ThurgreedMarshall |
07-19-2017 03:07 PM |
Civil Asset Forfeiture
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEC_Chick
(Post 508887)
Just when I think Jeff Sessions cannot possibly suck more, the DOJ comes out with its new civil asset forfeiture policy.
|
Someone needs to explain this to me. Who, besides law enforcement, thinks this bullshit law is okay? Libertarians sure as hell don't. Minorities don't (as they are the disproportionate targets). Liberals obviously don't. So, who the fuck does? Where is it getting the support?
Also, how the fuck is it that there is a legal concept in which a government actor can seize your property on the suspicion of it being involved in or acquired with the proceeds of a crime and then force the rightful owner to prove that it wasn't? How the fuck is this not a straight up government taking? Is it an exception?
And the legal fallacy that the target of the law is the property and not the person deprived of the property is legal bullshit that should have people picking up torches and pitchforks in anger. It's just absolutely ridiculous.
It makes sense to me that if the government can prove that property was gained with the proceeds of a crime for which the owner has been convicted ( before seizing it, of course), then it makes sense that it can be confiscated, auctioned off, etc. But civil asset forfeiture is being used to fucking fund police departments all over the country. Clearly people in the small towns where it is so very popular would prefer to have the minorities driving through fund their police departments. I see that. But cops are well beyond victimizing just them and are abusing this shit all over the place.
I don't get it at all. It seems like a clear violation of the Fifth Amendment. The Supreme Court should have ended it years ago.
TM
|