Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
nnnnhhh, sorry no. This was for interrogation. You have to distinguish being vicious for no reason to innocents from interrogating people who know shit. I know you have a problem with interrogation, but believe me this story only has legs because of the cruel for no reason angle.
|
The article refers to sworn statements that two handlers were having a "contest" to see how many prisoners they could make piss themselves.
Plus, Hank -- your memory is slipping. Remember the post of mine from (probably may) that quotes retired MP Generals as saying that the use of dogs in interrogations both violates Army regs and is an abomination in the eyes of the Lord? [paraphrase]
This will continue to hurt your side, a lot.
S_A_M
