torture and the fact that he conferred with a lawyer last week are entirely coinkydental.

Sidd Finch 06-11-2004 02:30 PM

Bush: We tortured people, OK?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Since it turns out that menacing the Abu Ghraib prisoners with unmuzzled dogs was expressly authorized by military intelligence, according to the dog handlers, I'm afraid the "abuse was policy, not frolic" story has more legs than you're willing to admit.
Coincidence! Just coincidence! Those intelligence officers were rogues. Plus, they probably thought they were still in Afghanistan, where such policies were authorized, not Iraq, where everyone knew (thru telepathy) that they weren't.

Sidd Finch 06-11-2004 02:32 PM

Bush: We tortured people, OK?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
nnnnhhh, sorry no. This was for interrogation. You have to distinguish being vicious for no reason to innocents from interrogating people who know shit.

How do you know they know shit before you torture... um, interrogate them?


I'm beginning to think you live in Salem.


Also, you may want to read the article from a week or so ago about how useless the interrogations at Abu Ghraib and other prisons were from an intelligence standpoint.

SlaveNoMore 06-11-2004 02:40 PM

Nappy Head
 
He slept on the job for 8 years. Why stop now.

http://www.drudgereport.com/rrbc.jpg

Gattigap 06-11-2004 02:47 PM

Nappy Head
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
He slept on the job for 8 years. Why stop now.

http://www.drudgereport.com/rrbc.jpg
Certainly, you're counting on the fact that since the subject of the rather obvious rejoinder to this is -- you know, dead -- the impulse to respond will be restrained, right?

Surely you know that shit won't work with this crowd.

SlaveNoMore 06-11-2004 02:48 PM

Friday Caption Contest
 
Enter your best caption for this photo:

http://us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com...2323246920.jpg

Kerry:

"....and she stepped on the ball. Hahahahaha"

Clinton:
[whispering]

"What a jackass. Can't I just run again? Hell, we all know I'd win in a landslide."

Hank Chinaski 06-11-2004 03:14 PM

Bush: We tortured people, OK?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
I'm beginning to think you live in Salem.
You can't equate this to Salem. Salem was the real deal as to torture, and I resent your trivialization. My little niece had a friend who lost her mother in the trials.

On the other hand, since the trials wrapped there hasn't been much witch problem there, has there?

Hank Chinaski 06-11-2004 03:16 PM

Friday Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
http://us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com...2323246920.jpg

how could they have fucked up so badly they'd nominate a guy thet can't put on TV?

http://www.foxnews.com/images/128029...erry_john2.jpg

Say_hello_for_me 06-11-2004 03:19 PM

Men with straw arms shouldn't throw stones at glass houses!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by The Larry Davis Experience
I didn't quote you, so I'm not sure where I misquoted you.
No no, it was attY last year. But you guys are both from California. What you said was:

"can you explain to me how you can criticize the UN for both not screening the recipients of their aid and for exercising discretion as to who gets what house?"

My concern is that I'm not sure how I can criticize "the UN for both not screening the recipients of their aid and for exercising discretion as to who gets that house" without actually stating criticism of the UN for both "not screening the recipients of their aid" (in the broad sense reflected in this quote). If I didn't say it, did I not do it? And if I didn't do it, is this like, like (as my lower lip begins to quiver) a straw man question?

Hello

Hank Chinaski 06-11-2004 03:28 PM

Friday Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Enter your best caption for this photo:

http://us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com...2323246920.jpg
Kerry:
since '99 or so, I only hire interns who are interested in Foreign travel. hahahahhah

Clinton:
I heard you told that one "I don't smoke cigars, but I will damn sure chew tobacco" to break the ice.

Gin Rummy 06-11-2004 03:34 PM

Nappy Head
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
He slept on the job for 8 years. Why stop now.

http://www.drudgereport.com/rrbc.jpg
And the thought bubbles for both read:

"Dear Lord, notwithstanding my fealty to the devil, please don't let [the other] get splashed with any Holy Water and spontaneously self-combust all over my new suit"

sgtclub 06-11-2004 04:01 PM

UN Says WMD Shipped Out of Iraq
 
http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtri...reaking_1.html

I don't know much about this publication, but here is what they are reporting:

Quote:

The United Nations has determined that Saddam Hussein shipped weapons of mass destruction components as well as medium-range ballistic missiles before, during and after the U.S.-led war against Iraq in 2003.

The UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission briefed the Security Council on new findings that could help trace the whereabouts of Saddam's missile and WMD program.

The briefing contained satellite photographs that demonstrated the speed with which Saddam dismantled his missile and WMD sites before and during the war. Council members were shown photographs of a ballistic missile site outside Baghdad in May 2003, and then saw a satellite image of the same location in February 2004, in which facilities had disappeared.

Secret_Agent_Man 06-11-2004 04:03 PM

Bush: We tortured people, OK?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Dana Milbank and Dana Priest write in The Washington Post: "President Bush said Thursday that he expects U.S. authorities to follow the law when interrogating prisoners abroad, but he declined to say whether he believes torture is permitted under the law. "Pressed repeatedly during a news conference here about a Justice Department memo saying torture could be justified in the war on terrorism, Bush said only that U.S. interrogators had to follow the law. Asked whether he agrees with the Justice Department view, Bush said he could not remember whether he had seen the memorandum."
Dude! Step off of my man W! After all, there is no controlling legal authority that says the Administration has done anything wrong.

Jeez, W is moving closer to the center -- he's turning into Al Gore.

S_A_M

futbol fan 06-11-2004 04:06 PM

Nappy Head
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
He slept on the job for 8 years. Why stop now.

http://www.drudgereport.com/rrbc.jpg
Looks like he's trying his damnedest not to bust out laughing while Bush tries to read all the beeg beeg words in the eulogy.

Sidd Finch 06-11-2004 04:09 PM

Nappy Head
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
He slept on the job for 8 years. Why stop now.

http://www.drudgereport.com/rrbc.jpg

CSpan puts me to sleep too.

Imagine -- if he was the best President since FDR while sleeping, what could he have accomplished if he kept, say, Reagan/Bush-type hours?

Atticus Grinch 06-11-2004 04:09 PM

Your Sources Suck Dead Dude's Dick
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtri...reaking_1.html

I don't know much about this publication, but here is what they are reporting:
I don't know much about that publication either, but based on the other work product of its "U.N. correspondent," I'm going to remain skeptical for a while longer.

SlaveNoMore 06-11-2004 04:11 PM

Nappy Head
 
Quote:

Sidd Finch
Imagine -- if he was the best President since FDR ...
You have a far, far more vivid imagination that I do.

Observation: the locals clearly got to you during your vacation.

Secret_Agent_Man 06-11-2004 04:12 PM

Bush: We tortured people, OK?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
nnnnhhh, sorry no. This was for interrogation. You have to distinguish being vicious for no reason to innocents from interrogating people who know shit. I know you have a problem with interrogation, but believe me this story only has legs because of the cruel for no reason angle.
The article refers to sworn statements that two handlers were having a "contest" to see how many prisoners they could make piss themselves.

Plus, Hank -- your memory is slipping. Remember the post of mine from (probably may) that quotes retired MP Generals as saying that the use of dogs in interrogations both violates Army regs and is an abomination in the eyes of the Lord? [paraphrase]

This will continue to hurt your side, a lot.

S_A_M

The Larry Davis Experience 06-11-2004 04:14 PM

How 'bout a little fire, scarecrow?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
No no, it was attY last year. But you guys are both from California. What you said was:

"can you explain to me how you can criticize the UN for both not screening the recipients of their aid and for exercising discretion as to who gets what house?"

My concern is that I'm not sure how I can criticize "the UN for both not screening the recipients of their aid and for exercising discretion as to who gets that house" without actually stating criticism of the UN for both "not screening the recipients of their aid" (in the broad sense reflected in this quote). If I didn't say it, did I not do it? And if I didn't do it, is this like, like (as my lower lip begins to quiver) a straw man question?
I think you should know by now that if I were (was?) not allowed to ask straw man questions I would ask no questions at all. I'd be reduced to trying to demonstrate my intellect by saying things like "The square of the hypotenuse of an isosceles triangle is equal to the sum of the squares of the remaining sides."

BUT, to bore everyone further on a Friday where I cannot bring myself to do work, I was taking your original reply to my questions as criticizing the UN for not screening the recipients of their aid. As in, once this freeze is over they're gonna just build the guntoter his goldarned house and it's probably going to have a tub with spa jets thrown in - oh wait, I'm putting words in your mouth again. Your words are better:
Quote:

As an umbrella, i believe the outrage can properly be stated that the U.N. is incompetent for not screening the recipients of their aid to determine the individual's justifiable and compensatable need for relief....
its hard to like the passer-outers of public money when they knowingly distribute the public money to the guntoters, especially if the aid is positively influenced in any way by the guntoting.
I don't follow how my sense is too broad.

I took your subsequent post as criticizing the UN for apparently giving different people different benefits. I got that from this:
Quote:

As for resources, the last few paragraphs of the article detail how different people are getting different things. Apparently, they are exercising some discretion in the building. Contrast that to public housing's one-size-fits-all 8 room romper-pads. Whereas, I'm not sure I've seen any articles about the U.S. bestowing such benefits on individual Iraqis.
In the context of "All in favor of letting these guys rebuild Iraq, please show your hands again," that sure looks like criticism of the UN's apportionment of aid to me. Am I wrong? Were you just observing the different situations without implying that one was superior?

Secret_Agent_Man 06-11-2004 04:16 PM

Friday Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Enter your best caption for this photo:

http://us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com...2323246920.jpg

Clinton: "Hey, John, you got your daughter's phone number handy?

Kerry: "Not a chance, fat boy."

S_A_M

Sidd Finch 06-11-2004 04:22 PM

Nappy Head
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
You have a far, far more vivid imagination that I do.

Heh. I knew that would stir you freaks up. Pavlov, meet my dog Slave. See how he drools when you say "Hillary!"


Some day, a few decades from now, I'll be explaining to my son how he might not have to pay 80% of his salary to the Federal Goverment Debt Reduction Plan had the country followed the fiscal prudence that the Clinton Administration imposed for 8 great years (years of superb economic growth despite what the Repubs claimed would be disastrous consequences of essential tax increases). Then he'll ask me what "Social Security" was, and I'll explain how Reagan lied to the country about this thing called a "Trust Fund", and 20 years later his disciples finally broke the news they'd known all along -- that the Trust Fund was a stealth tax increase on the poor that would have to be decimated to pay the price of Republican profligacy. Then we'll crawl back into our bunker to wait out the day's bombings, brought to us courtesy of the 4 million Al Qaeda recruits who signed up because they were pissed off at the series of revelations about Presidential memos that said "Geneva Schmeneva, just torture the fucking towelheads!" And we'll laugh (muffled slightly by the filter masks everyone has to wear given the long term effects of the reversal of the Clean Air Act brought about in the early 00s), and we'll turn on the TV to watch the New Man Show, where the Juggy Girls jump around in Ashcrofts, bathing suits that run from neck to lower thigh and named after the man who pressed through the law requiring them.


(Note: I'm kidding about some of that.)

Atticus Grinch 06-11-2004 04:22 PM

Yellow dog Republican.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
This will continue to hurt your side, a lot.
Isn't it pretty to think so?

I wish I shared your pessimism, but right now the country is so polarized and hateful toward anyone not American that W could personally fuck any randomly selected Iraqi male in the ass on primetime CBS and Bush's core constituency would say he deserved it. Oh, and then they would call on Michael Powell to fine CBS for broadcast indecency --- damn liberal media.

Remember, we're talking about a GOP consisting of people like Slave/Club/Bilmore, who will vote Mugabe for Pres. if he registers GOP and promises tax cuts, and people like Delay, who is the nation's most sought-after voter demographic because he's descended from people who stood on hills waiting for the Millenium, never waning in their faith that the Preacher's ability to predict the Second Coming is being better refined with each wrong prediction. It's perfect, really. Pandering to millenialist Christians = campaigning without accountability. An unfulfilled promise, to them, is proof of Satan's hold on the world, and motivates them to turn out in even greater numbers for the next election.

sgtclub 06-11-2004 04:31 PM

Nappy Head
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Then he'll ask me what "Social Security" was
As my friends in the ME say, "God Willing."

Hank Chinaski 06-11-2004 04:36 PM

Nappy Head
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Imagine -- if he was the best President since FDR
for the munitions industry, maybe.
they both spent 8 years letting our enemies gain in strength and numbers while they basically did fuck all. then there were lots of boms going off for awhile. oh yeah they both would fuck ugly in a sec. at least one would marry ugly.

Tyrone Slothrop 06-11-2004 05:05 PM

McCain, your country needs you
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
In this space, I've expressed incredulity that McCain would ever seriously consider joining a Kerry ticket.

Seems that even though the answer is still no, McCain is taking the offer, and has considered it, seriously.

I still think it's unlikely, but am surprised and impressed that McCain's people have tried to think it through, and think that the idea has merit beyond those of the simple acquisition of power.
CNN (well, AP) reports that Kerry didn't quite offer the job to McCain, but that McCain has declined overtures. Which doesn't surprise me, either, but it's smart politics by Kerry to be getting these stories.

Atticus Grinch 06-11-2004 05:15 PM

Reagan mockery that even Slave can get behind.
 
http://www.thestranger.com/2004-06-10/grab_bag-1.jpg

Tyrone Slothrop 06-11-2004 05:29 PM

How the East was won.
 
How Gyula Horn won the Cold War.

http://www.cipe.org/publications/fs/ert/e16/horn.gif
Gyula Horn

SlaveNoMore 06-11-2004 05:32 PM

Nappy Head
 
Quote:

Sidd Finch
Some day, a few decades from now, I'll be explaining to my son...
Some day, a few decades from now, I'll be sitting with Sidd Jr., sipping on a cocktail and smoking cigars, laughing about how one day, a long time ago, his daddy was a socialist.

eta At some point in the conversation, Sidd Jr. and I will laugh heartily over the topic of some thing called a lockbox

sgtclub 06-11-2004 05:37 PM

How the East was won.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
How Gyula Horn won the Cold War.

http://www.cipe.org/publications/fs/ert/e16/horn.gif
Gyula Horn
That analysis is thin, to say the least.

sgtclub 06-11-2004 05:39 PM

McCain, your country needs you
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
CNN (well, AP) reports that Kerry didn't quite offer the job to McCain, but that McCain has declined overtures. Which doesn't surprise me, either, but it's smart politics by Kerry to be getting these stories.
McCain has said repeatedly that if asked he would not accept. I think you nailed it - this is good politics.

Tyrone Slothrop 06-11-2004 05:43 PM

Nappy Head
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Some day, a few decades from now, I'll be sitting with Sidd Jr., sipping on a cocktail and smoking cigars, laughing about how one day, a long time ago, his daddy was a socialist.
Yeah, but you'll also be crying about how your own kids are protesting globalization and climate change.

SlaveNoMore 06-11-2004 05:45 PM

the Butterfly Effect
 
Quote:

sgtclub
That analysis is thin, to say the least.
After reading this, I'm more convinced it was Darko, the border guard with the bolt cutters, that won the Cold War.

SlaveNoMore 06-11-2004 05:47 PM

Nappy Head
 
Quote:

Tyrone Slothrop
Yeah, but you'll also be crying about how your own kids are protesting globalization and climate change.
I know, I know. They get it from her, dammit.

Gattigap 06-11-2004 05:48 PM

Abu Grahib: It's the new "Morning in America!"
 
I've realized that the GOPers' worries about the Iraqi prison scandal are overblown. What they should actually want is for it to get worse. Worries Matthew Yglasias:
Quote:

But I've been afraid since the first word of this [the Abu Grahib story breaking wide open] started trickling out that it might be a dead end for American liberalism. The charge that he's been overzealous -- that he's gone too far, that he's done to much -- to try and defeat America's enemies is, I think, one that George W. Bush can live with. The American people may well feel that he really has gone too far in one or two points, but you'd rather have the guy who does too much to defend America than the guy who does too little. Pressing this line of argument makes it seem as if Democrats are saying that the government needs to be more evenhanded between the terrorists, on the one hand, and American soldiers on the other.

Now, of course, I know that that's not the right way to understand all this at all, but I'm afraid it'll come across that way. The good issues for Democrats are things like, "the war was a distraction," "bad diplomacy raised the costs," "stingy budgeting (not enough armor, etc.) got soldiers killed," "who's guarding the ports?," and "sure, terrorism's bad, but that doesn't mean we don't also need a better health care system." Running as the defender of the rights of accused terrorists, on the other hand, doesn't seem like a winning game plan to me.
Brilliant, I tell you! Genius, I say!

So, I see Rove's commercials coming out in, say, September with sequential images of:
  • Lyndie grinding it out on film, then
  • Kerry (or a more attractive liberal surrogate) complaining about the US violating the GC and Bush being responsible, then
  • various 9/11 images, with a voiceover stating that this is what Democratic, sissyliberal policies will bring us, then
  • A statement from Bush in the Oval, saying "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice."*
Game over. Landslide, GOP.

Gattigap

* I know, I know. But he's been dead for a while. No one will connect the dots, and the line is handy these days.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:39 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com