ltl/fb |
08-26-2005 05:59 PM |
Way Over the Line
Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
I would prefer it if they used a system to insure that the cows died so they would not go through unecessary pain.
Man can't interfere with the natural process of nature. It just wouldn't work. All he can do is try and control how he acts and treats other beings. Why can't they use fish as Shark Bait? And yes, before you ask, I am more concerned about about puppies and kittens than I care about fish. Something to do with more complicated brains etc.
This of course, gets a lot more involved, but seems painfully obvious to me, and I find it hard to believe that I have to explain it to you.
|
Well, displaying search results by post and the humor in my response to your ambiguous post seemed painfully obvious to me -- we are obviously not at the mindmeld stage of our relationship.
You think that the bolts through the heads and the skinning alive are the natural processes of nature? I find this confusing. Or is this just convenient for you, so you are less worried about it than something that has no effect on you because it is far far away?
The sharks are probably more attracted to the puppies or whatever because they thrash around. And the taste is new. So it is probably more efficient to use puppies than to use fish, which are fairly calm when in water.
People feed their pet snakes live rodents, and you don't have a problem with this? Your cats have perfectly good cat food and only really catch the rodents and birds for sport, plus they probably get parasites and shit from them, and you don't have a problem with this? But you are worried about excess puppies off in the middle of nowhere? Would you prefer they starved to death?
|