LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 94
0 members and 94 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-29-2004, 08:46 PM   #3328
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,084
Scary Hilary Quote

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Honest answer: No. Not those tax cuts, anyway.
Here's a shorter summary from DeLong, from a post about ten days ago:
  • George W. Bush, after 9/11, had a chance to take out insurance against a poorly-performing labor market--had a chance to set a significant employment-creating fiscal stimulus program in motion. Yet he decided not to do so: decided to say that he was proposing a "jobs program" while what he decided to do was another round of tax cuts for the rich--a round that had extraordinarily little in the employment-bang-per-deficit-buck department. This isn't hair splitting: this is the essence. Bush bet that the labor market would recover on its own, and no one would notice that his deficit-boosting "jobs program" was weak tea in the context of the large shortfall in employment growth. He was wrong: we lost.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:42 AM.