LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Drive fast, live hard, no regrets... Sorry Penske (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=701)

Penske_Account 09-02-2005 08:04 PM

We have met the uneducated underclass, and it is
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
give him a break. what he did was childish and Stupid
2. Thanks for getting my back Hank.


Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski


i read a story about a hotel in Detroit that had terrible occumpency rates.

They should serve Motor City Bagels for breakfast. People love the local touches like that.

ltl/fb 09-02-2005 08:30 PM

We have met the uneducated underclass, and it is
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
give him a break.

I'm trying!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But I get pursued.

Penske_Account 09-02-2005 08:50 PM

We have met the uneducated underclass, and it is
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I'm trying!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But I get pursued. [/QUOTE]

I'm trying to make amends but some people are hardhearted. no offence.

Ty@50 09-02-2005 09:49 PM

We have met the uneducated underclass, and it is
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
give him a break. what he did was childish and Stupid, but those boards were empty anyway.

i read a story about a hotel in Detroit that had terrible occumpency rates. It teamed up with a guy who gives tours of bombed out buildings and neighborhoods. People actually come here to take the tour. This hotel, which needs the city to coemback for real to be vibrant, happily took in the few guests it had, even though those people were only there to mock the city. In other words, visitors, even deliquent ones, were better than no visitors.
I'd forgotten about this type ill-behavior being so common (both meanings) back now. You and Penske each did 3 or 4 things today that would get you banned for life under Paigow's rule.

evenodds 09-03-2005 12:58 AM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
I was not backpedalling when I said that my comments about the poor, uneducated underclass wasn't about the folks in the gulf coast. It's the truth. I do hate the whole "woe is me, I'm poor and the government should do more for me" mentality the poor, uneducated underclass seems to hang onto so dearly. I think that people can help themselves, change their own damn lives, make their situations better for their families. But I think they've got to choose to. And I don't think the answer is to continue to provide them with all the crap they've come to believe they are entitled to.
This is what I've been missing? Sad.

I would have expected a discussion of evacuee fashion at the very least, or, whether it is better to give comfortable clothes to evacuee friends or clothes to help them rebuild their lost wardrobes so they can find new jobs in Texas.

Shape Shifter 09-03-2005 01:11 AM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
This is what I've been missing? Sad.

I would have expected a discussion of evacuee fashion at the very least, or, whether it is better to give comfortable clothes to evacuee friends or clothes to help them rebuild their lost wardrobes so they can find new jobs in Texas.
The dead has arisen. Woo hoo! Nice ass, e/o.

Tyrone Slothrop 09-03-2005 02:51 AM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
If she said that you are correct. The school is private, of course, I don't believe in public education (pb topic), and is so liberal it makes Ty look like a republican. I am deep deep undercover with my politics.
Actually, when I was a registered Republican, it was when I was living in a large rectangular state in the Mountain Time Zone.

Flinty_McFlint 09-03-2005 02:57 AM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
This is what I've been missing? Sad.

I would have expected a discussion of evacuee fashion at the very least, or, whether it is better to give comfortable clothes to evacuee friends or clothes to help them rebuild their lost wardrobes so they can find new jobs in Texas.
Wait, you abandon us and then come back and yell at us for wrecking the house? I pissed in your potted plants.

Tyrone Slothrop 09-03-2005 04:00 AM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Flinty_McFlint
I'm for helping the people out first. I couldn't give a shit about the animals. I also think the people should also self-help themselves by eating the animals until help arrives.
On information and belief, fur doesn't taste all that good, even if you have fuel to cook with.

dtb 09-03-2005 12:22 PM

Vampire Slayers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Dude, she's not looking to molest the bat.
It's comforting to know that my good friend sebby has my back when I'm AWOL.

Thanks, man.

[note -- this is not an overture on my part for you to become my internet boyfriend. I'm afraid of your internet gf(s).]

dtb 09-03-2005 12:27 PM

Vampire Slayers
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Nut Case, Sensitive
Oh, Nuts!

Would you beat your grandmother to death if she wandered into the wrong place by accident?

In the interests of humanity, the proper way to remove a bat is to use a tennis racket; one hit stuns the bat, who can then be put outside, where it will eat all your mosquitos (there is no accounting for taste). Something tells me you have a tennis racket around somewhere, perhaps behind the saddles and epees.

If you ask nicely, I will also tell you how to get squirrels out of your attic.

NutS!
The squirrels are out of the attic (they were the bigass gross ones too -- red squirrels, the commie bastards of the squirrel kingdom). For the bats, however, we need to wait until winter time (I don't know why -- but that's what the bat man said.)

I will admit that I did not stay calm during the bat affair, and I would have wanted to spare the bat's life, but I didn't know what to do with it. I think bats are cute, actually (well, except for that rabies thing -- that's not so cute). I even put up a bat house (outside) for bats to come and roost in my yard.

But as you've made me feel really guilty, next time, I'll serve it some dinner and set up a bed for it.

Penske_Account 09-03-2005 12:32 PM

We have met the uneducated underclass, and it is
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Ty@50
I'd forgotten about this type ill-behavior being so common (both meanings) back now. You and Penske each did 3 or 4 things today that would get you banned for life under Paigow's rule.
I think I did 3 and Hank did 4.

Penske_Account 09-03-2005 12:35 PM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
This is what I've been missing? Sad.

I would have expected a discussion of evacuee fashion at the very least, or, whether it is better to give comfortable clothes to evacuee friends or clothes to help them rebuild their lost wardrobes so they can find new jobs in Texas.
At my house, in the discussions of the temporary adoptee we have discussed whether or not the child will have appropriate resort wear for our winter vacation. We decided probably not and better to buy the kid some stuff now (when summer clothes go on sale) than to wait until Dec/January, as resort wear is more expensive at that point.

Thoughts?

Penske_Account 09-03-2005 12:36 PM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Actually, when I was a registered Republican, it was when I was living in a large rectangular state in the Mountain Time Zone.
Relevancy? No offence.

Penske_Account 09-03-2005 12:36 PM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
On information and belief, fur doesn't taste all that good, .
Yes, tiddy is better than furry.

Ty@50 09-03-2005 12:52 PM

We have met the uneducated underclass, and it is
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I think I did 3 and Hank did 4.
Under the pyramid scheme Paigow based upon Amway, you get "credit" for everyone you brought in. That gives you 7 bads, by my count.

evenodds 09-03-2005 03:40 PM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
At my house, in the discussions of the temporary adoptee we have discussed whether or not the child will have appropriate resort wear for our winter vacation. We decided probably not and better to buy the kid some stuff now (when summer clothes go on sale) than to wait until Dec/January, as resort wear is more expensive at that point.

Thoughts?
Capital idea, old chum!

Of course, the clothes will be hopelessly out of fashion for 2006 . . .

Hank Chinaski 09-03-2005 04:59 PM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
At my house, in the discussions of the temporary adoptee we have discussed whether or not the child will have appropriate resort wear for our winter vacation. We decided probably not and better to buy the kid some stuff now (when summer clothes go on sale) than to wait until Dec/January, as resort wear is more expensive at that point.

Thoughts?
Ah, the efforts made by the well-intented, yet ignorant, crowd. Anyone who has visited Louisiana, away from strip clubs at least, would know that the thermal weight a native wears would differ greatly from what someone in the North would find comfortable.

I remember driving to Padre over spring break one March and stopping at a truck stop somewhere in La. Us Michigan residents were wearing shorts and t-shirts, and were quite comfortable. the La. residents around us, however, were dressed in sweaters and jackets- most wearing the sweaters, with only a few having them tied around the shoulders.

Have you thought of any of this, and have you considered whether your charge would feel comfortable telling you the clothing isn't warm enough? Other than imagining your newly earned halo have you given any thought to this at all?

I wonder if you might be more helpful to the child if you wait and buy appropriate clothing at the vacation site. to be honest, I truly wonder if it might be best for you to simply donate money, and let the more culturally sensitive attend to the child.

ltl/fb 09-03-2005 05:33 PM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Ah, the efforts made by the well-intented, yet ignorant, crowd. Anyone who has visited Louisiana, away from strip clubs at least, would know that the thermal weight a native wears would differ greatly from what someone in the North would find comfortable.

I remember driving to Padre over spring break one March and stopping at a truck stop somewhere in La. Us Michigan residents were wearing shorts and t-shirts, and were quite comfortable. the La. residents around us, however, were dressed in sweaters and jackets- most wearing the sweaters, with only a few having them tied around the shoulders.

Have you thought of any of this, and have you considered whether your charge would feel comfortable telling you the clothing isn't warm enough? Other than imagining your newly earned halo have you given any thought to this at all?

I wonder if you might be more helpful to the child if you wait and buy appropriate clothing at the vacation site. to be honest, I truly wonder if it might be best for you to simply donate money, and let the more culturally sensitive attend to the child.
If he doesn't get the child, he doesn't get the unpaid servant for his own children -- which would go a long way toward offsetting the costs for food and clothing. I really would think he's going to let the charity case wear hand-me-downs from the prince/princesses Penske, and I heard a rumor that they will be making a firm decision on the "whipping girl" role (given today's social mores) by midnight (Pacific) Monday.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 09-03-2005 05:47 PM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
Capital idea, old chum!
Is this another Penske sock?

Hank Chinaski 09-03-2005 05:53 PM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
If he doesn't get the child, he doesn't get the unpaid servant for his own children -- which would go a long way toward offsetting the costs for food and clothing. I really would think he's going to let the charity case wear hand-me-downs from the prince/princesses Penske, and I heard a rumor that they will be making a firm decision on the "whipping girl" role (given today's social mores) by midnight (Pacific) Monday.
dissent. I agree that Penske is the furthest thing from mentally healthy of the posters on this board- the K races, the "fectas," the multiple socks, the lying about his personal status/stature, all of it adds up to a classic diagnosis of neurosis- borderline psychosis. But he has always been solidily in the range of normal given his abnormalities,

I can recall no evidence of child abuse, and I feel an apology may be in order.

ltl/fb 09-03-2005 05:59 PM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
dissent. I agree that Penske is the furthest thing from mentally healthy of the posters on this board- the K races, the "fectas," the multiple socks, the lying about his personal status/stature, all of it adds up to a classic diagnosis of neurosis- borderline psychosis. But he has always been solidily in the range of normal given his abnormalities,

I can recall no evidence of child abuse, and I feel an apology may be in order.
Well, if there's no abuse of the existing children of his blood, and the whole concept of "whipping [child]" is that it gets the punishment the royal child would not, ergo there will be no abuse of the whipping child.

Are you sure you went to Harvard? I guess Bush went to Yale, so maybe Ivies aren't such the pedigrees anymore.

Penske_Account 09-03-2005 06:25 PM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
Capital idea, old chum!

Of course, the clothes will be hopelessly out of fashion for 2006 . . .

Right on! Now, that's what I'm talkin bout.

Penske_Account 09-03-2005 06:33 PM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
If he doesn't get the child, he doesn't get the unpaid servant for his own children -- which would go a long way toward offsetting the costs for food and clothing. I really would think he's going to let the charity case wear hand-me-downs from the prince/princesses Penske, and I heard a rumor that they will be making a firm decision on the "whipping girl" role (given today's social mores) by midnight (Pacific) Monday.
Now I understand what Wonk was talkin bout. Wonk, I hereby publicly apoligize for whatever statements I made about Fringe when we dined, al fresco. I was wrong.

Fringe, I will withhold the personal invective, although it would be richly deserved and easily accomplished, however, anytime you would like to compare notes on charitable donations or giving back to one's community in non-monetary ways, let me know and we can have Hank moderate the analysis. NPI. I'll bet you $5K I win.

Penske_Account 09-03-2005 06:34 PM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
dissent. I agree that Penske is the furthest thing from mentally healthy of the posters on this board- the K races, the "fectas," the multiple socks, the lying about his personal status/stature, all of it adds up to a classic diagnosis of neurosis- borderline psychosis. But he has always been solidily in the range of normal given his abnormalities,

I can recall no evidence of child abuse, and I feel an apology may be in order.
Right on! Now that's what I am talkin bout!!!

Penske_Account 09-03-2005 07:35 PM

NOLA
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Well, if there's no abuse of the existing children of his blood,
How do you know I have any children of blood? There has been no paternity test results unveiled. To date.

bold_n_brazen 09-04-2005 02:39 PM

Football pool
 
I've created a lawtalkers group at the ESPN eliminator football challenge.

http://games.espn.go.com/eliminator/frontpage

It's a private group called lawtalkers and the password is footballpool.

I propose that all who play make a donation to the board, in multiples of $10, based on what week you are eliminated. That is, a person eliminated in week 1 would donate $10, a person elimnated in week 2 would donate $20, etc. On your honor, of course.

And is some moderator wants to set up a seperate board for this, I'm cool with that.

Shape Shifter 09-04-2005 10:07 PM

Football pool
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
I've created a lawtalkers group at the ESPN eliminator football challenge.

http://games.espn.go.com/eliminator/frontpage

It's a private group called lawtalkers and the password is footballpool.

I propose that all who play make a donation to the board, in multiples of $10, based on what week you are eliminated. That is, a person eliminated in week 1 would donate $10, a person elimnated in week 2 would donate $20, etc. On your honor, of course.

And is some moderator wants to set up a seperate board for this, I'm cool with that.
Sounds good, but I think we should work the other way. Entrants knocked out in the first week would have to donate $160, the next week, $150, and so on (I think the NFL season may be 17 weeks with the bye week - maybe we could assign bye weeks among the entrants). This approach is better for the board and it rewards merit, or at least would eliminate the temptation to pick Cincy in Week 1.

dtb 09-05-2005 09:13 AM

Football pool
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
I've created a lawtalkers group at the ESPN eliminator football challenge.

http://games.espn.go.com/eliminator/frontpage

It's a private group called lawtalkers and the password is footballpool.

I propose that all who play make a donation to the board, in multiples of $10, based on what week you are eliminated. That is, a person eliminated in week 1 would donate $10, a person elimnated in week 2 would donate $20, etc. On your honor, of course.

And is some moderator wants to set up a seperate board for this, I'm cool with that.
Not only do I not understand how this works, I even clicked on the link to find out, and I still don't understand. If you decide to go with SS's method of bilking honest folks out of their money, I'll be an easy $170 (but someone has got to explain to me how this works.)

bold_n_brazen 09-05-2005 09:38 AM

Football pool
 
Quote:

Originally posted by dtb
Not only do I not understand how this works, I even clicked on the link to find out, and I still don't understand. If you decide to go with SS's method of bilking honest folks out of their money, I'll be an easy $170 (but someone has got to explain to me how this works.)
It's simple, really. Each week you pick one team you think will win that week. That's it. If your team wins, you advance to the next week. If your team loses, you are eliminated from the game. The only hard part is, you can only pick any given team once in a season.

Does that help?

Penske_Account 09-05-2005 02:16 PM

Football pool
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Sounds good, but I think we should work the other way. Entrants knocked out in the first week would have to donate $160, the next week, $150, and so on (I think the NFL season may be 17 weeks with the bye week - maybe we could assign bye weeks among the entrants). This approach is better for the board and it rewards merit, or at least would eliminate the temptation to pick Cincy in Week 1.
I do not think it is fair for Ty@50 to participate. As for those who correspond with him off board, I suppose we will have to be on the honour system, although I believe Sebbie repudiated the notion of honour codes in a recent posting exchange.

dtb 09-05-2005 08:40 PM

Football pool
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
It's simple, really. Each week you pick one team you think will win that week. That's it. If your team wins, you advance to the next week. If your team loses, you are eliminated from the game. The only hard part is, you can only pick any given team once in a season.

Does that help?
Hmm. That is simple enough (in theory). OK. I'm in. (Where can I find a list of all the teams? The last time I followed football was in the 70's. The 1870's.)

notcasesensitive 09-05-2005 10:43 PM

Football pool
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
I've created a lawtalkers group at the ESPN eliminator football challenge.

http://games.espn.go.com/eliminator/frontpage

It's a private group called lawtalkers and the password is footballpool.

I propose that all who play make a donation to the board, in multiples of $10, based on what week you are eliminated. That is, a person eliminated in week 1 would donate $10, a person elimnated in week 2 would donate $20, etc. On your honor, of course.

And is some moderator wants to set up a seperate board for this, I'm cool with that.
Three things:

1. Goddamn, ESPN.com sucks. Fucking incomprehensible as to how to joing a group; no links to anything useful at all. Apparently I speak spanish, because the link to join a group was in spanish for me. Their suckitude never ceases to amaze me.

2. I'm already doing two eliminator pools, so I'm not sure I'll remember to enter a pick here every week, but I'll try.

3. I would just wait to see how many people enter and then have the contribution scale down so that the winner donates nothing, last place donates the most. I agree that it doesn't seem right for those in the lead to have to pay more, but that's just me.

I appear to have my entry linked into the group at this point. Ready to go.

Tyrone Slothrop 09-06-2005 02:09 AM

door-to-door
 
Has anyone ever used these folks to move? They bring containers to your house, you load 'em up, they come back and get them, and ship 'em to wherever you're moving.

Hank Chinaski 09-06-2005 08:04 AM

Football pool
 
Quote:

Originally posted by dtb
Hmm. That is simple enough (in theory). OK. I'm in. (Where can I find a list of all the teams? The last time I followed football was in the 70's. The 1870's.)
Did anyone see Richard Simmons- New Orleans native- interviewed this weekend? He was wearing a pastel tank top. For a network interview about an enormous diaster in your hometown, is that appropriate? I believe it was Sunday, so pre-labor day, if that matters.

bold_n_brazen 09-06-2005 08:22 AM

Football pool
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Three things:

1. Goddamn, ESPN.com sucks. Fucking incomprehensible as to how to joing a group; no links to anything useful at all. Apparently I speak spanish, because the link to join a group was in spanish for me. Their suckitude never ceases to amaze me.

2. I'm already doing two eliminator pools, so I'm not sure I'll remember to enter a pick here every week, but I'll try.

3. I would just wait to see how many people enter and then have the contribution scale down so that the winner donates nothing, last place donates the most. I agree that it doesn't seem right for those in the lead to have to pay more, but that's just me.

I appear to have my entry linked into the group at this point. Ready to go.
1. I agree. They suck. And I am a spanish speaker too. But they do all the pool leg work for you, like keeping track of what teams people have already picked, etc...

3. That's fine with me. Since it's all on our honor anyway, and as you know, most of us have none.

Penske_Account 09-06-2005 10:16 AM

Football pool
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Did anyone see Richard Simmons- New Orleans native- interviewed this weekend? He was wearing a pastel tank top. For a network interview about an enormous diaster in your hometown, is that appropriate? I believe it was Sunday, so pre-labor day, if that matters.
What material? silk? Shorts or speedo?

Did you just call me Coltrane? 09-06-2005 10:35 AM

Football pool
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
Three things:

1. Goddamn, ESPN.com sucks. Fucking incomprehensible as to how to joing a group; no links to anything useful at all. Apparently I speak spanish, because the link to join a group was in spanish for me. Their suckitude never ceases to amaze me.

It's embarrassing. We held our fantasy football draft on ESPN.com, and the java application kept disconnecting people. Managers were inadvertently drafting 3 QBs in a row b/c they couldn't re-connect. We cancelled that draft and moved back to yahoo. I hate ESPN. It's time for ESPN to have some real competition. Just copy whatever ESPN was doing ten years ago (when it was still good).

Did you just call me Coltrane? 09-06-2005 10:40 AM

Football pool
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
What material? silk? Shorts or speedo?
I saw a guy at the beach yesterday in a real banana hammock. Not a speedo, but one of those male stripper hammocks. I actually think it was a Candid Camera type of thing. He picked a spot to lay out right in the middle of this big group of people...and then got up ten minutes later. He was also carrying a briefcase.

Alex_de_Large 09-06-2005 10:45 AM

Football pool
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
I saw a guy at the beach yesterday in a real banana hammock. Not a speedo, but one of those male stripper hammocks. I actually think it was a Candid Camera type of thing. He picked a spot to lay out right in the middle of this big group of people...and then got up ten minutes later. He was also carrying a briefcase.
Borat from Kzakhstan?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:08 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com