LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 97
0 members and 97 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-17-2004, 08:35 PM   #2407
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
There He Goes Again

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
You're right. As Fred Kaplan says in that piece I linked to in the edited portion of my post above, Bush "never said outright that Saddam had connections with 9/11. He suggested connections—and did so repeatedly until a majority of Americans believed Saddam was somehow involved in the attacks. But his comments were never more than calibrated suggestions—loose phrasings, words that seemed to be interchangeable but really weren't."

Do you really think that a sustained campaign to mislead people about a matter of national security is less reprehensible than a lie in a deposition about getting a blowjob? If so, you spent too long in law school.
There are and were plenty of connections between Iraq and Al Qaeda. Whether they jusified war is a separate question, but I thought that the case for war was based solely on WMDs? You can't have it both ways.

And I wouldn't characterize it as a "sustained campaign to mislead."
sgtclub is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:23 AM.