Quote:
Originally posted by The Larry Davis Experience
So the UN is incompetent because they took offense at the guys barging into their offices firing semiautomatic rifles? Or because they are trying to rebuild the homes of terrorists?
My sarcasm meter can't seem to differentiate between the different sentences here. I may have to upgrade.
|
On the one-in-a-million chance that you aren't joking with the alternatives (I'm willing to take even those odds to help you, my friend), I will clarify. The U.N. is incompetent for running "refugee camps" that are absolutely overrun with gun-toting members of terrorist organizations. As an umbrella, i believe the outrage can properly be stated that the U.N. is incompetent for not screening the recipients of their aid to determine the individual's justifiable and compensatable need for relief.
I generally despise public housing in this country, except that which provides for elderly (a bit broad), veterans, and families with dire and unexpected needs like handicapped children that are not the result of personal choices (like gangbangers who get shot into a wheelchair). Yet, while public housing is often overrun by guntoting thugs, just like Jenin, the guntoting thugs aren't frequently known to threaten the public housing officials with death if they don't provided better gigs.
Its hard to like guntoting thugs in either circumstance, but its hard to like the passer-outers of public money when they knowingly distribute the public money to the guntoters, especially if the aid is positively influenced in any way by the guntoting. Yet, the U.N.'s position seems to be, hey, just quit threatening
us and we'll give you whatever we can. Of course, that wouldn't be providing aid and comfort to terrorists, would it?
With our money?
Hello
