LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Drive fast, live hard, no regrets... Sorry Penske (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=701)

sebastian_dangerfield 08-30-2005 11:15 AM

Bald exes.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by dtb
BNB, you've got all this on the flow chart, right?

ETAsk, What is soft swinging?
A buddy of mine was going around to couples at a recent wedding earnestly asking them if they wanted to soft swing with he and his fiancee. I thought it was hysterical (he got some pretty strange looks from people who couldn't tell if he was kidding). The technical definition I got from google is below:

Soft swinging - Couples get together and engage in sexual activity together, but they only have sex with their own partners -- no partner swapping; no mingling of bodies between couples. But a lot of watching does go on -- and possibly some touching -- a touchy matter best negotiated in advance. The hard line for soft swinging is no intercourse between non-mates. A wider definition says that any time a couple brings in a third party, they are swinging (threesomes). But in this case the third party would only watch or be watched.

Hank Chinaski 08-30-2005 11:17 AM

Bald exes.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
A buddy of mine was going around to couples at a recent wedding earnestly asking them if they wanted to soft swing with he and his fiancee. I thought it was hysterical (he got some pretty strange looks from people who couldn't tell if he was kidding). The technical definition I got from google is below:

Soft swinging - Couples get together and engage in sexual activity together, but they only have sex with their own partners -- no partner swapping; no mingling of bodies between couples. But a lot of watching does go on -- and possibly some touching -- a touchy matter best negotiated in advance. The hard line for soft swinging is no intercourse between non-mates. A wider definition says that any time a couple brings in a third party, they are swinging (threesomes). But in this case the third party would only watch or be watched.
Pam, Tommy Lee and I soft swung?

taxwonk 08-30-2005 11:21 AM

Bald exes.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
Oh that reminds me. A page or two back, Wonk replied to a pregannt poster who is on my ignore list that he would drink that if he werent married or something. i didnt read what she wrote bc I dont read her, but I was a little nauseated by the possible return of Wonk's preggo fetish. Please tell me that is not what that was about.
It was a reference to a famous exchange between Winston Churchill and Lady Astor. Perhaps, if you know you are looking at something out of context, the more judicious choice would be to avoid leaping to conclusions.

taxwonk 08-30-2005 11:23 AM

Bald exes.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Bob
They were making "can't see your shoes" comments to each other. I assumed it was gentle, good-natured joshing between friends.
Hereby demonstrating the difference between looking at things in context and leaping over a wall blind.

taxwonk 08-30-2005 11:25 AM

Bald exes.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Silly, naive girl that I am, I thought one of the benefits of being ignored was that the ignorer would be completely and totally uninterested in anything having to do with moi.
Fool. One might as well assume you will have the presence of mind to put on matching shoes in the morning.

sebastian_dangerfield 08-30-2005 11:27 AM

Sports Betting Heart Attack
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
My sister has been using Jergens hand lotion in her hair for years to calm down the curls.
Paul Mitchell's "The Conditioner" - the only product that works as well for tcbing as it does on your hair.

Shape Shifter 08-30-2005 11:31 AM

Sports Betting Heart Attack
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Paul Mitchell's "The Conditioner" - the only product that works as well for tcbing as it does on your hair.
How did you come to know this? I may need to switch salons.

futbol fan 08-30-2005 11:40 AM

Monkeys and fried chicken
 
Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
Hendricks suggests that anyone who spots Dillion try to lure him with food. He's fond of apples, oranges, nuts, berries -- and Kentucky Fried Chicken.
How does he feel about

http://67.18.37.18/1642/181/upload/av-1844.gif?

notcasesensitive 08-30-2005 11:53 AM

There's No Place For Us
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
No one plans on going to the movies. It's a game-time decision. You end up going b/c you don't feel like going out.
Thank you. You just explained to me why I never* see any movies. Seriously.



*fine, "rarely"

Gattigap 08-30-2005 12:23 PM

There's No Place For Us
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
I still sneak in chocolate covered raisins and a drink. It actually wounds me to pay theatre prices, so I just don't do it.
You realize that your skinflint ways are taking food out of the mouths of Owen Wilson's bastard children, don't you? For shame.

Gattigap 08-30-2005 12:26 PM

Metawonkawhiff
 
Last night I watched the finale to 6FU, and am now ready to discuss it.

futbol fan 08-30-2005 12:35 PM

Metawonkawhiff
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
Last night I watched the finale to 6FU, and am now ready to discuss it.
Look, I didn't cry when I was watching it, ok? Did not cry. Just drop it.

Shape Shifter 08-30-2005 12:38 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
I'll never know what I've been missing.

"Cultural anthropologist Leonard Glick explores the history of the Snip from a skeptical perspective in Marked in Your Flesh, published this summer by Oxford University Press (serious scholarship, truly!). Glick acknowledges that in the book of Genesis, circumcision is the sign of God's covenant with Abraham. But then he takes the line of the anti-circumcision movement: Circumcision is painful, irreversible surgery to which newborn boys cannot consent. Its health benefits are marginal and overstated. And far from being an extraneous bit of flesh, the foreskin is "richly endowed with specialized nerves," making it 'the principal site of sexual sensation' in a man who has one. 'Circumcised men have lost more capacity for optimal pleasure than they will ever know,' Glick sighs. (He never comes out and says so, but his sense of loss seems personal.) In support of this proposition he cites the 12th-century Jewish physician and philosopher Moses Maimonides, who wrote that 'if at birth this member has been made to bleed and has had its covering taken away from it, it must indubitably be weakened.'"

http://www.slate.com/id/2124770/nav/tap1/

Gattigap 08-30-2005 12:39 PM

Metawonkawhiff
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
Look, I didn't cry when I was watching it, ok? Did not cry. Just drop it.
No?

Shit. Just ignore that PM, okay?

Replaced_Texan 08-30-2005 12:49 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I'll never know what I've been missing.

"Cultural anthropologist Leonard Glick explores the history of the Snip from a skeptical perspective in Marked in Your Flesh, published this summer by Oxford University Press (serious scholarship, truly!). Glick acknowledges that in the book of Genesis, circumcision is the sign of God's covenant with Abraham. But then he takes the line of the anti-circumcision movement: Circumcision is painful, irreversible surgery to which newborn boys cannot consent. Its health benefits are marginal and overstated. And far from being an extraneous bit of flesh, the foreskin is "richly endowed with specialized nerves," making it 'the principal site of sexual sensation' in a man who has one. 'Circumcised men have lost more capacity for optimal pleasure than they will ever know,' Glick sighs. (He never comes out and says so, but his sense of loss seems personal.) In support of this proposition he cites the 12th-century Jewish physician and philosopher Moses Maimonides, who wrote that 'if at birth this member has been made to bleed and has had its covering taken away from it, it must indubitably be weakened.'"

http://www.slate.com/id/2124770/nav/tap1/
Someone told me recently that American spies were often outted in WWI & II because almost every American male was circumcised and, for the most part, most Europeans were not.

Shape Shifter 08-30-2005 12:58 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Someone told me recently that American spies were often outted in WWI & II because almost every American male was circumcised and, for the most part, most Europeans were not.
They must not have been very good spies. Why did they show their penises to the Germans?

Hank Chinaski 08-30-2005 01:02 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
They must not have been very good spies. Why did they show their penises to the Germans?
rent Europa Europa. Sometimes, when a grown up man and a grown up lady feel a certain way they want to show each other their piddlers.

greatwhitenorthchick 08-30-2005 01:04 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I'll never know what I've been missing.

"Cultural anthropologist Leonard Glick explores the history of the Snip from a skeptical perspective in Marked in Your Flesh, published this summer by Oxford University Press (serious scholarship, truly!). Glick acknowledges that in the book of Genesis, circumcision is the sign of God's covenant with Abraham. But then he takes the line of the anti-circumcision movement: Circumcision is painful, irreversible surgery to which newborn boys cannot consent. Its health benefits are marginal and overstated. And far from being an extraneous bit of flesh, the foreskin is "richly endowed with specialized nerves," making it 'the principal site of sexual sensation' in a man who has one. 'Circumcised men have lost more capacity for optimal pleasure than they will ever know,' Glick sighs. (He never comes out and says so, but his sense of loss seems personal.) In support of this proposition he cites the 12th-century Jewish physician and philosopher Moses Maimonides, who wrote that 'if at birth this member has been made to bleed and has had its covering taken away from it, it must indubitably be weakened.'"

http://www.slate.com/id/2124770/nav/tap1/
For what it is worth, and I speak as a penis-less person, I don't think it is all that much better. I've never noticed an appreciable difference of the sounds of pleasure of those who are cut and those who aren't. This is based on sample size of about 10-11 uncut, (and considerably more who are cut), but still, I think it's enough for a valid comparison.

Shape Shifter 08-30-2005 01:05 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
For what it is worth, and I speak as a penis-less person, I don't think it is all that much better. I've never noticed an appreciable difference of the sounds of pleasure of those who are cut and those who aren't. This is based on sample size of about 10-11 uncut, (and considerably more who are cut), but still, I think it's enough for a valid comparison.
Thank you. I feel much better about my piddler now.

sebastian_dangerfield 08-30-2005 01:13 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I'll never know what I've been missing.

"Cultural anthropologist Leonard Glick explores the history of the Snip from a skeptical perspective in Marked in Your Flesh, published this summer by Oxford University Press (serious scholarship, truly!). Glick acknowledges that in the book of Genesis, circumcision is the sign of God's covenant with Abraham. But then he takes the line of the anti-circumcision movement: Circumcision is painful, irreversible surgery to which newborn boys cannot consent. Its health benefits are marginal and overstated. And far from being an extraneous bit of flesh, the foreskin is "richly endowed with specialized nerves," making it 'the principal site of sexual sensation' in a man who has one. 'Circumcised men have lost more capacity for optimal pleasure than they will ever know,' Glick sighs. (He never comes out and says so, but his sense of loss seems personal.) In support of this proposition he cites the 12th-century Jewish physician and philosopher Moses Maimonides, who wrote that 'if at birth this member has been made to bleed and has had its covering taken away from it, it must indubitably be weakened.'"

http://www.slate.com/id/2124770/nav/tap1/
Thanks. I need something else to be pissed about.

bold_n_brazen 08-30-2005 01:15 PM

Bald exes.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by dtb
BNB, you've got all this on the flow chart, right?

ETAsk, What is soft swinging?
Let's see...

Sebby wants to soft swing on the internet. PP allegedly told him she did. Sebby is internet boyfriend to both rp and PP. (Which is one of the world's funniest punchlines, if you ask me.)

And SS has a circumsized penis.

Anything else I should be noting?

sebastian_dangerfield 08-30-2005 01:17 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
For what it is worth, and I speak as a penis-less person, I don't think it is all that much better. I've never noticed an appreciable difference of the sounds of pleasure of those who are cut and those who aren't. This is based on sample size of about 10-11 uncut, (and considerably more who are cut), but still, I think it's enough for a valid comparison.
My guess is circumcision was started by Jewish women desperate for orgasms. Think of how much rampant premature ejaculation took place back in the day when all men had all those extra nerve endings...

sebastian_dangerfield 08-30-2005 01:18 PM

Bald exes.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
Let's see...

Sebby wants to soft swing on the internet. PP allegedly told him she did. Sebby is internet boyfriend to both rp and PP. (Which is one of the world's funniest punchlines, if you ask me.)

And SS has a circumsized penis.

Anything else I should be noting?
No, excellent recall... But please explain why PP and RP hate each other. Its got my net world in disarray.

Oliver_Wendell_Ramone 08-30-2005 01:20 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I'll never know what I've been missing.

"Cultural anthropologist Leonard Glick explores the history of the Snip from a skeptical perspective in Marked in Your Flesh, published this summer by Oxford University Press (serious scholarship, truly!). Glick acknowledges that in the book of Genesis, circumcision is the sign of God's covenant with Abraham. But then he takes the line of the anti-circumcision movement: Circumcision is painful, irreversible surgery to which newborn boys cannot consent. Its health benefits are marginal and overstated. And far from being an extraneous bit of flesh, the foreskin is "richly endowed with specialized nerves," making it 'the principal site of sexual sensation' in a man who has one. 'Circumcised men have lost more capacity for optimal pleasure than they will ever know,' Glick sighs. (He never comes out and says so, but his sense of loss seems personal.) In support of this proposition he cites the 12th-century Jewish physician and philosopher Moses Maimonides, who wrote that 'if at birth this member has been made to bleed and has had its covering taken away from it, it must indubitably be weakened.'"

http://www.slate.com/id/2124770/nav/tap1/
I'm not sure how I would have made it through junior high and high school with more sensativity.

Shape Shifter 08-30-2005 01:20 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
My guess is circumcision was started by Jewish women desperate for orgasms. Think of how much rampant premature ejaculation took place back in the day when all men had all those extra nerve endings...
In the Old Testament, God really fucked with people. "Abraham, go kill you son. Ha! Just kidding!" I bet he was kidding about the circumcision thing, too.

Sparklehorse 08-30-2005 01:21 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I'll never know what I've been missing.

"Cultural anthropologist Leonard Glick explores the history of the Snip from a skeptical perspective in Marked in Your Flesh, published this summer by Oxford University Press (serious scholarship, truly!). Glick acknowledges that in the book of Genesis, circumcision is the sign of God's covenant with Abraham. But then he takes the line of the anti-circumcision movement: Circumcision is painful, irreversible surgery to which newborn boys cannot consent. Its health benefits are marginal and overstated. And far from being an extraneous bit of flesh, the foreskin is "richly endowed with specialized nerves," making it 'the principal site of sexual sensation' in a man who has one. 'Circumcised men have lost more capacity for optimal pleasure than they will ever know,' Glick sighs. (He never comes out and says so, but his sense of loss seems personal.) In support of this proposition he cites the 12th-century Jewish physician and philosopher Moses Maimonides, who wrote that 'if at birth this member has been made to bleed and has had its covering taken away from it, it must indubitably be weakened.'"
How come you didn't also link to this article about how it's okay for some men to be squicked out by watching the mother of their child give birth?

Covering Shape Shifter's ass on the research for board bill

sebastian_dangerfield 08-30-2005 01:23 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
In the Old Testament, God really fucked with people. "Abraham, go kill you son. Ha! Just kidding!" I bet he was kidding about the circumcision thing, too.
LOL! What a zany God we have. My favorite is Revelations. When's Bruckheimer's treatment of that going to be screen ready?

Did you just call me Coltrane? 08-30-2005 01:23 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
For what it is worth, and I speak as a penis-less person, I don't think it is all that much better. I've never noticed an appreciable difference of the sounds of pleasure of those who are cut and those who aren't. This is based on sample size of about 10-11 uncut, (and considerably more who are cut), but still, I think it's enough for a valid comparison.
ELAINE: Hey Jerry, you ever seen one?

JERRY: You mean that wasn't uh...

ELAINE: Yeah.

JERRY: No.. you?

ELAINE: Ya.

JERRY: What'd you think?

ELAINE: (shakes her head) No, had no face, no personality. It was like a martian. But hey, you know that's me.

Hank Chinaski 08-30-2005 01:23 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sparklehorse
How come you didn't also link to this article about how it's okay for some men to be squicked out by watching the mother of their child give birth?

Covering Shape Shifter's ass on the research for board bill
I bet most of these women whose husbands lose interest look like this:

http://www.conservativegroundswell.c...ed_teacher.jpg

Did you just call me Coltrane? 08-30-2005 01:24 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone
I'm not sure how I would have made it through junior high and high school with more sensativity.
Exactly. My NRB rate was already ludicrous.

bold_n_brazen 08-30-2005 01:26 PM

Bald exes.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
No, excellent recall... But please explain why PP and RP hate each other. Its got my net world in disarray.
I merely keep track of the whats. I cannot begin to examine the whys.

sebastian_dangerfield 08-30-2005 01:27 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Exactly. My NRB rate was already ludicrous.
I could not go commando with that sort of hypersensitive crank. Things would get way out of hand...

Its hard enough keeping the fucker down when it rubs the fabric the wrong, er... right, way sometimes when I'm walking.

I'd be jailed for public indecency.

Shape Shifter 08-30-2005 01:28 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
LOL! What a zany God we have. My favorite is Revelations. When's Bruckheimer's treatment of that going to be screen ready?
If God didn't want us to have foreskin, why did He put it there in the first place?

Hank Chinaski 08-30-2005 01:28 PM

Bald exes.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
I merely keep track of the whats. I cannot begin to examine the whys.
But its a recent fight isn't it? RP you weren't fighting with her years ago were you?

Sparklehorse 08-30-2005 01:31 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I bet most of these women whose husbands lose interest look like this:

Not like that fake fat Britney picture NFH posted earlier today?

robustpuppy 08-30-2005 01:35 PM

Bald exes.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
But its a recent fight isn't it? RP you weren't fighting with her years ago were you?
I'm a lover, not a fighter.

Hank Chinaski 08-30-2005 01:36 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sparklehorse
Not like that fake fat Britney picture NFH posted earlier today?
didn't see it. I have nfh on ignore. I find it helps me pass the time in the grocery line reading the tabloids, if I don't go in already knowing the recent celeb divorce news.

andViolins 08-30-2005 01:50 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
If God didn't want us to have foreskin, why did He put it there in the first place?
Intelligent dick-sign?

aV

LessinSF 08-30-2005 01:59 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
In the Old Testament, God really fucked with people. "Abraham, go kill you son. Ha! Just kidding!" I bet he was kidding about the circumcision thing, too.
Well Abe says, "Where do you want this killin' done?"
God says, "Out on Highway 61."

LessinSF 08-30-2005 02:00 PM

I Hate My Parents
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
rent Europa Europa. Sometimes, when a grown up man and a grown up lady feel a certain way they want to show each other their piddlers.
or watch this season of Big Brother. Certain of the "houseguests" (Beau and Howie) quite enjoy showing others their "pee pees."


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com