LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 111
0 members and 111 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-14-2004, 06:43 PM   #2212
baltassoc
Caustically Optimistic
 
baltassoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The City That Reads
Posts: 2,385
The Padilla Case

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
I suppose next you'll be saying that accused criminals have forfeited the protections of the Bill of Rights by virtue of their transgressions?
I believe it was Reagan's Attorney General Ed Meese who suggested that the police only investigate the guilty, obviating the need for due process protections.*


* It took me a while to find it, but it's actually: "You don't have many suspects who are innocent of a crime. That's contradictory. If a person is innocent of a crime, then he is not a suspect."

I also came across this gem: "A Supreme Court decision does not establish a "supreme law of the land" that is binding on all persons and parts of government, henceforth and forevermore."
baltassoc is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:57 PM.