LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   A fashion board in which sometimes we'll remember to post spoiler warnings (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=833)

ThurgreedMarshall 03-03-2009 04:38 PM

Re: Football
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 382873)
They got a second round pick.

Why did they throw in Vrabel too?

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 03-03-2009 04:43 PM

Re: Football
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 382907)
Including the part where KC would hire Pioli away from the Pats at a higher salary?

Pioli was leaving. Cassell was leaving as a free agent. You don't think it's possible that Pioli and Belichick worked something out should Pioli end up outside the division?

TM

Tyrone Slothrop 03-03-2009 04:45 PM

Re: Football
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 382908)
Why did they throw in Vrabel too?

What I've read is that Vrabel is a terrific character guy whose physical skills are declining. If Pioli is trying to change the culture in KC, then maybe you bring in a guy like Vrabel to help.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 03-03-2009 04:50 PM

Re: Football
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 382909)
Pioli was leaving. Cassell was leaving as a free agent. You don't think it's possible that Pioli and Belichick worked something out should Pioli end up outside the division?

TM

Not concretely. Until a month ago (or so), Pioli was presumably working with Belichek on the Pats roster. So Pioli probably knew who was expendable/tradable, and clearly Cassel was (and Vrable as well), and Pioli called him up to say "hey, can we work something out?" once trade season opened. But Belicheck isn't stupid enough not to shop Cassel around to other teams as well to see what they could get for him

Shape Shifter 03-03-2009 04:52 PM

Re: Football
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 382821)
If I were the Lions I would skip the money for a Quarterback and focus on defense. Next year I would limit our offense to falling on the ball three times, and letting the clock run down then punting. I figure that way I can limit the magnitude of the losses.


Word is they're going to go with Vandy LB Aaron Curry.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 03-03-2009 04:56 PM

Re: Football
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 382910)
What I've read is that Vrabel is a terrific character guy whose physical skills are declining. If Pioli is trying to change the culture in KC, then maybe you bring in a guy like Vrabel to help.

It's win-win. Pats would cut him to save cap space otherwise. Chiefs would be interested in him. Chiefs don't have to negotiate salary. Pats don't have Vrabel showing up with the Dolphins/Bills/Jets next year.

ThurgreedMarshall 03-03-2009 04:59 PM

Re: Football
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 382910)
What I've read is that Vrabel is a terrific character guy whose physical skills are declining. If Pioli is trying to change the culture in KC, then maybe you bring in a guy like Vrabel to help.

No. Question is, why does New England throw in Vrabel? You telling me KC wouldn't have made the trade for a second rounder straight up? Shouldn't New England have gotten more back?

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 03-03-2009 05:07 PM

Re: Football
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 382911)
Not concretely. Until a month ago (or so), Pioli was presumably working with Belichek on the Pats roster. So Pioli probably knew who was expendable/tradable, and clearly Cassel was (and Vrable as well), and Pioli called him up to say "hey, can we work something out?" once trade season opened. But Belicheck isn't stupid enough not to shop Cassel around to other teams as well to see what they could get for him

You're probably right. But I don't put anything past Belichick. People have been talking about Pioli for awhile, so I'm sure Belichick knew that he was gone with the right offer. If you don't think those two guys discussed trades Pioli would be willing to make with the teams they both thought were interested in him, then we just think about this stuff differently.

I think we would have heard about Belichick shopping Cassel around before he slapped him with the franchise tag. If you don't know for sure that you can get some value out of trading him (and the market for who could actually take him was quite limited), why would you franchise him? I think he wanted to make sure he got him out of the division, talked to Pioli about it, couldn't get a better offer from another team, so he sent him off to KC.

TM

ThurgreedMarshall 03-03-2009 05:11 PM

Re: Football
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 382913)
It's win-win. Pats would cut him to save cap space otherwise. Chiefs would be interested in him. Chiefs don't have to negotiate salary. Pats don't have Vrabel showing up with the Dolphins/Bills/Jets next year.

That doesn't explain why they got no value whatsoever for him. He'll be starting in KC. KC got Cassel and a starting LB for a second round pick. Seems a little lop-sided to me.

TM

Tyrone Slothrop 03-03-2009 05:12 PM

Re: Football
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 382914)
No. Question is, why does New England throw in Vrabel? You telling me KC wouldn't have made the trade for a second rounder straight up? Shouldn't New England have gotten more back?

What Burger said. The Chiefs get Vrabel at his current salary; the Pats get him off their books and make sure he doesn't stay in the division. NE and KC don't play each other this year.

Quote:

That doesn't explain why they got no value whatsoever for him. He'll be starting in KC. KC got Cassel and a starting LB for a second round pick. Seems a little lop-sided to me.
He has close to no value for NE, since Belichick presumably was going to get rid of him anyway. He probably has a higher salary than the average player at that position. Belichick is heartless about getting rid of veterans. KC has a less talented roster, so should have fewer problems accommodating his salary. Think of the trade as Cassel for the second-round pick, with NE giving KC Vrabel straight up.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 03-03-2009 05:25 PM

Re: Football
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 382915)
If you don't think those two guys discussed trades Pioli would be willing to make with the teams they both thought were interested in him, then we just think about this stuff differently.

I guess "worked out in advance" means different things to each of us. I'm sure Pioli and Belichek talked, and if they didn't it's because they already knew so much about each other's teams. I just doubt that Belicheck was doing Pioli favors once he left.

ThurgreedMarshall 03-03-2009 05:26 PM

Re: Football
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop (Post 382917)
What Burger said. The Chiefs get Vrabel at his current salary; the Pats get him off their books and make sure he doesn't stay in the division. NE and KC don't play each other this year.



He has close to no value for NE, since Belichick presumably was going to get rid of him anyway. He probably has a higher salary than the average player at that position. Belichick is heartless about getting rid of veterans. KC has a less talented roster, so should have fewer problems accommodating his salary. Think of the trade as Cassel for the second-round pick, with NE giving KC Vrabel straight up.

That only makes sense if no other team in the league wanted him (and that may be, can't say I know; but if he can start, I'm sure he's worth something to other teams in the league). And if he's of so little value to New England, why would they care if he went to another team in the division? Getting cut is going to turn him into a superstar whenever he faces New England?

TM

dtb 03-03-2009 05:31 PM

Winter Activities
 
So this afternoon, I went snowshoeing. WTF? How is it that much different from just trudging around in your boots? Don't get me wrong, it was a nice little jaunt on a sunny day, but I guess I'm missing the concept of snowshoes and what they add to my life.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 03-03-2009 05:33 PM

Re: Football
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 382916)
. Seems a little lop-sided to me.

TM

Hard to say unless you know there was a better deal out there that the pats didn't take. As it was, they got a high 2d round pick instead of nothing, which is what they would otherwise have gotten if they didn't franchise him, ensured he's not with the Jets or another division rival, all for the cost of the relatively minor risk they would have to pay him in 2009 to warm the bench.

Tyrone Slothrop 03-03-2009 05:33 PM

Re: Football
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 382919)
That only makes sense if no other team in the league wanted him (and that may be, can't say I know; but if he can start, I'm sure he's worth something to other teams in the league). And if he's of so little value to New England, why would they care if he went to another team in the division? Getting cut is going to turn him into a superstar whenever he faces New England?

When you think about his value, you have to also think about his salary. I don't think his skills are gone, but aging linebackers have been having a rough time all over. And they want to keep him out of the division because he knows their system.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:28 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com