Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
You can't possibly be this naive. Have you been reading the papers these last four years? If spending cuts were politically viable, wouldn't we have seen them instead of deficits so the GOP never would have had to abandon its reputation for parsimony?
|
Bush is a lame-duck President in 2005 (with no heir-apparent, unless they dump Cheney*). He can take the risk because their are no consequences
Quote:
|
Did you miss the part of Bartlett's column noting that "most people support still more spending for education, health, and other programs"?
|
And "most people" support tax cuts. That the general population has always and continues to support this obvious contradiction is lost on many.
Quote:
|
Your party reads polls. Are you still living in hope that there's someone in the GOP who will grow a pair of balls and do something that endangers the GOP's congressional majority?
|
These fuckers from both parties are so gerrymandered in their districts that the only time there is a swing in either direction, it is because of retirement, not polls.
Quote:
|
Your electoral votes all come from states where they vote for the candidate who loves Jesus more.
|
Nobody fucks with the Jesus.
* which I still think may happen. Rummy goes end of July.
