![]() |
Fashionistas you have arrived
and you are FABULOUS
|
What a wonderful home this is.
I'm first and oh so unfashionable. |
Speaking of fashionistas, has anyone seen the new "movie" of the same title? I heard it won a lot of awards or something....
|
My test
Quote:
|
Test one two three
Is this thing on?
|
Is this the same software we used before?
http://smilies.networkessence.net/s/...eetz/boobs.gif I figured I had to offer at least a little fashionista content... |
What did I do wrong? Is the image/smilie insertion code turned off?
Edit: just noticed that [img] code is off... |
WTF?
What gives? I can't find anything to complain about yet.
Thurgreed(someone pass me a drink and let's get this cocktail party started)Marshall |
Software type
Quote:
No, it isn't the same software. It is based on the same software but it is actually proprietary. |
Re: Software type
Leagl,
Why do we have edit buttons showing on *everyone's* posts, not just our own? (It wouldn't let me modify others' posts, but still. My hopes of editing LFM's missives were dashed.) Gatti(alreading missing the pornographic emoticons)gap |
Re: Re: Software type
Quote:
I think the reason they have it there is b/c it requires fewer database calls if it just shows up for everyone. In other words, it would have to perform extra database queries for everyone when drawing a page in order to decide whether or not to show the image. This way, it only runs the query when the link is clicked, which reduces the load on the server. |
Re: WTF?
Quote:
|
Re: Re: Software type
Quote:
First, I lose my "too sexy for her rank" distinction. Then, I lose my powers. I am powerless. :( |
Re: Re: Re: Software type
Quote:
Quote:
|
Yup, still works...
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com